[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 567.

GingerAle

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 06:23:15 PM

Quote from: dEBRUYNE on July 14, 2016, 04:27:10 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 03:55:13 PM

Quote from: luigi1111 on July 14, 2016, 03:35:35 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 11:11:34 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 05, 2016, 02:46:48 PM

~~0MQ~~ ZMTP Question.....

2 WEEK BUMP. Still waiting.

Here's a good one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4DpbVQxlA

fluffypony is going to be speaking about this in the upcoming missive, which should be out in the next week or so.

FTFY.

So I get ignored until then? I'd rather have answers then listen to an hour long answer/question podcast that may or may not answer my questions. Did the community somehow stop being a part of the development and I didn't notice along the way? Are the Devs just calling the shots now without input or recourse?

Sorry but "The Cult of Fluffy" is getting a little out of hand here. I think 2 weeks is long enough to wait for an answer.

Any DEV can answer this unless he's the only one. And if he is the only one then there is something rotten in Denmark.

Why don't you hop on IRC and ask in #monero-dev? I am sure someone will provide you with an answer rather quickly.

I like having the info here so I don't have to keep logs. Not to mention IRC doesn't show up on google searches. Many times with my shitty memory I have googled stuff and found answer from my own past posts! That is weird.

Honestly I forget what the question was. If you concatenate it to about 2-3 sentences I'll post it on IRC and relay the response back. I'm a relay bot. Beep boop.

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: dEBRUYNE on July 14, 2016, 04:27:10 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 03:55:13 PM

Quote from: luigi1111 on July 14, 2016, 03:35:35 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 11:11:34 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 05, 2016, 02:46:48 PM

~~0MQ~~ ZMTP Question.....

2 WEEK BUMP. Still waiting.

Here's a good one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4DpbVQxlA

fluffypony is going to be speaking about this in the upcoming missive, which should be out in the next week or so.

FTFY.

So I get ignored until then? I'd rather have answers then listen to an hour long answer/question podcast that may or may not answer my questions. Did the community somehow stop being a part of the development and I didn't notice along the way? Are the Devs just calling the shots now without input or recourse?

Sorry but "The Cult of Fluffy" is getting a little out of hand here. I think 2 weeks is long enough to wait for an answer.

Any DEV can answer this unless he's the only one. And if he is the only one then there is something rotten in Denmark.

Why don't you hop on IRC and ask in #monero-dev? I am sure someone will provide you with an answer rather quickly.

I like having the info here so I don't have to keep logs. Not to mention IRC doesn't show up on google searches. Many times with my shitty memory I have googled stuff and found answer from my own past posts! That is weird.

dEBRUYNE

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1141

Update on the official GUI:

https://forum.getmonero.org/9/work-in-progress/2476/the-official-qt-gui-project?page=&noscroll=1#post-5121

dEBRUYNE

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1141

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 03:55:13 PM

Quote from: luigi1111 on July 14, 2016, 03:35:35 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 11:11:34 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 05, 2016, 02:46:48 PM

~~0MQ~~ ZMTP Question.....

2 WEEK BUMP. Still waiting.

Here's a good one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4DpbVQxlA

fluffypony is going to be speaking about this in the upcoming missive, which should be out in the next week or so.

FTFY.

So I get ignored until then? I'd rather have answers then listen to an hour long answer/question podcast that may or may not answer my questions. Did the community somehow stop being a part of the development and I didn't notice along the way? Are the Devs just calling the shots now without input or recourse?

Sorry but "The Cult of Fluffy" is getting a little out of hand here. I think 2 weeks is long enough to wait for an answer.

Any DEV can answer this unless he's the only one. And if he is the only one then there is something rotten in Denmark.

Why don't you hop on IRC and ask in #monero-dev? I am sure someone will provide you with an answer rather quickly.

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: luigi1111 on July 14, 2016, 03:35:35 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 11:11:34 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 05, 2016, 02:46:48 PM

~~0MQ~~ ZMTP Question.....

2 WEEK BUMP. Still waiting.

Here's a good one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4DpbVQxlA

fluffypony is going to be speaking about this in the upcoming missive, which should be out in the next week or so.

FTFY.

So I get ignored until then? I'd rather have answers then listen to an hour long answer/question podcast that may or may not answer my questions. Did the community somehow stop being a part of the development and I didn't notice along the way? Are the Devs just calling the shots now without input or recourse?

Sorry but "The Cult of Fluffy" is getting a little out of hand here. I think 2 weeks is long enough to wait for an answer.

Any DEV can answer this unless he's the only one. And if he is the only one then there is something rotten in Denmark.

luigi1111

legendary

Activity: 1105

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Hueristic on July 14, 2016, 11:11:34 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 05, 2016, 02:46:48 PM

0MQ stuff.....

2 WEEK BUMP. Still waiting.

Here's a good one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4DpbVQxlA

fluffypony is going to be speaking about this in the upcoming missive, which should be out in the next week or so.

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: Hueristic on July 05, 2016, 02:46:48 PM

Quote from: Hueristic on July 01, 2016, 11:26:15 AM

Quote from: fluffypony on July 01, 2016, 02:55:40 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on June 29, 2016, 09:05:01 AM

And I thought that this was replacing remote communication as well. Which is a VERY BIG DEAL. But after listening to the Podcast you linked I see that it is intended for interprocess communication currently but Fluffy did say it can be extended for wiring protocol replacement.

In terms of "dev notes", a lot of this stuff goes down on IRC in #monero-dev and sometimes even #monero. The bi-weekly dev meetings are the culmination of these discussions that span thousands of lines of text over many days.

Could you post those logs on pastebin?

Quote from: birr on July 01, 2016, 04:25:55 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on June 30, 2016, 08:06:02 PM

Quote from: Azael on June 30, 2016, 01:20:29 PM

Will Monero pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?

Ethereum is for smart contracts Factom is for data and Dash or Monero is for privacy.

Actually I don't know who's better between Dash or Monero and I know there is heated debate about this so not opening that pandoras box because I don't have a horse in the race. Anyway both are experimental technologies in field worthy of pursuit.

Well just looking at XMR's rich list should tell you something. Wink

http://moneroblocks.info/richlist

It could be worse, but there's a hint of smugness to the writing on that page.

As there should be, this project is headed by some of the smartest and capable people I've ever seen, they are so advanced they take for granted that we as a community know the things I ask in this thread. I feel like the kid in class that asked the question because others are lost and afraid to. Not to say I don't get lost, my brain is on life support these days. Lol

This project gets the hardest scrutiny and has never to my knowledge lied, misled or deceived the community, how many other ones can you say that about?

Still waiting on a reply here.

2 WEEK BUMP. Still waiting.

Here's a good one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4DpbVQxlA

MoneroMooo

legendary

Activity: 1276

Merit: 1001

Quote from: mmortal03 on July 13, 2016, 04:22:29 PM

Quote from: MoneroMooo on July 13, 2016, 03:41:52 PM

Do you remember the commit hash you had last saved this wallet cache with ? If so, which ?

I downloaded the source as a zip file on 2016-07-10, so it would've been after fluffypony's most recent commit from five days ago. Looking at the following, I don't see any commits since then: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commits/master

Does that answer your question? I can also see if I can reproduce the issue on further wallets if you'd like.

I'd misread. This is normal that a newer wallet cache can't be read by older simplewallet. There's new stuff added in that the old code can't understand. It'd be theoretically possible to keep forward compatibility though.

What I'm really interested in is whether newer code can't open an older wallet. That would need fixing.

mmortal03

legendary

Activity: 1762

Merit: 1011

Quote from: MoneroMooo on July 13, 2016, 03:41:52 PM

Quote from: mmortal03 on July 13, 2016, 10:00:37 AM

A wallet file of mine that was handled by the latest compile of simplewallet from the master seems to have become unopenable by simplewallet 0.9.4 (become not backwards compatible). I'm pretty sure all I did was refresh it, test sweep_all, and then save it, and now 0.9.4 gives the following error after typing the password: "Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc". The latest version of simplewallet that I compiled can still open it. I'm on Windows 10 64-bit. Anyway, not that big of a deal to me; just thought I'd mention it.

Do you remember the commit hash you had last saved this wallet cache with ? If so, which ?

I downloaded the source as a zip file on 2016-07-10, so it would've been after fluffypony's most recent commit from five days ago. Looking at the following, I don't see any commits since then: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commits/master

Does that answer your question? I can also see if I can reproduce the issue on further wallets if you'd like.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: osensei on July 12, 2016, 11:16:13 PM

Quote from: GingerAle on July 12, 2016, 09:53:35 PM

hopefully monerohash.com's recent upgrade to allow mining directly to an exchange, although not ideal, will move some of the hashrate from the others

I'd like that to happen

Quote from: GingerAle on July 12, 2016, 09:53:35 PM

the reason minergate has so much hash is because they have a browser miner.... which, you know, is just weird.

Mining in the browser is actually extremely slow. Most probably the reason they have so much hash is because their GUI miner has a "Smart Mining" feature (enabled by default) that mines the most profitable coin, which right now happens to be Monero. And that's probably why Minergate's XMR hash has gone up a lot from what they used to have.

That and the GUI miner (and built-in wallet on the site) is very user friendly. Ya know, people like dem GUIs.

MoneroMooo

legendary

Activity: 1276

Merit: 1001

Quote from: mmortal03 on July 13, 2016, 10:00:37 AM

A wallet file of mine that was handled by the latest compile of simplewallet from the master seems to have become unopenable by simplewallet 0.9.4 (become not backwards compatible). I'm pretty sure all I did was refresh it, test sweep_all, and then save it, and now 0.9.4 gives the following error after typing the password: "Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc". The latest version of simplewallet that I compiled can still open it. I'm on Windows 10 64-bit. Anyway, not that big of a deal to me; just thought I'd mention it.

Do you remember the commit hash you had last saved this wallet cache with ? If so, which ?

qgmurugan007

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: bitebits on July 13, 2016, 03:02:49 PM

Quote from: qgmurugan007 on July 13, 2016, 01:09:50 PM

XMR, need to hear some good news.

Monero is the good news kid. Learn about it.

Thanks for the enlightment, old man. Wink

bitebits

legendary

Activity: 2242

Merit: 3523

Flippin' burgers since 1163.

Quote from: qgmurugan007 on July 13, 2016, 01:09:50 PM

XMR, need to hear some good news.

Monero is the good news kid. Learn about it.

qgmurugan007

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: aminorex on July 13, 2016, 07:23:30 AM

Quote from: Blazin8888 on July 13, 2016, 12:51:12 AM

Looking forward to this. XMR + STEEM could very well be the best investments of 2016.

To me, an important difference (among many important differences) is that XMR could very well be the best investment of the third millennium. STEEM, not so much.

For me its BTS + STEEM are going to be the best ones. XMR, need to hear some good news.

mmortal03

legendary

Activity: 1762

Merit: 1011

A wallet file of mine that was handled by the latest compile of simplewallet from the master seems to have become unopenable by simplewallet 0.9.4 (become not backwards compatible). I'm pretty sure all I did was refresh it, test sweep_all, and then save it, and now 0.9.4 gives the following error after typing the password: "Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc". The latest version of simplewallet that I compiled can still open it. I'm on Windows 10 64-bit. Anyway, not that big of a deal to me; just thought I'd mention it.

luigi1111

legendary

Activity: 1105

Merit: 1000

Quote from: GingerAle on July 12, 2016, 09:53:35 PM

.... then again, the reason minergate has so much hash is because they have a browser miner.... which, you know, is just weird.

...no. The performance of the web miner is something like 1-2 hash/sec.

aminorex

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1030

Sine secretum non libertas

Quote from: Blazin8888 on July 13, 2016, 12:51:12 AM

Looking forward to this. XMR + STEEM could very well be the best investments of 2016.

To me, an important difference (among many important differences) is that XMR could very well be the best investment of the third millennium. STEEM, not so much.

Ratatosk

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250