[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1266.

silverkinguk

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

That's all I know for now.Encrypted messaging sounds good to me.

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: silverkinguk on June 12, 2014, 09:50:14 AM

PR team is different but am in touch with PizPie who is helping with the social network aspects of XC.

so there is a dedicated PR team , thats good to hear, any more hints on whats going on in the background?

silverkinguk

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

PR team is different but am in touch with PizPie who is helping with the social network aspects of XC.
My main company is a connected with Crowdfunding for various projects that accepts Bitcoins currently.

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: silverkinguk on June 12, 2014, 09:44:10 AM

The Foundation's main goals are to bring XC into the mainstream.
XC is still in it's early days of development but we plan to in time follow through with the objectives set in the mission statement.For now enjoy the cheap XC values.
I myself with a business partner will be helping with the ATM/POS adoption of XC as we have experience with bringing UK first two way Bitcoin ATM in London:

http://www.coindesk.com/robocoin-machine-heats-competition-londons-bitcoin-atms/

oh thats a really nice update, are u the PR team atsecure was talking about or different project alltogether?

dadon

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1002

Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.

Quote from: Profetu on June 12, 2014, 09:04:59 AM

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

there may be a problem, and it's small, but you must be delusional if you think cheplin is trying to help us, he is doing his best to find flaws in XC not so we can improve it, but to hurt it, because he is invested in DRK, he may of identified important flaws, even though this is rev 1 and the Dev said from the get go rev 1 would not be 100% anon, but this is not because he has a kind heart and wants to help us, the suggestion of this makes me roll my eyes....rev 2 it will be fixed, and all the drk boys will have to actually work harder on there product more instead of slapping it together calling them selves king,and slandering any competition that comes along, i'm not concerned still only a month old and we are neck to neck with drk that is 6 months old, so cheplin and all your sad little friends, best think of a better attack plan, concentrate on improving your own product because frankly it's a piece of shit that doesn't work, and Evan just used to get rich off, and soon after rev 2 and you can't trace the transactions anymore, you will have nothing but slanderous tweets to save your sorry excuse for cryto innovation, i would just dump and buy XC because seriously nothing can save DRK.

silverkinguk

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

The Foundation's main goals are to bring XC into the mainstream.
XC is still in it's early days of development but we plan to in time follow through with the objectives set in the mission statement.For now enjoy the cheap XC values.
I myself with a business partner will be helping with the ATM/POS adoption of XC as we have experience with bringing UK first two way Bitcoin ATM in London:

http://www.coindesk.com/robocoin-machine-heats-competition-londons-bitcoin-atms/

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: silverkinguk on June 12, 2014, 08:43:46 AM

Hey a lot of things happening in the background with this coin,dumpers will feel really silly later.
I'm part of the XC Foundation and have been featured on the World Crypto Network on youtube.

Glad to have you.
so what is going on with the Foundation?

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

the hourly says "GO"

Profetu

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

I am happy to own 1150 of these babies (up from 465) , they are all I could afford with my small amount of BTC, but I know the potential of XC and thats why I will be holding this coin for a long time to come.

silverkinguk

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

Hey a lot of things happening in the background with this coin,dumpers will feel really silly later.
I'm part of the XC Foundation and have been featured on the World Crypto Network on youtube.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: evtrmm on June 12, 2014, 08:39:25 AM

irc

no resistance? time to move it? Wink

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

irc

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 08:33:11 AM

Quote from: evtrmm on June 12, 2014, 08:29:56 AM

Quote from: Queeq on June 12, 2014, 08:14:34 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 12, 2014, 08:10:02 AM

Quote from: FoldingTime on June 12, 2014, 08:07:54 AM

I completely agree with you. Chaeplin has demonstrated a logical flow of the transaction and this needs to be addressed. Simply saying FUD is no counter argument. Either agree that the current system is flawed and will be fixed or prove that chaeplin is wrong.

chaeplin is the only one providing quality QA for this coin. You need these people to find the problems so they can be fixed.

Quote from: FoldingTime on June 05, 2014, 03:56:46 AM

Quote from: eduffield on June 04, 2014, 11:50:07 PM

Masternode payments are humming along now and the forking issue is fixed. Looks like we're good to launch masternode payments in 1 to 2 weeks. If all looks good tomorrow I'll push binaries and have everyone upgrade.

http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000c425522d7eba77eeb68b0d3b4713626f10341499eee12395f9378a3a
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000013a358ccbe40851660e650e7ecc9fe9b0b5bb95b893104e6732deeef8
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000057614c43354c6e4f879c7959d9e41e1e76263259f36b70ae556b5c5d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000019929d91dffec6c7636e816da5cd669b5e518c16facae7a8a841471a4
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000183cd7cf91eab1c644063550bb6bbfbcb433e55505afc054e31293025
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000b38bce68707b7c9cbbeffc2ccf767c7238074f18ecb13a10b9ccf075

We have about sixty masternodes on testnet and it looks like we're paying out about 98% of the new blocks. This is great news, everything is working perfectly Grin

.

Great work !!!!!!!!!!

My MasterNode on testnet is behaving well and giving me payouts so all looking good for the fork.

Oooh... ANOTHER DRK troll caring about XC. How nice of you...

How's that Masternode working out for you?

FoldingTime is right, like it or not. What is trolling is unsubstantiated accusations.

So, out of curiosity, the 60 masternodes split 150 DRK/ block? And you need 1000 DRK to run a masternode? (~15BTC)
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d

On mainnet there are hundreds.

t
y

sukottosan_d

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: evtrmm on June 12, 2014, 08:29:56 AM

Quote from: Queeq on June 12, 2014, 08:14:34 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 12, 2014, 08:10:02 AM

Quote from: FoldingTime on June 12, 2014, 08:07:54 AM

I completely agree with you. Chaeplin has demonstrated a logical flow of the transaction and this needs to be addressed. Simply saying FUD is no counter argument. Either agree that the current system is flawed and will be fixed or prove that chaeplin is wrong.

chaeplin is the only one providing quality QA for this coin. You need these people to find the problems so they can be fixed.

Quote from: FoldingTime on June 05, 2014, 03:56:46 AM

Quote from: eduffield on June 04, 2014, 11:50:07 PM

Masternode payments are humming along now and the forking issue is fixed. Looks like we're good to launch masternode payments in 1 to 2 weeks. If all looks good tomorrow I'll push binaries and have everyone upgrade.

http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000c425522d7eba77eeb68b0d3b4713626f10341499eee12395f9378a3a
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000013a358ccbe40851660e650e7ecc9fe9b0b5bb95b893104e6732deeef8
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000057614c43354c6e4f879c7959d9e41e1e76263259f36b70ae556b5c5d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000019929d91dffec6c7636e816da5cd669b5e518c16facae7a8a841471a4
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000183cd7cf91eab1c644063550bb6bbfbcb433e55505afc054e31293025
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000b38bce68707b7c9cbbeffc2ccf767c7238074f18ecb13a10b9ccf075

We have about sixty masternodes on testnet and it looks like we're paying out about 98% of the new blocks. This is great news, everything is working perfectly Grin

.

Great work !!!!!!!!!!

My MasterNode on testnet is behaving well and giving me payouts so all looking good for the fork.

Oooh... ANOTHER DRK troll caring about XC. How nice of you...

How's that Masternode working out for you?

FoldingTime is right, like it or not. What is trolling is unsubstantiated accusations.

So, out of curiosity, the 60 masternodes split 150 DRK/ block? And you need 1000 DRK to run a masternode? (~15BTC)
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d

On mainnet there are hundreds.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: policymaker on June 12, 2014, 08:21:50 AM

Quote from: fearcoka on June 12, 2014, 07:58:31 AM

Hey guys, Fear here. Also Closetmonster for miscers.

If you remember me, my friends and I started the big pump for XC. We didnt expect huge fud to drop the price but it had to be done.

That being said, insider info.

we love this coin.

Cheers

you people are still messing around with chaeplin and leave fearcoka's comment like this? you people are not die hard XCers... ty fearcoka for ur reply, I am inclined to stock up, NOW.

I have been filling.... filling..... thanks for the push below .0012 while I was dreaming....

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: Queeq on June 12, 2014, 08:14:34 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 12, 2014, 08:10:02 AM

Quote from: FoldingTime on June 12, 2014, 08:07:54 AM

I completely agree with you. Chaeplin has demonstrated a logical flow of the transaction and this needs to be addressed. Simply saying FUD is no counter argument. Either agree that the current system is flawed and will be fixed or prove that chaeplin is wrong.

chaeplin is the only one providing quality QA for this coin. You need these people to find the problems so they can be fixed.

Quote from: FoldingTime on June 05, 2014, 03:56:46 AM

Quote from: eduffield on June 04, 2014, 11:50:07 PM

Masternode payments are humming along now and the forking issue is fixed. Looks like we're good to launch masternode payments in 1 to 2 weeks. If all looks good tomorrow I'll push binaries and have everyone upgrade.

http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000c425522d7eba77eeb68b0d3b4713626f10341499eee12395f9378a3a
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000013a358ccbe40851660e650e7ecc9fe9b0b5bb95b893104e6732deeef8
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000057614c43354c6e4f879c7959d9e41e1e76263259f36b70ae556b5c5d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000019929d91dffec6c7636e816da5cd669b5e518c16facae7a8a841471a4
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000183cd7cf91eab1c644063550bb6bbfbcb433e55505afc054e31293025
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000b38bce68707b7c9cbbeffc2ccf767c7238074f18ecb13a10b9ccf075

We have about sixty masternodes on testnet and it looks like we're paying out about 98% of the new blocks. This is great news, everything is working perfectly Grin

.

Great work !!!!!!!!!!

My MasterNode on testnet is behaving well and giving me payouts so all looking good for the fork.

Oooh... ANOTHER DRK troll caring about XC. How nice of you...

How's that Masternode working out for you?

FoldingTime is right, like it or not. What is trolling is unsubstantiated accusations.

So, out of curiosity, the 60 masternodes split 150 DRK/ block? And you need 1000 DRK to run a masternode? (~15BTC)
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: adhitthana on June 12, 2014, 08:15:12 AM

Quote from: chaeplin on June 12, 2014, 08:01:41 AM

B and C can be used to single input.

Do you mean B and C can be ~~used~~ connected to single input. ?

If you mean this then HOW can they be ?

multiple input to a single transaction.

Mixer use your wallet. Check my post.

It's all about that.

adhitthana

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 08:17:45 AM

Here, I am done - I think this makes sense.

Read this while reviewing the flow chaeplin posted:
The transactions sent from the mixer (C) to the end address is of a set size (his example was 10). This is D.

He can then search the blockchain for possible candidates (value 10) via a script. Which gets us to block 28531 - this matches the 10.00 XC value. This can be linked at blocked 28533 with the mixer C - we already know C (output 9.99999).
This allows him to trace back to 28531 in the blockchain - to find the values that == 10.00 and match to a specific address - in this case: XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa which is B.

You can then take all the transactions for this address B - review them and find two matching amounts that == 10 which belong to one single address. This address is A. Since this address B has never been used before this transaction - this is easy to do - and - even if it had multiple transactions - they would not all related back to one single point with one single value (10).

Just for the record, - I think this is right.
Again - I'm participating to participate - nothing else.
If my logic is flawed, let me know please, this is vexing me - because this looks right and all I get is nothing constructive back.

Thank you .

ol92

sr. member

Activity: 445

Merit: 255

Quote from: sukottosan_d on June 12, 2014, 08:17:45 AM

Here, I am done - I think this makes sense.

Read this while reviewing the flow chaeplin posted:
The transactions sent from the mixer (C) to the end address is of a set size (his example was 10). This is D.

He can then search the blockchain for possible candidates (value 10) via a script. Which gets us to block 28531 - this matches the 10.00 XC value. This can be linked at blocked 28533 with the mixer C - we already know C (output 9.99999).
This allows him to trace back to 28531 in the blockchain - to find the values that == 10.00 and match to a specific address - in this case: XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa which is B.

You can then take all the transactions for this address B - review them and find two matching amounts that == 10 which belong to one single address. This address is A. Since this address B has never been used before this transaction - this is easy to do - and - even if it had multiple transactions - they would not all related back to one single point with one single value (10).

Thanks, this seems a clear explanation.
To prevent this kind of tracking, the solution could be multiple node used for one transaction. Is this the multipath revision announced by the dev? What is DRK solution to prevent this kind of analysis?

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1266. (Read 1484248 times)