Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 25. (Read 804672 times)

This is unhelpful and short-sighted

NOW is an opportunity to start anew. Even to an outsider it was obvious this projects main weakness was community, or lack thereof. All conversation should be open and if the members of the Foundation are serious they should get very vocal very fast.

50cent is right. He has been here from the beginning and been a loyal follower. We appreciate and value his opinion and sometimes, understand that people need to vent their frustrations. We all know we have had our bumps and bruises along the way, but we are here, we are delivering everything we promised and set out to accomplish, and I think that says a lot about us in the long term.

In other words: either glorify or go away. 

Also, about the blog.

After our blog was use to post propaganda for a competing project without authorization from the foundation, we deleted the accounts of those responsible to avoid any future confusion. We don't want people to think lisk was an authorized or supported project or that we were somehow transitioning to it.

Unfortunately Boris didn't realize that when you delete a user account on ghost, it deletes all of their posts, which frankly is terrible design. We are attempting to restore from a previous backup. This was not intentional and we hope we can get most of the content returned to the blog.

If you don't like Crypti there are hundreds of other coins out there for you. Including Lisk.

I'm on mobile so I apologize if this is short or grammatically weird.

As to the "we fucked up" post above. We did. We acknowledged it and we did our best to get back on track and fix it. I believe we have done better than most teams would have when their initial product failed. That's just my stance. We are also open sourcing the tech, hence the fork conversation. In regards to executive, once it's open source, everyone will be able to contribute in any way they see fit. Executive speaking, we will probably continue to function as a foundation much like bitcoin does.

As far as the delegates, I can't make people come start and run a delegate. That's up to the community. Are you running one? Is everyone else here? It starts with you guys. We need your help and we even tried to setup rewards to get people to run delegates. It's been very frustrating for us as we don't want to run them all. On a positive note we have seen a steady increase in people starting community delegates and think we are on the right track.

The foundation wallet funds (xcr) were moved in case previous members had access to the account, which there was question whether they did or not. We decided to stay on the safe side as 1 million xcr of the foundations that was donated for the reward program was not returned to us as of yet and we wanted to make sure funds were safe.

As far as VCs and ways forward, we are pursuing all possible options and looking at various scenarios. Our platform is all but complete and ready for prime time, which is why we are seeing forks much like btc and nxt did. We will do our best to stay open and honest with all of you and share our thoughts and what options we are looking at.

I'v been with Crypti from IPO (as investor), even before Max and Olivier appears.
And here is what I have to say after 18 month: we fucked up in NOVEMBER 2014.

- failed on initial consensus protocol (november 2014);
- failed on open source vs closed source;
- failed on decentralization vs centralization (BOTH TECHNOLOGICAL AND EXECUTIVE)).

Some comments:

No, you promise custom block chains till the end of 2014 end you fucked up.

Think about it, that's crazy centralization, even bitcoin mining pools is better then Crypti's delegates.

Foundation's main problems: SLOW, CLOSED and CENTRALIZED.

I can even say now the qualaties of successfull crypto project: FAST, OPEN SOURCE AND DECENTRALIZED.

I bought Crypti yesterday because of the good development Team. What a good timing...

Agreed, bye MAX bye LISK... best of luck.

Now back to XCR related topics in the XCR thread.

Strange. I am forging again but approval didnt icrease...

That does make some sense..

I think this coin recovers pretty fast and you can make 10 btc out of one.

What was the reason for moving funds?

And spamming personal messages!

Even if thats true Crypti seems to have a (nearly) complete platform so there could be solutions.

Could somebody besides Aram Mojtabai  respond?

their wallet empty  

Is there a shortage of funds to continue development at this point in time?
Is the platform almost complete/complete and ready for mainstream adoption?

Theres lots of VC funding for projects like this. Take a look at Factom. Couldnt you sell some of your stakes to raise capital. I assume the Foundation members have large stakes in XCR.

And now you are registering fake accounts

Great work guys

public ipo wallet has 0 btc 

Max, you have your own thread, please, post your announces there.

Funds was moved from foundation acc to new foundation acc. Because votes moved, we will wote again, no worries