Pages:
Author

Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 256 blocks solved! - page 23. (Read 105051 times)

newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
I believe it should be easy to participate in this forum, I've been here for a few years and hadn't tried to find out how it worked
Please stay on topic. This is the solo ckpool support thread ONLY.
I just followed ckpool, I've been here for a few years, I'm discovering how it works now, thank you
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
I believe it should be easy to participate in this forum, I've been here for a few years and hadn't tried to find out how it worked
Please stay on topic. This is the solo ckpool support thread ONLY.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
I believe it should be easy to participate in this forum, I've been here for a few years and hadn't tried to find out how it worked
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
How do I become legendary here? I'm a newbie based on what it says here
I just discovered how this works here
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Going to be a ton of new bitaxe sales now

My guess is it was actually an Avalon Nano 3. I have one and those are exactly the kind of numbers it is doing. Probably upgraded his/her bitaxe and used the same worker name.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
amazing performance of the small miner

Must order some Nano 3  Grin

 Wouldn't say amazing performance, it was performing as designed. Amazing luck though!
yes and no,

yes amazing luck, but the calculation made by the single small asic from the bitaxe, so also a big calculation in a short time against all other mine world wide and so in my mind performance. but yes performance i do not mean the hashspeed.

 

 I see where you're coming from, and it really is encouraging to all those solo miners out there running barely 1T against those mega farms where a single ASIC is hashing at 100T+.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 3003
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
amazing performance of the small miner

Must order some Nano 3  Grin

 Wouldn't say amazing performance, it was performing as designed. Amazing luck though!
yes and no,

yes amazing luck, but the calculation made by the single small asic from the bitaxe, so also a big calculation in a short time against all other mine world wide and so in my mind performance. but yes performance i do not mean the hashspeed.

 
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
amazing performance of the small miner

Must order some Nano 3  Grin

 Wouldn't say amazing performance, it was performing as designed. Amazing luck though!
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
member
Activity: 152
Merit: 25
This is fantastic news! Unbelievable!

BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

I hope my bitaxe gets a block!
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Although 3.49 TH is very very very small hashrate to find a block BUT... Normal single chip BitAxe units run only about a .5 TH
Maybe this is one of those HEX Units. Or several workers with same name.
Any thoughts
Looks like they ran one bitaxe for a couple of weeks and added more hashrate in the day leading up to the block; either more bitaxes or something else. Given the workername has bitaxe in it, I'm guessing it was multiple bitaxes by then.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 2
Although 3.49 TH is very very very small hashrate to find a block BUT... Normal single chip BitAxe units run only about a .5 TH
Maybe this is one of those HEX Units. Or several workers with same name.
Any thoughts
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Congratulations to miner bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u with the first bitaxe and only a tiny 3.1TH for finding the 290th solo block!

Code:
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.073] Possible block solve diff 300062660427407.250000 !
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.189] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.190] Solved and confirmed block 853742 by bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u.bitaxe
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.191] User bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u:{"hashrate1m": "3.49T", "hashrate5m": "3.11T", "hashrate1hr": "1.09T", "hashrate1d": "473G", "hashrate7d": "308G", "shares": 136919959, "authorised": 1720194068}
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.191] Worker bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u.bitaxe:{"hashrate1m": "3.49T", "hashrate5m": "3.11T", "hashrate1hr": "1.09T", "hashrate1d": "473G", "hashrate7d": "307G"}
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.236] Block solved after 316687459958461 shares at 386.0% diff

This much hashrate only would find a block once every 3500 YEARS on average, or one in 1 million per day!

https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000f0235e50becc0b3bc91231e236f67736d64b1813704b

 Once within every 3,500 years... so can be in 10 minutes or in 3,500 years. With current stats for hash & difficulty of course.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
How do I become legendary here? I'm a newbie based on what it says here
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Is the address starting with 1 still valid to win a block in the pool?
Yes, any valid bitcoin address is fine. The pool will refuse to let you mine if your username is not a valid bitcoin address.
How do I know if the address was valid, I've been in the pool for over 4 years
Your miner would fail to connect.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Is the address starting with 1 still valid to win a block in the pool?
Yes, any valid bitcoin address is fine. The pool will refuse to let you mine if your username is not a valid bitcoin address.
How do I know if the address was valid, I've been in the pool for over 4 years
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 3003
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
amazing performance of the small miner

Must order some Nano 3  Grin
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Congratulations to miner bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u with the first bitaxe and only a tiny 3.1TH for finding the 290th solo block!

Code:
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.073] Possible block solve diff 300062660427407.250000 !
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.189] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.190] Solved and confirmed block 853742 by bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u.bitaxe
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.191] User bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u:{"hashrate1m": "3.49T", "hashrate5m": "3.11T", "hashrate1hr": "1.09T", "hashrate1d": "473G", "hashrate7d": "308G", "shares": 136919959, "authorised": 1720194068}
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.191] Worker bc1qk4czgwtfhxwfd9r696kzledtmlu8yukdzpzn3u.bitaxe:{"hashrate1m": "3.49T", "hashrate5m": "3.11T", "hashrate1hr": "1.09T", "hashrate1d": "473G", "hashrate7d": "307G"}
[2024-07-24 17:43:46.236] Block solved after 316687459958461 shares at 386.0% diff

This much hashrate only would find a block once every 3500 YEARS on average, or one in 1 million per day!

https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000f0235e50becc0b3bc91231e236f67736d64b1813704b
According to the logs this miner has only been mining on the pool for 19 days to this address, and only increased their hashrate to 3TH within the last day!
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Is the address starting with 1 still valid to win a block in the pool?
Yes, any valid bitcoin address is fine. The pool will refuse to let you mine if your username is not a valid bitcoin address.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Is the address starting with 1 still valid to win a block in the pool?
Pages:
Jump to: