Topic: XAVOA - Online Bitcoin Casino - page 3. (Read 10299 times)
Great, I've activated your welcome bonus.
Registered under johnthedong to take a look at the site. Thanks.
Bonus added, good luck.
my username: skydust
Bonus added, good luck.
Recently signed up.
Username:
acceptance2
THANKS!
Username:
acceptance2
THANKS!
I just signed up and am same username as here: Prospero.
You've already got your bonus (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1383596).
Username: Marker88
Thx
Thx
... or if it is related to reusing previous deposit-addresses ...
Yes, these transactions had to be credited manually.I changed this last night, you are now free to use a fixed address or a newly generated one.
Thanks for fixing, and for the 100mBTC Bonus! (Unfortunately, this time it didn't last me
over a single streak of non-luck (picking wrong side) on increasing wagers
)... or if it is related to reusing previous deposit-addresses ...
Yes, these transactions had to be credited manually.I changed this last night, you are now free to use a fixed address or a newly generated one.
Out of curiosity, I created a second account "dicer" a couple of days ago and deposited
small amounts. First deposit went instantly well this time (starting out as "pending"), but
second deposit on the same address as first is still not credited despite 40 confirms and
a "Spent"-tag on the output:
first:
https://blockchain.info/tx/a2bf77377fb0c0e75cee7de9881e39ec0cdf7055dbbf68b20b2268c286314bc7
second:
https://blockchain.info/tx/8371e8725d0ea03ba3160aecf4864dc4ee61bedc7de297dddc81351efed32026
I'm now wondering, if the "not-automatically-crediting" bug just occurs randomly, or if it
is related to reusing previous deposit-addresses, versus using always the latest. (will try
another deposit on the respective newly generated deposit-address, too, but I rather have
only one deposit in the air at any time.)
Last time I complained about a still invisible deposit for account "foo", then by the time
you answered it had already shown up (after about a day). I wasn't sure if it actually did
so with or without some action from your side.
small amounts. First deposit went instantly well this time (starting out as "pending"), but
second deposit on the same address as first is still not credited despite 40 confirms and
a "Spent"-tag on the output:
first:
https://blockchain.info/tx/a2bf77377fb0c0e75cee7de9881e39ec0cdf7055dbbf68b20b2268c286314bc7
second:
https://blockchain.info/tx/8371e8725d0ea03ba3160aecf4864dc4ee61bedc7de297dddc81351efed32026
I'm now wondering, if the "not-automatically-crediting" bug just occurs randomly, or if it
is related to reusing previous deposit-addresses, versus using always the latest. (will try
another deposit on the respective newly generated deposit-address, too, but I rather have
only one deposit in the air at any time.)
Last time I complained about a still invisible deposit for account "foo", then by the time
you answered it had already shown up (after about a day). I wasn't sure if it actually did
so with or without some action from your side.
I was telling people about your casino in the chat on http://play.luckco.in/
Thanks!One guy signed up, but isn't able to post here, so I said I'd post for him:
registered: dalek
Bonus added, good luck. 
registered: dalek
Just want to say that admin doubled my sister's deposit. 
I was telling people about your casino in the chat on http://play.luckco.in/
One guy signed up, but isn't able to post here, so I said I'd post for him:
That was a few hours ago now, because the power went out here just after I said I'd post for him...
One guy signed up, but isn't able to post here, so I said I'd post for him:
That was a few hours ago now, because the power went out here just after I said I'd post for him...
What we need for things to be provably fair is for there to be no way for the house to unilaterally decide what the next result is going to be.
I'm working on it 
registered: ccliu
Bonus added, good luck. 
registered: ccliu
[...] there'd be another option: allow to bet on "edge", as well :-) that would be a bit like roulette, where you can also bet on the green 0.
That would make things better, but still not good enough in my opinion.
The house could easily analyse each player's play history and see whether they tend to bet more on 'edge' or 'heads/tails' and adjust the distribution of results accordingly to tip the odds in their favour. Unless the player plays randomly, the house can still (in theory) cheat. What we need for things to be provably fair is for there to be no way for the house to unilaterally decide what the next result is going to be.
My friend wants to join this as well and claim the bonus. He just signed up an account on bitcointalk.org
And its called Lepach. He also created an account with Lepach on your site.
I am wondering if you could credit him a 0.250 Bonus if there is any spots left?
Yes, of course. I've activated the bonus.And its called Lepach. He also created an account with Lepach on your site.
I am wondering if you could credit him a 0.250 Bonus if there is any spots left?
Hi, my username's vega.
Sorry, but this username doesn't exist.When are deposit-tx's supposed to show up on deposit page?
I made a deposit (after having lost what remained after my last withdraw)
and I'm not sure if I should even expect it to show up, before it is confirmed.
If it is supposed to show up instantly as "pending", then seemingly the bug of
not crediting incoming funds to accounts isn't yet fixed.
PS: tx=e3d7d83bca36a8453978b8f9afcbf7bd919fb6c6559765ce26b6db90fce55ad9
I can't reproduce this, all looks fine here.I made a deposit (after having lost what remained after my last withdraw)
and I'm not sure if I should even expect it to show up, before it is confirmed.
If it is supposed to show up instantly as "pending", then seemingly the bug of
not crediting incoming funds to accounts isn't yet fixed.
PS: tx=e3d7d83bca36a8453978b8f9afcbf7bd919fb6c6559765ce26b6db90fce55ad9
Transactions appear as "PENDING" after a few seconds.
Your deposit was credited at 14:56:57 UTC (after 1 confirmation).
Username: crosby
username: bachus
Bonus added, good luckYes, there is no provability about the edge case. Short of changing the algorithm itself towards including user-input, there'd be another option: allow to bet on "edge", as well :-) that would be a bit like roulette, where you can also bet on the green 0. Of course, betting on edge would have a much higher multiplicator, and maybe, consequentially, a lower max-bet.
All it proves is that the result of the spin was decided before you bet. It could still be that "edge" comes up more than 1% of the time, because the house is free to discard "heads" and "tails" games without ever presenting them to the player.
To make the game provably fair, the player needs to be able to influence the result by providing part of the seed that's used to generate the shuffle (like bitzino.com does).
Well, you've convinced me. I'll modify the game to make it provably fair. To make the game provably fair, the player needs to be able to influence the result by providing part of the seed that's used to generate the shuffle (like bitzino.com does).
Jump to: