[XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 300.

Litoshi

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors

Quote from: Vega on September 02, 2014, 10:30:59 AM

Quote from: Litoshi on September 02, 2014, 10:24:31 AM

As of today, XCR would benefit from being in SuperNet..... so since we need them more than they need us, we are not in a good negotiating position.

When XCR's features are fully implemented, we will be in a much better negotiating position, and they will need us more than we need them.

If I understand SuperNet correctly they don't have different demands for different coins. The only demand is that they want to buy 10% of the coin supply at the current price (this is why negotiations have to be a secret, to prevent price jump).

So there are no real details to be negotiated that would be different for a coin in it's infancy and an established one.

Two simple questions for all you SuperNet supporters:

1) What can SuperNet do for XCR that XCR cannot do for itself?

2) What is SuperNet EXACTLY??

Vega

hero member

Activity: 739

Merit: 500

Quote from: Litoshi on September 02, 2014, 10:24:31 AM

As of today, XCR would benefit from being in SuperNet..... so since we need them more than they need us, we are not in a good negotiating position.

When XCR's features are fully implemented, we will be in a much better negotiating position, and they will need us more than we need them.

If I understand SuperNet correctly they don't have different demands for different coins. The only demand is that they want to buy 10% of the coin supply at the current price (this is why negotiations have to be a secret, to prevent price jump).

So there are no real details to be negotiated that would be different for a coin in it's infancy and an established one.

Litoshi

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors

Quote from: Vega on September 02, 2014, 10:21:27 AM

Quote from: rabbiter on September 02, 2014, 10:00:54 AM

Another week passes without the source code being checked as promised by the developer.

Trust me people it's never going to happen.

A whole week. OMG!! We are all doomed.
Do you seriously not have anything better to do?

No he doesn't. He is too young to drive; too ugly to have a girlfriend; The FireWall of China blocks his porn; and he needs source code so he can launch his clone coin IPO.

Kevinrasf

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: crypti on September 02, 2014, 10:19:38 AM

News

We started 0.1.6t in testnet: http://testing.crypti.me

It's on review by our QA now.
I hope later today all functional will be tested and we will post new version.
It's working on micro instance (1 vCPU, 600 MB RAM).

I sent my id and another info to coinssource to confirm my person and add crypti to trust rating.

Great! thank you for the update!

Litoshi

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors

Quote from: grandpa_seth on September 02, 2014, 09:57:05 AM

I'm sure Crypti devs have their own opinion of Supernet. I trust their opinion about whether Crypti should or should not because they have a vision and invented the damn thing. However, my opinion is I am not a fan of Supernet for Crypti. Plus I don't wish Crypti to go down with the ship on one of James' ideas. Supernet might work out for other coins but I agree that Crypti has the ambition to be our own Supernet.

SuperNet or not should be the decision of the Foundation with the input of the community and the devs.

Thats why the devs have decided that XCR would be owned by the Crypti Foundation.

Once the Foundation is established, there should be a posting before a meeting with the agenda to be discussed, so that the community can add their input.

As for SuperNet...... My strategy in my lifetime of running a business, was to let the competition worry about me, not me worry about them. Also, to offer a superior product and superior customer service.

As of today, XCR would benefit from being in SuperNet..... so since we need them more than they need us, we are not in a good negotiating position.

When XCR's features are fully implemented, we will be in a much better negotiating position, and they will need us more than we need them.

Vega

hero member

Activity: 739

Merit: 500

Quote from: rabbiter on September 02, 2014, 10:00:54 AM

Another week passes without the source code being checked as promised by the developer.

Trust me people it's never going to happen.

A whole week. OMG!! We are all doomed.
Do you seriously not have anything better to do?

crypti

hero member

Activity: 511

Merit: 500

Boris, Crypti Lead Developer, Lisk Advisor

News

We started 0.1.6t in testnet: http://testing.crypti.me

It's on review by our QA now.
I hope later today all functional will be tested and we will post new version.
It's working on micro instance (1 vCPU, 600 MB RAM).

I sent my id and another info to coinssource to confirm my person and add crypti to trust rating.

CoinHolder

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on September 02, 2014, 09:59:40 AM

Crypti + SuperNet = 99% assured nice jump in price.

That is all ladies.

Short term or long term?

rabbiter

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Another week passes without the source code being checked as promised by the developer.

Trust me people it's never going to happen.

ShroomsKit_Disgrace

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!

Crypti + SuperNet = 99% assured nice jump in price.

That is all ladies.

grandpa_seth

sr. member

Activity: 316

Merit: 250

Simcoin Puny Humans Communicator

I'm sure Crypti devs have their own opinion of Supernet. I trust their opinion about whether Crypti should or should not because they have a vision and invented the damn thing. However, my opinion is I am not a fan of Supernet for Crypti. Plus I don't wish Crypti to go down with the ship on one of James' ideas. Supernet might work out for other coins but I agree that Crypti has the ambition to be our own Supernet.

CoinHolder

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Wulfcastle on September 02, 2014, 09:17:38 AM

Why does everyone want to be added to SuperNet? I posted earlier about this below :

Quote

Basically all jl777 wants to do is get features from other coins, which BTCD, doesn't have and use them to BTCD's advantage. I don't see the point in helping out another coin establish it's own network, with the use of our features, when it only benefits them. Why should Crypti really "ask" to be put into a network that doesn't benefit us in any way.

With that being said, I'm wholly for the idea of a Storj & Crypti partnership as GreXX mentioned a few pages back. Why? Becuase Storj will be utilizing our network and providing a service for Crypti users. They could create an App with Crypti's custom blockchain to enable use of MetaDisk and DriveShare on the Crypti network. This is a mutually beneficial partnership. Supernet on the other hand wants all coins to bend over and provide features for the hub of the network which is BTCD.

Crypti with custom blockchains support, can be it's own Supernet, which is why I don't see the point of becoming part of an inferior network.

Agree SuperNET is good for "small" coins, but I think Crypti is too big for this project.

Vega

hero member

Activity: 739

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wulfcastle on September 02, 2014, 09:17:38 AM

Why does everyone want to be added to SuperNet? I posted earlier about this below :

Because you were wrong then, and you are wrong now.

Edit: Because I'm sure you are going to ask why.
I'm not getting into the technical advantages as it's not clear yet. But one thing is sure. SuperNET doesn't take anything away from a coint it can only add to it.

The most imediate benefit would be to be added as one of the first coins is exposure, and with it huge price jump.

Wulfcastle

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Why does everyone want to be added to SuperNet? I posted earlier about this below :

Quote

Basically all jl777 wants to do is get features from other coins, which BTCD, doesn't have and use them to BTCD's advantage. I don't see the point in helping out another coin establish it's own network, with the use of our features, when it only benefits them. Why should Crypti really "ask" to be put into a network that doesn't benefit us in any way.

With that being said, I'm wholly for the idea of a Storj & Crypti partnership as GreXX mentioned a few pages back. Why? Becuase Storj will be utilizing our network and providing a service for Crypti users. They could create an App with Crypti's custom blockchain to enable use of MetaDisk and DriveShare on the Crypti network. This is a mutually beneficial partnership. Supernet on the other hand wants all coins to bend over and provide features for the hub of the network which is BTCD.

Crypti with custom blockchains support, can be it's own Supernet, which is why I don't see the point of becoming part of an inferior network.

Kevinrasf

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on September 02, 2014, 04:38:50 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I spoke some to jl777 about SuperNet and will forward info about it to devteam

Would be nice if crypti joins SuperNet. It would be a win-win situation.

Indeed, all the positive attention we can get is a +

ShroomsKit_Disgrace

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!

Quote from: ?? on ??

I spoke some to jl777 about SuperNet and will forward info about it to devteam

Would be nice if crypti joins SuperNet. It would be a win-win situation.

jiuge

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: SyRenity on September 01, 2014, 02:26:48 PM

Quote from: PondSea on August 31, 2014, 11:10:42 PM

Would there likely be working windows wallet in a weeks time?

We had some pause due to 0.1.6, now switching back to it in order to finalize the Windows compilation issues.

On another news, we are intensively interviewing developers now, and looking to hire the first full time help as soon as possible.
Our job requirements are pretty specific though, hence its taking some time to find the right people:
http://brainstorage.me/jobs/22455
(in Russian, however you can easily translate it via Google Translate)

If you have any Russian friends who might be the possible candidates - please forward them to this post!

Tweeted this. I feel it's essential to get more developers onboard, I feel you guys will have some busy days for sure Wink

It is a pity I am not in Russia. Cry

S3MKi

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1016

Quote from: SyRenity on September 01, 2014, 02:26:48 PM

Our job requirements are pretty specific though, hence its taking some time to find the right people:
http://brainstorage.me/jobs/22455
(in Russian, however you can easily translate it via Google Translate)

If you have any Russian friends who might be the possible candidates - please forward them to this post!

maybe Come-from-Beyond can help you https://nxtforum.org

canej

full member

Activity: 278

Merit: 100

Quote from: SyRenity on September 01, 2014, 02:33:42 PM

Quote from: canej on September 01, 2014, 02:25:53 PM

PLEASE PLEASE make sure the upgrade is well documented for us not so technical linux users. Dont mind reading a document.

Looking forward to v0.1.6

If you use the version directly, you will just need to replace the application files.
In Docker case, it also would be just a matter of pulling the latest version, instructions will be posted.

We will also check if we can add a section to existing installation document.

AWESOME! thank you

altcoin4u

member

Activity: 159

Merit: 10

Quote from: GreXX on September 01, 2014, 03:07:25 PM

Roadmap updated with descriptions. Let me know what you think.

http://blog.crypti.me/crypti-development-roadmap/

XML Parsing Error: unexpected parser state Location: jar:file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Mozilla%20Firefox/omni.ja!/chrome/toolkit/content/global/netError.xhtml Line Number 304, Column 68:

Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 300. (Read 804700 times)