Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1467. (Read 1484248 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


I hold DRK and I hold XC


I evangelise for neither. I just want the tech behind my coins to be as good as possible, if people break it all the better. Then the dev knows what needs to be fixed.

Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end.   The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver.  

Everyone knows  that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity.   DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death.   There is no need to create FUD for them.   Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story.


This is good data and actually a very simple fix, which will be included in v1.36....

Thank you!
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?

you should wait. the Minimum stake time is 8hrs, the Maximum stake time is up to 30 days. XC was released couple days ago - it can take up to 30 days before your coins begin staking. just wait and don't move them and have the wallet sometimes "opened for minting". opening a encrypted wallet for minting can be done in 2 ways:
a) decrypt the wallet (not so cool and not necessarry)
b) goto help --> debug window --> console  and enter this text: walletpassphrase "your wallet Password without the quotes" 99999999 true

a) fully opens your wallet and b) leaves your wallet encrypted but allows it to stake
Hey! Thanks for the quick answer !
Yes my wallet is ecnrypted and curently unlocked for minting ! I guess i-ll wait some more! Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Gone......

Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out?

No, DarkSend works, you can use it right now, only the payment of the masternodes has been postponed to mid-June.

PS: No FUD intended it's just fun to deduct the real sender from a mixed transaction.
http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-price-turmoil-network-issues-emergency-fork/
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Wait for 30days and if not staking then post again

Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?
hero member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 500
BintexFutures
ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


I hold DRK and I hold XC


I evangelise for neither. I just want the tech behind my coins to be as good as possible, if people break it all the better. Then the dev knows what needs to be fixed.

Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end.   The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver.  

Everyone knows  that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity.   DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death.   There is no need to create FUD for them.   Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000

Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out?

No, DarkSend works, you can use it right now, only the payment of the masternodes has been postponed to mid-June.

PS: No FUD intended it's just fun to deduct the real sender from a mixed transaction.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250

Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

Does DRK have a decentralized multi-path anonymizer that any users can run from their wallet without 10 years+ of IT/Linux experience to setup a Masternode just so they don't get hacked?  

I don't recall that...
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100

Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out?
sr. member
Activity: 419
Merit: 250
Price hasn't been boring like this loong time... no fireworks, no nothing ? What's up with the bet Smiley ?

I guess all the power is at DRK now...
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 500
Ask not what the coin can do for you - but what u can do for the coin !

Hey!  That's from my favorite prez.... Nakamoto !!!   Grin
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end.   The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver.  

Everyone knows  that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity.   DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death.   There is no need to create FUD for them.   Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story.

Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


XC is a decentralised coin mixer with some encryption chucked in. Ahead of DRK in terms of the coin mixing as it's less centralised and the nodes aren't causing forks. But neither are perfect.

The fact the dev has accomplished so much in such a short period of time already shows great promise for the coming weeks and months ahead. Now is the time for testing and ironing out the inevitable kinks in the system before then moving onto enhancing it to the next level.

I trust this dev more than any other dev I have known.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Forum installed so hopefully it will be finished tomorrow. There will be a Q&A sections where users can mark the best answer
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 255
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end.   The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver.  

Everyone knows  that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity.   DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death.   There is no need to create FUD for them.   Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 500
XC anon works fantastically, just finished testing and everything works as described on my end Cheesy

Thank you for the test!  Good one mate!
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?

you should wait. the Minimum stake time is 8hrs, the Maximum stake time is up to 30 days. XC was released couple days ago - it can take up to 30 days before your coins begin staking. just wait and don't move them and have the wallet sometimes "opened for minting". opening a encrypted wallet for minting can be done in 2 ways:
a) decrypt the wallet (not so cool and not necessarry)
b) goto help --> debug window --> console  and enter this text: walletpassphrase "your wallet Password without the quotes" 99999999 true

a) fully opens your wallet and b) leaves your wallet encrypted but allows it to stake
hero member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 500
BintexFutures
ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?
Jump to: