Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1312. (Read 1484248 times)

full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?

Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range...

We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin.


Yesteday 2H EMA was close to break up , it could start a big moove, so they start to dump early in night hours to stop it when the market is the weaker. At one point they will be force to buy higher by the market when the buying pressure will be too strong to stop.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Is this helpful for the dev?

ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

Please provide

Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet:

ID #1

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387

ID #2

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07



I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm
Check. you don't know how to read block explorer.
Have you heard change address ?


Code:
Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC

 
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC


Proved.

100 % helpful. You misssed my comment. "did Mixer forgot to change address ?"
Your TX is normal mixer tx, but mixer forgot something(I would call it bug).
Dev will fix it.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
Is this helpful for the dev?

ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

Please provide

Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet:

ID #1

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387

ID #2

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07



I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm
Check. you don't know how to read block explorer.
Have you heard change address ?


Code:
Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC

 
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC


Proved.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?

Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range...

We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?

there is a whole XC unmoderated thread providing FUD and harsh critisism 24/7. Apart from that, dev is working and not trying to promote with fancy prictures and stupid hype which is a true paradise compared to 9/10 shitcoins which do exactly that and fluctuate in a week accordingly.

The last 2 weeks price has been fluctuating steadily--- it is being used by traders as a means to make daily profit. Which is not bad imo if done in moderation.

With some major release, like REV 2 or enc messages and such, or PR team taking over, we should see some kind of pump. I certainly w8 for PR team info from the team, so we have 2 main things going on for us, steady coding development by secure, and promotion by the rest of the team.

Keep in mind that as stated by others, rich list is slowly accumulating more coins, if XC wasnt promising they d be the first to dump
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?
some people have no idea how huge XC will be in the near future, they are dumping for the best price they think they can get, they will probably hang themselves in 12 months..but that's there problem, let em dump.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

Please provide

Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet:

ID #1

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387

ID #2

Code:
Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?

Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range...
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.

Well follow link.
XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da

You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ?

do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC

No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address.

I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary.

BTW, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC is NOT my address.
member
Activity: 684
Merit: 10
Why the price are so low for so long Huh?

Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 Huh?

Why people constantly dumping Huh?

Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up.

It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range.

This has been going on for 5 days now.

Anybody else notice this ?  How do you explain it ?
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

Sender name: 520Bit
LOL

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.580 Is chaeplin correct?

ref.

Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da.htm

XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94741.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?94689.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93458.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93457.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93456.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93455.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82065.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82064.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82063.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82033.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81727.htm
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?81696.htm

Code:
Details for Transaction
Hash 37b60318b9bfff0838cfe2608f22077f7e7e7fc33555592d53e2e16cffa20588
Blockheight 24402 (3750 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-03 11:37:17
Total Output 2,804.591522 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 114309d0c6ec...:0 XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da 2,804.591532 XC

did Mixer forgot to change address ?



No, the sender address is not correct.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Send 0.1 XC to XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da anonymously, who can reveal the sender address?

Sender name: 520Bit
LOL

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.580 Is chaeplin correct?
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
1. Darkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Bitcoin CoinJoin and not 100% anon as promised. Instamined half of current outstanding coins or about 2million within 24hrs. gmaxwell the creator of CoinJoin and Bitcoin dev believed this was a SCAM coin;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641178.40
2. Cloak (X13 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL
3. Mastiffcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL
4. Vericoin (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
5. Pinkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Centralized mixer
6. Cryptcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
7. Libertycoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
8. Honorcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises (SCAM)
9. Dreamcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
10. Cinni: (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
11. Boost: (X13 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
12. Anoncoin (PoW Scrypt): IP obfuscation
13. TIPS (PoW Scrypt): Centralized mixer
14. Bytecoin-BCN (PoW): 99% premine of circulating coins + problematic codebase coupled with good anonymity (+2 years in development and still in infancy regarding basic stuff like GUI)
15. Bytecoin clones (PoW): Increasing in numbers every day diluting that field. MRO gets a special mention due to being the first clone. BBR gets another special mention for having a good dev. Still they experience significant problems due to the new codebase.
16. Zerocoin: DOA (?) / delayed for months
17. NXT (PoS): In discussions relative to anonymous implementation

vs

XC: First anonymous coin with encrypt Android wallet/message, Blockchain 2.0 ...

Isn't Monero the only one that could be added near XC ?
(just a question, no fud from me)
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Just found some yellowcoin I mined ages ago to dump and grab a few more..
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
Believe me, XC price will shock everyone once this thread reach up to 1000 pages. Keep discussing.


If that's what it takes, I'm all in  Wink

I'm doing my part.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
Believe me, XC price will shock everyone once this thread reach up to 1000 pages. Keep discussing.


If that's what it takes, I'm all in  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
Believe me, XC price will shock everyone once this thread reach up to 1000 pages. Keep discussing.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
1. Darkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Bitcoin CoinJoin and not 100% anon as promised. Instamined half of current outstanding coins or about 2million within 24hrs. gmaxwell the creator of CoinJoin and Bitcoin dev believed this was a SCAM coin;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641178.40
2. Cloak (X13 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL
3. Mastiffcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL
4. Vericoin (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
5. Pinkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Centralized mixer
6. Cryptcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
7. Libertycoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
8. Honorcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises (SCAM)
9. Dreamcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
10. Cinni: (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
11. Boost: (X13 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises
12. Anoncoin (PoW Scrypt): IP obfuscation
13. TIPS (PoW Scrypt): Centralized mixer
14. Bytecoin-BCN (PoW): 99% premine of circulating coins + problematic codebase coupled with good anonymity (+2 years in development and still in infancy regarding basic stuff like GUI)
15. Bytecoin clones (PoW): Increasing in numbers every day diluting that field. MRO gets a special mention due to being the first clone. BBR gets another special mention for having a good dev. Still they experience significant problems due to the new codebase.
16. Zerocoin: DOA (?) / delayed for months
17. NXT (PoS): In discussions relative to anonymous implementation

vs

XC: First anonymous coin with encrypt Android wallet/message, Blockchain 2.0 ...
hero member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 500
BintexFutures
I just heard on Polo Trollbox someone saying they have seen the XC wallet EM and that it is "MINDBLOWING"!   Is there any truth to it?

Probably the team had a sneak preview of this.. ATC told us it would be ready for testing by end of this week!

TheButcher in Polo trollbox is saying that he has personally witnessed it.... but will give no other info

polo

trollbox

truth


.....
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/44-xc-development-user-requestssuggestions/#entry361


I have started a thread for user input/suggestions, and I will keep the OP updated with all the suggeestions.
Jump to: