Simple Question:
I asked if "Accumulate got the Avalon outside the auction ?
Topic: [WTS] Avalon Batch #3 91xx + 93xx - page 2. (Read 8117 times)
So Accumulate acquired it via pm? 
no one has any idea what you're saying. get a HUMAN to translate for you.
So Accumulate acquired it via pm?
It's outrageous when somebody starts an auction and then sells the goods via PM. If you start an auction you have to honor its winner (and if you bid you have to honor your bid), otherwise all this is a joke. I think a scammer tag would be appropriate.
+1
It's outrageous when somebody starts an auction and then sells the goods via PM. If you start an auction you have to honor its winner (and if you bid you have to honor your bid), otherwise all this is a joke. I think a scammer tag would be appropriate.
Did Accumulate get it finally for 88 BTC?
83btc x 2
2 @ 87
Seriously, this is the last bid that can unmistakenly be regarded as "in time".
sorry, I've made a deal about 96btc and if your not considerably over it I dismiss your offer
huh? received that via PN
great now we are in dark closed door deal world no wonder my bid was dismissed
If we are going by op's end of auction post it should be candoo 90 @1 and uxt 91 @1
as per ops official post for end of aucroon
as per ops official post for end of aucroon
*yxt
*auction
terrible typos
+1 
If we are going by op's end of auction post it should be candoo 90 @1 and uxt 91 @1
as per ops official post for end of aucroon
as per ops official post for end of aucroon
sorry, I've made a deal about 96btc and if your not considerably over it I dismiss your offer
huh? received that via PN
*indisputable no undesirable
You've got an "sorry no valid bid" answer.
It was enough time for a real bid
Sorry but the is ridiculous
In the entrance post was clearly xx @
not xx-xx @
@candoo
and how will you find out how much the forum lags exactly?
also retroactively at the time
Everything other than the time stamp does not make sense
It was enough time for a real bid
Sorry but the is ridiculous
In the entrance post was clearly xx @
not xx-xx @
@candoo
and how will you find out how much the forum lags exactly?
also retroactively at the time
Everything other than the time stamp does not make sense
END OF AUCTION
BEFORE the end of Auction my highest offer was BTC92 X1 The only reason to disregard it would be that rules assumed a 1btc increments with no jumps in which case lets go back to the bid which followed those rules and let them win.
BUt if there were no rules of such then why is it not clear that I BID 79-92 Meaning 92 is my highest bid at undesirable time of the auction WELL before the end.,
88@2
Given the circumstances of a small lag (I've checked http://www.uhrzeit.org/atomuhr.php) I'll have to announce accumulate is the winner. I know some may be upset, but I've talked to him and we've come to an agreement.
We've already been hitting 97 
well weather it sux or doesn't is hardly the point I made it CLEAR I am prepaired to match any offer up to 92 which I DID. What seems to be the problem and why no one else went higher?
@ cycloid
True. Latest accepted price is 79BTC @ 2
This is an auction ,
That's not a real bid!
Put a final price not a range lol
79btc x 2
That's not a real bid!
Put a final price not a range lol
79btc x 2
True. Latest accepted price is 79BTC @ 2
Jump to: