Topic: Yet another analyst :) - page 113. (Read 269580 times)
I offer peace for you. I will not troll, copy and will just post my bearish signals here. That is all. You may continue with your bullish newsletter. It is also useful.
Cool bro. You are right at bull trend. At bear trend you continously wrong.
You see wedges and divergences at stocks, but you silent about them in bitcoin.
I am opposite, I hope. So what?
You see wedges and divergences at stocks, but you silent about them in bitcoin.
I am opposite, I hope. So what?
I don't take your advice, lucif, but I love reading it. I take in as many analyses and opinions as I can.
The more information the better! You do a great job of giving your opinion with pretty pictures. I appreciate this.
Keep up the good work. We all know you have many sources and losing on subscription will not affect this.
Never stop analyzing!
The more information the better! You do a great job of giving your opinion with pretty pictures. I appreciate this.
Keep up the good work. We all know you have many sources and losing on subscription will not affect this.
Never stop analyzing!
I also have nothing against someone analyzing the bitcoin charts in a different way.
I just made my statement to (i) protect my subscribers who pay for it and also (ii) my guts turned upside down with his wrong forecast that he was even defending for weeks. If people have followed him, they missed out one of the biggest rallies bitcoin has seen in its life.
and to lucif:
I am not a perma bull. You have just not been there when a bearish stance has been warranted. and as you seem to be comitted to remaina subscriber even with assuming other identities, there is nothing I can do.
sorry for becoming emotional but I am just a human being..
MACD resistance is close
And also, my posts are mostly bearish, because our community has a vacuum in bearish sphere. Other analysts mostly don't warn about possbile bearish scenarios. UP, UP, UP.
And I will say - here may be down and there may be resistance.
And I will say - here may be down and there may be resistance.
Thanks a lot =)
Thats what I do. I'll try to put just situation describtion information rather than advices. And a bit of trolling of course
Follow my info or not - is your choice and responsibility.
And I repeat, I don't copy anyone! I have a lot of info gathered in my mind from different sources. It is being processed by me and part of this I put in public.
Thats what I do. I'll try to put just situation describtion information rather than advices. And a bit of trolling of course
Follow my info or not - is your choice and responsibility.And I repeat, I don't copy anyone! I have a lot of info gathered in my mind from different sources. It is being processed by me and part of this I put in public.
I don't take your advice, lucif, but I love reading it. I take in as many analyses and opinions as I can.
The more information the better! You do a great job of giving your opinion with pretty pictures. I appreciate this.
Keep up the good work. We all know you have many sources and losing on subscription will not affect this.
Never stop analyzing!
The more information the better! You do a great job of giving your opinion with pretty pictures. I appreciate this.
Keep up the good work. We all know you have many sources and losing on subscription will not affect this.
Never stop analyzing!
There is no spoon good and evil. There is only coherence or conflict of interests.
Okay, imagine he will ban me, so what?
I am able to get subscription from another mail.
What this solves? Will he search continously in his subscribers list for Lucif?
Will he ask each new subscriber: If you are fucking lucif, get out from here!? Eh?
Who will suffer from this stupid action? I didnt break rules. So fuck off and provide services.
I am able to get subscription from another mail.
What this solves? Will he search continously in his subscribers list for Lucif?
Will he ask each new subscriber: If you are fucking lucif, get out from here!? Eh?
Who will suffer from this stupid action? I didnt break rules. So fuck off and provide services.
Solution to the age-old philosophical "Problem of Evil": It is necessary.
Information must take all possible forms / routes for the ultimate omnipotence to evolve from pure primordial randomness.
Satan's Slave cannot be kept from sprunging what informations it must! haha.
Okay, imagine he will ban me, so what?
I am able to get subscription from another mail.
What this solves? Will he search continously in his subscribers list for Lucif?
Will he ask each new subscriber: If you are fucking lucif, get out from here!? Eh?
Who will suffer from this stupid action? I didnt break rules. So fuck off and provide services.
I am able to get subscription from another mail.
What this solves? Will he search continously in his subscribers list for Lucif?
Will he ask each new subscriber: If you are fucking lucif, get out from here!? Eh?
Who will suffer from this stupid action? I didnt break rules. So fuck off and provide services.
Here's how it sits with me:
If you don't want Lucif learning from your analyses, remove him from your subscriber list.
If he used one of your charts or quotes in this thread, prove it in a post and remove him from your subscriber list.
Expecting people to subscribe and never speak a word of your analyses is ignorant. Information cannot be contained once you send it on the internet. Like a bitcoin, if you send it, it's now theirs to do as they please. The analyzer subscription 'service' model here is not a strong one for this reason. The copyrights and agreements associated with them cannot be depended upon. Like when you click through a microsoft license.
This might be a reason to change the model.
But frankly, if you think lucif is stealing customers or potential customer, I don't think that's the case. The subscription services are guesses at best -- most people know that they aren't going to make more money listening to you, in fact, losting 2.5 bitcoins a months pretty much seals the deal.
My 2 cents are pretty worthless, like all analyses, but here they are for all the world to share.
If you don't want Lucif learning from your analyses, remove him from your subscriber list.
If he used one of your charts or quotes in this thread, prove it in a post and remove him from your subscriber list.
Expecting people to subscribe and never speak a word of your analyses is ignorant. Information cannot be contained once you send it on the internet. Like a bitcoin, if you send it, it's now theirs to do as they please. The analyzer subscription 'service' model here is not a strong one for this reason. The copyrights and agreements associated with them cannot be depended upon. Like when you click through a microsoft license.
This might be a reason to change the model.
But frankly, if you think lucif is stealing customers or potential customer, I don't think that's the case. The subscription services are guesses at best -- most people know that they aren't going to make more money listening to you, in fact, losting 2.5 bitcoins a months pretty much seals the deal.
My 2 cents are pretty worthless, like all analyses, but here they are for all the world to share.
^ SPOT ON, CHERRI-YO
Why when I standing in opposite direction and criticism position - cypher and S3052 ask me for refund? Are you kidz?
Are you abusing me for drawing 50% Fibbonaci retracement and shown that on public? It's a everybody known resistance levels.
What the fuck? Someone please judge this.
Are you abusing me for drawing 50% Fibbonaci retracement and shown that on public? It's a everybody known resistance levels.
What the fuck? Someone please judge this.
It is not really about the fact that you are using fib numbers and common indicators.
It is because you get many special analyses per week and a 10+ page newsletter every week and then start a thread abiut the same thing: bitcoin technical analysis.
even if you do not copy anything directly from my service, reading it will at least impact you and this is not honest practice.
i know many financial advisers and newsletters who do not permit this, nor do I.
Why don't you accept that I return your bitcoins and then you do not have any financial loss.
And then you can carry on with your analyses in an unbiased fashion.
It's not that difficult to take unilateral action, no? Or maybe next time you should put the following notice on all the newsletters and correspondences " Strictly subscribers only. The service provider reserves the right to terminate all subscription services, providing that any remaining balance is refunded to the bitcoin address used for subscription. No service would be provided to a competitor."
You can not make people that are subscribed to a service to not be able to make a thread with their own opinions... that just isnt the way the bitcoin community should work. TA is full of opinions, from the same chart you can have infinite opinions. So, as long as someone literally make a copypaste of one of s3052's emails then there is no copyright or whatever bullshit involved.
Did lucif made public one of the newsletters that s3052 sends?
Do you have a direct link to download the pdf? No, so what the fuck is the problem with him stating his opinions in the forums???After all, s3052 says price is going up and lucif says price is going down.... just like every TA community does, there is people saying up and other say down. If you cant make your own opinions and just follow the herd... then welcome to the market mentality.
If you have your opinion and hate anyone that doesnt have the same opinion, well you have a big problem then.
Here's how it sits with me:
If you don't want Lucif learning from your analyses, remove him from your subscriber list.
If he used one of your charts or quotes in this thread, prove it in a post and remove him from your subscriber list.
Expecting people to subscribe and never speak a word of your analyses is ignorant. Information cannot be contained once you send it on the internet. Like a bitcoin, if you send it, it's now theirs to do as they please. The analyzer subscription 'service' model here is not a strong one for this reason. The copyrights and agreements associated with them cannot be depended upon. Like when you click through a microsoft license.
This might be a reason to change the model.
But frankly, if you think lucif is stealing customers or potential customer, I don't think that's the case. The subscription services are guesses at best -- most people know that they aren't going to make more money listening to you, in fact, losting 2.5 bitcoins a months pretty much seals the deal.
My 2 cents are pretty worthless, like all analyses, but here they are for all the world to share.
If you don't want Lucif learning from your analyses, remove him from your subscriber list.
If he used one of your charts or quotes in this thread, prove it in a post and remove him from your subscriber list.
Expecting people to subscribe and never speak a word of your analyses is ignorant. Information cannot be contained once you send it on the internet. Like a bitcoin, if you send it, it's now theirs to do as they please. The analyzer subscription 'service' model here is not a strong one for this reason. The copyrights and agreements associated with them cannot be depended upon. Like when you click through a microsoft license.
This might be a reason to change the model.
But frankly, if you think lucif is stealing customers or potential customer, I don't think that's the case. The subscription services are guesses at best -- most people know that they aren't going to make more money listening to you, in fact, losting 2.5 bitcoins a months pretty much seals the deal.
My 2 cents are pretty worthless, like all analyses, but here they are for all the world to share.
1. I am not a competitor. I don't know why paid analytics compete with my thoughts which are free for all. Hehe
2. I do not provide paid services
3. I do not share any part of analytics conclusions
2. I do not provide paid services
3. I do not share any part of analytics conclusions
Why when I standing in opposite direction and criticism position - cypher and S3052 ask me for refund? Are you kidz?
Are you abusing me for drawing 50% Fibbonaci retracement and shown that on public? It's a everybody known resistance levels.
What the fuck? Someone please judge this.
Are you abusing me for drawing 50% Fibbonaci retracement and shown that on public? It's a everybody known resistance levels.
What the fuck? Someone please judge this.
It is not really about the fact that you are using fib numbers and common indicators.
It is because you get many special analyses per week and a 10+ page newsletter every week and then start a thread abiut the same thing: bitcoin technical analysis.
even if you do not copy anything directly from my service, reading it will at least impact you and this is not honest practice.
i know many financial advisers and newsletters who do not permit this, nor do I.
Why don't you accept that I return your bitcoins and then you do not have any financial loss.
And then you can carry on with your analyses in an unbiased fashion.
It's not that difficult to take unilateral action, no? Or maybe next time you should put the following notice on all the newsletters and correspondences " Strictly subscribers only. The service provider reserves the right to terminate all subscription services, providing that any remaining balance is refunded to the bitcoin address used for subscription. No service would be provided to a competitor."
Volumed breakout through $16.95 resistance. Next resistance is next stop point. If candle closed above.
You know, fuck the honesty. The real reason for this bullshit is what I am sit in cash since $17 and you sit in Bitcoins since I dont know. Hehe. Thats the reason.
Hovewer I dont see this upward move fully completed
Hovewer I dont see this upward move fully completed
And you are insider trader, keeping most of people your exreamly bullish point of view. It is also not honest.
I just keep people balanced, providing opposite point of view. For free. It is their choice - follow me or you.
Yes, I learn TA for last two years by reading books and subscriptions.
Since you accepted my payment - please provide full services for that public offering I had paid.
I see conflict only in your refund offer. Reasons? Honesty is not a reason for me. Did I violate something?
I just keep people balanced, providing opposite point of view. For free. It is their choice - follow me or you.
Yes, I learn TA for last two years by reading books and subscriptions.
Since you accepted my payment - please provide full services for that public offering I had paid.
I see conflict only in your refund offer. Reasons? Honesty is not a reason for me. Did I violate something?
Why when I standing in opposite direction and criticism position - cypher and S3052 ask me for refund? Are you kidz?
Are you abusing me for drawing 50% Fibbonaci retracement and shown that on public? It's a everybody known resistance levels.
What the fuck? Someone please judge this.
Are you abusing me for drawing 50% Fibbonaci retracement and shown that on public? It's a everybody known resistance levels.
What the fuck? Someone please judge this.
It is not really about the fact that you are using fib numbers and common indicators.
It is because you get many special analyses per week and a 10+ page newsletter every week and then start a thread abiut the same thing: bitcoin technical analysis.
even if you do not copy anything directly from my service, reading it will at least impact you and this is not honest practice.
i know many financial advisers and newsletters who do not permit this, nor do I.
Why don't you accept that I return your bitcoins and then you do not have any financial loss.
And then you can carry on with your analyses in an unbiased fashion.
lucif,
seriously, I do not understand what you are doing here.
First, you subscribe to my service and you are still a subscriber for many more months
Then you come up with your own technical analysis
Then you decide to be bearish in contrast to the subscriber service, tricking some people into the completely wrong direction (you have been bearish since 13.5 $ and since then prices rallied about 30%.
Then you copy some of the views I give exclusively to subscribers (like the 50% retracement chart, etc.) which you are not allowed to
Apart from the fact that this is not fair, you may influence others and make them lose money.
I do not understand.
Perhaps someone who is neutral can judge about this?
seriously, I do not understand what you are doing here.
First, you subscribe to my service and you are still a subscriber for many more months
Then you come up with your own technical analysis
Then you decide to be bearish in contrast to the subscriber service, tricking some people into the completely wrong direction (you have been bearish since 13.5 $ and since then prices rallied about 30%.
Then you copy some of the views I give exclusively to subscribers (like the 50% retracement chart, etc.) which you are not allowed to
Apart from the fact that this is not fair, you may influence others and make them lose money.
I do not understand.
Perhaps someone who is neutral can judge about this?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1296791
So I have been violating your copyrights in the Spanish forum since october, and im not even subscribed to your newsletter... nice to know...
Oh wait!!!! Isnt it you the one who is violating my copyrights?
??Jump to: