I don't see why we all can't get along like Google and the Cyanogen team.
Let's all be friends and enjoy the time we have!
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1603. (Read 1484248 times)
May 29, 2014, 05:56:38 PM
May 29, 2014, 05:56:17 PM
You guys are totally missing the point. I don't care whether the current XC code is original or not. Writing a centralized mixer is so easy that the Fedoracoin guys did it. The point is the difference in difficulty between coding a centralized mixing service and coding a decentralized mixing service is enormous. Being able to do the former is NOT evidence that one can do the latter.
DRK hasn't been able to code that themselves (hint: check the last weeks activity in DRK).
The DRK dev is still trying to determine a solution that doesn't cause forking, security issues and other such matters. And even then it will still not be truly decentralised.
XC also has encrypted transactions. In a way XC is actually SUPERIOR to DRK. The only advantage DRK has right now is the dodgy masternodes that offer more decentralisation... cling onto that whilst you can because by this time next month we'll be past it.
May 29, 2014, 05:56:05 PM
Teka what about quoting these peer reviews in op because with this speed of postings they will be lost in the thread.
May 29, 2014, 05:55:06 PM
can someone summarize for me what are the happenings? I am kind of lost as to what happened? (conflicts,code, price etc)
Thank you
Thank you
Code.. That is all
No worries.. Everything is getting settled nicely.
Enjoy the coin and have fun!
May 29, 2014, 05:54:49 PM
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
Thanks for taking the time to take a look at this mindfox. Great to see you helping out another coin again.
May 29, 2014, 05:54:42 PM
The DRK fanboys won't be happy soon, I really think DRK is about to come off and XC is about to rise... Could get interesting...
this is the reply to your last message but I dont see it anymore in thread and my previous reply either
"dude cut it out already I have 17000 coins and I was concerned about this review thing and actually still am this is something can change my life compleatly or burn all my savings so Yes I am concerned read my first fuking post in here I arrived just today just for this community and this coin. so please do not offend me anymore "
I would like to know why they were both deleted
I strongly believe in this coin but this is scaring me
Well dumb of you to use your savings, trading anything is like gambling.
Well you r right
my crypto savings I should say but I strongly believed in XC if the Dev will deliver everything this will take not litecoin place but bitcoin itself, I don't see any limit to its growt
May 29, 2014, 05:53:47 PM
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT!
+1
May 29, 2014, 05:53:40 PM
can someone summarize for me what are the happenings? I am kind of lost as to what happened? (conflicts,code, price etc)
Thank you
Thank you
May 29, 2014, 05:53:22 PM
lol,
this is gold!
Have you seen how heated the DRK thread is getting!!!!??
this is gold!
Have you seen how heated the DRK thread is getting!!!!??
May 29, 2014, 05:52:15 PM
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT!
RIGHT ON!
Thank you Mindfox
May 29, 2014, 05:51:49 PM
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT!
+1
Darkcoin community receiving blow after blow, a review by rat4 would be a K.O.
And can I point out, once again ATCsecure has delivered what he promised
May 29, 2014, 05:50:54 PM
It's really interesting to watch someone constantly trying to bring the price down, selling coins at much lower price then buying price
They are trying to hold a balloon underwater.
Yes, it's too obvious that it's funny
May 29, 2014, 05:50:23 PM
You guys are totally missing the point. I don't care whether the current XC code is original or not. Writing a centralized mixer is so easy that the Fedoracoin guys did it. The point is the difference in difficulty between coding a centralized mixing service and coding a decentralized mixing service is enormous. Being able to do the former is NOT evidence that one can do the latter.
May 29, 2014, 05:50:19 PM
My coins need to grow up quickly if only i could feed them some Big bud
May 29, 2014, 05:50:04 PM
Dear dev, it would be great if you could use git like its used for, i believe you should know how git works!
Its impossible to analyze your code if we havent any history of the code and where it comes from ...
(for the users who wouldn't know for what a git repository is - wikipedia: Every Git working directory is a full-fledged repository with complete history and full version tracking capabilities, not dependent on network access or a central server.)
ps: that would also help in the claims of codebase, and it would be fair to the orginal code developers!
Thanks
Its impossible to analyze your code if we havent any history of the code and where it comes from ...
(for the users who wouldn't know for what a git repository is - wikipedia: Every Git working directory is a full-fledged repository with complete history and full version tracking capabilities, not dependent on network access or a central server.)
ps: that would also help in the claims of codebase, and it would be fair to the orginal code developers!
Thanks
May 29, 2014, 05:49:15 PM
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT!
May 29, 2014, 05:47:56 PM
If you want to get a second opinion of evaluating the code from a very well respected dev, then you should invite rat4 (Blackcoin dev) to take a look at it.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
I have sent him a PM with a bounty, it's up to him to accept it.
https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472145998882828288
rat4 is a very respected dev.
lol and when he looks at it and finds its unique, the price will triple instantly!
May 29, 2014, 05:47:33 PM
If you want to get a second opinion of evaluating the code from a very well respected dev, then you should invite rat4 (Blackcoin dev) to take a look at it.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
I have sent him a PM with a bounty, it's up to him to accept it.
https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472145998882828288
Good move, well done man.
+1 thank you Teka
May 29, 2014, 05:47:25 PM
The DRK fanboys won't be happy soon, I really think DRK is about to come off and XC is about to rise... Could get interesting...
this is the reply to your last message but I dont see it anymore in thread and my previous reply either
"dude cut it out already I have 17000 coins and I was concerned about this review thing and actually still am this is something can change my life compleatly or burn all my savings so Yes I am concerned read my first fuking post in here I arrived just today just for this community and this coin. so please do not offend me anymore "
I would like to know why they were both deleted
I strongly believe in this coin but this is scaring me
Well dumb of you to use your savings, trading anything is like gambling.
May 29, 2014, 05:47:07 PM
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
Jump to: