Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 216. (Read 4671910 times)
Is Nanopool steal some profit? Mined 12h and got almost twice less than expected by their built-in calc or by whattomine, checked some miners from nanopool top-list and as noticed same less 30-40% difference in payouts and what is calculated for them
any miners in here? i think this is wrong place sry
https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.html stilll indicating ~2700 nodes. Their hash rate indication has been out of whack for many months, but now appears to be on target at ~400MH/s? Bye bye ASICs 
I haven't been able to keep tabs well while traveling, but I did manage to contribute my meager laptop to the hash rate for the first 12 hours after the fork. Good to see the stabilization since that (last contact) point. Overall, it looks like less drama than I anticipated after those first hours. Good stuff.
I haven't been able to keep tabs well while traveling, but I did manage to contribute my meager laptop to the hash rate for the first 12 hours after the fork. Good to see the stabilization since that (last contact) point. Overall, it looks like less drama than I anticipated after those first hours. Good stuff.
Hey guyz i'm trying to mine xmr but xmrstak says tls_secure_algo false i dunno how to . can anyone tell me the right inputs for xmrstak, i have gtx1080ti and xeon e3 v1240 but i think cpu mining is not recommedded for this one. but how to mine with gtx? i'm trying to get connected to mineXMR.com or is this wrong place? Sorry i'm newbie
I think an encrypted algorithm is possible for GPU/CPU, it could change every block.
Hi guys,
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
This is the Monero thread, not the XMC thread
So far Monero, Sumokoin and Stellite have changed Algo. IPBC is doing it in less then a week. They opted for a heavily changed algo which should be even harder to crack that Sumokoin one.
Is IPBC just increasing the scratchpad size? I don't think that'd help things, we saw with the Balkai ASIC that it didn't seem to change much (the Balkai could do CryptoNight and CryptoNight-Lite)
They will increase the size yes. But I think they are also changing some others things. That is why its taking them long. They wan't to do the best algo change out of all Cryponight coins. I think that is very good, but we will see. I really like the IPBC project.
Otherwise I bow down to Monero devs and community for sticking it up the ass for ASICs. Monero gained a lot of reputation in my eyes.
I second demotion i will support any coin that fights asic unless they are from scrypt or sha256. I think asic should stick to those algo. Kudos to monero team and monero community for choosing to stay as decentralized as possible.
This!
Also IPBC not only increasing the scratchpad they also adopt the monero changes and also implement a small custom tweak to the Cryptonight algorithm, so ASICs moving to MoneroV7 aren’t compatible.
See here --> https://ipbc.io/eng/announcements/ipbc-fork-available-in-testnet/
Electroneum actually said they will follow monero's lead but i think they will be slow to follow.
Hi guys,
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
This is the Monero thread, not the XMC thread
So far Monero, Sumokoin and Stellite have changed Algo. IPBC is doing it in less then a week. They opted for a heavily changed algo which should be even harder to crack that Sumokoin one.
Is IPBC just increasing the scratchpad size? I don't think that'd help things, we saw with the Balkai ASIC that it didn't seem to change much (the Balkai could do CryptoNight and CryptoNight-Lite)
They will increase the size yes. But I think they are also changing some others things. That is why its taking them long. They wan't to do the best algo change out of all Cryponight coins. I think that is very good, but we will see. I really like the IPBC project.
Otherwise I bow down to Monero devs and community for sticking it up the ass for ASICs. Monero gained a lot of reputation in my eyes.
I second demotion i will support any coin that fights asic unless they are from scrypt or sha256. I think asic should stick to those algo. Kudos to monero team and monero community for choosing to stay as decentralized as possible.
Hi guys,
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
This is the Monero thread, not the XMC thread
So far Monero, Sumokoin and Stellite have changed Algo. IPBC is doing it in less then a week. They opted for a heavily changed algo which should be even harder to crack that Sumokoin one.
Is IPBC just increasing the scratchpad size? I don't think that'd help things, we saw with the Balkai ASIC that it didn't seem to change much (the Balkai could do CryptoNight and CryptoNight-Lite)
They will increase the size yes. But I think they are also changing some others things. That is why its taking them long. They wan't to do the best algo change out of all Cryponight coins. I think that is very good, but we will see. I really like the IPBC project.
Otherwise I bow down to Monero devs and community for sticking it up the ass for ASICs. Monero gained a lot of reputation in my eyes.
Hi guys,
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
This is the Monero thread, not the XMC thread
So far Monero, Sumokoin and Stellite have changed Algo. IPBC is doing it in less then a week. They opted for a heavily changed algo which should be even harder to crack that Sumokoin one.
Is IPBC just increasing the scratchpad size? I don't think that'd help things, we saw with the Balkai ASIC that it didn't seem to change much (the Balkai could do CryptoNight and CryptoNight-Lite)
This morning I had a transaction between Nanopool and Mymonero wallet.
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Could you try to verify the transaction?
https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/6137/how-do-i-as-a-recipient-verify-that-my-transaction-actually-arrived
The problem is solved. I think there is a slowing down in Mymonero wallet after the fork.
I got panic when my monthly mine's payment got lost for two hours
Good to hear
Nice to see that Monero and many other Cryptonight coins have changed there algo
Many others? oh pray tell
So far Monero, Sumokoin and Stellite have changed Algo. IPBC is doing it in less then a week. They opted for a heavily changed algo which should be even harder to crack that Sumokoin one.
This morning I had a transaction between Nanopool and Mymonero wallet.
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
If any part of a transaction is from a untrusted chain then it will be orphaned by the chain you are sending it to, I'd like to see a transaction that was a merge of the 2 chains. Do you have the link?
Hi guys,
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
Please recommend a XMC pool, THX!
This morning I had a transaction between Nanopool and Mymonero wallet.
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Could you try to verify the transaction?
https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/6137/how-do-i-as-a-recipient-verify-that-my-transaction-actually-arrived
The problem is solved. I think there is a slowing down in Mymonero wallet after the fork.
I got panic when my monthly mine's payment got lost for two hours
This morning I had a transaction between Nanopool and Mymonero wallet.
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Half of this transaction belongs to old old algorithm.
I can't see this transaction in my wallet.
In Nanopool, it says that the payment is confirmed.
Does it take more time in this new algorithm?
Could you try to verify the transaction?
https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/6137/how-do-i-as-a-recipient-verify-that-my-transaction-actually-arrived
Wallet 0.12.0.0 doesn't even start on windows 10.
Tried 3 different computers, without result.
Wallet crash within 1 sec of launching.
deamon start ok tho, which is wierd !
No errors, 2 lines of log :
2018-04-08 20:50:01.247 2596 INFO logging contrib/epee/src/mlog.cpp:185 New log categories: *:WARNING,net:FATAL,net.p2p:FATAL,net.cn:FATAL,global:INFO,verify:FATAL,stacktrace:INFO,logging:INFO,msgwriter:INFO
2018-04-08 20:50:02.497 2596 WARN net.http src/common/util.cpp:627 Failed to determine whether address '' is local, assuming not
I'm clueless... What a fiasco.
Anybody having wallet not even starting on win10 ?
Tried 3 different computers, without result.
Wallet crash within 1 sec of launching.
deamon start ok tho, which is wierd !
No errors, 2 lines of log :
2018-04-08 20:50:01.247 2596 INFO logging contrib/epee/src/mlog.cpp:185 New log categories: *:WARNING,net:FATAL,net.p2p:FATAL,net.cn:FATAL,global:INFO,verify:FATAL,stacktrace:INFO,logging:INFO,msgwriter:INFO
2018-04-08 20:50:02.497 2596 WARN net.http src/common/util.cpp:627 Failed to determine whether address '' is local, assuming not
I'm clueless... What a fiasco.
Anybody having wallet not even starting on win10 ?
Could you try launching via the start-low-graphics-mode.bat batch file that is included?
Something strange is happening with this fork.
Monerujo, which has been updated to version 12, shows the wrong block height, compared with the version 12 daemon I'm running locally.
As does wallet-cli when it's connected to a remote daemon that I know is running version 12, because it's on a vps that belongs to me.
?
Does anybody have success using a wallet that isn't connected to a local daemon?
Monerujo, which has been updated to version 12, shows the wrong block height, compared with the version 12 daemon I'm running locally.
As does wallet-cli when it's connected to a remote daemon that I know is running version 12, because it's on a vps that belongs to me.
?
Does anybody have success using a wallet that isn't connected to a local daemon?
Have you tried restarting the wallet and daemon?
Does anybody know how to send transaction after the hard fork? I always get an error like in this issue: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/3581
Moneromooo has suggested a patch that you can apply.
which miner software has upgrades already--i have been using cast--and what about mining pools?
Cast since 0.9.0 (http://www.gandalph3000.com/) and more or less all big pools are already upgraded.
Jump to: