Message from LitePaid.com, the LiteBit.eu altcoins payment gateway plugin for webshops :
"At this moment we are working on the accepment of Monero."
So, soon, directly possible to pay with XMR on most modern webshops with this free plugin.
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 520. (Read 4671924 times)
September 05, 2016, 04:53:04 AM
September 05, 2016, 04:26:44 AM
Could you try transfer_new instead of transfer? The remainder of the command is the same.
I used transfer_new with mixin_count from 2 to 8 and I got:
Code:
Error: failed to find a suitable way to split transactions
transfer_new 0
Code:
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 4.071798228705, transaction amount 4.930000000000 = 3.000000000000 + 1.930000000000 (fee)
In the second case at least (and at last) transfer see the same balance as "balance" command.
Unfortunately 1.93 XMR of fee for transferring just only 3 XMR is somewhat ridiculus... Over 63% of the transaction amount.
Have you really utilized the sweep_unmixable command? Because from your logs it seems like you have a lot of (possibly unmixable) small inputs, which results in a high fee.
In addition, did you mine to this wallet?
September 04, 2016, 11:14:57 PM
I believe it is the third Monero-branded abs.ex. sold by start the art. I bought the first. I think the 5-panel was the best of them, though.
Probably, he should be selling them on AlphaBay.
Probably, he should be selling them on AlphaBay.
September 04, 2016, 09:43:51 PM
SUMMER SALE
Painting -MONERO FLASH -
NOW :150 USD
sold
Horry shit. It's sold!! This is the most bullish news. It's been for sale for ever.
September 04, 2016, 08:34:53 PM
Yes, transfer fees are quite ridiculous right now but that will be resolved with the next scheduled fork, I am confident.
Any way to check/estimate the fee before I make the transfer?
Yes you can turn on "set always-confirm-transfers 1"
Damn. Good to know. Thanks.
September 04, 2016, 08:23:26 PM
Yes, transfer fees are quite ridiculous right now but that will be resolved with the next scheduled fork, I am confident.
Any way to check/estimate the fee before I make the transfer?
Yes you can turn on "set always-confirm-transfers 1"
September 04, 2016, 07:47:40 PM
Yes, transfer fees are quite ridiculous right now but that will be resolved with the next scheduled fork, I am confident.
Any way to check/estimate the fee before I make the transfer?
September 04, 2016, 07:39:23 PM
Yes, transfer fees are quite ridiculous right now but that will be resolved with the next scheduled fork, I am confident.
In fact, I say that purely on the basis of the core team's history of good judgement. They don't always do what I think is optimal, but they always do something very reasonable, and usually I would be inclined to trust their judgement, as a group, to be better than my own, by default. I can't think of any other crypto for which that is true, remarkably.
In fact, I say that purely on the basis of the core team's history of good judgement. They don't always do what I think is optimal, but they always do something very reasonable, and usually I would be inclined to trust their judgement, as a group, to be better than my own, by default. I can't think of any other crypto for which that is true, remarkably.
September 04, 2016, 07:33:29 PM
Could you try transfer_new instead of transfer? The remainder of the command is the same.
I used transfer_new with mixin_count from 2 to 8 and I got:
Code:
Error: failed to find a suitable way to split transactions
transfer_new 0
Code:
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 4.071798228705, transaction amount 4.930000000000 = 3.000000000000 + 1.930000000000 (fee)
In the second case at least (and at last) transfer see the same balance as "balance" command.
Unfortunately 1.93 XMR of fee for transferring just only 3 XMR is somewhat ridiculus... Over 63% of the transaction amount.
September 04, 2016, 06:17:25 PM
I played with myself and before the end, an idea pop out instead of something else, so I quickly start to tune up my rig, and get these results, so what do you think is better
830h/s for xmr
or
620h/s for xmr + 12Mh eth + 230Mh sia
830h/s for xmr
or
620h/s for xmr + 12Mh eth + 230Mh sia
it is just 30W more solo VS tripple mining
September 04, 2016, 06:10:59 PM
Looks like XMR is headed to the moon again
Well it's night time here again, so ... yeah...
And this was supposed to be a weekend to relax in the US... I've barely slept in 3 days!!!
September 04, 2016, 06:09:41 PM
Looks like XMR is headed to the moon again
Well it's night time here again, so ... yeah...
September 04, 2016, 05:59:21 PM
Looks like XMR is headed to the moon again
September 04, 2016, 05:40:36 PM
Thanks dEBRUYNE. I was able to send some XMR using higher mixin_count. I have also swept unmixable.
I can't understand however the discrepancy between "balance" shown by balance command and "money available to transfer".
Please look at this example:
Does it mean I have 0.13 XMR available to transfer and 3.941798229 of unavailable?
What shell I do with unavailable? Can I check "available to transfer" balance before I attempt to make a transfer and it fails?
To check balance, type "balance" into simplewallet. From your output it shows that you probably have a lot of dust. You might want to undust this first with the sweep_unmixable command.
I can't understand however the discrepancy between "balance" shown by balance command and "money available to transfer".
Please look at this example:
Code:
[wallet 48KCoY]: balance
Balance: 4.071798228705, unlocked balance: 4.071798228705
[wallet 48KCoY]: transfer 4 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGRoyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB 1 4f6862f49ab77c19043f668b8f1c25a274ed4c57ca36704e1259b3816c2187c1
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.130000000000, transaction amount 1.000000000000 = 1.000000000000 + 0.000000000000 (fee)
Balance: 4.071798228705, unlocked balance: 4.071798228705
[wallet 48KCoY]: transfer 4 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGRoyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB 1 4f6862f49ab77c19043f668b8f1c25a274ed4c57ca36704e1259b3816c2187c1
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.130000000000, transaction amount 1.000000000000 = 1.000000000000 + 0.000000000000 (fee)
Does it mean I have 0.13 XMR available to transfer and 3.941798229 of unavailable?
What shell I do with unavailable? Can I check "available to transfer" balance before I attempt to make a transfer and it fails?
Could you try transfer_new instead of transfer? The remainder of the command is the same.
September 04, 2016, 04:27:14 PM
Thanks dEBRUYNE. I was able to send some XMR using higher mixin_count. I have also swept unmixable.
I can't understand however the discrepancy between "balance" shown by balance command and "money available to transfer".
Please look at this example:
Does it mean I have 0.13 XMR available to transfer and 3.941798229 of unavailable?
What shell I do with unavailable? Can I check "available to transfer" balance before I attempt to make a transfer and it fails?
To check balance, type "balance" into simplewallet. From your output it shows that you probably have a lot of dust. You might want to undust this first with the sweep_unmixable command.
I can't understand however the discrepancy between "balance" shown by balance command and "money available to transfer".
Please look at this example:
Code:
[wallet 48KCoY]: balance
Balance: 4.071798228705, unlocked balance: 4.071798228705
[wallet 48KCoY]: transfer 4 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGRoyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB 1 4f6862f49ab77c19043f668b8f1c25a274ed4c57ca36704e1259b3816c2187c1
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.130000000000, transaction amount 1.000000000000 = 1.000000000000 + 0.000000000000 (fee)
Balance: 4.071798228705, unlocked balance: 4.071798228705
[wallet 48KCoY]: transfer 4 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGRoyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB 1 4f6862f49ab77c19043f668b8f1c25a274ed4c57ca36704e1259b3816c2187c1
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.130000000000, transaction amount 1.000000000000 = 1.000000000000 + 0.000000000000 (fee)
Does it mean I have 0.13 XMR available to transfer and 3.941798229 of unavailable?
What shell I do with unavailable? Can I check "available to transfer" balance before I attempt to make a transfer and it fails?
September 04, 2016, 04:10:30 PM
What does this mean?
**********************************************************************
You are now synchronized with the network. You may now start simplewallet.
Please note, that the blockchain will be saved only after you quit the daemon wi
th "exit" command or if you use "save" command.
Otherwise, you will possibly need to synchronize the blockchain again.
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
**********************************************************************
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.582652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Synced 1128889/112888
9
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.584652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2016-Sep-04 18:02:52.096539 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Sync data returned un
known top block: 1128889 -> 1009962 [118927 blocks (-165 days) ahead]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
**********************************************************************
You are now synchronized with the network. You may now start simplewallet.
Please note, that the blockchain will be saved only after you quit the daemon wi
th "exit" command or if you use "save" command.
Otherwise, you will possibly need to synchronize the blockchain again.
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
**********************************************************************
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.582652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Synced 1128889/112888
9
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.584652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2016-Sep-04 18:02:52.096539 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Sync data returned un
known top block: 1128889 -> 1009962 [118927 blocks (-165 days) ahead]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
It's just an outdated peer who never upgraded from the last fork. You can ignore it, or type:
ban XXXXXXXXXX (put in ip address obviously).
Edit - it used to autoban IP's but I haven't seen that happen in a while now. (?)
September 04, 2016, 04:08:34 PM
What does this mean?
**********************************************************************
You are now synchronized with the network. You may now start simplewallet.
Please note, that the blockchain will be saved only after you quit the daemon wi
th "exit" command or if you use "save" command.
Otherwise, you will possibly need to synchronize the blockchain again.
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
**********************************************************************
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.582652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Synced 1128889/112888
9
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.584652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2016-Sep-04 18:02:52.096539 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Sync data returned un
known top block: 1128889 -> 1009962 [118927 blocks (-165 days) ahead]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
**********************************************************************
You are now synchronized with the network. You may now start simplewallet.
Please note, that the blockchain will be saved only after you quit the daemon wi
th "exit" command or if you use "save" command.
Otherwise, you will possibly need to synchronize the blockchain again.
Use "help" command to see the list of available commands.
**********************************************************************
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.582652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Synced 1128889/112888
9
2016-Sep-04 18:02:36.584652 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX] SYNCHRONIZED OK
2016-Sep-04 18:02:52.096539 [P2P6][XXXXXXXXXXXXX]Sync data returned un
known top block: 1128889 -> 1009962 [118927 blocks (-165 days) ahead]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
September 04, 2016, 11:34:52 AM
How come this has gone down?
September 04, 2016, 11:33:38 AM
Can anyone point me to an easy to use image for a USB drive that is bootable and can start up a cpu miner on a laptop that is setup to not allow "malware or grayware" to run on it? I'd like to use it off work hours for the i7 cpu in it. Also, something simple... I'm not really familiar with linux command line stuff. I still remember some DOS though! 
September 04, 2016, 11:19:31 AM
I played with myself and before the end, an idea pop out instead of something else, so I quickly start to tune up my rig, and get these results, so what do you think is better
830h/s for xmr
or
620h/s for xmr + 12Mh eth + 230Mh sia
830h/s for xmr
or
620h/s for xmr + 12Mh eth + 230Mh sia
i don't think you can dual mine monero with etheruem or i'm missing something? in any case they both peform quite the same, but right now monero is dumped, so a bit under ethereum for now
Jump to: