WTF Quark - page 4. | Bitcointalksearch.org

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

Quote from: El Dude on March 12, 2014, 07:29:51 AM

Quote from: digitalindustry on March 12, 2014, 04:18:53 AM

nope I believe it relates to an error in the GPU miner -:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

here he is the biggest quark pumptard of them all.

poor El Dude an his bag of magical Litecoins - you must feel pretty good that China gave such a nice pump to the old dead algo SCRYPT but don't worry retard, there are good years ahead of mindless ASIC mining and dumping that sucker yet.

you better get out to paper asap , something a retard like your self can understand, a pretty piece of paper.

: )

i'll see you back at $14 or under tard. lots of mining money to be made yet on that sucker.

El Dude

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

Quote from: digitalindustry on March 12, 2014, 04:18:53 AM

nope I believe it relates to an error in the GPU miner -:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

here he is the biggest quark pumptard of them all.

miningpoolhub

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1006

Mining Pool Hub

Quote from: HiroS on March 12, 2014, 03:07:46 AM

Spacing between blocks is 30 seconds which is too short a period. Do not fall for impractical coins like Fastcoin because they are fast, what is really happening is a huge amount of wasted hash power as several blocks get minted for every genuine block. I do not see a future for wasteful coins but remember that they could hard fork to change the behaviour if anyone cares.

About 50 seconds is the time when you see a drop off in orphans and 60 seconds is a solid choice. The 2.5 minutes chosen by Litecoin seems very conservative now and Bitcoin's 10 minutes seems like an age to wait.

I agree.

Maxcoin's 30 seconds block time makes orphan problems and very low stability to mine.

Miner need to change block work every 30 seconds, which means if p2p network delays 1 second, they lose 3.3% to catch than other pools.
Network delay problem is unsolvable right now.

digitalindustry

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

‘Try to be nice’

nope I believe it relates to an error in the GPU miner -:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

HiroS

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Spacing between blocks is 30 seconds which is too short a period. Do not fall for impractical coins like Fastcoin because they are fast, what is really happening is a huge amount of wasted hash power as several blocks get minted for every genuine block. I do not see a future for wasteful coins but remember that they could hard fork to change the behaviour if anyone cares.

About 50 seconds is the time when you see a drop off in orphans and 60 seconds is a solid choice. The 2.5 minutes chosen by Litecoin seems very conservative now and Bitcoin's 10 minutes seems like an age to wait.

CoinBuzz

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 250

Quote from: whyenot on March 12, 2014, 12:22:44 AM

Why did the orphan rate suddenly jump so high?

http://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/orphaned-qrk.html

Do you think it could it be related to the fact that one pool is responsible for ~95% of the global hash rate? Wink

the coin is really centralized these days, but orphans is because it's block time is very low

whyenot

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Why did the orphan rate suddenly jump so high?

http://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/orphaned-qrk.html

Do you think it could it be related to the fact that one pool is responsible for ~95% of the global hash rate? Wink

Topic: WTF Quark - page 4. (Read 3044 times)