Pages:
Author

Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency - page 65. (Read 688812 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
I've gotten this error occasionally while mining today, on both Linux and Windows. I'm using mikaelh's hp6 lately, so I don't know if the issue is unique to it.

Code:
checkqueue.h:171: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.

I also have been getting this error every now and then. It happens about once a day or so, not at a specific time, though.
I just threw together a script to see if primecoind was running, and if not, email me and restart the process.

Can you show me how to make a .bat file that starts "setgenerate true -1" once the client is launched/restarted?

That's the only part I haven't figured out how to do yet.

Just add gen=1 to your config file.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
I've gotten this error occasionally while mining today, on both Linux and Windows. I'm using mikaelh's hp6 lately, so I don't know if the issue is unique to it.

Code:
checkqueue.h:171: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.

I also have been getting this error every now and then. It happens about once a day or so, not at a specific time, though.
I just threw together a script to see if primecoind was running, and if not, email me and restart the process.

Can you show me how to make a .bat file that starts "setgenerate true -1" once the client is launched/restarted?

That's the only part I haven't figured out how to do yet.
full member
Activity: 213
Merit: 100
I've gotten this error occasionally while mining today, on both Linux and Windows. I'm using mikaelh's hp6 lately, so I don't know if the issue is unique to it.

Code:
checkqueue.h:171: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.

I also have been getting this error every now and then. It happens about once a day or so, not at a specific time, though.
I just threw together a script to see if primecoind was running, and if not, email me and restart the process.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
I ran out of money on my digital ocean account, but I will add in $5 just to test this out. Thanks Sunny!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
I keep crashing on Linux no matter what build I am using.... Sad.  Primecoind just stops even with the new build that was just posted.....
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Looks good at first glance. It's getting late for me, so I'll port it to my tree in the morning.

Let me know how it goes.

I'm not going to update until I know it's stable.
sr. member
Activity: 301
Merit: 250

Looks good at first glance. It's getting late for me, so I'll port it to my tree in the morning.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Thanks Sunny - that's quite a significant change so I appreciate your ability to turn it around this quickly.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I've gotten this error occasionally while mining today, on both Linux and Windows. I'm using mikaelh's hp6 lately, so I don't know if the issue is unique to it.

Code:
checkqueue.h:171: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Block spacing is back under 1 min - network returning to normal
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Looks like the transaction was finally mined by someone.
I'm not quite sure why, but things should be fine for now.
We just need to prevent this from happening again in the future.

It looks all good now.

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
FPGA Mining LLC
Looks like the transaction was finally mined by someone.
I'm not quite sure why, but things should be fine for now.
We just need to prevent this from happening again in the future.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
FPGA Mining LLC
PRIMECOIN NETWORK GETTING DDOS ATTACK?

I dropped 90% in PPS. (PC, and all servers)

See a few posts above: We know what's happening, and a fix is being worked on. For now everyone is affected by it to the same degree, so it isn't really much to worry about.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
PRIMECOIN NETWORK GETTING DDOS ATTACK?

I dropped 90% in PPS. (PC, and all servers)
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
FPGA Mining LLC
It is not an attack. It's an issue in the miner that doesn't handle large block efficiently. A fix is being tested. Both the stock miner and mikaelh's miner are impacted.

Looks like I "broke" Primecoin by accident. Oh crap.

Anything I can do to help fix this up? Might double spending the funds in smaller transactions help resolve this?
If so, what's the easiest way to do this, now that the offending TXNs are lingering around in my wallet?
Or can someone somehow just forcibly mine them to get rid of them?

Why aren't those TXNs being mined (but relayed) in the first place? I sent them with stock primecoind with stock fee settings. I feel like that really shouldn't happen...

How long are these going to float around in mempools if we don't do anything about it?

I assume things will temporarily fix themselves for now as soon as the last of these large transactions get encoded into the blockchain. And then soon there will probably be updated builds of primecoin that fix its handling of large transactions.

IIUC the problem is that these transactions aren't going to be mined into blocks if the miner runs an unmodified primecoind.
So these will be around for a while if we don't take care of them somehow :/
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
It is not an attack. It's an issue in the miner that doesn't handle large block efficiently. A fix is being tested. Both the stock miner and mikaelh's miner are impacted.

Looks like I "broke" Primecoin by accident. Oh crap.

Anything I can do to help fix this up? Might double spending the funds in smaller transactions help resolve this?
If so, what's the easiest way to do this, now that the offending TXNs are lingering around in my wallet?
Or can someone somehow just forcibly mine them to get rid of them?

Why aren't those TXNs being mined (but relayed) in the first place? I sent them with stock primecoind with stock fee settings. I feel like that really shouldn't happen...

How long are these going to float around in mempools if we don't do anything about it?

How much did you move  Grin
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
It is not an attack. It's an issue in the miner that doesn't handle large block efficiently. A fix is being tested. Both the stock miner and mikaelh's miner are impacted.

Looks like I "broke" Primecoin by accident. Oh crap.

Anything I can do to help fix this up? Might double spending the funds in smaller transactions help resolve this?
If so, what's the easiest way to do this, now that the offending TXNs are lingering around in my wallet?
Or can someone somehow just forcibly mine them to get rid of them?

Why aren't those TXNs being mined (but relayed) in the first place? I sent them with stock primecoind with stock fee settings. I feel like that really shouldn't happen...

How long are these going to float around in mempools if we don't do anything about it?

I assume things will temporarily fix themselves for now as soon as the last of these large transactions get encoded into the blockchain. And then soon there will probably be updated builds of primecoin that fix its handling of large transactions.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
FPGA Mining LLC
It is not an attack. It's an issue in the miner that doesn't handle large block efficiently. A fix is being tested. Both the stock miner and mikaelh's miner are impacted.

Looks like I "broke" Primecoin by accident. Oh crap.

Anything I can do to help fix this up? Might double spending the funds in smaller transactions help resolve this?
If so, what's the easiest way to do this, now that the offending TXNs are lingering around in my wallet?
Or can someone somehow just forcibly mine them to get rid of them?

Why aren't those TXNs being mined (but relayed) in the first place? I sent them with stock primecoind with stock fee settings. I feel like that really shouldn't happen...

How long are these going to float around in mempools if we don't do anything about it?
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 250
It is not an attack. It's an issue in the miner that doesn't handle large block efficiently. A fix is being tested. Both the stock miner and mikaelh's miner are impacted.
I tried taking the creation of a new block template outside of the loop, and it still seems to be affecting me.
Pages:
Jump to: