Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 242. (Read 804701 times)
October 01, 2014, 11:17:59 AM
Grexx was right when he have said that price won't rise in 6 month, but it will be even lower.
October 01, 2014, 11:14:51 AM
bter withdraw dissabled, why?
Coin does not work afaik. Network was disabled, because there are many forks. 
October 01, 2014, 11:14:45 AM
More than 2 millions dumped ... 
October 01, 2014, 11:14:35 AM
Wulf,
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
Hiring more devs doesn't speed up the process. Usually it's the contrary as every new dev has to learn about the project which needs some time.
Adding devs only speeds everything up when the core is ready and fully functional. So you will have a few devs doing windows Client, others doing Linux, ....
But hiring more devs to fix a bug in the core won't speed up anything.
Yet I still believe this project has a bright future.
October 01, 2014, 11:12:25 AM
Price is below IPO or not? 
It might happend, I have seen this happend before with other coins when dealing with bad news.
But looking at this from a longer perspective, they will get back on track in a while hence I am waiting to see how deep it goes before throwing my BTC on it.
I don't blame people- they've been patient for several months only to be hit with a setback. The way I see it, if I've been patient for a month I can be patient one more or so.
Price will probably rebound slightly when the panicdumpers has been ironed out which in a sense isn't all so bad really.
Even though my confidence in the developers team has decreased, I still do believe in them amidst all this. This is new code which is bound to cause trouble no matter how boring that sounds.
Most people here who invested seem to have no clue in it's risks and rewards all new coins will have it's up and downs. XCR hasn't reached theirs yet. It still has potential, as the idea is still intact just like NXT was in the early days. Regardless, this is one of the projects I follow that excites me in crypto, feel free to point me to something else really in terms of innovation there is none.
In the end, if you wanted a clone of something there is plenty. BTC used to be buggy too, etc etc I could go on all day. but you get my point
While this is a disaster, let's not come hat and handy and scream the world is over when it isn't. Similar stories can be found literally all over.
Update us.
Also get the temporary fix up running already will you.
I would suggest hiring a developer from the NXT community, there is plenty of good ones. It brings credibility and many are very talented and I am pretty sure many will be thrilled to work with you. Stop worrying about the BTC or it will be all you have to worry about. You need help, so let's stop pretending it isn't so. You got equity (15% XCR), and that can be leveraged. Be smart.
A long shot but I got orders at 3-500 hoping someone panics and fatfingers.
October 01, 2014, 11:11:07 AM
bter withdraw dissabled, why?
October 01, 2014, 11:06:50 AM
Ow shit, I didnt notice price dropped so much : |
October 01, 2014, 10:53:59 AM
Price is below IPO or not?
October 01, 2014, 10:48:51 AM
Wulf,
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
I spent ~5 minutes typing that post, but anyway... Time Zones are irrelevant if the developers haven't posted anything in a few days.
Also the only reason 750 BTC was even reached, was because of the fact that a cap was posted. I invested on Day 1, where around 200 BTC was invested, on Day 2 around 50 BTC was invested, on Day 3 around 20 BTC was invested. Only once the cap was announced did the volume pick up again, because investors didn't want a big diluted IPO. Had the cap not been put in place, volume would've continued to drop further, and I guarantee you that the mark of 750 BTC wouldn't have even been reached.
Or you know, it would have just picked up days before it ended.
Yes yes, we're all irritated. Especially Wolfcastle shows his true colours after flaming me for "only caring about price."
BTC raised could have been higher but you know what. That's not really the problem here. Developers focusing their energy elsewhere than code is.
And nearly all of the top volume coins has started behind 0 BTC. So this is not really the truth.
Crypti has EQUITY they can front if they would need to. Their 15% should be used towards "development fund" and not to line their own pocket.
If they want to have a project at all. They will have to offer up their equity to make new developers feel equal. And let people in to help with code.
I think there is a lot of clarifying here to do. Crypti has the chance of EVERYTHING and NOTHING right now.
Just stop the community neglecting already. Let us help you. And implement the temporary fix.. today..... not in a week. Please.
It would've but, it probably wouldn't have been enough to push it past the 750 BTC that was raised. As for "flaming you", in my defense your post made it seem like you wanted to host a design contest to somehow cause a price increase. With regards to the temporary fix, I totally agree, it needs to be implemented as soon as possible, not like the usual "it's almost done, just around the corner" type of releases that we've become accustomed to.
October 01, 2014, 10:42:42 AM
Wulf,
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
I spent ~5 minutes typing that post, but anyway... Time Zones are irrelevant if the developers haven't posted anything in a few days.
Also the only reason 750 BTC was even reached, was because of the fact that a cap was posted. I invested on Day 1, where around 200 BTC was invested, on Day 2 around 50 BTC was invested, on Day 3 around 20 BTC was invested. Only once the cap was announced did the volume pick up again, because investors didn't want a big diluted IPO. Had the cap not been put in place, volume would've continued to drop further, and I guarantee you that the mark of 750 BTC wouldn't have even been reached.
Or you know, it would have just picked up days before it ended.
Yes yes, we're all irritated. Especially Wolfcastle shows his true colours after flaming me for "only caring about price."
BTC raised could have been higher but you know what. That's not really the problem here. Developers focusing their energy elsewhere than code is.
And nearly all of the top volume coins has started behind 0 BTC. So this is not really the truth.
Crypti has EQUITY they can front if they would need to. Their 15% should be used towards "development fund" and not to line their own pocket.
If they want to have a project at all. They will have to offer up their equity to make new developers feel equal. And let people in to help with code.
I think there is a lot of clarifying here to do. Crypti has the chance of EVERYTHING and NOTHING right now.
Just stop the community neglecting already. Let us help you. And implement the temporary fix.. today..... not in a week. Please.
October 01, 2014, 10:31:22 AM
I can't believe, but Crypti is dying.
I had big expectations with this coin, but since the begining it looks like dev team is not ready to accomplish this project. Always stalling and delaying the plan. This coin will end up as emunie, a coin that had it all to have been high, and because the slowness of its developers ended up as an unknow coin.
October 01, 2014, 10:25:21 AM
Wulf,
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
I spent ~5 minutes typing that post, but anyway... Time Zones are irrelevant if the developers haven't posted anything in a few days.
Also the only reason 750 BTC was even reached, was because of the fact that a cap was posted. I invested on Day 1, where around 200 BTC was invested, on Day 2 around 50 BTC was invested, on Day 3 around 20 BTC was invested. Only once the cap was announced did the volume pick up again, because investors didn't want a big diluted IPO. Had the cap not been put in place, volume would've continued to drop further, and I guarantee you that the mark of 750 BTC wouldn't have even been reached.
October 01, 2014, 10:21:02 AM
Wulf,
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
That was one of my worries. I wish they tried to raise more, even if it means I get less stack. I just hope this project succeed to come to a stage where it is self sustainable.
October 01, 2014, 10:15:54 AM
Where are the actual founders of the coin and why are they not communicating?
Everyone is very busy!! Yes we know its important to take a second to update you all... even though most of the time what we have to say is not enough... So Grexx is working on a proper Status update for you all.. Please know that our lack of posting right now is not due to our lack of work beeing done on Crypti.. It is the opposite.. We are working long hours and just as dedicated to the project as ever...
October 01, 2014, 10:11:19 AM
Wulf,
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
You put a lot of time and energy into that last post........ so much energy and time that you did not do anything else meanwhile? Well, that is what is happening internally with the devs. There is much going on, and they are too busy to blog here.
There is lots of communication going on internally. Most of the devs are in Central Asia, where the time is 12 hours different from yours, so dont expect immediate answers at noon your time.
Believe me when I say they are hard at work on it...... If you have been on this blog since the beginning, you will know that I was a very big critic of this project. I do see lots of potential here, so I invested.
The devs made a big mistake when they limited the IPO to 750BTC. Other IPOs have generated 2000BTC and more. That low limit has made the coin price higher (good for you), but limited the funds for future development. If the devs had let the IPO run for the full 30 days, or even a week longer, they would be sitting on a stash of thousands of BTC that would allow them to fill an office with programmers. That did not happen, as they listened to and followed the opinion of the community.
The current price of BTC is not helping as well.
October 01, 2014, 10:08:24 AM
Solving network and bugs are important. But giving your community affirmations and confidence is equally important. I have been holding XCR since 1.7k and still am.
An update directly from you would be critical now
October 01, 2014, 09:56:40 AM
Okay so now where is the temporary fix? I'm sorry guys, but we've kept on hearing that bug fixes are around the corner, and there's been nothing to show for it.
We literally can't trust your word anymore, for example just 3 days ago SyRenity, said that you guys found and isolated the problem and that once it passed testing you would release 0.1.7 which fixed the PoT bug along with the Windows Wallet. Then today BitSeed informed us that for some reason a temporary fix to the PoT will be released "soon", with a permanent solution and Windows Wallet to be released "two weeks from now". Which one is it?
Now if you look at things from a bigger perspective, what about the Custom Blockchains, which were originally due out at the beginning of September? Is it coming out soon, is it "around the corner" as has been said many times? With the slow progress that has been made, I honestly don't even think that we'll see Custom Blockchains this year. As it is the Windows Wallet now will only be coming out late October.
What's more in the midst of all this chaos, you guys are spending time choosing a new logo? I know how hypocritical that sounds, when I was the one heavily criticizing your teams lackadaisical approach to design, but considering the quality of the designs put forward, Crypti is far better off staying with its current design. How about forgetting about the design aspect for a while, believe me the new designs would do more harm than good, and just focus on actually delivering on some of your releases, like the Windows Wallet or Custom Blockchains. Once you've delivered that, then talk about design again. There isn't anything wrong with Crypti's current design and some of the designs put forward just look downright terrible.
The network has been down for close to a week now, and what is worrisome is that it was treated like no big deal for the first few days. The team's communication has been appalling throughout this whole process. We shouldn't have to ask you for more information or for an update, it is your job to provide us with adequate information so that we can get a grasp on the situation.
And I know exactly how responses to this post will sound. "Crypti is new technology, there will always be unforseen bugs...", "We can't guarantee anything on release times due to the nature of these things..." etc, etc. The time deadlines aren't what we are complaining about, it's the way that you've communicated with your community, or failed to do so throughout this whole situation that is the problem. As you can see, there was a massive dump on BTER. The thing is people haven't lost faith in the network, they've lost faith in your teams' ability to deliver.
We literally can't trust your word anymore, for example just 3 days ago SyRenity, said that you guys found and isolated the problem and that once it passed testing you would release 0.1.7 which fixed the PoT bug along with the Windows Wallet. Then today BitSeed informed us that for some reason a temporary fix to the PoT will be released "soon", with a permanent solution and Windows Wallet to be released "two weeks from now". Which one is it?
Now if you look at things from a bigger perspective, what about the Custom Blockchains, which were originally due out at the beginning of September? Is it coming out soon, is it "around the corner" as has been said many times? With the slow progress that has been made, I honestly don't even think that we'll see Custom Blockchains this year. As it is the Windows Wallet now will only be coming out late October.
What's more in the midst of all this chaos, you guys are spending time choosing a new logo? I know how hypocritical that sounds, when I was the one heavily criticizing your teams lackadaisical approach to design, but considering the quality of the designs put forward, Crypti is far better off staying with its current design. How about forgetting about the design aspect for a while, believe me the new designs would do more harm than good, and just focus on actually delivering on some of your releases, like the Windows Wallet or Custom Blockchains. Once you've delivered that, then talk about design again. There isn't anything wrong with Crypti's current design and some of the designs put forward just look downright terrible.
The network has been down for close to a week now, and what is worrisome is that it was treated like no big deal for the first few days. The team's communication has been appalling throughout this whole process. We shouldn't have to ask you for more information or for an update, it is your job to provide us with adequate information so that we can get a grasp on the situation.
And I know exactly how responses to this post will sound. "Crypti is new technology, there will always be unforseen bugs...", "We can't guarantee anything on release times due to the nature of these things..." etc, etc. The time deadlines aren't what we are complaining about, it's the way that you've communicated with your community, or failed to do so throughout this whole situation that is the problem. As you can see, there was a massive dump on BTER. The thing is people haven't lost faith in the network, they've lost faith in your teams' ability to deliver.
October 01, 2014, 09:46:46 AM
OMG, look at the price 
Just 5BTC and we go to 0 satoshis
Just 5BTC and we go to 0 satoshis
That is what is known as a sale..... I am buying more.
October 01, 2014, 09:37:21 AM
OMG, look at the price
Just 5BTC and we go to 0 satoshis
Just 5BTC and we go to 0 satoshis
October 01, 2014, 09:37:15 AM
Same as NAScoin thread.
Slowly dying with promises and apologies.
We all know what will happen.
Slowly dying with promises and apologies.
We all know what will happen.
Yes, it's sad.
I think the price will be under ICO price very soon if these problems are not solved soon.
Esspecially if you dump 0.5million coins or more at once...
I would be very gratefull for someone to dump another 0.5million XCR. I promise i will put some buy orders at 100 price...
Jump to: