[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1269.

phosphorush

hero member

Activity: 503

Merit: 500

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 12, 2014, 07:37:42 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 12, 2014, 07:35:10 AM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 07:26:41 AM

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

I agree. This a problem when the bounty is only 100XC.
It's maybe not enough to get serious analysis from multiple people

Does anyone have ANY link where DRK offered a bounty to prove their anon work?? Anyone? Bueller?

they do not have anon Cheesy

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 12, 2014, 07:37:42 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 12, 2014, 07:35:10 AM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 07:26:41 AM

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

I agree. This a problem when the bounty is only 100XC.
It's maybe not enough to get serious analysis from multiple people

Does anyone have ANY link where DRK offered a bounty to prove their anon work?? Anyone? Bueller?

+1 why is it always here we are expected to do these things, its totally ridiculous... DRK fudders posing as serious interested investors, that is why...

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: evtrmm on June 12, 2014, 07:36:48 AM

sukottosan_d ,
I am rather sure this is being looked at.
this is still under development, and is nowhere near a final product. The concerns that are raised ARE valid.

I do not believe ATC has been on since this was posted, and I am sure he will address it. BUT, I would rather him not sit and argue all day and just get back to the task.

Yesterday, hard link provided.
Dev refused it.

phosphorush

hero member

Activity: 503

Merit: 500

Quote from: adhitthana on June 12, 2014, 07:35:10 AM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 07:26:41 AM

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

I agree. This a problem when the bounty is only 100XC.
It's maybe not enough to get serious analysis from multiple people

+1

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: adhitthana on June 12, 2014, 07:35:10 AM

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 07:26:41 AM

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

I agree. This a problem when the bounty is only 100XC.
It's maybe not enough to get serious analysis from multiple people

Does anyone have ANY link where DRK offered a bounty to prove their anon work?? Anyone? Bueller?

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

sukottosan_d ,
I am rather sure this is being looked at.
this is still under development, and is nowhere near a final product. The concerns that are raised ARE valid.

I do not believe ATC has been on since this was posted, and I am sure he will address it. BUT, I would rather him not sit and argue all day and just get back to the task.

adhitthana

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 07:26:41 AM

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

I agree. This a problem when the bounty is only 100XC.
It's maybe not enough to get serious analysis from multiple people

benthach

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1000

Quote

Ask him if he will be to identify this
1. When he is not GIVEN all the needed info
And
2. When there is more than 1 xnode transaction occurring in the same block...... what if all transactions were handled xnode transactions

i bet not more then 10 xnodes is working correct and running right now. it is hard to know if this thing is working even myself is a very tech guy. i also believed not many people know how to use debug command and send anonomous right now so that might be the reason most xnodes sitting for days with no transaction. it would be convenience and easy if we have click check button to send anonymous transaction, just like unlock and check button for staking.

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 07:26:41 AM

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

ATCSecure has responded NUMEROUS times that by rev 2 with multi-path, this is a non-issue. Why should he waste any more time on a pattern matcher when this exact problem won't be a problem any more?

sukottosan_d

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: evtrmm on June 12, 2014, 07:13:47 AM

Quote from: roede94105 on June 12, 2014, 06:50:03 AM

What about this?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 12, 2014, 03:49:38 AM

Ref:

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 08:34:25 AM

Mixer Test using v1.42

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

Code:

Hash7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f
Appeared inX11Coin 28533 (2014-06-11 13:25:09)
Number of inputs2 (Jump to inputs)
Total in10
Number of outputs1 (Jump to outputs)
Total out9.99999
Size345 bytes
Fee0.00001
Raw transaction

Inputs

Index	Previous output	Amount	From address	ScriptSig
0	235b7cba7a...:1	8.329413	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	73:3046...e501 33:03f5...9f33
1	2b46b1f30d...:1	1.670587	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	72:3045...3501 33:03f5...9f33
Outputs

Index	Redeemed at input	Amount	To address	ScriptPubKey
0	Not yet redeemed	9.99999	XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D	DUP HASH160 20:788b...2bb6 EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG

* block : 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D : 9.99999

* Search through pattern

Code:

user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./run.py 28500 28590
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached

* ====> Working block height 28531 has 4 tx
	* ====> Searchng XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 10.0
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28533 : diff : 2
				*===> XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D 9.99999 link is : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa <----> XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb

* ====> Working block height 28587 has 5 tx
	* ====> Searchng XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 0.15
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28590 : diff : 3
				*===> XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz 0.14999 link is : XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 <----> XMDDFuadQFGas9Zn8nTMVFFGz9hUc7Jteo

Possible candidate in 28531

Code:

Hash7315a0968d1aa71e01031583446625bde7189bee1642d3c85737a537d7480778
Previous Blockc2ef588b1680c5498151345eacc4a3c363d77d802aff45674a597c3bdbfac00f
Next Block7e5eeaeecda5745b32be824e5da54a9a95b5b350126a216bf5499c0f6e5fa2c9
Height28531
Version4
Transaction Merkle Roote9c293aa46b5f2bc684349e6b4accbbb196f36b04742e26d2df53811a2a9fdfd
Time1402492966 (2014-06-11 13:22:46)
Difficulty0.000 (Bits: 1e047c41)
Cumulative Difficulty11 973 042.889
Nonce0
Transactions4
Value out2070.657277
Transaction Fees-1.62137
Average Coin Age9.27782 days
Coin-days Destroyed17767.243184
Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed62.9868%

Transactions

Transaction	Fee	Size (kB)	From (amount)	To (amount)
c6d0da399b...	0	0.077	Generation: 1.62137 + -1.62137 total fees	Unknown: 0
dcd8718986...	-1.62139	0.258	XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 1993.671236
Unknown: 0
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.64
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.652626
2c3d8fcfa4...	0.00001	0.229	XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R: 40.99999
XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 6.635299
633fe22002...	0.00001	0.23	XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XZ2zsBE5oqTciM5bkWtPajqqjQKHNv8Cip: 30.99997
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 3.364701

* multiple tx pattern to same destination

* address never used before 28531
* input value matched.

from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa.

* coin flow :
BLOCK 28531
from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
-->
BLOCK 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

: SENDER : XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R
: MIXER INPUT : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa / never used before
: MIXER OUTPUT : XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
: PAYEE : XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

If outputs of address XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa and XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb are
spent as an input for a transaction, Mixer identified.
Link from wallet B to wallet C is identified

As XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa is nerver used before, check XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa's tx.

http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa

Code:


Transaction	Block	Approx. Time	Amount	Balance	Currency
2c3d8fcfa4...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	6.635299	6.635299	XC
633fe22002...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	3.364701	10	XC
0d227a1fcf...	28540	2014-06-11 13:39:49	0.003	10.003	XC
07957c70d0...	28555	2014-06-11 14:03:57	0.001	10.004	XC
dd438f2fbd...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.003)	10.001	XC
fe5ad7f573...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.001)	10	XC
36e6e4f1bb...	28646	2014-06-11 17:08:27	(3.364701)	6.635299	XC
d24770a89a...	28653	2014-06-11 17:20:52	(6.635299)	0	XC
8e708043fa...	28847	2014-06-11 22:52:01	0.0001	0.0001	XC

Block 28645 has hard link.

http://cryptexplorer.com/block/4255ac4c5e93fa1769f58312d76338779229424538357dc4cf00a07fc1aafb74

* Hard Link is real.

Ask him if he will be to identify this
1. When he is not GIVEN all the needed info
And
2. When there is more than 1 xnode transaction occurring in the same block...... what if all transactions were handled xnode transactions

You guys should look at this seriously. I think it can be fixed relatively easily - but if it's ignored it could be a problem for you later.
Chaeplin spent a bunch of time working through every detail to get you a step by step description of the issue.
And no one is responding seriously, no one has given a counter analysis - that is not a good sign for investors.
Can someone show where chaeplin's analysis is flawed? No one has directly responded at any point. Quote a post - draw lines...whatever you need to do.

I came to the same conclusion as him after reviewing a series of transactions yesterday - but it was annoying and took me a long time. If this isn't an issue - can someone just point out where? Or create a counter-example? If you want to be taken seriously - I'm pretty sure it's important and shouldn't be brushed off like it's nothing.

I don't know how you can call it FUD and ignore it......he walked you through the problem.
If you don't understand it...fine - let someone who does argue a counter-analysis. Don't just call it FUD because you don't understand what is going on.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: roede94105 on June 12, 2014, 06:50:03 AM

What about this?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 12, 2014, 03:49:38 AM

Ref:

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 08:34:25 AM

Mixer Test using v1.42

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

Code:

Hash7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f
Appeared inX11Coin 28533 (2014-06-11 13:25:09)
Number of inputs2 (Jump to inputs)
Total in10
Number of outputs1 (Jump to outputs)
Total out9.99999
Size345 bytes
Fee0.00001
Raw transaction

Inputs

Index	Previous output	Amount	From address	ScriptSig
0	235b7cba7a...:1	8.329413	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	73:3046...e501 33:03f5...9f33
1	2b46b1f30d...:1	1.670587	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	72:3045...3501 33:03f5...9f33
Outputs

Index	Redeemed at input	Amount	To address	ScriptPubKey
0	Not yet redeemed	9.99999	XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D	DUP HASH160 20:788b...2bb6 EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG

* block : 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D : 9.99999

* Search through pattern

Code:

user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./run.py 28500 28590
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached

* ====> Working block height 28531 has 4 tx
	* ====> Searchng XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 10.0
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28533 : diff : 2
				*===> XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D 9.99999 link is : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa <----> XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb

* ====> Working block height 28587 has 5 tx
	* ====> Searchng XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 0.15
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28590 : diff : 3
				*===> XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz 0.14999 link is : XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 <----> XMDDFuadQFGas9Zn8nTMVFFGz9hUc7Jteo

Possible candidate in 28531

Code:

Hash7315a0968d1aa71e01031583446625bde7189bee1642d3c85737a537d7480778
Previous Blockc2ef588b1680c5498151345eacc4a3c363d77d802aff45674a597c3bdbfac00f
Next Block7e5eeaeecda5745b32be824e5da54a9a95b5b350126a216bf5499c0f6e5fa2c9
Height28531
Version4
Transaction Merkle Roote9c293aa46b5f2bc684349e6b4accbbb196f36b04742e26d2df53811a2a9fdfd
Time1402492966 (2014-06-11 13:22:46)
Difficulty0.000 (Bits: 1e047c41)
Cumulative Difficulty11 973 042.889
Nonce0
Transactions4
Value out2070.657277
Transaction Fees-1.62137
Average Coin Age9.27782 days
Coin-days Destroyed17767.243184
Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed62.9868%

Transactions

Transaction	Fee	Size (kB)	From (amount)	To (amount)
c6d0da399b...	0	0.077	Generation: 1.62137 + -1.62137 total fees	Unknown: 0
dcd8718986...	-1.62139	0.258	XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 1993.671236
Unknown: 0
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.64
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.652626
2c3d8fcfa4...	0.00001	0.229	XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R: 40.99999
XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 6.635299
633fe22002...	0.00001	0.23	XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XZ2zsBE5oqTciM5bkWtPajqqjQKHNv8Cip: 30.99997
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 3.364701

* multiple tx pattern to same destination

* address never used before 28531
* input value matched.

from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa.

* coin flow :
BLOCK 28531
from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
-->
BLOCK 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

: SENDER : XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R
: MIXER INPUT : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa / never used before
: MIXER OUTPUT : XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
: PAYEE : XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

If outputs of address XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa and XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb are
spent as an input for a transaction, Mixer identified.
Link from wallet B to wallet C is identified

As XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa is nerver used before, check XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa's tx.

http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa

Code:


Transaction	Block	Approx. Time	Amount	Balance	Currency
2c3d8fcfa4...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	6.635299	6.635299	XC
633fe22002...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	3.364701	10	XC
0d227a1fcf...	28540	2014-06-11 13:39:49	0.003	10.003	XC
07957c70d0...	28555	2014-06-11 14:03:57	0.001	10.004	XC
dd438f2fbd...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.003)	10.001	XC
fe5ad7f573...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.001)	10	XC
36e6e4f1bb...	28646	2014-06-11 17:08:27	(3.364701)	6.635299	XC
d24770a89a...	28653	2014-06-11 17:20:52	(6.635299)	0	XC
8e708043fa...	28847	2014-06-11 22:52:01	0.0001	0.0001	XC

Block 28645 has hard link.

http://cryptexplorer.com/block/4255ac4c5e93fa1769f58312d76338779229424538357dc4cf00a07fc1aafb74

* Hard Link is real.

Ask him if he will be to identify this
1. When he is not GIVEN all the needed info
And
2. When there is more than 1 xnode transaction occurring in the same block...... what if all transactions were handled xnode transactions

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

It is a quiet day.. XC has highest volume on mintpal @ 521BTC 24 hour... So nothing to worry about..

reebokasss

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: Slipknot79 on June 12, 2014, 06:53:40 AM

dat volume Angry

yes, because we are going to 120k Wink

i already set my buy order

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: cryptico on June 12, 2014, 06:48:05 AM

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 12, 2014, 06:31:30 AM

Do agree with this but remember we are still weeks old... We do have to be patient, dev is delivering daily, and is on the forum most nights, thats a lot more than almost any other coin.. I dont want him rushing just to crowd please... Steady progress is much better....

Indeed but dev stepped up the game yesterday confronting chaeplin directly so I was supposing an update was coming soon as well.

Yep,

That was welcome and good to see him destroy chaeplin as a fudding troll, I think there are developments coming very soon, I am in no desperate rush to see them though...

Slipknot79

copper member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Blockchain Just Entered The Real World

dat volume Angry

roede94105

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

What about this?

Quote from: chaeplin on June 12, 2014, 03:49:38 AM

Ref:

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 08:34:25 AM

Mixer Test using v1.42

http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

Code:

Hash7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f
Appeared inX11Coin 28533 (2014-06-11 13:25:09)
Number of inputs2 (Jump to inputs)
Total in10
Number of outputs1 (Jump to outputs)
Total out9.99999
Size345 bytes
Fee0.00001
Raw transaction

Inputs

Index	Previous output	Amount	From address	ScriptSig
0	235b7cba7a...:1	8.329413	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	73:3046...e501 33:03f5...9f33
1	2b46b1f30d...:1	1.670587	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	72:3045...3501 33:03f5...9f33
Outputs

Index	Redeemed at input	Amount	To address	ScriptPubKey
0	Not yet redeemed	9.99999	XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D	DUP HASH160 20:788b...2bb6 EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG

* block : 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D : 9.99999

* Search through pattern

Code:

user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./run.py 28500 28590
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached

* ====> Working block height 28531 has 4 tx
	* ====> Searchng XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 10.0
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28533 : diff : 2
				*===> XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D 9.99999 link is : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa <----> XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb

* ====> Working block height 28587 has 5 tx
	* ====> Searchng XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 0.15
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28590 : diff : 3
				*===> XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz 0.14999 link is : XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 <----> XMDDFuadQFGas9Zn8nTMVFFGz9hUc7Jteo

Possible candidate in 28531

Code:

Hash7315a0968d1aa71e01031583446625bde7189bee1642d3c85737a537d7480778
Previous Blockc2ef588b1680c5498151345eacc4a3c363d77d802aff45674a597c3bdbfac00f
Next Block7e5eeaeecda5745b32be824e5da54a9a95b5b350126a216bf5499c0f6e5fa2c9
Height28531
Version4
Transaction Merkle Roote9c293aa46b5f2bc684349e6b4accbbb196f36b04742e26d2df53811a2a9fdfd
Time1402492966 (2014-06-11 13:22:46)
Difficulty0.000 (Bits: 1e047c41)
Cumulative Difficulty11 973 042.889
Nonce0
Transactions4
Value out2070.657277
Transaction Fees-1.62137
Average Coin Age9.27782 days
Coin-days Destroyed17767.243184
Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed62.9868%

Transactions

Transaction	Fee	Size (kB)	From (amount)	To (amount)
c6d0da399b...	0	0.077	Generation: 1.62137 + -1.62137 total fees	Unknown: 0
dcd8718986...	-1.62139	0.258	XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 1993.671236
Unknown: 0
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.64
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.652626
2c3d8fcfa4...	0.00001	0.229	XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R: 40.99999
XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 6.635299
633fe22002...	0.00001	0.23	XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XZ2zsBE5oqTciM5bkWtPajqqjQKHNv8Cip: 30.99997
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 3.364701

* multiple tx pattern to same destination

* address never used before 28531
* input value matched.

from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa.

* coin flow :
BLOCK 28531
from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
-->
BLOCK 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

: SENDER : XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R
: MIXER INPUT : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa / never used before
: MIXER OUTPUT : XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
: PAYEE : XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

If outputs of address XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa and XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb are
spent as an input for a transaction, Mixer identified.
Link from wallet B to wallet C is identified

As XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa is nerver used before, check XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa's tx.

http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa

Code:


Transaction	Block	Approx. Time	Amount	Balance	Currency
2c3d8fcfa4...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	6.635299	6.635299	XC
633fe22002...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	3.364701	10	XC
0d227a1fcf...	28540	2014-06-11 13:39:49	0.003	10.003	XC
07957c70d0...	28555	2014-06-11 14:03:57	0.001	10.004	XC
dd438f2fbd...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.003)	10.001	XC
fe5ad7f573...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.001)	10	XC
36e6e4f1bb...	28646	2014-06-11 17:08:27	(3.364701)	6.635299	XC
d24770a89a...	28653	2014-06-11 17:20:52	(6.635299)	0	XC
8e708043fa...	28847	2014-06-11 22:52:01	0.0001	0.0001	XC

Block 28645 has hard link.

http://cryptexplorer.com/block/4255ac4c5e93fa1769f58312d76338779229424538357dc4cf00a07fc1aafb74

* Hard Link is real.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Artoodeetoo on June 12, 2014, 06:31:30 AM

Do agree with this but remember we are still weeks old... We do have to be patient, dev is delivering daily, and is on the forum most nights, thats a lot more than almost any other coin.. I dont want him rushing just to crowd please... Steady progress is much better....

Indeed but dev stepped up the game yesterday confronting chaeplin directly so I was supposing an update was coming soon as well.

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Do agree with this but remember we are still weeks old... We do have to be patient, dev is delivering daily, and is on the forum most nights, thats a lot more than almost any other coin.. I dont want him rushing just to crowd please... Steady progress is much better....

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cryptico on June 12, 2014, 06:09:22 AM

Anyway..

Would be nice to know from the Dev when he is awake what are the plan for the release of the encrypted messaging system and the Marketing plan for the Coin. I know that he was saying that the message would have been delivered by the End of this week or Am I wrong?

Would be nice as well to know when a user Friendly wallet with a new GUI with one botton set up for ex nodes and messaging will be delivered that will be really nice implementation with what we have already.

Kick ass wallet with noob friendly GUI I think is a must to have as soon as possible.

this.

1. user friendly wallet (normal one and Xnode one); Xcend button
2. EM

less conf work will save a lot of noobs.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Anyway..

Would be nice to know from the Dev when he is awake what are the plan for the release of the encrypted messaging system and the Marketing plan for the Coin. I know that he was saying that the message would have been delivered by the End of this week or Am I wrong?

Would be nice as well to know when a user Friendly wallet with a new GUI with one botton set up for ex nodes and messaging will be delivered that will be really nice implementation with what we have already.

Kick ass wallet with noob friendly GUI I think is a must to have as soon as possible.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1269. (Read 1484248 times)