I hope you like it as much as I do!
Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 42. (Read 804673 times)
October 03, 2015, 03:43:01 PM
Okay guys, we are still in the board meeting. But we already decided that we will make the Crypti v0.3.2 core open source next week!
I hope you like it as much as I do!
I hope you like it as much as I do!
October 03, 2015, 12:26:59 PM
We have a strong consensus in the Foundation to open source the code, and realize the need at this point to release it now that we are ready for developers to begin writing and testing dapps.
It's a milestone for all crypti supporters
October 03, 2015, 11:56:20 AM
We have a strong consensus in the Foundation to open source the code, and realize the need at this point to release it now that we are ready for developers to begin writing and testing dapps.
October 03, 2015, 10:24:36 AM
Main difference - still closed source? 
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
Early in the thread it was said that Crypti source would be released quarterly. It's been over a year though.
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
Got some cheap on Cryptsy, but considering just dumping it cause Crypsty wallet is constantly borked, and I don't want to install closed source shit on my comps anyway.
Hey Crypti, what's yours comments on jwinterm shit ?
Main reason why didn't opened source it, because someone of our team worried about new scam forks and someone worried about bugs in code.
Last months we see that it's problem, and because we (Max, Me, Olivier) agreed that it need to be open source asap. We still need to close it with other foundation members, i think we will do it on this weekly meeting.
Quote
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
We on exchanges last year, no one exchanges said that we contain malware lol, if you mean this.
To give a few more insights:
Every Saturday we have a foundation board meeting, that means today. We will discuss this matter today and will post our decision on Monday. Like Boris above said, some of us know very well that we need to open source it ASAP.
About Cryptsy, we said multiple times to not use it. It's not on our website anymore and the OP say it as well. Recently we made some success in this area, so let's hope they will soon fix their wallets.
I think you must go opensource. By the way, all my BTC invested in Crypti.
Even if there will appear some shitforks, you'll get something much more valuable - new developers, which, I think, will work for free/fun.
October 03, 2015, 05:40:11 AM
Main difference - still closed source?
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
Early in the thread it was said that Crypti source would be released quarterly. It's been over a year though.
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
Got some cheap on Cryptsy, but considering just dumping it cause Crypsty wallet is constantly borked, and I don't want to install closed source shit on my comps anyway.
Hey Crypti, what's yours comments on jwinterm shit ?
Main reason why didn't opened source it, because someone of our team worried about new scam forks and someone worried about bugs in code.
Last months we see that it's problem, and because we (Max, Me, Olivier) agreed that it need to be open source asap. We still need to close it with other foundation members, i think we will do it on this weekly meeting.
Quote
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
We on exchanges last year, no one exchanges said that we contain malware lol, if you mean this.
To give a few more insights:
Every Saturday we have a foundation board meeting, that means today. We will discuss this matter today and will post our decision on Monday. Like Boris above said, some of us know very well that we need to open source it ASAP.
About Cryptsy, we said multiple times to not use it. It's not on our website anymore and the OP say it as well. Recently we made some success in this area, so let's hope they will soon fix their wallets.
October 03, 2015, 05:25:34 AM
Main difference - still closed source?
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
Early in the thread it was said that Crypti source would be released quarterly. It's been over a year though.
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
Got some cheap on Cryptsy, but considering just dumping it cause Crypsty wallet is constantly borked, and I don't want to install closed source shit on my comps anyway.
Hey Crypti, what's yours comments on jwinterm shit ?
Main reason why didn't opened source it, because someone of our team worried about new scam forks and someone worried about bugs in code.
Last months we see that it's problem, and because we (Max, Me, Olivier) agreed that it need to be open source asap. We still need to close it with other foundation members, i think we will do it on this weekly meeting.
Quote
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
We on exchanges last year, no one exchanges said that we contain malware lol, if you mean this.
October 03, 2015, 03:58:51 AM
Main difference - still closed source?
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
Early in the thread it was said that Crypti source would be released quarterly. It's been over a year though.
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
Got some cheap on Cryptsy, but considering just dumping it cause Crypsty wallet is constantly borked, and I don't want to install closed source shit on my comps anyway.
Hey Crypti, what's yours comments on jwinterm shit ?
October 02, 2015, 10:58:42 PM
Main difference - still closed source?
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
Early in the thread it was said that Crypti source would be released quarterly. It's been over a year though.
Is there any quotes from Cryptsy or Poloniex people saying they've reviewed the source code? Or do they just run it in a VM and don't give a fuck?
Got some cheap on Cryptsy, but considering just dumping it cause Crypsty wallet is constantly borked, and I don't want to install closed source shit on my comps anyway.
October 02, 2015, 08:13:02 PM
Main difference - still closed source?
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
Early in the thread it was said that Crypti source would be released quarterly. It's been over a year though.
October 02, 2015, 03:26:59 PM
Posted by Max. Crypti PR can't post images yet.
This will not last long.
Why
October 02, 2015, 03:00:03 PM
Posted by Max. Crypti PR can't post images yet.
This will not last long.
October 02, 2015, 03:42:46 AM
Ratnet please setup your delegate node, else I will remove my votes again. Thank you.
Other users were downvoting you.
Other users were downvoting you.
October 01, 2015, 04:00:41 PM
Posted by Max. Crypti PR can't post images yet.
October 01, 2015, 10:42:17 AM
Main difference - still closed source?
Yep. But this difference won't hold for long.
October 01, 2015, 10:17:32 AM
Posted by Max. Crypti PR can't post images yet.
October 01, 2015, 10:02:41 AM
Our press release on CoinDesk just got published.
Crypti Foundation Releases Open Beta of Decentralized Application (Dapp) Platform
Crypti Foundation Releases Open Beta of Decentralized Application (Dapp) Platform
October 01, 2015, 07:29:46 AM
Great release, will check soon! Great things to come
Great things to come September 30, 2015, 01:29:47 PM
Crypti v0.5.0 Open Beta Test
Hello Testers,
Today marks the beginning of the open testing period for Gaia, also known as Crypti 0.5.0.
This blog post collects all the information you need to thoroughly test Crypti v0.5.0 during this period. If you think something is missing, please contact us and we will add it as soon as possible. In the case you need testnet XCR for the Foundations testnet, please ask!
Get all necessary information on our blog
Hello Testers,
Today marks the beginning of the open testing period for Gaia, also known as Crypti 0.5.0.
This blog post collects all the information you need to thoroughly test Crypti v0.5.0 during this period. If you think something is missing, please contact us and we will add it as soon as possible. In the case you need testnet XCR for the Foundations testnet, please ask!
Get all necessary information on our blog
September 30, 2015, 01:27:38 PM
An Introduction to Gaia, Crypti v0.5.0
Hello Crypti Community,
Following yesterdays announcement we would like to provide you with a little more information regarding Crypti v0.5.0, also known as Gaia.
Gaia is our next big update featuring the long awaited decentralized application platform, together with a Dapp Store, M-of-N multi-signature accounts and countless backend and frontend improvements. Plus some smaller incremental improvements including: loading bars, background blockchain loading (for delegates at launch) and dramatic speed improvements.
Visit the blog post for much more information
Hello Crypti Community,
Following yesterdays announcement we would like to provide you with a little more information regarding Crypti v0.5.0, also known as Gaia.
Gaia is our next big update featuring the long awaited decentralized application platform, together with a Dapp Store, M-of-N multi-signature accounts and countless backend and frontend improvements. Plus some smaller incremental improvements including: loading bars, background blockchain loading (for delegates at launch) and dramatic speed improvements.
Visit the blog post for much more information
September 30, 2015, 12:23:39 PM
I see XCR's advantages, and I think XCR is undervalued now and your team is really doing things, and only got 750BTC funding, much less than Ethereum, this world is not fair, especially for your case. 
I agree on all your points.
Jump to: