Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1431. (Read 1484248 times)

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Dev will work this out, few people starting to get worried over nothing.
These bugs will be ironed out soon enough and we will be back #1
Who needs drugs or a woman when you have crypto to shake all your senses.
Price fall will only last about another 1-1.5 hrs get your cheap XC now.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
it seems the block moves slow, how can we speed up the block?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
to make a coin anonymous the block need to be random number, but it would be hard to track anything or fork would be difficult to fix and explorer would be hard for stalkers to take a glam. random block number would be easier for pow/pos coin then mineable coin. this would be perfect for XC or even DRK, when dark moving to pos
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
XC
this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid Smiley)

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

yes, so we need a public test.

I guess something happened as below: (forgive me if I were wrong LOL just guess since I don't know the design)
Start, A wants send 1 XC to C, and B is mixer;
A sends 1 XC to B's input address(B-Addr-input);
B waits enough confirm......just wait.....
B gets enough confirm for 1 XC and "split" the 1 XC to 0.9 and 0.1, two parts;
B sends 0.9 XC from its output address B-Addr-Output-No.1 to C;
B sends 0.1 XC from its output address B-Addr-Output-No.2 to C;     (I don't know what relationship the input and output wallet address of B might have)
C gets 2 incoming XC trans from the 2 address above.

Someone could find out the start time of the two incoming trans and search the block chain, finally he will find out just before the 2 trans, there's a trans for 1XC(== 0.9 + 0.1), and he find the sender.
I don't know how does Chaeplin find the relationship between input address and output address of Mixer B.
Seems it's not so anon if the mixer just split the original amount of transaction. it should do some make up job, right? And the input address and output address must not have any link.
Maybe there's too few mixer ATM and DEV should pay attention on this.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 252
this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid Smiley)

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

yes, so we need a public test.

I reserved some XCs to help the test. I would like to try next release and if somebody could reveal the sender address.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid Smiley)

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

yes, so we need a public test.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
XC
this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid Smiley)

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
XC China community can join the XC coin QQ group.
XC 中国社区,欢迎大家的加入,致力于推动XC在中国的发展。
负责联系中国的虚拟货币行业的媒体和相关的交易平台。

QQ group: 246338769

here is the link:

http://jq.qq.com/?_wv=1027&k=RoKiLg


focus on promoting XC coin in china and contact chinese social media and chinese main exchange platform.

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Chaeplin is actually helping the coin, not hindering it.

It's like some of you don't want any testing or questioning, because you're scared of the price of your bag.

I'm holding a lot too and the only way the coin will move forwards is by rigorous testing.

Guess what, I hold DRK too. Am I now banned from the cult?

+1. Potential bug must be found and fixed before success.

also Chaeplin is somehow the 3rd dev in dark community, so he is capable for doing many tests.

welcome all feedback on the potential bugs, so we can fix this in next update.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
XC
Chaeplin is actually helping the coin, not hindering it.

It's like some of you don't want any testing or questioning, because you're scared of the price of your bag.

I'm holding a lot too and the only way the coin will move forwards is by rigorous testing.

Guess what, I hold DRK too. Am I now banned from the cult?

+1. Potential bug must be found and fixed before success.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
He's doing to test last 24 hours. If he want to dump he already do it this before the test.

it is good that chaeplin use some tactic to track the transaction. i think dev can bypass it and with new update and official one, dev can make it impossible. with more transaction and more working nodes.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
He's doing to test last 24 hours. If he want to dump he already do it this before the test.

just some tx fee bugs should be fixed, no need to worry about this, also the mixer has worked.

so you can not find direct link between blockchin.

but you can find some tx fee patten, so you can just track the coin explorer to find some sender address.

also because we have few input and xnode are running now.

hope dev can fix this in the next update.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Transactions taking longer and longer to confirm for many hours now.

The last tx took 60 minutes for 1st confirmation (version 1.35).

Not good.

few people are staking?

then community guys should open your wallet and begin to stake now.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 250
He's doing to test last 24 hours. If he want to dump he already do it this before the test.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Perhaps he is busy working on wallet, xnodes, and dev work? Perhaps related to it?

i wouldnt worry .. he seems like trustworthy type of dude... but yea kinda should notify people before moving the shiz around.

I second that

Dan's reputation is on the line...  That's worth more than anything

I have had mine change addresses when they stake. I would guess that is what has happened here. He will let us know.

^ This

just wait for the dev‘s update, no need to worry about this. he is a respectable guy. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
Transactions taking longer and longer to confirm for many hours now.

The last tx took 60 minutes for 1st confirmation (version 1.35).

Not good.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
he also said he was going to work on a script to test the Xnode functionality after the Chaeplin stuff so maybe he is using the premine for that.

that's a shit ton to test with.

it's odd trying to follow those transactions though as they move through so many addresses at the same time.

Chaeplin has posted: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7120583
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
he also said he was going to work on a script to test the Xnode functionality after the Chaeplin stuff so maybe he is using the premine for that.

that's a shit ton to test with.

it's odd trying to follow those transactions though as they move through so many addresses at the same time.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
he also said he was going to work on a script to test the Xnode functionality after the Chaeplin stuff so maybe he is using the premine for that.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Perhaps he is busy working on wallet, xnodes, and dev work? Perhaps related to it?

i wouldnt worry .. he seems like trustworthy type of dude... but yea kinda should notify people before moving the shiz around.

I second that

Dan's reputation is on the line...  That's worth more than anything

I have had mine change addresses when they stake. I would guess that is what has happened here. He will let us know.

^ This
Jump to: