Topic: ►►►[XBC] BitcoinPlus ►Official Thread◄官方公告◄◄◄ - page 88. (Read 408040 times)

Yes we all want whats best for XBC development and things will be done at our pace.We will see whats doable and if its suitable and can be accomplished within a particular timeframe it will be completed.I dont know what you are referring to regarding what "happened to a number of things in the past" but we are living in the present now and looking to a sustainable future not a quick moon.




Are you starting back with those conspiracy theories again?

The outsourced dev may be too busy by the looks of it?

Other coins have a bigger budget for him?

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

Just my opinion anyway.

I personally want the best for XBC, and I'm sure the devs behind this maybe want this too, but its at their pace and not at the communities, and things that will bring advancement seem to always be put on hold...its happened with a number of things in the past, and this is certainly looking no different.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

Not sure...but this thread looks like its turning into a price manipulation tool.

This sounds really great. I am surprised the DEVS have not responded to this offer/suggestion? What is the take of the DEVs on this?

Kind regards,
Robbert

So guys peep this.

https://github.com/GENERALBYTESCOM/

Lets get the XBC code integrated into our software.

Then I will push a fresh build with XBC integrated to every single BTM I own.

So XBC will then be available for purchase in so many locations, it'll make your head spin.

Hows that sound?

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

@Egghead
@BitcoinPlusBus
@rushmybitcoin

Sorry guys for bothering again, but there is still something i wanted to ask You about.
I know our dev is working on enabling the wallet's internal messaging by-default.

And while i believe easy functionality is a good thing per se, i'm still a little worried about it's safety & security implications, especially for 24/7 staking nodes.
I admit i'm unable to assess, whether the messaging enabled by-default feature will mean a higher risk exposure to hacks or an increase of potential attack area.
But IF it will even mean just a SLIGHTLY higher risk of accounts (public keys) being spied upon, or having their IP's or onion-IP's sniffed out, for example by
unwanted incoming messages, SPAM or even outspoken threats,
i hope it's not too late already, to propose and appeal to our dev, to at least include a checkbox in the properties, for completely disabling the messaging.
I mean in a way, that when its disabled over the checkbox, that the messaging feature connection cannot be established and is permanently interrupted,
so that when disabled it's basically missing all the needed console commands (like in previous wallet version) which it needs to work.

In case the messaging is disabled, the data packets containing the message information should not even make it through to the other side,
and not that these data packets are coming through, regardless of checkbox setting, and are just not being displayed if disabled. I think you know what i'm trying to say.

I was thinking specifically about the security of accounts holding 50+ coins (but after further price increases, even accounts with less coins might feel concerned or get nervous),
and of course always-on staking nodes, whose operators simply do not need or not even want enabled by-default messaging.
I hope you will forgive me, if you think i wrote something stupid, but please consider, not all wallet users might feel the same about the messaging feature,
and the users will increase a lot over time.

Please also include the following providers on your list of payment-processors for a possible future integration:

https://www.altaccept.com/
https://www.edigicash.co/
https://www.expresscoin.com/
https://gourl.io/

Thanks for your attention and the continued efforts.

After 12 hours and having reached 110 block confirmations your coins are mature enough for staking.Normally the more you have the more often you will find a block hence stake regularly.The smaller amount you have staking the longer you will wait as you will have less weight on the network.

A small amount should still stake 1-2 times daily due to still relatively low POS difficulty.

Sorry I think someone did tell me this but I can't find it now. I'm just wondering how much XBC would I need for it to stake 1 - 2 times a day?

What I'm working out is that by leaving my computer on 24/7 with the wallet staking, it's keeping my room warm and 1-2 times a day staking should cover most of my electricity bill in a month