[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1622.

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on May 29, 2014, 12:34:20 PM

As a piece of advice to your community, ask your dev to verify his identity. That's the first step to gaining trust from investors. A Linkedin profile is not sufficient.

Go away bad dream, luckily we didn't ask for your advice. Welcome to ignore

Guys, what Brilliantrocket suggested is not a bad idea, but a good one that would help XC's credibility. That being said, (and I think anyone can agree with me), I would perfectly understand why the Dev may not want to go to such great lengths, and would not fault him for not doing so. Sufficient evidence is already on the table to strongly testify to atcsecure's identity. How he would go about proving it further would be a question to answer. Must he submit drivers license and passport? I don't think anyone would do that.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Grifftech on May 29, 2014, 12:37:47 PM

Quote from: battbot on May 29, 2014, 12:36:02 PM

It's sad that I have to use my @cinniteam twitter account (which should only be reserved for cinni stuff) to defend XC and atcsecure's credibility. But after all this FUD I felt that it was the right thing to do. People need to hear the truth from as many credible witnesses as possible.

Very nice thing to do, appreciate it mate

Seriously thank you so much.

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on May 29, 2014, 12:34:20 PM

As a piece of advice to your community, ask your dev to verify his identity. That's the first step to gaining trust from investors. A Linkedin profile is not sufficient.

Like Satoshi did you mean? Cheesy

Most of the coins in the top 10 were founded by anonymous developers. It will be nice to get further verification of the dev, but it's dis-ingenious of you to say it's needed as a first step to "gain trust".

Quote from: Nuttynut1987 on May 29, 2014, 12:29:56 PM

I'm not afraid of the coding, I can read and understand the code and that's not where the problem is or where my worries are.
Its all the stuff that happens around it, the blaming of people, the constant abuse some people seem to get, the blatant lies that people put in, people who are to quick to judge or which don't understand half of what they're saying etc. All in all how would a coin not be affected by that? or in this case, get over that and continue on his previous coarse?

BlackCoin went through far worse. Yesterday was a walk in the park compared to that.

Surely you saw yesterday DRK plunging as XC rose spectacularly? People will invest in XC and dump DRK if they see the facts. And the facts can't be hidden forever.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Guys keep it clean.

Grifftech

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: battbot on May 29, 2014, 12:36:02 PM

It's sad that I have to use my @cinniteam twitter account (which should only be reserved for cinni stuff) to defend XC and atcsecure's credibility. But after all this FUD I felt that it was the right thing to do. People need to hear the truth from as many credible witnesses as possible.

Very nice thing to do, appreciate it mate

minairia3

sr. member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 326

20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook

I was a programmer years ago. Some things don't change: when you code, (especially on your own)you try things, test things and comment out (//) what you don't need. You go down thought paths or want to see what happens to A if I run B with C? Who knows what the developer was testing, experimenting with, etc. that night when played around with those lines. A big issue with big projects is getting guys to clean up their code; a loosing battle when there's a big deadline and upper management just wants it to work because the VCs want it to work ... You guys code this stuff privately, not in a corporate controlled environment so it is no wonder that the code isn't pristine and perfectly clean. It seems to work well so far; haven't read/heard anything that says otherwise and the fud spreaders would have jumped on any bugs or issues with both feet already,

Quote from: mig5000 on May 29, 2014, 12:07:44 PM

Quote from: Junkey on May 29, 2014, 12:06:24 PM

Quote from: mig5000 on May 29, 2014, 12:03:38 PM

Teka It is really bad taste to just remove any post that are questioning the integrity of the coin... This post from the other thread hasn't been fixed and I think it's important to fix this.

In the main.cpp of XC there is this :

https://github.com/atcsecure/X11COIN/commit/6f0428202c17f1ea21cd1b8dab55c025a57375c7

This summit was done 16 hours ago , you can find this

bool CTxOut::IsDust() const
+{
+ // FedoraCoin: IsDust() detection disabled, allows any valid dust to be relayed.
+ // The fees imposed on each dust txo is considered sufficient spam deterrant.
+ return false;
+}

now I checked 2 other coins and they don't have this "dust" function from Fedoracoin. Why is it that it is in XC's code and not in BC's ?

Ok, you might not be a programmer so let me explain this. When you put "//" in front of code it is called commenting it out. That means it does not run and is not used.

Yes but why would it be in there in the first place if it's from the "ground up" code ? I didn't find this piece of code in any other coin I checked.

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

It's sad that I have to use my @cinniteam twitter account (which should only be reserved for cinni stuff) to defend XC and atcsecure's credibility. But after all this FUD I felt that it was the right thing to do. People need to hear the truth from as many credible witnesses as possible.

Brilliantrocket

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

As a piece of advice to your community, ask your dev to verify his identity. That's the first step to gaining trust from investors. A Linkedin profile is not sufficient.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Nuttynut1987 on May 29, 2014, 12:29:56 PM

Quote from: Teka on May 29, 2014, 12:16:14 PM

Ok so here is my answer:

We have survived massive dumps in the multipool days, we are recovering from this quite well. Here is what I did yesterday to minimize the fud: https://twitter.com/drasticraven and also my Bitcointalk history. The dev himself offered up a review of the code which to my knowledge is still happening for today. Pizpie calmed the IRC.

Our three principles are:

Privacy.
Innovation.
Transparency.

I'm not afraid of the coding, I can read and understand the code and that's not where the problem is or where my worries are.
Its all the stuff that happens around it, the blaming of people, the constant abuse some people seem to get, the blatant lies that people put in, people who are to quick to judge or which don't understand half of what they're saying etc. All in all how would a coin not be affected by that? or in this case, get over that and continue on his previous coarse?

The XC team has addressed the FUD and we've moved on. The dev is working very hard on coding and I'm feed backing community concerns/ideas as we go. This happens in crypto all the time, there is not a single coin not even Bitcoin (especially not Bitcoin) that hast to deal with fud and quick judging individuals.

Nuttynut1987

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: Teka on May 29, 2014, 12:16:14 PM

Ok so here is my answer:

We have survived massive dumps in the multipool days, we are recovering from this quite well. Here is what I did yesterday to minimize the fud: https://twitter.com/drasticraven and also my Bitcointalk history. The dev himself offered up a review of the code which to my knowledge is still happening for today. Pizpie calmed the IRC.

Our three principles are:

Privacy.
Innovation.
Transparency.

I'm not afraid of the coding, I can read and understand the code and that's not where the problem is or where my worries are.
Its all the stuff that happens around it, the blaming of people, the constant abuse some people seem to get, the blatant lies that people put in, people who are to quick to judge or which don't understand half of what they're saying etc. All in all how would a coin not be affected by that? or in this case, get over that and continue on his previous coarse?

But yea - we do need to move on, ill wait and see what happens

kicker

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

Quote from: tat123 on May 29, 2014, 12:20:14 PM

I removed my coins from the exchange yesterday... how many days do they take to mature so I can stake? Sorry if I missed it earlier.

unlock you wallet and hold your mouse right under the mining symbol.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Also this still relevant:

OK Ladies and Gents, Let's keep this thread as peaceful and a respectable as possible. No matter what happened today, respect the Darkcoin guys. Most of them stood up for us.

We recovered quickly and efficiently because we work with Facts. I'm sure that I speak for the whole team when I say that we are willing to go the extra mile for you guys.

However we need to move on, everything is fine and we are back to speed. Let's show the world that we have a strong community. Remember discuss ideas/ projects not people.

All the best,
Daniel Community Manager

fearcoka

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

All threads are getting trolled now days

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on May 29, 2014, 12:20:47 PM

Quote from: Teka on May 29, 2014, 12:16:14 PM

Quote from: Nuttynut1987 on May 29, 2014, 12:11:16 PM

I have a genuine question, and its absolutely not meant as trolling or what so ever.

Personally I haven't dumped my XC and for now I wont because I have trust in this coin - i think

But I can't help to wonder how a coin can survey FUD like this, and mostly coming with that massive dumps.
Are there any plans yet? do the DEVs have a certain vision on how to proceed from here?

Its not per say a XC problem, I see it happening a lot.
I'm still quite new to this whole thing - but how can a coin ever be successful (like LTC for example) with all those wa***rs around?

Ok so here is my answer:

We have survived massive dumps in the multipool days, we are recovering from this quite well. Here is what I did yesterday to minimize the fud: https://twitter.com/drasticraven and also my Bitcointalk history. The dev himself offered up a review of the code which to my knowledge is still happening for today. Pizpie calmed the IRC.

Our three principles are:

Privacy.
Innovation.
Transparency.

Which code is it that is being reviewed? No one is disputing that the dev wrote code for a centralized mixer. I want to see code for something that doesn't already exist in a litany of iterations.

The new anon system version 2.0 which is designed to be more anonymous and more decentralized.

Astroxjr

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Price will likely climb again later today.

Bottom was still higher then previous low, so all good , grab them whilst they are cheap !!

badam

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

Quote from: fearcoka on May 29, 2014, 12:20:36 PM

Quote from: fedmahnkassad on May 29, 2014, 12:19:57 PM

Quote from: DRobert on May 29, 2014, 12:17:44 PM

Thanks for the new thread Teka Cool

I am kinda sad we lost 300 pages Sad

i didnt read what happened, any cliffs?

Countless fud mostly from drk community so we moved to a self moderated thread.

Brilliantrocket

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: Teka on May 29, 2014, 12:16:14 PM

Quote from: Nuttynut1987 on May 29, 2014, 12:11:16 PM

I have a genuine question, and its absolutely not meant as trolling or what so ever.

Personally I haven't dumped my XC and for now I wont because I have trust in this coin - i think

But I can't help to wonder how a coin can survey FUD like this, and mostly coming with that massive dumps.
Are there any plans yet? do the DEVs have a certain vision on how to proceed from here?

Its not per say a XC problem, I see it happening a lot.
I'm still quite new to this whole thing - but how can a coin ever be successful (like LTC for example) with all those wa***rs around?

Ok so here is my answer:

We have survived massive dumps in the multipool days, we are recovering from this quite well. Here is what I did yesterday to minimize the fud: https://twitter.com/drasticraven and also my Bitcointalk history. The dev himself offered up a review of the code which to my knowledge is still happening for today. Pizpie calmed the IRC.

Our three principles are:

Privacy.
Innovation.
Transparency.

Which code is it that is being reviewed? No one is disputing that the dev wrote code for a centralized mixer. I want to see code for something that doesn't already exist in a litany of iterations.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000