[XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU! - page 92.

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: hammuh on June 27, 2018, 12:09:56 PM

Vega 64s

confgpu.txt
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
(etc.)

12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 1019.38 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 1042.35 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 1022.37 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 1035.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 1026.74 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 1029.77 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 1030.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 1024.28 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 1020.92 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 1031.15 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 1007.70 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 1027.57 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 1019.47 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 1027.29 h/s
12:08:34 | Total: 14365.70 h/s - Max: 14388.12 h/s

It's need results from other miners like SRB and Cast XMR to compare with. And point algo and amount of video memory please.

hammuh

jr. member

Activity: 41

Merit: 1

Vega 64s

confgpu.txt
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
(etc.)

12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 1019.38 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 1042.35 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 1022.37 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 1035.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 1026.74 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 1029.77 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 1030.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 1024.28 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 1020.92 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 1031.15 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 1007.70 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 1027.57 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 1019.47 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 1027.29 h/s
12:08:34 | Total: 14365.70 h/s - Max: 14388.12 h/s

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: syncro2017 on June 27, 2018, 10:16:20 AM

Quote

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel.
On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee.

syncro2017

newbie

Activity: 81

Merit: 0

Quote

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I take the previous comment back for a moment, just downloaded the latest SRB Miner 1.6.1, seems the hashrate is on part with JCE
I updated my post, just to be clear, overclock/undervolt settings were the same between all test

syncro2017

newbie

Activity: 81

Merit: 0

Quote

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: syncro2017 on June 27, 2018, 08:36:13 AM

First of all, Thanks for the great work @JCE-Miner , i believe in a while this will be the fastest miner

Now here are the results of my test on one of my rigs.
Setup : 6 Cards

Asus ROG Strix RX570 4GB Hynix - Index 0
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 3
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 4
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 1
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 2
Asus RX550 LP 2GB Hynix - Index 5

All flashed with custom bios

Mining Monero (XMR)

start.bat command line for miner:

Code:

jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c confgpu.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --variation %FORK% --low -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*

confgpu.txt:

Code:

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
]

After playing with config values for about an hour , looks like these are the best i came up with. the issue is the a very long time it takes to restart the miner because of opencl payload compilation

Result after 12 hours running:

Code:

XMR Stak result:

Code:

HASHRATE REPORT - AMD

| ID | 10s | 60s | 15m | ID | 10s | 60s | 15m |
| 0 | 471.2 | 471.9 | (na) | 1 | 471.2 | 470.5 | (na) |
| 2 | 248.9 | 248.0 | (na) | 3 | 251.1 | 247.7 | (na) |
| 4 | 243.4 | 241.6 | (na) | 5 | 238.8 | 239.5 | (na) |
| 6 | 493.0 | 493.8 | (na) | 7 | 493.3 | 492.5 | (na) |
| 8 | 477.3 | 477.7 | (na) | 9 | 477.1 | 476.6 | (na) |
| 10 | 255.4 | 255.7 | (na) | 11 | 251.9 | 254.3 | (na) |
Totals (AMD): 4372.5 4369.8 0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL): 4372.5 4369.8 0.0 H/s
Highest: 4376.5 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Rig was running very stable for over 12 hours. Very impressive RX550 performance, over 500h/s, great job on this one!
Now couple of remarks:

1. Takes a long time to generate the opencl payload for the cards, i know that this is just the first beta but would be a really good idea to implement cache so need to generate only once and then just use the pre-compiled binary and load into the cards, like xmr-stak does.
2. When reporting the share value, its always the same and is equal to a static diff i set to mine at, here is the log:

Code:

08:19:45 | GPU Thread 1 Lane 14 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:45 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:47 | GPU Thread 6 Lane 138 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:47 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:55 | GPU Thread 2 Lane 69 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 380 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 390 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 10 Lane 254 finds a Share, value 27060

as you can see value is always 27060

Otherwise, great job!!! hope there will be more optimizations and another release soon for even more hashrate

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

gvb

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 9

ok, my issues seems to be solved.

I installed a mining specific amd driver, rebooted and now it's mining on the GPU aswell.

It went from 130H/s CPU to 285H/S CPU+GPU

Thanks a lot, enjoy your fee!

syncro2017

newbie

Activity: 81

Merit: 0

First of all, Thanks for the great work @JCE-Miner , i believe in a while this will be the fastest miner

Now here are the results of my test on one of my rigs.
Setup : 6 Cards

Asus ROG Strix RX570 4GB Hynix - Index 0
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 3
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 4
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 1
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 2
Asus RX550 LP 2GB Hynix - Index 5

All flashed with custom bios

Mining Monero (XMR)

start.bat command line for miner:

Code:

jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c confgpu.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --variation %FORK% --low -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*

confgpu.txt:

Code:

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
]

After playing with config values for about an hour , looks like these are the best i came up with. the issue is the a very long time it takes to restart the miner because of opencl payload compilation

Result after 12 hours running:

Code:

XMR Stak 2.4.5 config:

Code:

// gpu: Ellesmere memory:3673
// compute units: 32
// Asus ROG Strix RX570 4GB Elpida
{ "index" : 0,
"intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},
{ "index" : 0,
"intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},

// gpu: gfx804 memory:1646
// compute units: 8
// MSI RX550 2GB Elpida
{ "index" : 1,
"intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},
{ "index" : 1,
"intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},

// gpu: gfx804 memory:1646
// compute units: 8
// MSI RX550 2GB Elpida
{ "index" : 2,
"intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},
{ "index" : 2,
"intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},

// gpu: Ellesmere memory:3673
// compute units: 36
// Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix
{ "index" : 3,
"intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
"comp_mode" : true
},
{ "index" : 3,
"intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
"comp_mode" : true
},

// gpu: Ellesmere memory:3673
// compute units: 36
// Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix
{ "index" : 4,
"intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
"comp_mode" : true
},
{ "index" : 4,
"intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
"comp_mode" : true
},

// gpu: gfx804 memory:1646
// compute units: 8
// MSI RX550 2GB Elpida
{ "index" : 5,
"intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},
{ "index" : 5,
"intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"comp_mode" : true
},

XMR Stak 2.4.5 result:

Code:

HASHRATE REPORT - AMD

| ID | 10s | 60s | 15m | ID | 10s | 60s | 15m |
| 0 | 471.2 | 471.9 | (na) | 1 | 471.2 | 470.5 | (na) |
| 2 | 248.9 | 248.0 | (na) | 3 | 251.1 | 247.7 | (na) |
| 4 | 243.4 | 241.6 | (na) | 5 | 238.8 | 239.5 | (na) |
| 6 | 493.0 | 493.8 | (na) | 7 | 493.3 | 492.5 | (na) |
| 8 | 477.3 | 477.7 | (na) | 9 | 477.1 | 476.6 | (na) |
| 10 | 255.4 | 255.7 | (na) | 11 | 251.9 | 254.3 | (na) |
Totals (AMD): 4372.5 4369.8 0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL): 4372.5 4369.8 0.0 H/s
Highest: 4376.5 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------

SRB Miner 1.6.1 Config:

Code:

"gpu_conf" :
[
{ "id" : 0, "intensity" : 20, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 1, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 2, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 3, "intensity" : 20, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 4, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 5, "intensity" : 20, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},

]
}

SRB Miner 1.6.1 Result:

Code:

GPU0: Radeon 550 Series [gfx804] [2048 MB][Intensity 20.0][W: 16][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 1]
GPU1: Radeon RX 570 Series [Ellesmere] [4096 MB][Intensity 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 3]
GPU2: Radeon RX 580 Series [Ellesmere] [4096 MB][Intensity 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 4]
GPU3: Radeon 550 Series [gfx804] [2048 MB][Intensity 20.0][W: 16][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 5]
GPU4: Radeon RX 580 Series [Ellesmere] [4096 MB][Intensity 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 8]
GPU5: Radeon 550 Series [gfx804] [2048 MB][Intensity 20.0][W: 16][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 9]

[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU0 : 470 H/s [T: 61c, RPM: 3674, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:1]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU1 : 967 H/s [T: 58c, RPM: 1081, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU2 : 1022 H/s [T: 64c, RPM: 765, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2150 MHz][BUS:4]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU3 : 484 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 3221, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU4 : 988 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 901, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:8]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU5 : 494 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 0, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:9]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] Total: 4425 H/s

Rig was running very stable for over 12 hours. Very impressive RX550 performance, over 500h/s, great job on this one!
Now couple of remarks:

1. Takes a long time to generate the opencl payload for the cards, i know that this is just the first beta but would be a really good idea to implement cache so need to generate only once and then just use the pre-compiled binary and load into the cards, like xmr-stak does.
2. When reporting the share value, its always the same and is equal to a static diff i set to mine at, here is the log:

Code:

08:19:45 | GPU Thread 1 Lane 14 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:45 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:47 | GPU Thread 6 Lane 138 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:47 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:55 | GPU Thread 2 Lane 69 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 380 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 390 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 10 Lane 254 finds a Share, value 27060

as you can see value is always 27060

Otherwise, great job!!! hope there will be more optimizations and another release soon for even more hashrate

gvb

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 9

Quote from: smparo on June 27, 2018, 07:07:28 AM

You made the same mistake I did Wink

Just add a comma before "gpu_threads_conf" :
],
"gpu_threads_conf" :
[

Thanks that solved the syntax issue.

Now it seems to use 2 thread on the AMD and send some compiled code to it but the hash rate seems to stay on 0H/s.

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Heavy algo didn't grows up with time... At least about 10-15 min didn't added speed. So on RX 580 heavy algo max 1000 h/s. On SRB it's up to 1120 h/s.

smparo

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: gvb on June 27, 2018, 06:53:16 AM

smparo,

from the moment that I add those GPU lines I get an invalid syntax error when I run the start batch file.

Quote

"cpu_threads_conf" :
[
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 0, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 2, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 3, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
]

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":400 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":400 },
]

It detects both my Interl (id:0) and AMD (id:1) now tho but it's not using any yet.

You made the same mistake I did Wink

Just add a comma before "gpu_threads_conf" :

],

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[

gvb

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 9

smparo,

from the moment that I add those GPU lines I get an invalid syntax error when I run the start batch file.

Quote

"cpu_threads_conf" :
[
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 0, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 2, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
   { "cpu_architecture" : "auto", "affine_to_cpu" : 3, "use_cache" : true, "multi_hash":1 },
]

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":400 },
   { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":400 },
]

It detects both my Interl (id:0) and AMD (id:1) now tho but it's not using any yet.

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: JCE-Miner on June 27, 2018, 01:36:38 AM

thanks for the feedback

your results are suprising on 270X on my hd7870 i really was far above Claymore, and Claymore is easy to configure.
against srb, well i probably didn't configure it at max but i couldn't reach the 540 i get on JCE. i'll retry with your exact same settings.

to disable opencl, parameter --no-gpu

also a very important thing, i let opencl allocate resource progressively, so the max hashrate is reached after a few minutes. at start, jce is often at 80% speed. Claymore punch the card to the max immediately. i'll add a message when the miner starts so people are not disapointed.

SRB miner latest versions works not so good on older cards like 2xx and 3xx.
I tried to wait some time and yes: speed grows. On 270X i got 545-546 h/s. But Claymore's 11.3 550 h/s still faster and without fee...
I think if you make multihash not devidable by 16 to make it possible to set it to 460, your miner can achive Claymore's speed...
Now will try heavy algo on 580...

P.S. You must add saving gpu kernels to not compile it every time like it SRB miner maked.

gvb

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 9

ok, the right one is installed and it finds my main (shitty) intel gpu but not the secondary radeon R7.

might need to reboot due to that mining problem with XMRig, will do that after lunch and report here.

gvb

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 9

wait a second... the link in the first post points to a download of the CPU only version

I'll download the right version first Wink

smparo

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: gvb on June 27, 2018, 03:19:29 AM

JCE,

do I need to do anything special to have my GPU detected/enabled?

I have an AMD Radeon R7 200 I believe.

XMRig detects it but after a few jobs all counters remain 0 or N/A so I wanted to give your GPU version a try.

Edit: this shows XMRig for my card...

[2018-06-23 22:19:09] compiling code and initializing GPUs. This will take a while...
[2018-06-23 22:19:11] #0, GPU #0 AMD Radeon R7 200 Series, intensity: 576 (8/256), cu: 6

not a top class card but the extra 120H/s is better than nothing at all Wink

You need to remove "--auto" in your start line and add "-c confgpu.txt", like this one
jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe --any --forever --variation %FORK% --low -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %* -c confgpu.txt

Then edit the file confgpu.txt and change the parameters.
I have done some test with my R7 200 and i go to 140H/s with this parameter (memory at 1050MHz):

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":400 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":400 },
]

gvb

jr. member

Activity: 140

Merit: 9

JCE,

do I need to do anything special to have my GPU detected/enabled?

I have an AMD Radeon R7 200 I believe.

XMRig detects it but after a few jobs all counters remain 0 or N/A so I wanted to give your GPU version a try.

Edit: this shows XMRig for my card...

[2018-06-23 22:19:09] compiling code and initializing GPUs. This will take a while...
[2018-06-23 22:19:11] #0, GPU #0 AMD Radeon R7 200 Series, intensity: 576 (8/256), cu: 6

not a top class card but the extra 120H/s is better than nothing at all Wink

nordmann666

member

Activity: 361

Merit: 16

vega 56
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1232 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 16, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1232 },

~1800hs

but...would it not better to use seperate cpu miner with static difficulty? the GPU forced the pool to send high diff jobs = no shares found by CPU

Iamtutut

full member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 131

Thanks a lot !

JCE-Miner

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 22

sure.
you can already mine it with --any --variation 4

to do now is multi-pool and gpu autoconfig

Topic: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU! - page 92. (Read 90814 times)