Looks like it was 40 Petahash?
Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 256 blocks solved! - page 19. (Read 105090 times)
Congrats to the miner!
Looks like it was 40 Petahash?
Looks like it was 40 Petahash?
Congratulation to 36AisvWi1UiwLTeTZxLzindAkorqeUc3tT for solving Block 858,978.
diff: 197522447695680 @ ~15-35P
diff: 197522447695680 @ ~15-35P
Wow, congrats! Before 100% too
Bravo anon miner! Bravo CK & CK pool!
It's been a good year here for a handful of people.
Bravo anon miner! Bravo CK & CK pool!
It's been a good year here for a handful of people.
Congratulations!
Well what do you know, looks like I spoke too soon 
Congratulations whoever found block 858978
Congratulations whoever found block 858978
Far too quiet around here...
About time we hit another block don't you think?
About time we hit another block don't you think?
Hi all, new to mining. Sorry if this question is answered somewhere else but I saw conversations going back to 2014 and can't possibly read it all.
When solo mining with CK pool is there a way to verify which miner solved the block? What I'm trying to understand is if there is a way to verify if my miner finds a block. At this point (with limited understanding) I'm just point hash and CK pool and hoping they are trustworthy and will pay out if my miner gets lucky.
On a separate note is there a way to put a message in the found block? I see the last block (853742) from Solo CK pool and the coinbase tag and OP_RETURN data is full of gibberish. It would be cool if each solo miner could put their own notes in those fields (understandably this might mean more overhead for CK pool and if that's the reason why we can't that's totally fair).
Cheers!
When solo mining with CK pool is there a way to verify which miner solved the block? What I'm trying to understand is if there is a way to verify if my miner finds a block. At this point (with limited understanding) I'm just point hash and CK pool and hoping they are trustworthy and will pay out if my miner gets lucky.
On a separate note is there a way to put a message in the found block? I see the last block (853742) from Solo CK pool and the coinbase tag and OP_RETURN data is full of gibberish. It would be cool if each solo miner could put their own notes in those fields (understandably this might mean more overhead for CK pool and if that's the reason why we can't that's totally fair).
Cheers!
Gotcha!
I see there's some lucky people on here that already hit a block. Any particular reason why ckpool doesn't display Block Height and Last Found on miningpoolstats.stream?
I see there's some lucky people on here that already hit a block. Any particular reason why ckpool doesn't display Block Height and Last Found on miningpoolstats.stream?
You can use this link to see the last blocks found:
https://mempool.ninja/mining/pool/solock
The pool gives every worker effectively unlimited unique work so they can't overlap.If you managed to write your own broken mining software that redid the same hashes somehow the pool would reject them. If the pool is reporting your hashrate correct there are no dupes.
Gotcha!
I see there's some lucky people on here that already hit a block. Any particular reason why ckpool doesn't display Block Height and Last Found on miningpoolstats.stream?
Hello ck
The pool is working as well as before, thank you.
And there is no problem
I haven't changed a single thing on the pool in years, but sure. The pool is working as well as before, thank you.
And there is no problem
Hello ck
The pool is working as well as before, thank you.
And there is no problem
The pool is working as well as before, thank you.
And there is no problem
Hi all!
Me and two buddies joined CK Pool this month with a total of 9 Avalon Nanos. At this moment we can just hope that eventually the total of 36 TH/s hits a block.
I have a question though related to the process of generating hashes with different units to a single wallet:
When I mine with verious units to a wallet, do the units know what hashes were already tested by requesting them at the pool or do the miners just test if the generated hash works?
Would the share be rejected if two units post the same hash to the pool? Do units know what hashes the other units have already sent?
From what I understand a hash is generated from a textblock of the previous hash, so there can be millions and billions of different hashes for the same text block.
I'm just asking in theory.
Thanks in advance and lucky mining to everyone. May Satoshi be with you!
The pool gives every worker effectively unlimited unique work so they can't overlap.If you managed to write your own broken mining software that redid the same hashes somehow the pool would reject them. If the pool is reporting your hashrate correct there are no dupes. Me and two buddies joined CK Pool this month with a total of 9 Avalon Nanos. At this moment we can just hope that eventually the total of 36 TH/s hits a block.
I have a question though related to the process of generating hashes with different units to a single wallet:
When I mine with verious units to a wallet, do the units know what hashes were already tested by requesting them at the pool or do the miners just test if the generated hash works?
Would the share be rejected if two units post the same hash to the pool? Do units know what hashes the other units have already sent?
From what I understand a hash is generated from a textblock of the previous hash, so there can be millions and billions of different hashes for the same text block.
I'm just asking in theory.
Thanks in advance and lucky mining to everyone. May Satoshi be with you!
Hi all!
Me and two buddies joined CK Pool this month with a total of 9 Avalon Nanos. At this moment we can just hope that eventually the total of 36 TH/s hits a block.
I have a question though related to the process of generating hashes with different units to a single wallet:
When I mine with verious units to a wallet, do the units know what hashes were already tested by requesting them at the pool or do the miners just test if the generated hash works?
Would the share be rejected if two units post the same hash to the pool? Do units know what hashes the other units have already sent?
From what I understand a hash is generated from a textblock of the previous hash, so there can be millions and billions of different hashes for the same text block.
I'm just asking in theory.
Thanks in advance and lucky mining to everyone. May Satoshi be with you!
Me and two buddies joined CK Pool this month with a total of 9 Avalon Nanos. At this moment we can just hope that eventually the total of 36 TH/s hits a block.
I have a question though related to the process of generating hashes with different units to a single wallet:
When I mine with verious units to a wallet, do the units know what hashes were already tested by requesting them at the pool or do the miners just test if the generated hash works?
Would the share be rejected if two units post the same hash to the pool? Do units know what hashes the other units have already sent?
From what I understand a hash is generated from a textblock of the previous hash, so there can be millions and billions of different hashes for the same text block.
I'm just asking in theory.
Thanks in advance and lucky mining to everyone. May Satoshi be with you!
Hi i am new here and with minining is right Statumuser: btcwallet.Workername_1 ?
to give a name for difrent miners ?
to give a name for difrent miners ?
Yes, you can use either "." or "_" to name your workers.
For example:
wallet.worker1
wallet_worker2
and how i can see if i solve a block ?
Your bestshare needs to be > or = to the current network difficulty (though the block could still be orphan but unlikely)
+ most ASICs interfaces show "BlockFound=1" (or something similar) when you find one.
+ the coins in your wallet waiting for their 100 network confirmations and people congratulating your wallet address in this thread
Hi i am new here and with minining is right Statumuser: btcwallet.Workername_1 ?
to give a name for difrent miners ?
and how i can see if i solve a block ?
to give a name for difrent miners ?
and how i can see if i solve a block ?
I spotted the call for it to change set difficulty but it seems to keep doing 10k diff for some time after this.
Either it flips to the lower or it sometimes stays on 10k untill the next set diff message comes but that can sometimes be some period of time.
should we not Dequeued the work on this call?
Either it flips to the lower or it sometimes stays on 10k untill the next set diff message comes but that can sometimes be some period of time.
should we not Dequeued the work on this call?
Code:
₿ (291161) bm1366Module: RX Job ID: 38
₿ (291161) asic_result: Nonce difficulty 264.60 of 10000.
₿ (291691) bm1366Module: RX Job ID: 38
₿ (291691) asic_result: Nonce difficulty 54983.11 of 10000.
₿ (291691) stratum_api: tx: {"id": 12, "method": "mining.submit", "params": ["bc1***.***, "648516380013d80c", "0500000000000000", "66bb9e77", "0f860342", "0fe28000"]}
₿ (291811) stratum_task: rx: {"params":[858],"id":null,"method":"mining.set_difficulty"}
₿ (291811) stratum_task: Set stratum difficulty: 858
₿ (291811) stratum_task: rx: {"result":true,"error":null,"id":12}
₿ (291821) stratum_task: message result accepted
₿ (292671) bm1366Module: RX Job ID: 40
Should we not do create_jobs_task: New Work Dequeued here if the stratum message is to move to 852 diff?
₿ (292671) asic_result: Nonce difficulty 282.49 of 10000.
₿ (293201) bm1366Module: RX Job ID: 40
₿ (293201) asic_result: Nonce difficulty 481.34 of 10000.
₿ (293741) bm1366Module: RX Job ID: 40
₿ (293741) asic_result: Nonce difficulty 326.37 of 10000.
Code contines for some time at 10k diff before the switch down to the stratum set_difficulty.
CK can I ask why it takes so long for the diff change sometimes up to 10 min or more for Bitaxe boards?
Takes nearly 11 min from connecting before the pool adjusts the diff down from 10k to normally for bitaxe between 320-550 range is what I see the boards land is most of the time.
Takes nearly 11 min from connecting before the pool adjusts the diff down from 10k to normally for bitaxe between 320-550 range is what I see the boards land is most of the time.
I've not used Bitaxe before, does it send the suggested diff back to the pool like CGMiner does?
With a Gekko Science compac F, if I set the suggested diff to say 600 in CGminer, within a few seconds of connecting to the pool the rate is adjusted to that what was requested.
Perhaps the Bitaxe firmware doesn't do this?
LOL
CK is legit and an OG in the space.
Just GTFOH if you're going to throw unfounded and inaccurate accusations.
Just GTFOH if you're going to throw unfounded and inaccurate accusations.
Jump to: