Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1624. (Read 1484248 times)

LOL, it was just a playful jab Aren't my Paint skills uber

In terms of the future I have this post which collates a few snippets from the dev:

The mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...  DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform

This is why the multi-path paradigm network I built back in 2005 still functions to do this day and scaled up to meet the demands of 2014... think back to 2005, granted we had the internet, but not the mobile technology - and that is a key part of my background is mobility that will be leveraged in the android anonymous POS wallet

(http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf)
(The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day )

If your waiting for NSA proof anonymity - well that is the goal of our REV 2 release..

No, mixing is only part of it, XC now contains a completely new transaction protocol layer that is encrypted and will be leveraged as a platform for all sorts of concepts.... and it will leverage multi-path paradigm topology (which again is a custom developed concept based on dual-path paradigm)So mixing is just the first application to run on top of this new protocol........ Don't want this key point to get lost --- mixing is just the first application, the list is long and the potential is huge, and since the foundation has been built and deployed, it is now time to build on that foundation.... with some revolutionary concepts and idea's.....

Also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform

You sir, are the man. I feel distinctly less like I'm about to have a stroke. Teka, thank you too. You two are preventing all-out war.

www.shouldipanicsell.com

A wise man would hold the majority of his XC in staking wallets, which I do. But there was no way I could miss out shorting down from 400sats. Managed to pull my starting amount off the exchanges and back in to wallets, and still have a few thousand left on Mint and Trex to play with. Was a fantastic day! I usually only trade in BTC and stay away from alts in general. But like I have said before, I think I have found my altcoin darling.

hi everybody in community, we can still ask bter add XC coin on their exchange platform

here is the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/zh-cn/requests/new

Teka It is really bad taste to just remove any post that are questioning the integrity of the coin... This post from the other thread hasn't been fixed and I think it's important to fix this.

In the main.cpp of XC there is this :

https://github.com/atcsecure/X11COIN/commit/6f0428202c17f1ea21cd1b8dab55c025a57375c7

This summit was done 16 hours ago , you can find this

bool CTxOut::IsDust() const
 +{
 +    // FedoraCoin: IsDust() detection disabled, allows any valid dust to be relayed.
 +    // The fees imposed on each dust txo is considered sufficient spam deterrant.
 +    return false;
 +}

now I checked 2 other coins and they don't have this "dust" function from Fedoracoin. Why is it that it is in XC's code and not in BC's ?

Post here you never know.... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=627225.0;topicseen

It's a wise decision. Now we just need somebody professional to work on the whole branding.

It seems like he is improving daily, provence as long as he sticks with market info and lower font i's fine.

Yes as mentioned here:


We are open to all feedback and it's my job to hear all of you out. This means that when you took to the forums/twitter, irc etc to let us know your opinion on the name, we listened. We have thought long and hard about the name and after hearing the feedback, decided that we are sticking with just XC.

Remember, if you have any concerns that haven't already been answered or want help with projects let me know.


That's for anyone who missed it.

Would you also ban provenceday? He makes this look like the average P&D thread. The constant caps and big fonts are really annoying.

Oh please. That was nothing personal.

Can someone help by organizing relevant information from the old thread regarding things like our anon feature / x nodes / blockchain 2.0  --> this will help people more easily see the innovation of XC

 

My official Logo submission  

http://i1219.photobucket.com/albums/dd434/Grifftech/xcoin_zpsc0b6d88d.png

I used to trade a lot then... xc

This is great and rock solid team here.

I really trust the hard work done, and really appreciate to see that there is nothing wrong with this coin.

I'll keep my XC for long time  

Thanks again.

Just read the name of XC is not going to be changed... thank you. The new name was a little cheesy.

Ahhhhh, so much better.

Been an eventful 24 hours! Seen both the up and downsides of the cryptocommunity. And that trade volume yesterday! Crap, haven't had that much fun tradings alts since November!

we now have a 20% total trade volume on all altcoins, that's great!