These might work well, cheap too.
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Low-Profile-Heatsink-Intel-D945GCLF-Atom-Mini-ITX-board-/130303965124?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e56b8b7c4
Topic: X6500 Custom FPGA Miner - page 34. (Read 219954 times)
394.95 MH/s | 0: 1558/28/10 1.8%/0.6% | 1: 1573/15/15 0.9%/0.9% | 9h47m | AH00WOVT
^^ 200mhz bitstream with a gigantic box fan blowing on it. ordered some thermal glue, so i'll try that out soon
^^ 200mhz bitstream with a gigantic box fan blowing on it. ordered some thermal glue, so i'll try that out soon
Cablesaurus are still out of stock 
Any reason why this bitstream isn't posted on http://fpgamining.com/bitstreams/ ?
I've ordered the thermal adhesive and would like to give it a try.
I've ordered the thermal adhesive and would like to give it a try.
^^ This ^^
200MHz bitstream's been posted.
http://fpgamining.com/bitstreams/
Please be very very careful with the 200Mhash bitstreams in fact anything above 166 is serious business. You'd probably need to remove the stock tape and thermal epoxy the heatsinks on or use a heftier heatsink.
Whatever you do, you still need to maintain some airflow over the board as the Vregs are getting warm too. So even if you so decide to watercool the FPGAs you'd need a low speed fan to push some air over the Vregs.
Whatever you do, you still need to maintain some airflow over the board as the Vregs are getting warm too. So even if you so decide to watercool the FPGAs you'd need a low speed fan to push some air over the Vregs.
Any reason why this bitstream isn't posted on http://fpgamining.com/bitstreams/ ?
I've ordered the thermal adhesive and would like to give it a try.
I've ordered the thermal adhesive and would like to give it a try.
^^ This ^^
As promised thermal pictures of the board.
Awesome! So, in the second image, is the heatsink on the right so much cooler because the fan is that much closer to it? Interesting.
And very nice work with the power measurement! Happy to see it so low, even when including 1/3 of a fan.
Thanks, O_Shovah!
Yes the right heatsink in the second and the one in the backround of the third picture.
The fan was ~ 50mm apart from the board.So the cooling effekt should be even better if its fixated closer.
Even if i may not be abled to bring my own FPGA project to frutition as it seems, adding some scientific measurements
to the projects around should be a profit for all participants
As promised thermal pictures of the board.
Awesome! So, in the second image, is the heatsink on the right so much cooler because the fan is that much closer to it? Interesting.
And very nice work with the power measurement! Happy to see it so low, even when including 1/3 of a fan.
Thanks, O_Shovah!
@ Fizzisist
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermic images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermic images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
PM'd the bitstream. Thermal images would be amazing!
Any reason why this bitstream isn't posted on http://fpgamining.com/bitstreams/ ?
I've ordered the thermal adhesive and would like to give it a try.
Uploaded 200 MHz to the website.
As promised thermal pictures of the board.
Backside
From connector side
Loocking towards the fan
Roomtemperature 21°C
80mm Fan @ 10V
@180mhz
Camera: NEC IR Thermoshot F30
These pictures ist subject to the :
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 3.0 Licence
please contact me if you need it.
I also did some measurements on the power consumption:
Measured at the barrel connector excluding power supply losses.
So just the power consumption of the board alone
1233mA @ 12,00V + (1/3)* 256mA @ 10,00V [Fan] = 15,64 W
(under the asumption that one 80mm fan is sufficient for 3 boards)
Using Hameg laboratory power supply
For comparison Icarus :
1580 mA @ 12,00V = 18,96 W
Backside
From connector side
Loocking towards the fan
Roomtemperature 21°C
80mm Fan @ 10V
@180mhz
Camera: NEC IR Thermoshot F30
These pictures ist subject to the :
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 3.0 Licence
please contact me if you need it.
I also did some measurements on the power consumption:
Measured at the barrel connector excluding power supply losses.
So just the power consumption of the board alone
1233mA @ 12,00V + (1/3)* 256mA @ 10,00V [Fan] = 15,64 W
(under the asumption that one 80mm fan is sufficient for 3 boards)
Using Hameg laboratory power supply
For comparison Icarus :
1580 mA @ 12,00V = 18,96 W
@ Fizzisist
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermic images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermic images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
PM'd the bitstream. Thermal images would be amazing!
Any reason why this bitstream isn't posted on http://fpgamining.com/bitstreams/ ?
I've ordered the thermal adhesive and would like to give it a try.
I never have any joy when expected to compile code in order to install it... NEVER. 
I figured there was something missing between Python and gcc, so I installed a package (gcc-plugin-python), but this had no effect. Any ideas? 
I figured there was something missing between Python and gcc, so I installed a package (gcc-plugin-python), but this had no effect. Any ideas? Welcome back!!
I think that's an easy problem to fix, and I saw it when I installed on Linuxcoin a while back. You need the developer version of python:
apt-get install python-dev (or whatever Mandriva uses for packages)
Hopefully that does it.
Yeah! Thanks fizz. That did it. Just have the one board mining @ 100 Mhz ATM. Iĺl have to buy some more cables and rig up a power supply to run all four boards but it does seem to be working.
Iḿ thinking of investing in another ten or so boards, then building up the farm as they generate bitcoin. What version of python are you running? Try installing 2.6.7 and using that directly i.e.: python2.6 setup.py build
Thanks freshzive, I got the bug with the dev upgrade though.
O_shovah: you sure you use the thermal imager just for PCBs? xD hehehe
But yeah it'd be interesting to see.
Fizzi: told ya thermal epoxy makes a world of difference. I've been successful taking mine off by popping it off with a wide plastic spatula between the FPGA and the heatsink when it's warm. This way you don't put stress on the balls. You might crush the FPGA itself with too much force though. So it's still not a 100% solution especially if the epoxy is strong.
I was using this
http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_silver_thermal_adhesive.htm
I mixed up a small amount on a disposable spoon. Applied it to the center of my heatsink and put a 1KG weight on top of the heatsink overnight.
But yeah it'd be interesting to see.
Fizzi: told ya thermal epoxy makes a world of difference. I've been successful taking mine off by popping it off with a wide plastic spatula between the FPGA and the heatsink when it's warm. This way you don't put stress on the balls. You might crush the FPGA itself with too much force though. So it's still not a 100% solution especially if the epoxy is strong.
I was using this
http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_silver_thermal_adhesive.htm
I mixed up a small amount on a disposable spoon. Applied it to the center of my heatsink and put a 1KG weight on top of the heatsink overnight.
@ Fizzisist
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermic images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermic images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
PM'd the bitstream. Thermal images would be amazing!
@ Fizzisist
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermal images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
Would you mind pointing me to that 200mhz bitstream or to the source ?
I would like to give it a try.
Ps:
I will post some thermal images of the board as i did it for icarus tonight.
Also, I removed the thermal tape on the heatsink by first peeling it off with my fingernail, then soaking the heatsinks for some time in alcohol. The adhesive residue came off completely. I wiped the tops of the FPGAs down with alcohol before gluing, as well.
Anyone (besides fizzisist) successfully running the 180Mhz bitstream? Care to comment on your speed and what cooling you're using?
Given how stable the 166Mhz bitstream has been for me, not sure if the upgrade is worth it.
Given how stable the 166Mhz bitstream has been for me, not sure if the upgrade is worth it.
A quick update on my experiences with cooling. I was trying out 200 MHz on a few boards and saw one of them giving a lot of invalids (~8%) so I decided to make that the subject of an experiment with thermal epoxy. Without changing anything else in my setup (see this post), I popped those heatsinks off and glued them down with some Arctic Alumina Thermal Adhesive. After letting that cure with some weight clamping it down, I loaded up the 200 MHz bitstream and ran it for about a day and got this:
Code:
Running time: 21h43m
Getwork interval: 20 secs
FPGA 0:
Accepted: 3586
Rejected: 53 (1.46%)
Invalid: 0 (0.00%)
Hashrate (all nonces): 199.87 MH/s
Hashrate (valid nonces): 199.87 MH/s
Hashrate (accepted shares): 196.96 MH/s
FPGA 1:
Accepted: 3545
Rejected: 61 (1.69%)
Invalid: 1 (0.03%)
Hashrate (all nonces): 198.12 MH/s
Hashrate (valid nonces): 198.06 MH/s
Hashrate (accepted shares): 194.71 MH/s
Total hashrate for device: 397.99 MH/s / 397.94 MH/s / 391.68 MH/s
If anyone is having trouble with cooling, I suggest they give that a try! I have no idea how to remove a heatsink that's glued on, so only do this if you think you're satisfied with the stock heatsink. In fact, I'll try this out on a few more boards and see if the gains are consistent across the board.
tor works over a proxy (socks5)
poclbm supports it since this commit
https://github.com/m0mchil/poclbm/commit/5e994e7af4ae3f5fba364b29ca6c49ef7f9f18b5
socks.py seams like a nice way for implementation
every connection must use the proxy
poclbm supports it since this commit
https://github.com/m0mchil/poclbm/commit/5e994e7af4ae3f5fba364b29ca6c49ef7f9f18b5
socks.py seams like a nice way for implementation
every connection must use the proxy
Hey guys,
Been following bitcoin for a year or so, speculating in it for a few months, considering mining for a few weeks and following the thread a few days. I'm pretty caught up on where everythings at and I'm looking to join the project.
Consider this my introduction and sincere thanks to Fizzisist and the other project leaders.
Looking to make a purchase on a board in the next week or so once my wall wort arrives.
Plan on running the board from my mac mini initially.
This is my first dive into mining but I think FPGA boards and the x6500 are an opportune entry point.
Thanks again and I look forward to seeing what we can build.
JR
Been following bitcoin for a year or so, speculating in it for a few months, considering mining for a few weeks and following the thread a few days. I'm pretty caught up on where everythings at and I'm looking to join the project.
Consider this my introduction and sincere thanks to Fizzisist and the other project leaders.
Looking to make a purchase on a board in the next week or so once my wall wort arrives.
Plan on running the board from my mac mini initially.
This is my first dive into mining but I think FPGA boards and the x6500 are an opportune entry point.
Thanks again and I look forward to seeing what we can build.
JR
Welcome and thanks for the positive support!
anyone tried to make the miner-software tor-useable?
why? my pool has an .onion adress which should be avaible in case of ddos-attacks
i know tsocks should run on linux, but i am on windows, a open-source or freeware alternative would be nice but i didn't find something yet
as far as i get it i have to rewrite rpcclient.py
why? my pool has an .onion adress which should be avaible in case of ddos-attacks
i know tsocks should run on linux, but i am on windows, a open-source or freeware alternative would be nice but i didn't find something yet
as far as i get it i have to rewrite rpcclient.py
What exactly do you need to change? I'm not really familiar with the inner workings of tor. Do other miners work with it properly? If so, I'd be happy to incorporate whatever changes are needed.
Jump to: