Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1277. (Read 1484248 times)
June 11, 2014, 06:32:31 PM
we shoudl be happy that they are trying to project their DRk insecurities into us
June 11, 2014, 06:31:58 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
Simple question, no FUD at all.
srysly, kaiju category 3 failed and now they send cat 4? what is this?
June 11, 2014, 06:31:21 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
Simple question, no FUD at all.
That XC feature list as related to this thread just a moment ago is verbal diarrhoea. Enjoy losing your money.
From the DRK thread, you are no impartial observer.. TROLL...
Should I suggest others read your previous posts also supporting chaeplin the fisherman?
https://twitter.com/chaeplin
Come back when DRK actually works.
I stand by that comment. Now if you would be so kind as to provide me the block height so that I can verify the veracity of those claims.
I just see you as another joke character... I hope you are being paid well by the DRK holders for your poor efforts...
June 11, 2014, 06:29:53 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
Simple question, no FUD at all.
That XC feature list as related to this thread just a moment ago is verbal diarrhoea. Enjoy losing your money.
From the DRK thread, you are no impartial observer.. TROLL...
Should I suggest others read your previous posts also supporting chaeplin the fisherman?
https://twitter.com/chaeplin
Come back when DRK actually works.
I stand by that comment. Now if you would be so kind as to provide me the block height so that I can verify the veracity of those claims.
If I cannot, then I would apologize and maybe buy a few.
A potential investor wants that block height.
June 11, 2014, 06:26:56 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
What mixing? I don't see any mixing. What are you talking about?
June 11, 2014, 06:25:41 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
Simple question, no FUD at all.
That XC feature list as related to this thread just a moment ago is verbal diarrhoea. Enjoy losing your money.
From the DRK thread, you are no impartial observer.. TROLL...
Should I suggest others read your previous posts also supporting chaeplin the fisherman?
https://twitter.com/chaeplin
Come back when DRK actually works.
June 11, 2014, 06:23:21 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
Simple question, no FUD at all.
GGGaAahhHhH you must be a DRK Troll!!!!!
lol interesting thread today.
June 11, 2014, 06:22:07 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
Simple question, no FUD at all.
June 11, 2014, 06:20:33 PM
Incessant baseless FUD is a good indicator of a great coin. XC will be a legend in crypto currencies in July, (I would say in my opinion but it's only a matter of time until this is a fact).
June 11, 2014, 06:20:10 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
99% of your posts are on the DRK thread.. Thanks for coming over...
June 11, 2014, 06:19:45 PM
Cryptogretzky, Dadon, DRRobert, Wevus, Evtrmm, Mikemikemike, Jestersdead, Greyskies, 520bit, Jasinlee, Teka, Pizpie and anyone else interested:
Huge differentiator XC MOBILE APP has been created (Android and IPhone) but not released
- quick mobile transfer
- balance checks
- full control over keys
- advanced QR code scanner
- mixer support coming
If we want to do an exclusive launch with XC - message me in our IRC channel #XCofficial - I'm there as Alliance.
I spoke with the mobile app developer and he sees the potential in XC, likes the community, and may do it for a XC bounty.
He was originally looking to do the launch with a different coin; however, if we can get in there quickly, it's ours.
Huge differentiator XC MOBILE APP has been created (Android and IPhone) but not released
- quick mobile transfer
- balance checks
- full control over keys
- advanced QR code scanner
- mixer support coming
If we want to do an exclusive launch with XC - message me in our IRC channel #XCofficial - I'm there as Alliance.
I spoke with the mobile app developer and he sees the potential in XC, likes the community, and may do it for a XC bounty.
He was originally looking to do the launch with a different coin; however, if we can get in there quickly, it's ours.
+1
Is this the new XC "DARK" wallet. J/K
Somebody is in contact with this guy ?
June 11, 2014, 06:18:41 PM
At what block height did mixing start?
June 11, 2014, 06:16:03 PM
June 11, 2014, 06:13:15 PM
Please be very careful with the source code! The DRK people WILL rip it off, while keeping their source code secret. If they ask why they can't see XC's source, ask them why nobody can see theirs.
Chaeplin's github repo, for example:
https://github.com/chaeplin?tab=activity
Note: he's not actually a dev for them, as much as he wishes to be.
Chaeplin's github repo, for example:
https://github.com/chaeplin?tab=activity
Note: he's not actually a dev for them, as much as he wishes to be.
June 11, 2014, 05:53:29 PM
Chaplaen has been shown to be incapable of linking the transactions. That is good enough for me and for the 1% who it is not good enough for read - hidden agenda...
That's good, but who is Chaeplin, and why is what he says or does the the final word?But things have moved very very well so far in a short space of time
June 11, 2014, 05:53:22 PM
ATC, You have done more than enough. Shut the door to DRK trolls now.. What has DRK done other than release a failed update and then delay its fix.. It has closed code... It is not anonymous...
That is why they are here...
Chaplaen has been shown to be incapable of linking the transactions. That is good enough for me and for the 1% who it is not good enough for read - hidden agenda...
Lets see DRK open up, offer bountys, have code peer review etc etc.. At the moment this is not a level playing field.
I would suggest for the next request, agree to it on the basis that DRK offers exactly the same test and public bounty... Sounding fair?
That is why they are here...
Chaplaen has been shown to be incapable of linking the transactions. That is good enough for me and for the 1% who it is not good enough for read - hidden agenda...
Lets see DRK open up, offer bountys, have code peer review etc etc.. At the moment this is not a level playing field.
I would suggest for the next request, agree to it on the basis that DRK offers exactly the same test and public bounty... Sounding fair?
+1 really good conclusion !
June 11, 2014, 05:50:54 PM
I kinda agree, and make it a big enough bounty. Otherwise we are just wasting time here...
I'd like to see a bigger bounty too. But this is all very new, so it's ok that it is moving ahead in small steps. We have made progress, which is a positive,but there is always room to progress more. June 11, 2014, 05:49:14 PM
ATC, You have done more than enough. Shut the door to DRK trolls now.. What has DRK done other than release a failed update and then delay its fix.. It has closed code... It is not anonymous...
That is why they are here...
Chaplaen has been shown to be incapable of linking the transactions. That is good enough for me and for the 1% who it is not good enough for read - hidden agenda...
Lets see DRK open up, offer bountys, have code peer review etc etc.. At the moment this is not a level playing field.
I would suggest for the next request, agree to it on the basis that DRK offers exactly the same test and public bounty... Sounding fair?
That is why they are here...
Chaplaen has been shown to be incapable of linking the transactions. That is good enough for me and for the 1% who it is not good enough for read - hidden agenda...
Lets see DRK open up, offer bountys, have code peer review etc etc.. At the moment this is not a level playing field.
I would suggest for the next request, agree to it on the basis that DRK offers exactly the same test and public bounty... Sounding fair?
June 11, 2014, 05:49:10 PM
Active spamming.
user@sv2:~/x11coin> x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'
0a50c8b4408aec0b6acdae11dbd9d88ce4b67092a55cf634ff3cde9d48089784
Code:
user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./who.py 28617
* ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx
* ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb
tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2
*===> block reached
*===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1
*===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'
* ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx
* ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb
tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2
*===> block reached
*===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1
*===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'
user@sv2:~/x11coin> x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'
0a50c8b4408aec0b6acdae11dbd9d88ce4b67092a55cf634ff3cde9d48089784
What about this?
what about it? the only discussion point is the transaction I posted and provided the details for both sides - which anybody can replicate themselves and get the same result that I posted
June 11, 2014, 05:48:10 PM
A 5 btc bounty was already offered by me and 3 other members (2 btc was put up by me and 1 btc from each of the other 3) to have the code tested when atcsecure felt it was ready.
Jump to: