Author

Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 239. (Read 804701 times)

sr. member
Activity: 338
Merit: 255
.....I am under contract for my job through summer 2016. I can't legally quit even if I wanted to, so I can't change that. I would if I could, trust me.
That just does not compute, in my mind  Huh  Is this what they call, 'modern slavery'?


Lol is not that he CANNOT as in forced not to... but my guess is that he is tied by contract to face a severe penalty if he does indeed try to leave his work before the deal expires.

@Grexx and the others:

Damn guys, did the 99designs contest expired? I was travelling and didn't know you were looking for a image rebranding... I am designer and also have sent some works to 99designs, am I still on time to submit a proposal?

I just like to involve in the projects I have shares in )

Eth.
legendary
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
PoT is not impossible. The method we were using however simply isn't scalable
PoT is not impossible. But we dont know how to make it possible.  Roll Eyes
Nice  Grin

No one said we don't know how to make it possible.... We have solutions... however not sure we have found the best solution yet, which is why we are going ahead with a temporary PoT... while we work out the best permanent solution. 
No one said you know how to make it possible....  Roll Eyes
To have solutions which may be or may be not working - is not "know how to make it possible"  Tongue
hero member
Activity: 817
Merit: 1000
Truth is a consensus among neurons www.synereo.com
Any particular reason for this price drop or it's just normal alt-coin price fluctuation?

Literally look up one post
legendary
Activity: 888
Merit: 1000
Monero - secure, private and untraceable currency.
Any particular reason for this price drop or it's just normal alt-coin price fluctuation?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
PoT is not impossible. The method we were using however simply isn't scalable
PoT is not impossible. But we dont know how to make it possible.  Roll Eyes
Nice  Grin

No one said we don't know how to make it possible.... We have solutions... however not sure we have found the best solution yet, which is why we are going ahead with a temporary PoT... while we work out the best permanent solution. 
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
PoT is not impossible. The method we were using however simply isn't scalable
PoT is not impossible. But we dont know how to make it possible.  Roll Eyes
Nice  Grin

What are you trying to accomplish with your ongoing flaming and trolling? You were a 'normal' dude at the beginning of NXT. Now you are appearing like a 15yo boy.
legendary
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
PoT is not impossible. The method we were using however simply isn't scalable
PoT is not impossible. But we dont know how to make it possible.  Roll Eyes
Nice  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
@ Devs

Come-from-Beyond is one of NXT's lead developers. Why don't you let him take a look at the source code too see if he could help with the PoT problem. I'm sure I read somewhere a while back that he'd like to take a look at Crypti's source code if the develpers allowed it.

I don't have time for this, sorry.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
I will also push for community involvement and try to get you all an in depth description of the problems we were having and what was causing them so you can help analyze the flaws and help to build a system that can accomplish what we originally set out to build.

U have 3 different algos (PoT, PoP and PoI) that contribute to the total "weight" of a node/account and determine who will forge next block? If this is the case then I suggest to split all blocks into 3 different types. Let blocks 0, 3, 6, 9, ... be forged with pure PoT, blocks 1, 4, 7, 10, ... - with pure PoI and blocks 2, 5, 8, 11, ... - with PoI. This will work as an alloy. Once the network starts diverging on the latest PoT block the next PoP will force it to converge again and the following PoI block should help a little too. So, if PoP and PoI work well enough then PoT issue should be mitigated, of coz, u have to have activity (purchases and merchant registrations) that lets PoP and PoI to take place.

@ Devs

Come-from-Beyond is one of NXT's lead developers. Why don't you let him take a look at the source code too see if he could help with the PoT problem. I'm sure I read somewhere a while back that he'd like to take a look at Crypti's source code if the develpers allowed it.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
I will also push for community involvement and try to get you all an in depth description of the problems we were having and what was causing them so you can help analyze the flaws and help to build a system that can accomplish what we originally set out to build.

U have 3 different algos (PoT, PoP and PoI) that contribute to the total "weight" of a node/account and determine who will forge next block? If this is the case then I suggest to split all blocks into 3 different types. Let blocks 0, 3, 6, 9, ... be forged with pure PoT, blocks 1, 4, 7, 10, ... - with pure PoP and blocks 2, 5, 8, 11, ... - with PoI. This will work as an alloy. Once the network starts diverging on the latest PoT block the next PoP will force it to converge again and the following PoI block should help a little too. So, if PoP and PoI work well enough then PoT issue should be mitigated, of coz, u have to have activity (purchases and merchant registrations) that lets PoP and PoI to take place.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
Risk taker & Black Swan farmer.
.....I am under contract for my job through summer 2016. I can't legally quit even if I wanted to, so I can't change that. I would if I could, trust me.
That just does not compute, in my mind  Huh  Is this what they call, 'modern slavery'?


Hmm american, can't legally quit, no cellphones. Guessing the military?  Tongue Alternatively Elon Musk finished SpaceX earlier than expected and is taking Grex with him.



Indeed, Grex mentioned earlier he was working in the military.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
.....I am under contract for my job through summer 2016. I can't legally quit even if I wanted to, so I can't change that. I would if I could, trust me.
That just does not compute, in my mind  Huh  Is this what they call, 'modern slavery'?


Hmm american, can't legally quit, no cellphones. Guessing the military?  Tongue Alternatively Elon Musk finished SpaceX earlier than expected and is taking Grex with him.

legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
.....I am under contract for my job through summer 2016. I can't legally quit even if I wanted to, so I can't change that. I would if I could, trust me.
That just does not compute, in my mind  Huh  Is this what they call, 'modern slavery'?
full member
Activity: 468
Merit: 100
im going to dump 1mil cryptis now. brace yourselves!trolling is fun when I needed more cheap cryptos.



You gave away your real intent when you said you needed more cheap cryptos.............

You are not dumping, you are trying to get others to dump.  I bet you are the one that just put in BUY orders on Bter at 960 to 910 sats.

A lot of BUY orders just now being set on Bter in the 900s, but the only sales were BUYS at 1290.  On Cryptsy, the proces are still 1621/1433.

No dump happened. 

He was just trying to set off a panic dump so he could buy in cheaper....... In some countries, that can get you killed.

I'm hinting the intentions of fuds above my post. people dump first then they come bashing out loud during difficult times trying to take quick profit from weak hands.
member
Activity: 324
Merit: 10
I believe in your team, because I see what you pay for your confidence and CYRpti everything.But don't pursue perfect one pace reachs the designated position.Downtime is not normal, so many days hope to put an end to this state as soon as possible.First a simple forging.The perfect solution can test in the background Once a successful launch.
我相信你的团队,因为我看你们的信心和为CYRpti所付出的一切。但不要追求一步到位的完美。停机这么多天是不正常的,希望尽快结束这种状态。先实行简单的锻造。完美的方案可以在后台测试 一旦成功再推出。
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Let me just post this as well, for reference for those who frequent here and watch for my updates. I am in Denver, CO (Mountain Time - UTC-07:00) and I work a normal 8-4 or 9-5 schedule on weekdays and do not have typical cell phone or internet access on my job site. So if I go an extended period without updates, that is why. When I get home I am typically available and working on Crypti related items for at least 6-8 hours a night. On the weekends I am available most of the time. If you want to get my attention during the hours i'm available, it's easiest to hit me up on Twitter ( https://twitter.com/GreXX_ ) because it pops up on my phone. I am under contract for my job through summer 2016. I can't legally quit even if I wanted to, so I can't change that. I would if I could, trust me.

Just wanted to put that out there to help everyone know why I might not be posting over a given period of time.

As a matter of fact, we are going to be updating the Board Members on the OP and our new site will have our team listed. I will try to add a listing of typical hours we are available to help you guys know who might be around and when. I think it would help for you to have a better idea of our schedules. We might also be able to include an easiest method of contact (like twitter for me) in there to help as well.

You can also join the Facebook GROUP here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/teamcrypti/ where Max and I are admins and can respond as well.


Before someone FUDs this no cell phone having job, I am genuinely interested what job you have that doesn't allow it?   Grin
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Let me just post this as well, for reference for those who frequent here and watch for my updates. I am in Denver, CO (Mountain Time - UTC-07:00) and I work a normal 8-4 or 9-5 schedule on weekdays and do not have typical cell phone or internet access on my job site. So if I go an extended period without updates, that is why. When I get home I am typically available and working on Crypti related items for at least 6-8 hours a night. On the weekends I am available most of the time. If you want to get my attention during the hours i'm available, it's easiest to hit me up on Twitter ( https://twitter.com/GreXX_ ) because it pops up on my phone. I am under contract for my job through summer 2016. I can't legally quit even if I wanted to, so I can't change that. I would if I could, trust me.

Just wanted to put that out there to help everyone know why I might not be posting over a given period of time.

As a matter of fact, we are going to be updating the Board Members on the OP and our new site will have our team listed. I will try to add a listing of typical hours we are available to help you guys know who might be around and when. I think it would help for you to have a better idea of our schedules. We might also be able to include an easiest method of contact (like twitter for me) in there to help as well.

You can also join the Facebook GROUP here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/teamcrypti/ where Max and I are admins and can respond as well.
full member
Activity: 284
Merit: 101
Thanks for the update Grexx. 
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
The forks were due to the short 60 second block timing, and that the node was communicating with every other node in that minute. This worked well with 50 nodes on testnet, but did not work when scaled up.  The Proof of Time algo was a great idea, to reward loyal forgers, but it is a bottleneck at present. 
OMG!  Shocked
They really thought that such simple algo will work on network with >1000 nodes? :doublefacepalm:   Roll Eyes

It's obviously not scalable to have "everybody talking to everybody during all blocktimes".

For PoT to be implemented, the total pool of nodes is going to have to be divided into a number of subpools where only nodes in one subpool have the "possible right" to forge during a given blocktime, only one node in this subpool actually DOES forge during this blocktime, only one choosen subpool talks "everybody to everybody" during this blocktime, and all other subpools must STFU during this blocktime.   The max subpool size is dependent on what will work in the real world, and the "devil in the details" is how nodes are added and subtracted to an appropriate subpool as they come online or go offline.

Not an impossible problem, but tricky, and it would avoid both the PoW ASIC arms race of Bitcoin and the PoS hoarding problem of NXT to set a new and viable 2.0 standard methodology.   I'm hodling.

Hey Mal,

It's an interesting concept and similar to one I was discussing with someone as a possible solution. After we get the main net back up and running and get a chance to provide some details, I'd be interested in discussing this a little bit more in detail. We may try to setup a community chat once it calms down a little to discuss some of the options.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
I'm going to ask again since no one answered before. Is anyone going to be at Inside Bitcoin in Las Vegas on 5-7 October? Eric and I will be there on the 6th and 7th and would love to have a sit-down with anyone who is there and still supports Crypti.


Sadly nope. Going to do a presentation on Crypti? Also who is Eric  Cheesy


Eric is my real name.. I go by it on cryptitalk.com and I also go by Vetro7 on GitHub

I'm a member of the Board of Directors
http://blog.crypti.me/status-update-22-sep-14/

Ah you're Eric I see. Thumbs up you do great work also. Well, spread the Crypti word in Vegas atleast and maybe we'll find ourselves with a new enthusiast or two.  Wink
Jump to: