Ok ... and ?
I'm happy you was not at the start of BTC supporting it with your vision and idea ...
Just leave ...
You do realize that not seeing the "con" side of an investment is a bad idea right? Any coin I decide to invest in I will welcome criticism to. Informed decisions are not blindly optimistic ones
We are looking for constructive criticism, not fud. XC has proven itself to be a legitimate currency with high standards for any tech put out publicly. I remember you were a very active member in one of the fud threads. Further you did not listen to our answer and took your own conclusions.
It's mostly because I've not seen any real answers. I do have a question - how does XChat compare to Bitmessage - does it offer better anonymity and if so how?
It's funny you ask that, because even BitMessage is asking for independent audit for their system. Do YOU know how BitMessage is really anonymous and good in any way? How do you compare one system to another when both systems are not at the audited phase yet?
Bc one is open source?
So what if it's open source? The question is... even if it's open source, do YOU know how secure it is. BitMessage is still awaiting independent audit themselves like I said. Even if both are open source, if both have not been audited independently... you don't really know how secure it is. eg. there is nothing to quantify against each other.
It's like arguing about who's lawn is greener without a spectrophotometer or... who can throw the ball faster without a calibrated radar gun.
We are just not at the point to ask questions like that yet.
Open source anon software > closed source that claims to be anon.
Ya... as if you can read code. Open source shit is not better than close source...
You are telling me that GIMP is better than Photoshop?
USBcoin was open source... so what? There was malicious code in there to allow the scamming dev to create fake coins and made over 120 btc from the scam.
Open source codes that aren't maintained and audited by experts all the time are some of the most vunerable because there can be zero day exploit simply because any flaws are immediately seen by black hats while the white hats people are sleeping.
Snapchat, Whatsapp, Line... EVERY SINGLE one of these are not open source. You think normal people give a crap about it?
People who are serious about anon and into cryptocurrencies. Yes. Very much so.
People who are not serious will buy doge
Ya... people that have money and can move market can't read codes. They rely on experts review. Guess what? XC will have those reviews and bounties post Rev 3.
You are welcome.