[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1239.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: sfc on June 14, 2014, 01:25:24 PM

Team, please setup an official donation adress for the bounty that will be paid to anyone finding the sender adress. I think, we should make it much more than 1 BTC to attract more ppl with the potential to crack it. I guess there are a lot of people willing to donate including me.

I can donate 100 XCs no prob

silverkinguk

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

Charlie Chaplin post the address stop goofing around

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: synechist on June 14, 2014, 01:36:52 PM

Quote from: hoertest on June 14, 2014, 01:30:43 PM

Quote from: sfc on June 14, 2014, 01:25:24 PM

Team, please setup an official donation adress for the bounty that will be paid to anyone finding the sender adress. I think, we should make it much more than 1 BTC to attract more ppl with the potential to crack it. I guess there are a lot of people willing to donate including me.

the big one should be left for rev2 the final product when its no longer about bug fixing but more as a promo gig, synechist will probably already have it planned,

synechist please leave chaep behind and concentrate on promotion, not worth the effort i hope everybody knows that by now.

Yes, I think the issue has now been laid to rest.

I felt it was worthwhile to work out exactly what Chaeplin had done and to explain it in plain English sentences, so that anyone with the patience to digest them can understand the case. Now that that's been done (and in the absence of a retort of some substance from Chaeplin), there's no further reason for the community to wonder about it. It's properly behind us now.

On to the next!

which logo won the contest? and when will the source code include the new logo?

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: hoertest on June 14, 2014, 01:30:43 PM

Quote from: sfc on June 14, 2014, 01:25:24 PM

Team, please setup an official donation adress for the bounty that will be paid to anyone finding the sender adress. I think, we should make it much more than 1 BTC to attract more ppl with the potential to crack it. I guess there are a lot of people willing to donate including me.

the big one should be left for rev2 the final product when its no longer about bug fixing but more as a promo gig, synechist will probably already have it planned,

synechist please leave chaep behind and concentrate on promotion, not worth the effort i hope everybody knows that by now.

Yes, I think the issue has now been laid to rest.

I felt it was worthwhile to work out exactly what Chaeplin had done and to explain it in plain English sentences, so that anyone with the patience to digest them can understand the case. Now that that's been done (and in the absence of a retort of some substance from Chaeplin), there's no further reason for the community to wonder about it. It's properly behind us now.

On to the next!

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sfc on June 14, 2014, 01:25:24 PM

Team, please setup an official donation adress for the bounty that will be paid to anyone finding the sender adress. I think, we should make it much more than 1 BTC to attract more ppl with the potential to crack it. I guess there are a lot of people willing to donate including me.

the big one should be left for rev2 the final product when its no longer about bug fixing but more as a promo gig, synechist will probably already have it planned,

synechist please leave chaep behind and concentrate on promotion, not worth the effort i hope everybody knows that by now.

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

I am actually frustrated that you guys give chaeplin more attention, get over him already, dev releases v1.5 with bounty, more people will want to taste the bounty, just share and spam the bounty out in the open. You think a serious coder will turn down 600$ for a couple of hours work?

PS: Teka plz DO moderate the thread in a strict manner, the next two days are going to be really busy, people will try to FUD like hell with hours passing by and no1 claiming the bounty.

sfc

member

Activity: 134

Merit: 10

Affirmative! But we could already start collecting. that would be a nice teaser.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: sfc on June 14, 2014, 01:25:24 PM

Team, please setup an official donation adress for the bounty that will be paid to anyone finding the sender adress. I think, we should make it much more than 1 BTC to attract more ppl with the potential to crack it. I guess there are a lot of people willing to donate including me.

Lets get REV1.5 out the door, and then we can do this

sfc

member

Activity: 134

Merit: 10

Team, please setup an official donation adress for the bounty that will be paid to anyone finding the sender adress. I think, we should make it much more than 1 BTC to attract more ppl with the potential to crack it. I guess there are a lot of people willing to donate including me.

ssmc2

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1040

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:29:09 PM

Quote from: pookielax31 on June 14, 2014, 12:27:00 PM

ATC.... are we gonna see a Rev 1.5 wallet release today?

Most likely tomorrow night

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:58:11 PM

the bounty is out there for anybody to claim... 1 BTC

+1

When is REV 1.5 releasing to public?

jasinlee

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3

I have dealt with contractors from India just like this, take a job they cannot finish or even understand. Turn in code that makes no sense and is no where close to the guidelines set forth. Then getting mad when you tell them the work isnt correct and you will not pay them for it.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

the bounty is out there for anybody to claim... 1 BTC

BrewCrewFan

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 501

Quote from: mr_random on June 14, 2014, 12:51:49 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 14, 2014, 12:15:15 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:08:55 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 12:05:20 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:03:08 PM

SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.

Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!

Can you deny this ?
Is not single entity ?

This is your a Xnode address.

So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program

I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up..

As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there...

chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left...

Chaeplin is actually a very sneaky and cunning individual.

He posts irrelevant shit and acts like he doesn't understand. But he knows exactly wtf he is doing.

Why the fuck he keeps harping back to old versions of XC is beyond me. He's a FUDster with technical knowledge - the worst kind, because only a handful of regular posters understand the protocol well enough to challenge him.

Atcsecure has posted the challenge for the newest version of XC. By all means anyone is invited to try and crack it.

Winner winner of the steak dinner.

ethereal73

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: flashbit on June 14, 2014, 12:49:03 PM

Quote from: ethereal73 on June 14, 2014, 12:43:53 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:18:32 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 12:17:00 PM

Quote from: ethereal73 on June 14, 2014, 12:12:56 PM

What is the senders address, and how did you produce it?
I followed the idea GMaxwell provided in your link, but didnt get the senders address, but i'm pretty new to this stuff could mis a a thing or two.
I believe a senders address could be posted in euh.... just provide the senders address, nothing more!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7261379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7261411
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7266886

WTF is that?

as I said, POST THE address's

Sorry Cheaplin, i will back you up when people are starting attacks on a personal level.
i will NOT back you up a technical way, the question is easy, provide the senders addresss.
What i see are a view links to a view topics, thats not what is asked for.
just post the senders address, no links, nothing, plain and simple the senders address.

I think Cheaplin's silence is telling. Nothing more to add.

As far as i can see, ATCSecure has provided a great job here.
And it looks like Chaeplin can't figure out the address.

Chaeplin has actually 3 choices.
1. Post the address, and only the address.
2. Ask for more time to investigate, and i think ATCSecure will provide a day more without a problem.
3. Or admit he can't find the Address. (silence is also admitting)

Just my 2 XCents

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: fourdegrees11 on June 14, 2014, 12:26:40 PM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 14, 2014, 12:15:15 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:08:55 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 12:05:20 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:03:08 PM

SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.

Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!

Can you deny this ?
Is not single entity ?

This is your a Xnode address.

So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program

I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up..

As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there...

chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left...

This.

He continuously blows off what ATCsecure says and then posts the same garbage. How is this helping?

^ this. anyone complimenting chaeplin needs to see all his repeat spams in both DRK and XC Uncensored threads of issues that have already been properly answered by atcsecure. Chaeplin is not trying to help XC but trying to spread FUD. That much is clear.

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 14, 2014, 12:15:15 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:08:55 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 12:05:20 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:03:08 PM

SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.

Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!

Can you deny this ?
Is not single entity ?

This is your a Xnode address.

So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program

I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up..

As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there...

chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left...

Chaeplin is actually a very sneaky and cunning individual.

He posts irrelevant shit and acts like he doesn't understand. But he knows exactly wtf he is doing.

Why the fuck he keeps harping back to old versions of XC is beyond me. He's a FUDster with technical knowledge - the worst kind, because only a handful of regular posters understand the protocol well enough to challenge him.

Atcsecure has posted the challenge for the newest version of XC. By all means anyone is invited to try and crack it.

flashbit

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 505

Quote from: ethereal73 on June 14, 2014, 12:43:53 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:18:32 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 12:17:00 PM

Quote from: ethereal73 on June 14, 2014, 12:12:56 PM

What is the senders address, and how did you produce it?
I followed the idea GMaxwell provided in your link, but didnt get the senders address, but i'm pretty new to this stuff could mis a a thing or two.
I believe a senders address could be posted in euh.... just provide the senders address, nothing more!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7261379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7261411
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7266886

WTF is that?

as I said, POST THE address's

Sorry Cheaplin, i will back you up when people are starting attacks on a personal level.
i will NOT back you up a technical way, the question is easy, provide the senders addresss.
What i see are a view links to a view topics, thats not what is asked for.
just post the senders address, no links, nothing, plain and simple the senders address.

I think Cheaplin's silence is telling. Nothing more to add.

ethereal73

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: atcsecure on June 14, 2014, 12:18:32 PM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 14, 2014, 12:17:00 PM

Quote from: ethereal73 on June 14, 2014, 12:12:56 PM

What is the senders address, and how did you produce it?
I followed the idea GMaxwell provided in your link, but didnt get the senders address, but i'm pretty new to this stuff could mis a a thing or two.
I believe a senders address could be posted in euh.... just provide the senders address, nothing more!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7261379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7261411
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7266886

WTF is that?

as I said, POST THE address's

Sorry Cheaplin, i will back you up when people are starting attacks on a personal level.
i will NOT back you up a technical way, the question is easy, provide the senders addresss.
What i see are a view links to a view topics, thats not what is asked for.
just post the senders address, no links, nothing, plain and simple the senders address.

flashbit

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 505

Lol not a good sign - the 6 hr bitcoinwisdom chart is showing the dragon now spewing fire. The chart is mad. Who knows where this will go now.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1239. (Read 1484248 times)