I do believe I shall parade some solo with my 2 OC'ed nanofury usb sticks because why not. May add a few more tonight if I can free up a hub. Maybe even a onestringminer.
All this evening.
Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 464. (Read 1514844 times)
November 04, 2014, 11:40:21 AM
November 02, 2014, 11:24:22 PM
back with some power . . . http://solo.ckpool.org/users/18NeJYTXhpZfoQFBrPt1QsW5bCndRDeAwq
let's hit a block !
I assume you put your broken stratum implementation on the main solo pool since nothing is showing up but errors in my console. Remember to use the tube pool for those on port 3334.let's hit a block !
looks ok on my side now ... should i goto 3334 ?
yeah 18N is me . . . will reconfigure to 3334 after i wake up. going to bed now. working hard at my 2nd data center. testing many rigs , server, setups , etc .... will be back shortly.
November 02, 2014, 11:03:47 PM
back with some power . . . http://solo.ckpool.org/users/18NeJYTXhpZfoQFBrPt1QsW5bCndRDeAwq
let's hit a block !
I assume you put your broken stratum implementation on the main solo pool since nothing is showing up but errors in my console. Remember to use the tube pool for those on port 3334.let's hit a block !
looks ok on my side now ... should i goto 3334 ?
November 02, 2014, 10:29:19 PM
back with some power . . . http://solo.ckpool.org/users/18NeJYTXhpZfoQFBrPt1QsW5bCndRDeAwq
let's hit a block !
I assume you put your broken stratum implementation on the main solo pool since nothing is showing up but errors in my console. Remember to use the tube pool for those on port 3334.let's hit a block !
looks ok on my side now ... should i goto 3334 ?
November 02, 2014, 10:14:48 PM
back with some power . . . http://solo.ckpool.org/users/18NeJYTXhpZfoQFBrPt1QsW5bCndRDeAwq
let's hit a block !
I assume you put your broken stratum implementation on the main solo pool since nothing is showing up but errors in my console. Remember to use the tube pool for those on port 3334. let's hit a block !
November 02, 2014, 10:00:01 PM
back with some power . . . http://solo.ckpool.org/users/18NeJYTXhpZfoQFBrPt1QsW5bCndRDeAwq
let's hit a block !
managed to connect via my proxy server.
let's hit a block !
managed to connect via my proxy server.
November 02, 2014, 07:28:32 PM
pointed ±17TH to the pool to see if I get lucky 
and some extra TH more, total hashpower 32.75 TH
I guess I doubled the total-pool-hashrate Maybe I find a block or maybe someone else from the pool, anyway: May the force be with us !
November 02, 2014, 07:18:29 PM
^^ looks like the guy above will win this Lotto.
Joined my Icarus FPGA !!!
Luck is on my side
Joined my Icarus FPGA !!!
Luck is on my side
November 02, 2014, 07:07:23 PM
pointed ±17TH to the pool to see if I get lucky
November 02, 2014, 12:42:05 PM
Thx CK for this pool
joined with my 2*U2 and 1 Block Erupter...whopping 4,3GHash/s
{"hashrate1m": "4.27G", "hashrate5m": "3.16G", "hashrate1hr": "636M", "hashrate1d": "39.2M"}
joined with my 2*U2 and 1 Block Erupter...whopping 4,3GHash/s
{"hashrate1m": "4.27G", "hashrate5m": "3.16G", "hashrate1hr": "636M", "hashrate1d": "39.2M"}
November 01, 2014, 08:26:16 AM
Hey ck i can't seem to connect via proxy. Any particular settings and some advice pls.
Thx
Thx
November 01, 2014, 07:28:32 AM
I joined with one USB 333 Mh miner 
Wish me luck
Wish me luck November 01, 2014, 04:49:31 AM
Hi all, I also recently joined ckpool with one of my antminer s1's that was lying about doing nothing. Might as well use it for the luck factor.
Just one question, I noticed on blockchain that quite a number of blocks were discovered by ckpool during September 2014. It appears that only one (1) block was discovered by ckpool during October 2014. Anybody know the reason for the decrease
Con setup the pool for some pretty large-sized miners in September, which explains the number of found blocks. As far as I know, only 2 blocks have been solved by "regular" miners here. One guy had about 5 - 6TH/s here when he found the block, and the other guy had about 9TH/s when he solved it.Just one question, I noticed on blockchain that quite a number of blocks were discovered by ckpool during September 2014. It appears that only one (1) block was discovered by ckpool during October 2014. Anybody know the reason for the decrease
October 30, 2014, 07:46:56 PM
Now, I feel small.
4 GH/s, and 180 GH/s. hahahaha but what the hell, if lady luck is on my side, then lucky i will be
4 GH/s, and 180 GH/s. hahahaha but what the hell, if lady luck is on my side, then lucky i will be
Con setup the pool for some pretty large-sized miners in September, which explains the number of found blocks. As far as I know, only 2 blocks have been solved by "regular" miners here. One guy had about 5 - 6TH/s here when he found the block, and the other guy had about 9TH/s when he solved it.
October 30, 2014, 09:40:13 AM
Hi all, I also recently joined ckpool with one of my antminer s1's that was lying about doing nothing. Might as well use it for the luck factor.
Just one question, I noticed on blockchain that quite a number of blocks were discovered by ckpool during September 2014. It appears that only one (1) block was discovered by ckpool during October 2014. Anybody know the reason for the decrease
Con setup the pool for some pretty large-sized miners in September, which explains the number of found blocks. As far as I know, only 2 blocks have been solved by "regular" miners here. One guy had about 5 - 6TH/s here when he found the block, and the other guy had about 9TH/s when he solved it. Just one question, I noticed on blockchain that quite a number of blocks were discovered by ckpool during September 2014. It appears that only one (1) block was discovered by ckpool during October 2014. Anybody know the reason for the decrease
October 30, 2014, 08:04:23 AM
Hi all, I also recently joined ckpool with one of my antminer s1's that was lying about doing nothing. Might as well use it for the luck factor.
Just one question, I noticed on blockchain that quite a number of blocks were discovered by ckpool during September 2014. It appears that only one (1) block was discovered by ckpool during October 2014. Anybody know the reason for the decrease
Just one question, I noticed on blockchain that quite a number of blocks were discovered by ckpool during September 2014. It appears that only one (1) block was discovered by ckpool during October 2014. Anybody know the reason for the decrease
October 30, 2014, 04:30:59 AM
Another restart. Sorry can't help myself since the pool code keeps improving, and this is a tech demo pool after all. Apart from seeing a little burst of rejects after the restarts you will have not noticed any real interruption to mining, and this time your stats should have been preserved across the restart if you were actively mining at the time. Anyone else's stats will be "frozen in time" from the point the pool was restarted. I'm pretty sure I've addressed all outstanding design considerations for this pool so I'll try my best to resist restarting it again.
October 29, 2014, 03:41:22 PM
just moved 3 s-3's here . will move 2 on weds. bringing me 6 or 3th .
I will run them until new years day.
if diff jumps stay at 5% I will have a 1 in 10 shot at a block.
my earnings in a shared pool would be about 2.45 coins so 10 to one is about right.
I will run them until new years day.
if diff jumps stay at 5% I will have a 1 in 10 shot at a block.
my earnings in a shared pool would be about 2.45 coins so 10 to one is about right.
I moved a couple back http://solo.ckpool.org/users/1JF5kWzMbkGu57WiNXSE9aHE29do2znCgG
October 28, 2014, 02:34:13 PM
just moved 3 s-3's here . will move 2 on weds. bringing me 6 or 3th .
I will run them until new years day.
if diff jumps stay at 5% I will have a 1 in 10 shot at a block.
my earnings in a shared pool would be about 2.45 coins so 10 to one is about right.
I will run them until new years day.
if diff jumps stay at 5% I will have a 1 in 10 shot at a block.
my earnings in a shared pool would be about 2.45 coins so 10 to one is about right.
October 28, 2014, 03:39:05 AM
--suggest-diff also supports low starting values now.
many thanks for that ckolivas
Jump to: