Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency - page 138. (Read 688812 times)
July 10, 2013, 05:53:26 PM
July 10, 2013, 05:43:59 PM
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
Just about
When Sunny commits his code to the repo, I will build another (if I am still awake).
Or you could pastebin your file and we could try that? Is this prime or main.cpp?
July 10, 2013, 05:38:32 PM
Another update from Sunny King is upcoming - not only will it bail out after max. 3 secs, it will also bail out if a new block has arrived in the meantime.
-> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2702001
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
-> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2702001
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
LoL! am I a shinkicker? I like kicker of balls and shins together!!!
did he release a linux update though.. that doesn't involve need to add code to it?
July 10, 2013, 05:30:31 PM
Another update from Sunny King is upcoming - not only will it bail out after max. 3 secs, it will also bail out if a new block has arrived in the meantime.
-> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2702001
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
-> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2702001
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
Awesome, thanks Mike270 & shinkicker ! Tips to you both
July 10, 2013, 05:28:07 PM
Another update from Sunny King is upcoming - not only will it bail out after max. 3 secs, it will also bail out if a new block has arrived in the meantime.
-> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2702001
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
-> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2702001
And if shinkicker's still awake he may provide a compiled windows client :-)
July 10, 2013, 05:08:34 PM
Has anyone successfully compiled on Windows with UPNP? I notice my new optimized binary is much faster, but it seems so have a much worse network connection (and the binary is much smaller).
July 10, 2013, 05:04:37 PM
Hi gatra,
with those few blocks/day and primes/s being quite imprecise...
I left optimizations in when they didn't appear to cause an immediately visible (~10min) deterioration in primes/s.
with those few blocks/day and primes/s being quite imprecise...
I left optimizations in when they didn't appear to cause an immediately visible (~10min) deterioration in primes/s.
Hi
I didn't try it for primecoin, but for other coin I used this: https://github.com/freewil/bitcoin-testnet-box
It's just a script that allows you to run 2 instances against each other, so it works like a small network of 2 nodes. If you run the optimized against the standard wallet and have them mine for some time, the faster one should have mined more blocks.
Also, using ints for the bool arrays adds only a couple of fast instructions: for example instead of doing vfCompositeBiTwin[nVariableMultiplier] = true;
you would do
vfCompositeBiTwin[nVariableMultiplier >> 5] |= 1 << (nVariableMultiplier & 0x1f )
for testing it's if( vfCompositeBiTwin[nVariableMultiplier >> 5] & (1 << (nVariableMultiplier & 0x1f )))
July 10, 2013, 04:59:49 PM
July 10, 2013, 04:59:08 PM
One question...
I'm running the same wallet in two computers (in different places) and I just find a block... how can I know which computer has mined this block... I mean... the wallet I can see at the moment mark the block as mined, but I figured that the other wallet (in other place) will mark the same... so... How can I know which computer have found the block?
Look out for I'm running the same wallet in two computers (in different places) and I just find a block... how can I know which computer has mined this block... I mean... the wallet I can see at the moment mark the block as mined, but I figured that the other wallet (in other place) will mark the same... so... How can I know which computer have found the block?
proof-of-work found
in debug.log
July 10, 2013, 04:51:43 PM
debug.log
July 10, 2013, 04:51:15 PM
One question...
I'm running the same wallet in two computers (in different places) and I just find a block... how can I know which computer has mined this block... I mean... the wallet I can see at the moment mark the block as mined, but I figured that the other wallet (in other place) will mark the same... so... How can I know which computer have found the block?
I'm running the same wallet in two computers (in different places) and I just find a block... how can I know which computer has mined this block... I mean... the wallet I can see at the moment mark the block as mined, but I figured that the other wallet (in other place) will mark the same... so... How can I know which computer have found the block?
July 10, 2013, 04:49:44 PM
What do you think that asterisk is doing?
Looking for Obelisk? :-) July 10, 2013, 04:47:41 PM
What do you think that asterisk is doing?
Looking for Obelisk? :-) July 10, 2013, 04:46:11 PM
compile error. Where am I noobing it...?
??
What do you think that asterisk is doing?Code:
unsigned int nBiTwinSeq = 0;
for (; nBiTwinSeq < * nChainLength; nBiTwinSeq++)
{
....
Code:
prime.cpp: In member function 'bool CSieveOfEratosthenes::Weave()':
prime.cpp:532:27: error: invalid type argument of unary '*' (have 'unsigned int')
??
-- edit
I assume that "never mind" means you saw it after taking a short break.
July 10, 2013, 04:43:21 PM
For the two for loop, i get that
[...]
i'm not sure of myself on this one
Should do, but comment out[...]
i'm not sure of myself on this one
if (nBiTwinSeq < nChainLength)
in the first for loop, as that was the idea of splitting the loop (don't need to check there as that loop only runs up to nChainLength).
And add
unsigned int nBiTwinSeq = 0;
before the first loop
Rest looks ok (testing something else right now so my code already looks different.... yeah I know, no versioning, but hey... I'm doing this for fun :-) )
compile error. Where am I noobing it...?
Code:
unsigned int nBiTwinSeq = 0;
for (; nBiTwinSeq < * nChainLength; nBiTwinSeq++)
{
....
Code:
prime.cpp: In member function 'bool CSieveOfEratosthenes::Weave()':
prime.cpp:532:27: error: invalid type argument of unary '*' (have 'unsigned int')
?? EDIT- never mind. Someone virtual punch me in the face....
July 10, 2013, 04:40:54 PM
For the two for loop, i get that
[...]
i'm not sure of myself on this one
Should do, but comment out[...]
i'm not sure of myself on this one
if (nBiTwinSeq < nChainLength)
in the first for loop, as that was the idea of splitting the loop (don't need to check there as that loop only runs up to nChainLength).
And add
unsigned int nBiTwinSeq = 0;
before the first loop
Rest looks ok (testing something else right now so my code already looks different.... yeah I know, no versioning, but hey... I'm doing this for fun :-) )
July 10, 2013, 04:29:12 PM
I'm starting to get a little cheesed off. Where the heck is the dev on this one? Any chance of getting an optimized client so (regular) people can actually use this?
+1
It wasn't that hard to optimize it by hand.
Give C++ a try. It'll do you a lot more good than just making a quick speculative buck in the long run.
July 10, 2013, 04:27:29 PM
I'm starting to get a little cheesed off. Where the heck is the dev on this one? Any chance of getting an optimized client so (regular) people can actually use this?
+1
July 10, 2013, 04:27:14 PM
I'm starting to get a little cheesed off. Where the heck is the dev on this one? Any chance of getting an optimized client so (regular) people can actually use this?
Jump to: