Currently reserved @ BIN of 210, awaiting escrow'ed payment.
200+BTC ? When they expected break even with that cost?
But good to you dogie
Topic: [WTS] B2 Avalon In Hand - page 3. (Read 5576 times)
200+BTC ? When they expected break even with that cost?
But good to you dogie
I have viewed this site for quite a while ...
I day trade bitcoins for the past 4 months.
I am new to nothing here.
I day trade bitcoins for the past 4 months.
I am new to nothing here.
So what that I joined 2 weeks ago. That has nothing to do with anything. I have viewed this site for quite a while and just decided to finally join. Not to mention I day trade bitcoins for the past 4 months. I am new to nothing here.
WOW!!
who ever bought that.... if they want one for cheaper contact me
who ever bought that.... if they want one for cheaper contact me
Currently reserved @ BIN of 210, awaiting escrow'ed payment.
I cant believe people are bidding this high still. *shakes head* That's great for you though
Thanks for your words of wisdom, person who registered 2 weeks ago.
I cant believe people are bidding this high still. *shakes head* That's great for you though
...just in case that was ambiguous, shbtc has paid a deposit in order to bid and the auction is still ongoing.
190 BTC
Pre approved bid, buyer paid a deposit to John K.
190 BTC
60 hours left 
Oh okay.. thanks for clearing that up
Sorry man but I have to say this...
Being able to overclock something past its design hashrate is great, but that extra hashrate comes at a cost. Having the fans run constantly and the hardware running harder adds some risk to the investment. You're expecting that extra hashrate to equal an increase in value, which is absolutely true, but the extra value shouldn't be proportionate to the original $/Gh basis that you're calculating the value on. If your buyer is making extra BTC by running it harder, that harder risk should be rewarded. Maybe increasing the value by 50% on extra hashrate rather than 100% would make more sense, at least to me anyway.
Another example of this would be the eruptor blades. They shouldn't be based on a 13gh/s value, but rather a 10gh/s with an overclocking incentive.
This is just my opinion, if you don't agree with me then just ignore my post.
Blades are probably the worst example to use. They are NOT overclocked at 13GH, they have two clock settings - allowing the user to choose to prioritise power consumption or hash rate.Being able to overclock something past its design hashrate is great, but that extra hashrate comes at a cost. Having the fans run constantly and the hardware running harder adds some risk to the investment. You're expecting that extra hashrate to equal an increase in value, which is absolutely true, but the extra value shouldn't be proportionate to the original $/Gh basis that you're calculating the value on. If your buyer is making extra BTC by running it harder, that harder risk should be rewarded. Maybe increasing the value by 50% on extra hashrate rather than 100% would make more sense, at least to me anyway.
Another example of this would be the eruptor blades. They shouldn't be based on a 13gh/s value, but rather a 10gh/s with an overclocking incentive.
This is just my opinion, if you don't agree with me then just ignore my post.
Avalon based OCing is 'true' overclocking, but at the same time there was headroom built into the chips. Yifu said recently "you finally found it", as he'd posted within the github about this some time ago. There is some risk like everything in bitcoin, and nothing else. You can choose to run the unit at 85 (or higher, I don't have the right cooling here and have to sleep next to this unit) or at 66.
Every bid so far has been for a 66GH miner, I don't think anyone is attaching directed worth to the overclocking as no one can gaurantee it. And think, if I was truly increasing the price proportionally, @100GH that'd be 150% market price for the 66GH units - which I'm no where near.
oops
Sorry man but I have to say this...
Being able to overclock something past its design hashrate is great, but that extra hashrate comes at a cost. Having the fans run constantly and the hardware running harder adds some risk to the investment. You're expecting that extra hashrate to equal an increase in value, which is absolutely true, but the extra value shouldn't be proportionate to the original $/Gh basis that you're calculating the value on. If your buyer is making extra BTC by running it harder, that harder risk should be rewarded with greater value incentive. Maybe increasing the price by 50% per extra gh/s rather than 100% would make more sense, at least to me anyway.
Another example of this would be the eruptor blades. They shouldn't be based on a 13gh/s value, but rather a 10gh/s with an overclocking incentive.
This is just my opinion, if you don't agree with me then just ignore my post.
Being able to overclock something past its design hashrate is great, but that extra hashrate comes at a cost. Having the fans run constantly and the hardware running harder adds some risk to the investment. You're expecting that extra hashrate to equal an increase in value, which is absolutely true, but the extra value shouldn't be proportionate to the original $/Gh basis that you're calculating the value on. If your buyer is making extra BTC by running it harder, that harder risk should be rewarded with greater value incentive. Maybe increasing the price by 50% per extra gh/s rather than 100% would make more sense, at least to me anyway.
Another example of this would be the eruptor blades. They shouldn't be based on a 13gh/s value, but rather a 10gh/s with an overclocking incentive.
This is just my opinion, if you don't agree with me then just ignore my post.
Sorry man but I have to say this...
Being able to overclock something past its design hashrate is great, but that extra hashrate comes at a cost. Having the fans run constantly and the hardware running harder adds some risk to the investment. You're expecting that extra hashrate to equal an increase in value, which is absolutely true, but the extra value shouldn't be proportionate to the original $/Gh basis that you're calculating the value on. If your buyer is making extra BTC by running it harder, that harder risk should be rewarded. Maybe increasing the value by 50% on extra hashrate rather than 100% would make more sense, at least to me anyway.
Another example of this would be the eruptor blades. They shouldn't be based on a 13gh/s value, but rather a 10gh/s with an overclocking incentive.
This is just my opinion, if you don't agree with me then just ignore my post.
Being able to overclock something past its design hashrate is great, but that extra hashrate comes at a cost. Having the fans run constantly and the hardware running harder adds some risk to the investment. You're expecting that extra hashrate to equal an increase in value, which is absolutely true, but the extra value shouldn't be proportionate to the original $/Gh basis that you're calculating the value on. If your buyer is making extra BTC by running it harder, that harder risk should be rewarded. Maybe increasing the value by 50% on extra hashrate rather than 100% would make more sense, at least to me anyway.
Another example of this would be the eruptor blades. They shouldn't be based on a 13gh/s value, but rather a 10gh/s with an overclocking incentive.
This is just my opinion, if you don't agree with me then just ignore my post.
72 hours left
Want to sell as I'm now going to be travelling alot over the next 9 months and my parents house is already overheating from all the GPUs xD Moving to group buy income shares.
.. already back from your journey
GPU's ... blades ... and now you are selling avalon's
Not started travelling yet, although these units are so nice and dainty I could take 2 with me.
Never sold a GPU, that was greaterninja.
Sold my blades and those of others.
Yes I am selling Avalons.
Want to sell as I'm now going to be travelling alot over the next 9 months and my parents house is already overheating from all the GPUs xD Moving to group buy income shares.
.. already back from your journey
GPU's ... blades ... and now you are selling avalon's
You know the deal. This unit is arriving with me on Monday.
Auction starts at 100btc. Minimum increment of 1btc.
I reserve the right to withdraw this auction or sell by pm/blind bid.
- 3 module.
- 66-71 (or even 80 with the new clock speeds) GH.
- Assume PSU isnt included.
- Shipped from the UK, globally.
- Up to 2btc worth of shipping included (ie if it costs 4 to ship, you'll pay 2).
- Happy to escrow (John K) but you'll pay fees.
- Auction ends Friday 28th at midnight GMT+1.
- Bids extend by 1 hour.
Auction starts at 100btc. Minimum increment of 1btc.
I reserve the right to withdraw this auction or sell by pm/blind bid.
As tradition requests. 100 BTC are you crazy? Total scam. Etc.
Jump to: