Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1311. (Read 1484248 times)

hero member
Activity: 503
Merit: 500
Long term this coin will beat DRK. Why else do big DRK supporters (propulsion, chaeplin, alexgm) keep trying to discredit us?

DRK requires people to set up nodes. XC you can run the node from your wallet!

DRK node payment system caused a major fork and the dev has pushed back his fix another two weeks because he keeps finding bugs!

XC version 2 will offer greater privacy thanks to the multipath protocol which is similar in nature to TOR and encrypted messaging.

We've accomplished in 2 weeks what has taken DRK many months. Remember DRK was undervalued too for a long time. XC is in beta, keep testing it and pushing it to the limits and my number one tip is always read the post history of anyone bashing XC because 9 times out of 10 they are a DRK pumper.

That seems all true but the price is still a shit Cheesy
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Long term this coin will beat DRK. Why else do big DRK supporters (propulsion, chaeplin, alexgm) keep trying to discredit us?

DRK requires people to set up nodes. XC you can run the node from your wallet!

DRK node payment system caused a major fork and the dev has pushed back his fix another two weeks because he keeps finding bugs!

XC version 2 will offer greater privacy thanks to the multipath protocol which is similar in nature to TOR and encrypted messaging.

We've accomplished in 2 weeks what has taken DRK many months. Remember DRK was undervalued too for a long time. XC is in beta, keep testing it and pushing it to the limits and my number one tip is always read the post history of anyone bashing XC because 9 times out of 10 they are a DRK pumper.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Im starting to really regret investing in this coin. Seems we are just buying in so the big bag holders can dump


lol...not necessarily.. with the unique features XC coin has to offer and to come, bag holders' dump will fall into other investors hands.
It is a long term investment coin. So relax, chill, have a beer.

Exactly. I made a mint off a few coins back in the craze of Hazard coins. Ended up having to sit on them for about 5 months, and still made 15 BTC off one coin and that was mining on low end nvidia cards ( 460 and a 540.... and a 250 LOL ).
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Im starting to really regret investing in this coin. Seems we are just buying in so the big bag holders can dump

Many of us would have already done so. In fact, many of us "bag holders" have been buying up more coins. Most chasing short term profit most have already exited.

Look, I am no saint when it comes to not complaining, but its more or less needing a place to vent.
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
Im starting to really regret investing in this coin. Seems we are just buying in so the big bag holders can dump


lol...not necessarily.. with the unique features XC coin has to offer and to come, bag holders' dump will fall into other investors hands.
It is a long term investment coin. So relax, chill, have a beer.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Im starting to really regret investing in this coin. Seems we are just buying in so the big bag holders can dump

If you bothered to read couple pages back, you would have found out that this statement is not true!
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
Im starting to really regret investing in this coin. Seems we are just buying in so the big bag holders can dump

Sell your coins and your worries will be over. nuffsaid
jr. member
Activity: 141
Merit: 1
The World’s First Blockchain Core
Im starting to really regret investing in this coin. Seems we are just buying in so the big bag holders can dump
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?

Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range...

We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin.


Yesteday 2H EMA was close to break up , it could start a big moove, so they start to dump early in night hours to stop it when the market is the weaker. At one point they will be force to buy higher by the market when the buying pressure will be too strong to stop.

I am not worried about this price. Every time it goes below 100k I buy more. When Rev2 is out it will surely go up.

yes you not worried and buy more under 100K, i'm not worried and buy under 100K, he is same etc. because who write this thread, all say same thing.
So who sell that much coin. if most people think grown and buy, how can price down steadily. thats it i cant understant.

sorry for my bad english.

similar fear, similar answers and price only going down.

price is going up and down,not really down that much anymore..people buy and then quickly sell..making small profits maybe,cos they not patient enough perhaps or they like to play small games..Cheesy..and if you worried,just sell it and move on,somebody else gonna buy it for sure..Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 255
I sent 9 XC by sendfrommixer command to another address, but only 2 XC sent out, the rest are still in my wallet, why?
I believe there is a limit to the amount right now, since the mixer is still in beta state (to prevent significant loss).
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
I sent 9 XC by sendfrommixer command to another address, but only 2 XC sent out, the rest are still in my wallet, why?
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1002
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?

Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range...

We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin.


Yesteday 2H EMA was close to break up , it could start a big moove, so they start to dump early in night hours to stop it when the market is the weaker. At one point they will be force to buy higher by the market when the buying pressure will be too strong to stop.

I am not worried about this price. Every time it goes below 100k I buy more. When Rev2 is out it will surely go up.

yes you not worried and buy more under 100K, i'm not worried and buy under 100K, he is same etc. because who write this thread, all say same thing.
So who sell that much coin. if most people think grown and buy, how can price down steadily. thats it i cant understant.

sorry for my bad english.

similar fear, similar answers and price only going down.
bbr
sr. member
Activity: 290
Merit: 250
For those running as xnode - have you received any credits to your wallet and how long did it take? I have been running for about 24 hours and not seen anything so not sure if it is working or not.

I have seen this in my debug log a lot: AddPortMapping(0, 0, 192.168.178.26) failed with code 403 (UnknownError)

I have forwarded port 32348 in my router and allowed it in windows firewall but still the same. Could that error be the issue or am i just being impatient?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250

this transaction was not mixed, but rather just passed through

Yes, so I comment it. "did Mixer forgot to change address ?"
hero member
Activity: 503
Merit: 500
Ok will someone do it properly? Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
Is this helpful for the dev?

ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

Please provide

Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet:

ID #1

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387

ID #2

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07



I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm
Check. you don't know how to read block explorer.
Have you heard change address ?


Code:
Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC

 
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC


Proved.

this transaction was not mixed, but rather just passed through

I used sendfrommixer command, not sure why not mixed.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Is this helpful for the dev?

ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

Please provide

Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet:

ID #1

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387

ID #2

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07



I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm
Check. you don't know how to read block explorer.
Have you heard change address ?


Code:
Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC

 
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC


Proved.

this transaction was not mixed, but rather just passed through
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
Is this helpful for the dev?

ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

Please provide

Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet:

ID #1

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387

ID #2

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07



I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm
Check. you don't know how to read block explorer.
Have you heard change address ?


Code:
Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC

 
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC


Proved.

100 % helpful. You misssed my comment. "did Mixer forgot to change address ?"
Your TX is normal mixer tx, but mixer forgot something(I would call it bug).
Dev will fix it.
What was sender address
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
1. Darkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Bitcoin CoinJoin and not 100% anon as promised. Instamined half of current outstanding coins or about 2million within 24hrs. gmaxwell the creator of CoinJoin and Bitcoin dev believed this was a SCAM coin;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641178.40
2. Cloak (X13 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL
3. Mastiffcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL
4. Vericoin (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
5. Pinkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Centralized mixer
6. Cryptcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
7. Libertycoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
8. Honorcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises (SCAM)
9. Dreamcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
10. Cinni: (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
11. Boost: (X13 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
12. Anoncoin (PoW Scrypt): IP obfuscation
13. TIPS (PoW Scrypt): Centralized mixer
14. Bytecoin-BCN (PoW): 99% premine of circulating coins + problematic codebase coupled with good anonymity (+2 years in development and still in infancy regarding basic stuff like GUI)
15. Bytecoin clones (PoW): Increasing in numbers every day diluting that field. MRO gets a special mention due to being the first clone. BBR gets another special mention for having a good dev. Still they experience significant problems due to the new codebase.
16. Zerocoin: DOA (?) / delayed for months
17. NXT (PoS): In discussions relative to anonymous implementation

vs

XC: First anonymous coin with encrypt Android wallet/message, Blockchain 2.0 ...

People do not see the real potential in this coin but rather drop in volume and price which really disappoints me.
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
Believe me, XC price will shock everyone once this thread reach up to 1000 pages. Keep discussing.


i hope so lol. i couldve sold at 400k, but i held on Smiley
Jump to: