The bounty for the logo is now 200XC
a Logo design in 99design website is 299 Dollars:
http://99designs.com/launchI would give the 200 plus XCs to them rather than Amateours if nothing good is found and it seems you can organize contests there Why we just do not move the Contest in that website so? and we can give exposure to the contest to more designers that hopefully are professional as well?
What do you think?
We need a full identity package not just a logo. Something that is put together as a whole and not piecemeal. I am sorry but you are not going ot get that with a contest nor do I think we will get that from 99design.
I work with people who do this on a daily basis and have the means to deliver what we need. I have extended an offer to the dev to have this done at no cost to the community or the dev and am awaiting his reply.
I agree on this also would be nice to hear from ATC and the community maybe they can enter the contest for the logo as a start? I have a friend as well that I contacted but he is not into crypto and busy as shit
Dude the devs aren't open to a name change, I've been trying to push this idea. 'that other coin' name changed FROM our one currently, and fucking did very well. Like seriously XClouds sounds damn good, its marketable, easily design able, and revolves around the idea of decentralization and mesh networking. Also you could have a motto on the coin/logo that said 'XClouds ... Transfer Anonymous' to hit BOTH key points of the coin.
Nah yo fuck that, well call it two letters, xc
like what?
No disrespect I'm sure the developers have a grasp on the situation but I mean come on.
+1 it s not good that we cannot discuss a namechange openly. there might be a lot work to do but without identity who knows what u are workin on? xcloud is pretty cool if it wasn t taken already.
X cloud sounds retarded. And the dev team makes executive decisions not the community. XC name was already decided, so stop bringing it up and move on
Look just as you are entitled to your asinine opinion, as is everyone else, which is why having a community vote for anew name is a good idea.
In a way you're right, the developers should issue executive orders for issues relative to the technology and infrastructure.
But simple things such as the name and logo should be left to the hands of the community, as these common people are the ones putting money into the coin in the first place. And these same people are the ones that are would be investors.
those aren't simple things, as i remember the community already decided for xc but i don't know how big that vote was, i think it sounds cool and doesn't limit itself to a specific feature, perhaps working anon is just the beginning so it should be neutral name wise, i think names like dark or black are a mistake, even positiv brands like liberty limit you in your ability to grow in the future.
as stated befor , xc is sexy
One thing to keep in mind is if something is insanely successful, as XC is (it is compared to most), don't mess with the branding more than you need to. Obviously they/we need a new logo, and that is underway. The tech is being advanced. Changing the name is rolling a lot of dice for no reason at all. If your coin is ranked #97, think about a name change, sure, otherwise, don't screw it up. "Xcloud" sounds awful. XC/X11coin/Xcoin - Obvious tie in with the original Darkcoin name, leave it as is.
FYI: I was debating people that wanted to change the name "Darkcoin" in the past. So it could lose all momentum and be forgotten. Good thing Evan didn't listen to the bad ideas.