[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 204.

ailikun

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 254

Quote from: -ck on March 25, 2016, 12:56:54 AM

Code:

[2016-03-25 00:55:26.217] Possible block solve diff 1684119876772.186523 !
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] Solved and confirmed block 404180 by 17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] User 17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp:{"hashrate1m": "38.3T", "hashrate5m": "37.3T", "hashrate1hr": "37.7T", "hashrate1d": "37T", "hashrate7d": "48.2T"}
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] Worker 17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp:{"hashrate1m": "38.3T", "hashrate5m": "37.3T", "hashrate1hr": "37.7T", "hashrate1d": "37T", "hashrate7d": "49.9T"}
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] Block solved after 503477725820 shares at 304.2% diff

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000000a721d8b3e0f224010ad3f2e70d875be0a459367da996d3

Congratz cheeseater

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Code:

[2016-03-25 00:55:26.217] Possible block solve diff 1684119876772.186523 !
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] Solved and confirmed block 404180 by 17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] User 17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp:{"hashrate1m": "38.3T", "hashrate5m": "37.3T", "hashrate1hr": "37.7T", "hashrate1d": "37T", "hashrate7d": "48.2T"}
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] Worker 17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp:{"hashrate1m": "38.3T", "hashrate5m": "37.3T", "hashrate1hr": "37.7T", "hashrate1d": "37T", "hashrate7d": "49.9T"}
[2016-03-25 00:55:26.333] Block solved after 503477725820 shares at 304.2% diff

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000000a721d8b3e0f224010ad3f2e70d875be0a459367da996d3

Morguk

hero member

Activity: 595

Merit: 506

Quote from: Krak on March 14, 2016, 11:17:56 PM

Blockchain.info works just fine with generation transactions; I used to use it with p2pool all the time.

That's good to hear thanks.

aarons6

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1006

Quote from: hodedowe on March 21, 2016, 05:23:07 PM

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 04:34:48 PM

So I am taking that as a yes that coinbase.com wallet address are safe for solo.ckpool.org? Or to be really sure, anyone solo mined with a coinbase.com wallet address that hit a solo block from solo.ckpool.org want to verify that they received their coins and nail this once and for all?

Do you guys not have computers at all? Anyone mining should have their own wallet. Period. Not some rent-a-wallet from some online supplier that can just take your coins and claim "Oops, dey got stoleded. Srry!". Run Multi-bit and it takes about 8 mb of space. Run Bitcoin core if you have space and bandwidth to run a full node, then use Armory for a secure wallet. It's not rocket science.

while you can make the core wallet very secure.. i believe for the most part an online wallet is more secure then most people.. meaning they usually force 2fa from authy, and they have sms text withdrawl. core wallet doesnt do that, and lots of people choose stupid passw0rds, or not backing up in case of hardware failure..

so i do think that an online wallet is probably better for a regular person.. (read that i lost 21 bitcoins thread in general)

now i would NEVER hold my coins in an exchange.. those use hot wallets and your coins are pooled up.. not kept private.

id use blockchain.info.. and id use a pregenerated address.. meaning i generated the keys from somewhere OFFLINE.. you can use a program or a wallet from a computer that is NOT ONLINE.. then import it into blockchain.info manually.

this will let you use online security.. but at the same time the key was never ONLINE so nobody can hack it. plus if for whatever reason blockchain.info goes down, you can import that key into another client and still have access to coins.

notoriot

member

Activity: 78

Merit: 10

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 05:29:31 PM

Quote from: hodedowe on March 21, 2016, 05:23:07 PM

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 04:34:48 PM

So I am taking that as a yes that coinbase.com wallet address are safe for solo.ckpool.org? Or to be really sure, anyone solo mined with a coinbase.com wallet address that hit a solo block from solo.ckpool.org want to verify that they received their coins and nail this once and for all?

Do you guys not have computers at all? Anyone mining should have their own wallet. Period. Not some rent-a-wallet from some online supplier that can just take your coins and claim "Oops, dey got stoleded. Srry!". Run Multi-bit and it takes about 8 mb of space. Run Bitcoin core if you have space and bandwidth to run a full node, then use Armory for a secure wallet. It's not rocket science.

I understand where your mind is at, but that is not the point, everyone has their own choices, what people are trying to determine is if in fact coinbase.com accepts generation transactions or not and I was asking if anyone that used a coinbase.com wallet that found a solo block received their BTC to prove that statement or not. Knowledge is always good.

I didn't ask, is it wise to use coinbase.com wallet...

Are we any clearer on whether coinbase accepts generated coins or not .. i use coinbase and I mine here (never hit a block to date) but always assumed coinbase was a safe bet on that front ....

And for the record I would immediately move coins from coinbase in the event that I solved a block.. but for ease of use and to be able to receive email notifications on transactions I like coinbase and buy coins from there regularly and have never had a problem

hodedowe

sr. member

Activity: 359

Merit: 251

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 05:29:31 PM

Quote from: hodedowe on March 21, 2016, 05:23:07 PM

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 04:34:48 PM

So I am taking that as a yes that coinbase.com wallet address are safe for solo.ckpool.org? Or to be really sure, anyone solo mined with a coinbase.com wallet address that hit a solo block from solo.ckpool.org want to verify that they received their coins and nail this once and for all?

Do you guys not have computers at all? Anyone mining should have their own wallet. Period. Not some rent-a-wallet from some online supplier that can just take your coins and claim "Oops, dey got stoleded. Srry!". Run Multi-bit and it takes about 8 mb of space. Run Bitcoin core if you have space and bandwidth to run a full node, then use Armory for a secure wallet. It's not rocket science.

I understand where your mind is at, but that is not the point, everyone has their own choices, what people are trying to determine is if in fact coinbase.com accepts generation transactions or not and I was asking if anyone that used a coinbase.com wallet that found a solo block received their BTC to prove that statement or not. Knowledge is always good.

I didn't ask, is it wise to use coinbase.com wallet...

The implication was there. You trust someone else to hold your coins and you're just asking for another Mt. Gox scandal.

pikachuy

sr. member

Activity: 544

Merit: 250

Quote from: hodedowe on March 21, 2016, 05:23:07 PM

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 04:34:48 PM

So I am taking that as a yes that coinbase.com wallet address are safe for solo.ckpool.org? Or to be really sure, anyone solo mined with a coinbase.com wallet address that hit a solo block from solo.ckpool.org want to verify that they received their coins and nail this once and for all?

Do you guys not have computers at all? Anyone mining should have their own wallet. Period. Not some rent-a-wallet from some online supplier that can just take your coins and claim "Oops, dey got stoleded. Srry!". Run Multi-bit and it takes about 8 mb of space. Run Bitcoin core if you have space and bandwidth to run a full node, then use Armory for a secure wallet. It's not rocket science.

I understand where your mind is at, but that is not the point, everyone has their own choices, what people are trying to determine is if in fact coinbase.com accepts generation transactions or not and I was asking if anyone that used a coinbase.com wallet that found a solo block received their BTC to prove that statement or not. Knowledge is always good.

I didn't ask, is it wise to use coinbase.com wallet...

hodedowe

sr. member

Activity: 359

Merit: 251

Quote from: pikachuy on March 21, 2016, 04:34:48 PM

So I am taking that as a yes that coinbase.com wallet address are safe for solo.ckpool.org? Or to be really sure, anyone solo mined with a coinbase.com wallet address that hit a solo block from solo.ckpool.org want to verify that they received their coins and nail this once and for all?

Do you guys not have computers at all? Anyone mining should have their own wallet. Period. Not some rent-a-wallet from some online supplier that can just take your coins and claim "Oops, dey got stoleded. Srry!". Run Multi-bit and it takes about 8 mb of space. Run Bitcoin core if you have space and bandwidth to run a full node, then use Armory for a secure wallet. It's not rocket science.

pikachuy

sr. member

Activity: 544

Merit: 250

Quote from: hodedowe on March 17, 2016, 04:16:03 PM

Quote from: larocfra on March 17, 2016, 02:08:16 PM

Here is the reply that I got for Coinbase.com

I’m not sure if by generation transactions if you mean newly minted coins? If that is what you mean, then yes, we do support them, but like any newly minted bitcoin. you’ll need to wait 100 blocks before you can transact with them.
I hope that helps! Let us know if you have any other questions, and thanks for using Coinbase.

That still don't tell me if it is good or not, now I started Bitcoin Core in pruning mode and again it is a lot a bandwidth, MY ISP allow me only 130 gig a month
Is there a alternative wallet ? I would like to go back to solo.ckpool

I'm pretty sure you could get by with a light wallet like Multi-bit and be fine. That still lets you control your coins, but you don't have to run a full node to make it work (IIRC).

I also contacted coinbase.com too and I asked:

Code:

I am planning to solo mine bitcoins, does our coinbase.com wallet address accept freshly found mined bitcoins directly?

and their response was:

Code:

We sure do allow acceptance of newly mined bitcoins. You can use any of your addresses found here to deposit what you have mined. https://www.coinbase.com/addresses

So I am taking that as a yes that coinbase.com wallet address are safe for solo.ckpool.org? Or to be really sure, anyone solo mined with a coinbase.com wallet address that hit a solo block from solo.ckpool.org want to verify that they received their coins and nail this once and for all?

hodedowe

sr. member

Activity: 359

Merit: 251

Quote from: larocfra on March 17, 2016, 02:08:16 PM

Here is the reply that I got for Coinbase.com

I’m not sure if by generation transactions if you mean newly minted coins? If that is what you mean, then yes, we do support them, but like any newly minted bitcoin. you’ll need to wait 100 blocks before you can transact with them.
I hope that helps! Let us know if you have any other questions, and thanks for using Coinbase.

That still don't tell me if it is good or not, now I started Bitcoin Core in pruning mode and again it is a lot a bandwidth, MY ISP allow me only 130 gig a month
Is there a alternative wallet ? I would like to go back to solo.ckpool

I'm pretty sure you could get by with a light wallet like Multi-bit and be fine. That still lets you control your coins, but you don't have to run a full node to make it work (IIRC).

Mikestang

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1000

Quote from: larocfra on March 17, 2016, 02:08:16 PM

I’m not sure if by generation transactions if you mean newly minted coins? If that is what you mean, then yes, we do support them,

...

That still don't tell me if it is good or not,

They answered you pretty clearly that yes, they support newly minted coins, i.e. a generation transaction.

There are some posts in the forum that show how much bandwidth a full node uses, plus there are ways to limit traffic to reduce your bandwidth, try a search for those threads.

citronick

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1080

---- winter*juvia -----

Quote from: larocfra on March 17, 2016, 02:08:16 PM

Here is the reply that I got for Coinbase.com

I’m not sure if by generation transactions if you mean newly minted coins? If that is what you mean, then yes, we do support them, but like any newly minted bitcoin. you’ll need to wait 100 blocks before you can transact with them.
I hope that helps! Let us know if you have any other questions, and thanks for using Coinbase.

That still don't tell me if it is good or not, now I started Bitcoin Core in pruning mode and again it is a lot a bandwidth, MY ISP allow me only 130 gig a month
Is there a alternative wallet ? I would like to go back to solo.ckpool

you may want consider a web wallet. Check out holytransaction.com
my ck-solo block went to this web wallet BTC address.

larocfra

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Here is the reply that I got for Coinbase.com

I’m not sure if by generation transactions if you mean newly minted coins? If that is what you mean, then yes, we do support them, but like any newly minted bitcoin. you’ll need to wait 100 blocks before you can transact with them.
I hope that helps! Let us know if you have any other questions, and thanks for using Coinbase.

That still don't tell me if it is good or not, now I started Bitcoin Core in pruning mode and again it is a lot a bandwidth, MY ISP allow me only 130 gig a month
Is there a alternative wallet ? I would like to go back to solo.ckpool

Denizs66

sr. member

Activity: 283

Merit: 250

Thank you for the information. So I want do be away from the Blockchain online Wallet.

Whats about the Ledger Nano | Bitcoin Hardware Wallet USB Stick? Can I use this wallet for Solo-Mining on the CK Pool?

Thank You very much

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Nthused on March 17, 2016, 01:12:46 AM

ck pool down ? getting 503 error on website and MRR rentals lost hashrate and I have all 3 pools there even for backup.

Looks like a major connectivity issue at the data centre. De is still working but obviously stats are offline.

~~EDIT: I've temporarily put the old DE only stats server back online at de.ckpool.org until the master pool connectivity is resolved~~

Looks like it's back online now. Mine on.

Nthused

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1001

ck pool down ? getting 503 error on website and MRR rentals lost hashrate and I have all 3 pools there even for backup.

chiguireitor

legendary

Activity: 872

Merit: 1010

Coins, Games & Miners

Also, it seems there's a -onlyblocks option now, to stop transactions from eating bandwidth.... that alone reduces 80% bandwidth requirements. (although to see a payment, you have to wait a block).

irritant

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol

Quote from: larocfra on March 15, 2016, 08:11:37 PM

Quote from: hodedowe on March 15, 2016, 07:53:59 PM

Quote from: larocfra on March 15, 2016, 07:18:48 PM

I now using bitcoin core on my pc, how much bandwidth will this wallet will be using by month ?

This may be helpful. It's a line you add to bitcoin.conf

Quote

Reduce upload traffic

A major part of the outbound traffic is caused by serving historic blocks to other nodes in initial block download state.

It is now possible to reduce the total upload traffic via the -maxuploadtarget parameter. This is not a hard limit but a threshold to minimize the outbound traffic. When the limit is about to be reached, the uploaded data is cut by not serving historic blocks (blocks older than one week). Moreover, any SPV peer is disconnected when they request a filtered block.

This option can be specified in MiB per day and is turned off by default (-maxuploadtarget=0). The recommended minimum is 144 * MAX_BLOCK_SIZE (currently 144MB) per day.

Whitelisted peers will never be disconnected, although their traffic counts for calculating the target.

A more detailed documentation about keeping traffic low can be found in /doc/reduce-traffic.md.

I am using Bitcoin core 64bit for windows there is no bitcoin.conf

you have to make one, in %APPDATA%/Bitcoin/

larocfra

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: hodedowe on March 15, 2016, 07:53:59 PM

Quote from: larocfra on March 15, 2016, 07:18:48 PM

I now using bitcoin core on my pc, how much bandwidth will this wallet will be using by month ?

This may be helpful. It's a line you add to bitcoin.conf

Quote

Reduce upload traffic

A major part of the outbound traffic is caused by serving historic blocks to other nodes in initial block download state.

It is now possible to reduce the total upload traffic via the -maxuploadtarget parameter. This is not a hard limit but a threshold to minimize the outbound traffic. When the limit is about to be reached, the uploaded data is cut by not serving historic blocks (blocks older than one week). Moreover, any SPV peer is disconnected when they request a filtered block.

This option can be specified in MiB per day and is turned off by default (-maxuploadtarget=0). The recommended minimum is 144 * MAX_BLOCK_SIZE (currently 144MB) per day.

Whitelisted peers will never be disconnected, although their traffic counts for calculating the target.

A more detailed documentation about keeping traffic low can be found in /doc/reduce-traffic.md.

I am using Bitcoin core 64bit for windows there is no bitcoin.conf

hodedowe

sr. member

Activity: 359

Merit: 251

Quote from: larocfra on March 15, 2016, 07:18:48 PM

I now using bitcoin core on my pc, how much bandwidth will this wallet will be using by month ?

This may be helpful. It's a line you add to bitcoin.conf

Quote

Reduce upload traffic

A major part of the outbound traffic is caused by serving historic blocks to other nodes in initial block download state.

It is now possible to reduce the total upload traffic via the -maxuploadtarget parameter. This is not a hard limit but a threshold to minimize the outbound traffic. When the limit is about to be reached, the uploaded data is cut by not serving historic blocks (blocks older than one week). Moreover, any SPV peer is disconnected when they request a filtered block.

This option can be specified in MiB per day and is turned off by default (-maxuploadtarget=0). The recommended minimum is 144 * MAX_BLOCK_SIZE (currently 144MB) per day.

Whitelisted peers will never be disconnected, although their traffic counts for calculating the target.

A more detailed documentation about keeping traffic low can be found in /doc/reduce-traffic.md.

Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 204. (Read 1514767 times)