Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 255. (Read 804701 times)

okay, I can only hold up the price so long
That will be a welcome addition..

Trust me we are all working very hard to get you the windows node "1-click" installer... guys this isn't just a windows wallet

What these means is we need to make this run on every windows version out there... So while some of our windows nodes have worked well in windows 7... some have worked well in windows 8.1 and some have worked well in both.. each time we tweak this or that we must then cross test the new version on each system (x64 and x32)... We want this release to run smooth and have a great user experience for ever windows user out there.. So once again we just have a little more work to do on it... once we are finished our team will have created for you... a Windows backwards compatible fully functioning 1-click install and launch windows server node running on the Crypti network

People have been waiting too long, so devs need to make a wallet without bugs.
Need more Proof of Patience

Wednesday and no windows client? 

Link please

generate public address by passphrase

What do you mean?
BTC address is f(private key), Crypti address is f(private key). What is difference?
You can generate new address by new private key (passphrase) in an offline mode (and store the passphrase on a paper for example) and send coins to this address in online. It's same way as cold storage.

Why do you need to get access in offline mode? Do you want to see a history, balance, forged list and so or you want only generate public address by passphrase?

I don't think this is an issue where we want to necessarily hold a community vote, I do however understand where you are coming from. I wouldn't say we feel like the current logo is "bad", but we felt like we could do something more innovative or more professional that encompassed more of our long term image for Crypti. That being said, as we see the results, we have yet to see something that inspired us enough to want to change. So it may be that we are somewhat partial to the current logo as well.

We will see what we get from the 99designs contest and go from there.

Just for reference, he isn't a Board member or on the development team. It sounds like you are referencing him as part of the dev team.

Second, keep it moderately appropriate please. We don't need to attack each other and get so belligerent over differing opinions. He thinks it shouldn't be on BTT, you think it should, thats the brunt of the argument and doesn't really require that kind of conversation. You guys can just disagree and that's OK.

I am reading and taking into consideration both opinions.

As far as my opinion goes, we are pursuing all avenues to work on our design. We tried some designers we knew and a few we found online but didn't like the results, so we started the 99 designs contest. Right now it is running and we will see what kind of submissions we get and go from there.

What are we in sixth grade here? Come on, let's act like adults.. It's fine to exchange ideas and provide feedback.. But we don't need to call each other names..

Okay so let me, get this straight. You are saying that by not having a design contest hosted on Bitcointalk, Crypti's distribution may be flawed. Think about that for a second...

I'm the supposed "angry kid" here, yet you are the one throwing a fit after I argued against your suggestion. Is this just a case of pot calling the kettle black?

I've told you again and again, that you are looking at this from a market perspective, not from a design perspective.

yes before we go about changing the current logo. Let's have the community vote on such a measure. I think the current design looks fine and is kind of established.. When I think of Crypti, that logo is what I think of. I guess since it has been our trademark since the start of the project.
Regards,
Brian

everybody chill. No need to throw out the F bombs. Let's try to keep it somewhat clean when you're trying to convey your message

I would love the hear thou what is the reason to try and change the current logo, and what is the general direction you guys are after.

Yea, no need to argue...

I think its a right way also!

I can agree on notifying the community about the contest, But must warn that suggesting a logo in a contest ≠ getting involved necessarily. Also, I would suggest the board to ask for multiple professional opinions when choosing the logo based on the pre-defined values to convey (put some efforts in the brief), but keep the decision process to yourself.

rejected ideas/opinions might turn nice people into mad trolls sometimes That's why making the contest on 99 is a good idea, you have clear set of rules so no one gets too disappointed.

Thou feeling important participating in those kind of conversations. I feel the team is very professional with taking the right paths.

What are you on about? Firstly, I'm not part of the Crypti Foundation in any way or form, the fact that you think I am part of the foundation because I disagreed with your idea, and rated it as unprofessional or "shot it down" as you put it, shows your sentiment towards the rest of the actual Foundation.


Secondly you, yourself said that the design contest would be used an an avenue for exposure, then you implied that there is no volume on the markets by saying : "If you haven't noticed there is like 10 people trading this.", the fact that you are looking at this from a market perspective shows that you have no interest in the design process at all. I don't see how a simple design contest leads to :


Thirdly have you seen any of the design contests threads? I'm a designer myself, though no longer freelance, and if you look at those type of threads most of the entries are simply atrocious. Any coin which has to resort to posting logo design contests on a crypto-currency forum screams unprofessional-ism, did you ever see coins such as Ethereum, MaidSafe, BitSharesX ever posting logo design contests? To date the only "successful" design contest that I've seen has been the strict NEM Logo Committee threads, and even there, the chosen NEM logo was designed by an internal full-time designer. There is only one real designer of note on BCT, that being BitCrea.

All of your arguments lead back to one place, price and volume. If you actually cared about the design process you would let professionals with backgrounds in design be entrusted with the logo of a major crypto-currency, rather than MS Paint junkies looking to score a quick buck from bounties.

But hey, if you want to resort to swearing and insults to get your point across, if I'm the AIDS of cryptoccurrencies, then you are Ebola.

No. nothing like that. just use the existing UI and warp it up as a downloadable version. simple as that.
Right now I have to have a connection to get the wallet interface. but I wish to get access to that interface even when I'm not online to see my address.
Other parts of the interface should notify me if I don't have an active connection anyway..

So the reason behind hosting a logo design competition is to gain exposure, and in turn boost volume? Honestly...

Secondly notice you say that we are on a "cryptoforum", not a design community. Tell me which community you think will provide better designs, a crypto-currency forum or a design community tailor made for freelance design contests?

P.S. If you didn't notice there was a 54 BTC Volume spike yesterday, on average the daily volume is between 6-15 BTC and the price has been held constant between 1400 & 1700 Satoshis, the past few weeks. I don't see any problem there considering that most of Crypti's features haven't even been implemented yet.

I fail to see how it hurts to include the community in this? We are on a cryptoforum and this is a cryptocurrency.
"Oh no let's not get more exposure! It's so bad!" If you haven't noticed there is like 10 people trading this.