Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero Speculation - page 1452. (Read 3313576 times)

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
March 17, 2016, 11:59:03 AM
There's a hard fork in less than a week and no binaries have yet been released ?!

Did you miss this? Also, any 0.9.x version is fine in advance of the hardfork. The first 0.9.x version was released on 31 December 2015.

Monero v0.9.2 - Hydrogen Helix - released! (Urgent and important bug fixes for the upcoming hard fork)

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/releases/tag/v0.9.2

Quote
will do shasums / gpg signed mesage tomorrow

Information from Github:

Quote
This has urgent and important bug fixes to 0.9.0 Hydrogen Helix
  • Major performance and size improvements to the LMDB database implementation
  • Urgent and important bug fixes for the upcoming hard fork
  • Huge bug fixes to the database hard fork handling
  • New simplewallet flag to restore from keys
  • Initial work on a wallet library / API
  • Updated in-source block headers



General hardfork information:

Background:

https://forum.getmonero.org/4/academic-and-technical/303/a-formal-approach-towards-better-hard-fork-management

Quote
What are the change(s) with the upcoming hard fork on the 20th of March?

  • Blocktime is bumped from 1 to 2 minutes. See:

https://forum.getmonero.org/20/general-discussion/2401/increasing-the-block-time

  • Minimum blocksize is bumped to 60 KB. See:

https://forum.getmonero.org/20/general-discussion/2409/increasing-the-minimum-block-size

A big advantage of this is that current individual transactions that sometimes won't go through (because they are a bit above the median due to many outputs (e.g. dust), or the daemon / MyMonero rejects them for some reason) can easily be included in the block without incurring a penalty. Above is a bit of a blunt explanation, I am sure one of the core-team members / developers could give you a more detailed explanation.

  • Finally, the recommendations from the MRL team stated in MRL-0004, of which the minimum mixin >= 3 is probably the most salient. See:

https://lab.getmonero.org/pubs/MRL-0004.pdf

P.S. Due to variance the hard fork will likely be on the 21th or 22th of March. A specific block height was determined for the hardfork, not a specific date. The specific blockheight for the hardfork can be found here:

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/blob/master/src/cryptonote_core/blockchain.cpp#L83

Quote
// version 2 starts from block 1009827

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
March 17, 2016, 11:56:09 AM
If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks.

In part yes, but also malware on your computer. There is no substitute for cold storage, paper wallets, good hardware wallets, etc.

Quote
So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish.

That is true assuming you are completely sure that nothing was compromised when you created it. Hard to really know that.


Well, what I wanted to convey is that, if one has already created the wallet for cold storage in mymonero, either the coins are already gone or they are still there. Tongue
Therefore, accessing mymonero just to transfer the coins to another cold storage may in fact worsen your chances of getting hacked. It would be safer to wait for the code to restore short mnemonic seeds to be available for offline use. Either through simplewallet or a third party client.

I'll just speculate here, but I believe what was ultimately referred to was the vulnerability of MITM when accessing mymonero via Tor because outproxies are essentially just "men in the middle" and anyone using them is trusting that they are benign. I'm pretty sure that if you see the https in standard clearnet, things are encrypted end to end so noone in the middle can read your stuffs. This doesn't prevent malware on your end from swiping your stuffs though. Keyloggers I guess would be the main thing. Or if your text input into the mymonero login is stored temporarily in any fashion. But ultimately I don't really know what I'm talking about, I'm just piecing together what I've gathered so far.

What concerns me is the amount that was stolen. That had to have been one of the larger if not the largest wallet on there. That says to me someone either targeted him specifically or had/has access to that info. I would not consider MyMonero safe for other than pocket change. And expect that someday every one of those accounts will be emptied. The Odds of only his account (specifically such a large one) going through a poison Tor node are So extremely low I can't even entertain the thought of that being the method of compromise.


Highly unlikely it was a targeted attack. Also, fairly unlikely that it was a Tor MITM attack. Even if it was, it probably was a driveby attack instead of a targeted one. MyMonero doesn't have a .onion link and therefore it is fairly easy to perform an MITM attack for a tor exit node (I think fluffypony stated that they already had earlier cases of TOR MITM attacks on MyMonero). Same happened to blockchain.info before they had a .onion address. Lots of threads about people that had their BTC stolen.

It is more likely malware/trojan/rootkit/virus etc. that somehow stole his XMR, i.e. acquired his seed somehow.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
March 17, 2016, 11:50:41 AM
I am considering getting a Trezor. I have little interest in BTC at the moment (though multi-coin capability may be handy), so this would be based on the expectation that XMR compatible Trezor firmware will be fully functional going forward. Reasonable assumption?
Q

It already works Smiley
http://weuse.cash/2016/03/07/trezor-for-monero-first-impressions/

Just consider it beta until it's merged with the official Trezor firmware Wink

Yeah, I guess I mean is it a good bet that this will get official. I would be looking to use this for more than testing. Not really sure how bg a deal the viewkey transmission is.

Anyway, I prefer the idea of Trezor to paper wallets, so I hope it happens. Thanks to NoodleDoodle for doing the groundwork on this.  Smiley
Q

One of the trezor founders was asking for testers, so most likely it gets merged upstream (and thus signed by Trezor) once the code is finalized. See:

https://twitter.com/AlenaSatoshi/status/709837766150983680
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
March 17, 2016, 11:49:24 AM
I am considering getting a Trezor. I have little interest in BTC at the moment (though multi-coin capability may be handy), so this would be based on the expectation that XMR compatible Trezor firmware will be fully functional going forward. Reasonable assumption?
Q

It already works Smiley
http://weuse.cash/2016/03/07/trezor-for-monero-first-impressions/

Just consider it beta until it's merged with the official Trezor firmware Wink

Yeah, I guess I mean is it a good bet that this will get official. I would be looking to use this for more than testing. Not really sure how bg a deal the viewkey transmission is.

Anyway, I prefer the idea of Trezor to paper wallets, so I hope it happens. Thanks to NoodleDoodle for doing the groundwork on this.  Smiley
Q

There is a guide/example here:

"Generate simplewallet based on MyMonero 13 word mnemonic seed"

https://github.com/moneroexamples/mymonero-simplewallet
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
March 17, 2016, 11:41:55 AM
There's a hard fork in less than a week and no binaries have yet been released ?!

Any binary that is v0.9.x is compatible. So, the first compatible version was released in December I believe.

Batter Swings and misses Again! About 6 months before you can get your participation trophy primer. Smiley




Watching Vanilla Scam and Dash Scam get pumped while Monero stays even for the day.   Huh Angry

Worked out for me! Cheesy But I have no faith in BTC so I cashed it out the last few months and cannot accure more without using otb or us getting a pairing. Anyone wants to do a OTB sale to me can PM. As you can see I will only buy in the dips.


Just for SlapHappy as requested. BTW slap you can pm me when you want to act like an adult and I'll consider your words on whether to remove you from ignore. Questioning my integrity and calling me a liar is pretty much a line you don't come back from.




If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks.

In part yes, but also malware on your computer. There is no substitute for cold storage, paper wallets, good hardware wallets, etc.

Quote
So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish.

That is true assuming you are completely sure that nothing was compromised when you created it. Hard to really know that.


Well, what I wanted to convey is that, if one has already created the wallet for cold storage in mymonero, either the coins are already gone or they are still there. Tongue
Therefore, accessing mymonero just to transfer the coins to another cold storage may in fact worsen your chances of getting hacked. It would be safer to wait for the code to restore short mnemonic seeds to be available for offline use. Either through simplewallet or a third party client.

I'll just speculate here, but I believe what was ultimately referred to was the vulnerability of MITM when accessing mymonero via Tor because outproxies are essentially just "men in the middle" and anyone using them is trusting that they are benign. I'm pretty sure that if you see the https in standard clearnet, things are encrypted end to end so noone in the middle can read your stuffs. This doesn't prevent malware on your end from swiping your stuffs though. Keyloggers I guess would be the main thing. Or if your text input into the mymonero login is stored temporarily in any fashion. But ultimately I don't really know what I'm talking about, I'm just piecing together what I've gathered so far.

What concerns me is the amount that was stolen. That had to have been one of the larger if not the largest wallet on there. That says to me someone either targeted him specifically or had/has access to that info. I would not consider MyMonero safe for other than pocket change. And expect that someday every one of those accounts will be emptied. The Odds of only his account (specifically such a large one) going through a poison Tor node are So extremely low I can't even entertain the thought of that being the method of compromise.



sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
March 17, 2016, 11:30:32 AM
I am considering getting a Trezor. I have little interest in BTC at the moment (though multi-coin capability may be handy), so this would be based on the expectation that XMR compatible Trezor firmware will be fully functional going forward. Reasonable assumption?
Q

It already works Smiley
http://weuse.cash/2016/03/07/trezor-for-monero-first-impressions/

Just consider it beta until it's merged with the official Trezor firmware Wink

Yeah, I guess I mean is it a good bet that this will get official. I would be looking to use this for more than testing. Not really sure how bg a deal the viewkey transmission is.

Anyway, I prefer the idea of Trezor to paper wallets, so I hope it happens. Thanks to NoodleDoodle for doing the groundwork on this.  Smiley
Q
hero member
Activity: 870
Merit: 585
March 17, 2016, 10:52:56 AM
If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks.

In part yes, but also malware on your computer. There is no substitute for cold storage, paper wallets, good hardware wallets, etc.

Quote
So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish.

That is true assuming you are completely sure that nothing was compromised when you created it. Hard to really know that.


Well, what I wanted to convey is that, if one has already created the wallet for cold storage in mymonero, either the coins are already gone or they are still there. Tongue
Therefore, accessing mymonero just to transfer the coins to another cold storage may in fact worsen your chances of getting hacked. It would be safer to wait for the code to restore short mnemonic seeds to be available for offline use. Either through simplewallet or a third party client.
Another option is to do the conversion from 13 to 25 words.  Who has link(s) to how you do that?  I'm very interested.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
March 17, 2016, 10:23:52 AM

today or tomorrow.

I prefer a log chart, makes more sense, imho:

legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
March 17, 2016, 10:13:42 AM
I am considering getting a Trezor. I have little interest in BTC at the moment (though multi-coin capability may be handy), so this would be based on the expectation that XMR compatible Trezor firmware will be fully functional going forward. Reasonable assumption?
Q

It already works Smiley
http://weuse.cash/2016/03/07/trezor-for-monero-first-impressions/

Just consider it beta until it's merged with the official Trezor firmware Wink
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
March 17, 2016, 09:58:16 AM
I am considering getting a Trezor. I have little interest in BTC at the moment (though multi-coin capability may be handy), so this would be based on the expectation that XMR compatible Trezor firmware will be fully functional going forward. Reasonable assumption?
Q
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
March 17, 2016, 09:44:58 AM
If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks.

In part yes, but also malware on your computer. There is no substitute for cold storage, paper wallets, good hardware wallets, etc.

Quote
So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish.

That is true assuming you are completely sure that nothing was compromised when you created it. Hard to really know that.


Well, what I wanted to convey is that, if one has already created the wallet for cold storage in mymonero, either the coins are already gone or they are still there. Tongue
Therefore, accessing mymonero just to transfer the coins to another cold storage may in fact worsen your chances of getting hacked. It would be safer to wait for the code to restore short mnemonic seeds to be available for offline use. Either through simplewallet or a third party client.

I'll just speculate here, but I believe what was ultimately referred to was the vulnerability of MITM when accessing mymonero via Tor because outproxies are essentially just "men in the middle" and anyone using them is trusting that they are benign. I'm pretty sure that if you see the https in standard clearnet, things are encrypted end to end so noone in the middle can read your stuffs. This doesn't prevent malware on your end from swiping your stuffs though. Keyloggers I guess would be the main thing. Or if your text input into the mymonero login is stored temporarily in any fashion. But ultimately I don't really know what I'm talking about, I'm just piecing together what I've gathered so far.
legendary
Activity: 981
Merit: 1005
No maps for these territories
March 17, 2016, 09:36:13 AM
ETH going to hell. Monero waiting. We could be be in decoupling time.
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
March 17, 2016, 09:30:13 AM



today or tomorrow.
hero member
Activity: 649
Merit: 500
March 17, 2016, 09:09:33 AM
If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks.

In part yes, but also malware on your computer. There is no substitute for cold storage, paper wallets, good hardware wallets, etc.

Quote
So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish.

That is true assuming you are completely sure that nothing was compromised when you created it. Hard to really know that.


Well, what I wanted to convey is that, if one has already created the wallet for cold storage in mymonero, either the coins are already gone or they are still there. Tongue
Therefore, accessing mymonero just to transfer the coins to another cold storage may in fact worsen your chances of getting hacked. It would be safer to wait for the code to restore short mnemonic seeds to be available for offline use. Either through simplewallet or a third party client.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1116
March 17, 2016, 08:41:49 AM
There's a hard fork in less than a week and no binaries have yet been released ?!

Any binary that is v0.9.x is compatible. So, the first compatible version was released in December I believe.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
March 17, 2016, 08:28:06 AM
There's a hard fork in less than a week and no binaries have yet been released ?!
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
March 17, 2016, 07:48:19 AM
If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks.

In part yes, but also malware on your computer. There is no substitute for cold storage, paper wallets, good hardware wallets, etc.

Quote
So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish.

That is true assuming you are completely sure that nothing was compromised when you created it. Hard to really know that.
hero member
Activity: 649
Merit: 500
March 17, 2016, 06:57:58 AM
I have coins stored on wallets created with mymonero.com. Are they less secure than a paper wallet created with moneroaddress.org?

Unfortunately yes, fluffypony discourages storing any relatively large amounts there because webwallets always bring an additional layer of risk. Therefore, I would recommend to use https://moneroaddress.org to create a paper wallet. Alternatively, if you are fairly paranoid, use this guide:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/48cgmd/an_extensive_guide_for_securely_generating_an/

The guide ensures that the only way your coins can get stolen is physical access, which is extremely rare. It might take you a few hours to get familiar and comfortable with, but in the end it brings ease to the mind.

If I understood correctly (bear in mind that this rarely happens Tongue) fluffypony was referring to the possibility of MITM attacks. So every time you access mymonero you are incurring the risk of getting your coins stolen. So, afaik, there is nothing less secure with the wallets created with mymonero (discounting the 13 vs 24 word mnemonic).

If you, for whatever reason, used mymonero to create a coldish wallet, and never login again, you should be pretty safeish. And instead of logging in to transfer your funds to a proper cold address/account, you'd be better off not to. Wait instead for the short mnemonic seed to be supported by simplewallet.


Guys in the know: amirite?


EDIT: Adding context
https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/491gbj/i_lost_some_monero_that_i_had_on_mymonerocom/d0ocdpm
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
March 17, 2016, 05:50:40 AM
Pretty big triangle closing in less than 12h, visible in 2h. If done right we could be reaching .0035-.004 area. If gone wrongside, we could face .002 arena... Thoughts?

You use TA and I use my subconscious.  Seems like something is brewing.  I don't think .002 or .0035-.004 is possible for the time frame you are talking about.  Too much support to allow 0.002 and too much resistance until accumulation is finished.  When will that be finished?  NFC.  Good luck Cool  For now that leaves nowhere...........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWtCittJyr0
legendary
Activity: 981
Merit: 1005
No maps for these territories
March 17, 2016, 04:48:31 AM
Pretty big triangle closing in less than 12h, visible in 2h. If done right we could be reaching .0035-.004 area. If gone wrongside, we could face .002 arena... Thoughts?
Jump to: