Topic: Yet another analyst :) - page 20. (Read 269579 times)
Bitstamp already broke triangle and is retesting. Im waiting for it to continue dropping right about the next hour
hmm it looks almost like ...
I remember that you drew it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131065.1760
hmm it looks almost like ...
again triangle for you https://www.tradingview.com/v/ZpnjOZCp/
I would be all over some $-20 bitcoins
again triangle for you https://www.tradingview.com/v/ZpnjOZCp/
Yes but after about 93 $ (90 to Bitstamp) just surrender to the earlier lows.
Now it'is the last chance to double bottom ..
again triangle for you https://www.tradingview.com/v/ZpnjOZCp/
As for daily, my issue with that is that we don't have it entering the triangle initially from the top and bouncing off the bottom. Instead it bounces low outside the bounds, then enters the triangle and bounces off the top. This gives the triangle a slightly more bullish character than the one I posted.
So you expect at the end of the triangle first break up and then fall down?
I'm honestly about 60/40 bearish on the daily at this point. It would take some intense short term buying pressure to base a rally from here.
But that's assuming a breakout.... We could very well move sideways for a while.
similarly, I'd like to see break, but I do not say "that's in front of us:, because we want it.
Our wishes does not change the market.
As for daily, my issue with that is that we don't have it entering the triangle initially from the top and bouncing off the bottom. Instead it bounces low outside the bounds, then enters the triangle and bounces off the top. This gives the triangle a slightly more bullish character than the one I posted.
So you expect at the end of the triangle first break up and then fall down?
I'm honestly about 60/40 bearish on the daily at this point. It would take some intense short term buying pressure to base a rally from here.
But that's assuming a breakout.... We could very well move sideways for a while.
As for daily, my issue with that is that we don't have it entering the triangle initially from the top and bouncing off the bottom. Instead it bounces low outside the bounds, then enters the triangle and bounces off the top. This gives the triangle a slightly more bullish character than the one I posted.
So you expect at the end of the triangle first break up and then fall down?
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
This resembles BTC right now.
On what timescale?
15 minute lol
Also daily since about $160
I see the 15 minute, but don't get lost in the wiggles
As for daily, my issue with that is that we don't have it entering the triangle initially from the top and bouncing off the bottom. Instead it bounces low outside the bounds, then enters the triangle and bounces off the top. This gives the triangle a slightly more bullish character than the one I posted. However, things still look fairly bearish based on other indicators.
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
This resembles BTC right now.
On what timescale?
15 minute lol
Also daily since about $160
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
This resembles BTC right now.
On what timescale?
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
This resembles BTC right now.
hmm it looks almost like ...
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
This resembles BTC right now.
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
A lot of US folks in here calls themselves "anarcho-capitalists". I explain them that's an oxymoron, that anarchism is against capitalism by definition, because capitalism is hierarchical and coercitive by nature.
This. The Rothbardian "definition" mentioned earlier was simply made up when some capitalists tried to co-opt the word. Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
This 
Socialism is too loaded of a word to convey any meaning.
So is captialism and anarchism unfortunately.
We should find new words.
Words mean what they mean, but changing the meaning of the words is one of the preferred methods of the status quo to control the people's thoughts.
About capitalism and anarchism I have an endless debate on these forums. A lot of US folks in here calls themselves "anarcho-capitalists". I explain them that's an oxymoron, that anarchism is against capitalism by definition, because capitalism is hierarchical and coercitive by nature. And we go on arguing for 20-pages long threads in the politics&society subforums.
Anyhow, sorry for the OT lucif, please show us some bearish triangles
Socialism is too loaded of a word to convey any meaning.
So is captialism and anarchism unfortunately.
We should find new words.
Right, we just need to be clear about what we mean without using those words. Unfortunately, each of those words conjures up a preconceived idea that is different for each of us.
Most people conflate "anarchy" and "anomie".
I honestly dont see way up from here. Either down or sideways.
I see good way up from mid-11s/sub-12s.
I see good way up from mid-11s/sub-12s.
Quoting this for use three days from now
History moves so fast in Bitcoinland.
Socialism is too loaded of a word to convey any meaning.
So is captialism and anarchism unfortunately.
We should find new words.
See what I did there?
Jump to: