Topic: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU! - page 62. (Read 90841 times)

0.32i online - minor version

not me
i've nothing between my old HD7000s and my RXs

The trailing dot, plus or any symbol is tolerated and ignored to detect the coin. And all is passed as-is to the pool.

I strongly recommend 18.6 drivers for RX560, later drivers caused either crash or perf regression on my rigs.

Impressive video about the Threadripper
I note all AMD CPU, even back to the AM3/FM2 sockets, have a performance of about 75 h/s per mining core. But the Athlon x4 can use only two cores (because it has 4M cache) while your threadripper uses 32

I couldn't blind-find the Numa node bug, the node are simply requested from the OS. But since the threads don't share memory (except in the rare case one use the Dual-thread mode for older CPUs) the performance impact of using the wrong Numa is very low.

About the bad CPU counter, i also rechecked all and found no more bug, please in your config go back to a simple numbering from 0 to N. If you kept the indices 0-15 then 64-79 the miner won't start because your 32 cpus are 0-31

Done the 0.32i, now testing


Next big feature will be Watchdog.

Veronite is to be added in the upcoming 0.32i, meanwhile you can mine with parameter --any --variation 5
let me check on that pool, it will be a good test for the new native Veronite support

edit, tried with current version (the wallet is a dummy one):


Expected, and it says what to do: add --any --variation N with N=Cryptonight-Heavy=5

I'm mining veronite (pool.veronite.space), and yeah, I tried both "+" and "." but nothing works...
When using other miner, for example xmr-stak, it does work...

Has anybody tried it on R9 390?

which pool?
some pools want "+" instead of "."

Hey JCE-Miner (and everybody).
I'm using 32f version for GPU and static diff option (using the dot ".") after the address
doesn't seem to be working...

Someone has the same problem ?
Apparently it is supported by the miner (and also by the mining pool...)

Cheers!

 

2.5kh/s is really, really nice

If you don't mind, I will post a link to your video on reddit, may I?

Just posted a quick video on YouTube of the testing of the AMD Ryzen 2990WX and gave a shout out to JCE Miner

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87mHny7PZME

Cheers

what parameters to set for RX460/560? this one? its not the faster then SRB
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },

what drivers you recomend for RX460/560?

And the fastest and most stable Vega miner, the fact that you should really start to promote a lot more 

AMD Threadripper 2990WX

on XMR stak - 1750H/s
On JCE miner 2250h/s

https://twitter.com/BitsBeTrippin/status/1032334235879792641

source in this reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/99f524/inital_testing_xmrstak_with_a_2990wx/

Ok for Numa nodes, i'll take a look again, but since i've no dual CPU to test on, it will be a blind fix, if any. Same for the guy who had troubles with his dual Xeon. I already got good feedbacks about dual xeon configs, so it may be a motherboard/chipset dependent bug of some sort.

Good idea the per-bus ordering, and simple to do. I add it to the list of little fixes for next version.

This what? the miner itself? it's online for several monthes and has a bunch of users, sure. That's the fastest on CPU and on some GPU cards like RX550/560. Give it a try, it's not a virus or anything, even if detected as, like all miners.
No fee is mined during the first minute, so you have nothing to lose

Download it from my github page only, be careful there are a lot of fake releases in other forum topics with a link to a Mega page. That actually is a virus, don't download from there.

@JCE-Miner

Can we have option for gpu ordering based on bus ID? It's easier to debug a flaky GPU.

Any one who already tried this?

can you check how NUMA nodes are used, on my dual cpu mobos it says NUMA node 0 on both miners that are set up to use the cpus separately

hi all, and sorry for the late answers

HiveOS : i've so little time for the linux version that's unlikely i make a dedicated hiveos one. but couldn't hiveos integrate jce, their side ? the cpu version is quite simple to configure, and autoconfig is well tuned.

multi-algo: the first step is multi-coin on same algo (like switching from Loki to Ryo). i'm working on it.

stealth mode: i never tried it, but isn't this a mode to turn a miner into a botnet? this feature looks suspicious to me…

i plan to release soon a minor version with a few fixes.

Hi @JCE-Miner!

I'm very very satisfied with JCE + Ryzen 5 1600 + Windows. Pretty high hashrate (1900~2000H/s mining CN-Lite). But I'm using HiveOS to mine some coins that doesn't have good miners for Windows. And in the HiveOS I don't have the marvelous JCE-Miner.

I know a version for Linux, but I couldn't create a custom miner. Can you make a integrated version for HiveOS?
Guidelines are here: https://github.com/minershive/hiveos-linux/blob/master/hive/custom/README.md
Some miners packed already: http://download.hiveos.farm/custom/

Thanks in advance!

Hello. Is it possible to make this miner working in stealth mode? Like Background command in XMrig.

@JCE-Miner
Do you plan to support algo switching in next releases?

yes I also feel the same way, CN-V7 JCE faster about 50-60 h/s per card and no hash rate drop like other miner for RX Vega card, but for RX 580 I think about the same with other miner.
CN-Heavy / Haven / Saber RX 580 faster about 20-30 h/s per card, but RX Vega I think about the same with other miner.

I hope JCE Dev keep updating and more active in this forum, because it's true in term of speed JCE is faster but in term of feature I think other miner got more feature that maybe for some miner it's very useful.

Keep the good work.