1.Ok, so we all agree , that the opinion of this smooth about other competing project fall in conflict of interest:A
conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization is involved in multiple interests (financial, emotional, or otherwise), one of which could possibly
corrupt the motivation of the individual or organization.
2. Also I want to show to all that smooth is not objective with the terms he use, and he is a manipulator and love to play with words. (I really see no acting from him, only big big big mouth that set!) :
You are in conflict of interest.
Your opinion don't count, only peanuts.
You are not objective :
There was nothing wrong with the history of Monero. It's one of if not the cleanest coins and launches in history.
"If not THE CLEANEST", i just can't stop loled.. Tks for this.
When we all know that it was not true :
If that's true, then why aren't you trolling the monero thread constantly pointing out the fact that it was launched as a scam because of its intentionally de-optimized miner? Don't you owe that to the users and investors of XMR? I think daily reminders at a minimum should suffice. Get on it!
Because it was not intentionally (or otherwise) de-optimized by the then-or current-developers of Monero, who were the ones who in fact optimized it and released the fixes as open source, to the great inconvenience and frustration of those trying to stay ahead with optimized private miners. This is well-documented; there is no dispute over it.
So you are admitting that monero was released with a scam miner that had been
intentionally de-optimized, but you are claiming that you had no knowledge of the scam code you continued to push on your users? Are we supposed to just take your word on this?
"Admitting" that it was likely deliberately de-optimzed by the Bytecoin/CN scammers from which Monero was forked? We're the ones who originally discard and reported exactly that!
I believe it was eizh, or tacotime, I don't remember which.
So monero had a scam launch, but yet I don't see you trolling the monero thread regularly to remind everyone of this fact. Why do you care more about the users of other coins than the users of coins you dev? Shouldn't they get 24h reminders about the XMR scam?
So the conclusion of this is that smooth opinion is smooth opinion and his value is nothing, /dev/null, because it is biased by his agenda and because he is (pseudo) core-dev of two others coins.
So nothing really nothing objective can come from this little jealous TRollero.