Pages:
Author

Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency - page 57. (Read 688824 times)

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I'm not a mathemetician but my understanding is that

A) There's essentially an unlimited number of primes. Even when youre talking numbers hundreds of digits long, yoiu'll still find primes in them pretty regularly (every couple hundred digits or so).

B) Primecoin isn't even trying to find the biggest primes out there - indeed if it was and did, Sonny would qualify for some pretty big reward money

I have a feeling that the biggest primes are safe since the top 10 are all Mersenne Primes found by GIMPS.  Primecoin has helped find record Cunningham primes in the 120-160 digit length, GIMPS' record is something like 17 million digits.  The next reward from EFF is for a 100,000,000+ digit prime ($100,000) and a 1,000,000,000+ digit prime ($150,000).

means (2^332.xxx.xxx)-1 , to confirm that a number this large is prime with LL would need 2000 hours with a GTX Titan or 3400 hours with an 8-core CPU
now you have to see that the chance to find a Mersenne Prime in that range is 1 : 370000 (many candidates are proven composite with trialfactoring)
so normally it would need ~168.000 years for one person to find a 100,000,000+ digit prime, try your luck Wink
I used 2 cores of an i5 2500k on such a number and it took over 200 days to complete.  Using an 8 core CPU would be a huge power waste for very little speed gain.  The P95 program is very efficient, so memory bandwidth becomes an issue.  In addition, each iteration depends on the one prior, so parallelation is impossible.  IIRC, on my 2500k, using a single core would run at 144ms per iteration, 2 cores at 75ms, 3 cores at 60ms and all 4 core 55ms.  VERY inefficient with multiple cores.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Primecoin isn't trying to find all primes, even small ones. It is looking for Cunningham chains (and, no, I don't know what they are either)
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
I'm not a mathemetician but my understanding is that

A) There's essentially an unlimited number of primes. Even when youre talking numbers hundreds of digits long, yoiu'll still find primes in them pretty regularly (every couple hundred digits or so).

B) Primecoin isn't even trying to find the biggest primes out there - indeed if it was and did, Sonny would qualify for some pretty big reward money

I have a feeling that the biggest primes are safe since the top 10 are all Mersenne Primes found by GIMPS.  Primecoin has helped find record Cunningham primes in the 120-160 digit length, GIMPS' record is something like 17 million digits.  The next reward from EFF is for a 100,000,000+ digit prime ($100,000) and a 1,000,000,000+ digit prime ($150,000).

means (2^332.xxx.xxx)-1 , to confirm that a number this large is prime with LL would need 2000 hours with a GTX Titan or 3400 hours with an 8-core CPU
now you have to see that the chance to find a Mersenne Prime in that range is 1 : 370000 (many candidates are proven composite with trialfactoring)
so normally it would need ~168.000 years for one person to find a 100,000,000+ digit prime, try your luck Wink
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I'm not a mathemetician but my understanding is that

A) There's essentially an unlimited number of primes. Even when youre talking numbers hundreds of digits long, yoiu'll still find primes in them pretty regularly (every couple hundred digits or so).

B) Primecoin isn't even trying to find the biggest primes out there - indeed if it was and did, Sonny would qualify for some pretty big reward money

I have a feeling that the biggest primes are safe since the top 10 are all Mersenne Primes found by GIMPS.  Primecoin has helped find record Cunningham primes in the 120-160 digit length, GIMPS' record is something like 17 million digits.  The next reward from EFF is for a 100,000,000+ digit prime ($100,000) and a 1,000,000,000+ digit prime ($150,000).
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
I was wondering if a clone of primecoin will have any scientific value? Is primecoin eventually will find ALL the primes or only some? So it make a primecoin clone valueless? Am I missing something? Thanks.

If all the mankind turn every computer that has ever being built, and ever will be built, to running prmecoin finding primes, and do that till the end of mankind, all primes that would be found would be drop in the ocean, while the rest of the ocean are non-found primes. And even this is overly optimistic, that drop should be divided infinite number of times and only one tiny-tiny part of that drop would be found primes.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
I'm not a mathemetician but my understanding is that

A) There's essentially an unlimited number of primes. Even when youre talking numbers hundreds of digits long, yoiu'll still find primes in them pretty regularly (every couple hundred digits or so).

B) Primecoin isn't even trying to find the biggest primes out there - indeed if it was and did, Sonny would qualify for some pretty big reward money


Primecoin finds chains of smaller primes because they are easier to verify.  Verification needs to be quick for a proof of work to function properly.  Verifying primality of very large numbers is hard.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I'm not a mathemetician but my understanding is that

A) There's essentially an unlimited number of primes. Even when youre talking numbers hundreds of digits long, yoiu'll still find primes in them pretty regularly (every couple hundred digits or so).

B) Primecoin isn't even trying to find the biggest primes out there - indeed if it was and did, Sonny would qualify for some pretty big reward money
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
I was wondering if a clone of primecoin will have any scientific value? Is primecoin eventually will find ALL the primes or only some? So it make a primecoin clone valueless? Am I missing something? Thanks.

Disclosure: i'm not planning to launch any clone coin, i'm just curious to understand more.
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
Stuff has settled down in regards to XPM  Cheesy

Difficulty has dropped throughout today. Within a week we might peek back under 9.0 diff. That would be interesting. I added some more servers today at my place and I'm getting a few thousand more PPS. Bring it on I say!

I just went the lazy route.  Spent ~48 hours running parameter benchmarks and found some hearty improvements to my average 5-chain/hr.
Its going pretty well though.  Mined 5 blocks in the last 24hrs, so I can't really complain.
VPS?
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250
Stuff has settled down in regards to XPM  Cheesy

Difficulty has dropped throughout today. Within a week we might peek back under 9.0 diff. That would be interesting. I added some more servers today at my place and I'm getting a few thousand more PPS. Bring it on I say!

I just went the lazy route.  Spent ~48 hours running parameter benchmarks and found some hearty improvements to my average 5-chain/hr.
Its going pretty well though.  Mined 5 blocks in the last 24hrs, so I can't really complain.

Mind i if i ask what settings you are using?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Stuff has settled down in regards to XPM  Cheesy

Difficulty has dropped throughout today. Within a week we might peek back under 9.0 diff. That would be interesting. I added some more servers today at my place and I'm getting a few thousand more PPS. Bring it on I say!

I just went the lazy route.  Spent ~48 hours running parameter benchmarks and found some hearty improvements to my average 5-chain/hr.
Its going pretty well though.  Mined 5 blocks in the last 24hrs, so I can't really complain.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Stuff has settled down in regards to XPM  Cheesy

Difficulty has dropped throughout today. Within a week we might peek back under 9.0 diff. That would be interesting. I added some more servers today at my place and I'm getting a few thousand more PPS. Bring it on I say!
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Stuff has settled down in regards to XPM  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
The release of a GPU miner might just counteract all those expiring 30 day DigitalOcean trails? Amiright guys?  Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
[...] so IMHO it's not worth the electricity to mine at this point.
...that's why I turned of my dual HD5850 Bitcoin miner in June 2011 - it was simply not worth investing the electricity for the lousy 0.8 BTC (per day) I could earn by pooled mining these days...
This time I'm going to make other mistakes Wink

When cost to mine>cost to buy, you're better off using cash to purchase it on the market.

It's still far too difficult to get cash into the ecosystem. At least for Americans.

I can use mtgoz, but that incurs wire transfer fees

I can use virwox, but you get hit with many 2.5% commissions (I think there a fee to make initial deposit, another to sell dollars and buy lindens, another to sell lindens and buy BTC, and yet another to withdraw those BTC.

I can use campbx, but I have to wait 30 days before dwolla will let them let me withdraw those btcs.

Or I can use local bitcoins. But everyone there seems to charge 10-20% more than the mtgox price.

That's why people mine even when mining costs more than just buying the coins.
Not true about CampBX.  It only 30 days from when you first deposit funds - after those first 30 days, the account is verified and no longer any delays.  The only delay is funding Dwolla (sending from Dwolla to  CampBX is instant). CampBX is great for smaller purchases, their fee 0.55%  - the only problem with them is lack of liquidity. Still always cheaper than both Mt. Gox and Coinbase.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
So the difficulty has been ~9.2x for over a week now.

Where will GPU mining take us?
Who knows, much much higher  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 250
So the difficulty has been ~9.2x for over a week now.

Where will GPU mining take us?
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
[...] so IMHO it's not worth the electricity to mine at this point.
...that's why I turned of my dual HD5850 Bitcoin miner in June 2011 - it was simply not worth investing the electricity for the lousy 0.8 BTC (per day) I could earn by pooled mining these days...
This time I'm going to make other mistakes Wink

When cost to mine>cost to buy, you're better off using cash to purchase it on the market.

It's still far too difficult to get cash into the ecosystem. At least for Americans.

I can use mtgoz, but that incurs wire transfer fees

I can use virwox, but you get hit with many 2.5% commissions (I think there a fee to make initial deposit, another to sell dollars and buy lindens, another to sell lindens and buy BTC, and yet another to withdraw those BTC.

I can use campbx, but I have to wait 30 days before dwolla will let them let me withdraw those btcs.

Or I can use local bitcoins. But everyone there seems to charge 10-20% more than the mtgox price.

That's why people mine even when mining costs more than just buying the coins.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
[...] so IMHO it's not worth the electricity to mine at this point.
...that's why I turned of my dual HD5850 Bitcoin miner in June 2011 - it was simply not worth investing the electricity for the lousy 0.8 BTC (per day) I could earn by pooled mining these days...
This time I'm going to make other mistakes Wink

When cost to mine>cost to buy, you're better off using cash to purchase it on the market.
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250
Well, ~5 hours later and up to 4.87 XPM.  Rough estimate = 4.3 XPM per day from 10k PPS

Can someone else running similar number of PPS confirm these result? Not that I don't believe it, but the return looks a bit high.

I'm running at about 11-12k PPS and for the last few days i've gotten about 1 XPM (+/- 0.15) per day on ypool.

Try tweaking your settings (if you haven't already). Find the sievesetting that yields the highest difficulty shares on average.  A setting of 800000 was my rigs best setting by far.
Pages:
Jump to: