Topic: Yobit.net signature campaign - page 33. (Read 44447 times)

Just don't bother because in the first place you are not qualified to join in this campaign, read the rules first and wait until you rank up to sr.
Rules : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52571948

Hi I need help to create the signature  I mean how to get signature uid and enter in the yobit to he get paid and can we post or reply on any topic for get btc

This has the trade-off of being an exchange or just a service with a low reputation. As DiamondCardz has mentioned, even though you write a good, instructive, discussable reply, as one person sees the Cryptotalk signature it automatically gives you the vibe of being a potential spammer. On the forum, you mostly see the signature first, then the reply and finally the person who actually posted the reply. If one thread has a billion people with all being Cryptotalk signature members, it sometimes gets annoying. Especially when more than half of those members are just shitposting. If they want visibility. So be it, lower the reward for lower ranks and increase it for higher ranks, put a merit limit and (maybe) include special bonuses?

So far, since the beginning of October, I've reported a lot of people to Yahoo due to violation of rules or just straight up abusing the campaign. A considerable number of them were Sr. Members. Although it will definitely cut the number of people participating, if you were to take out the Sr. Members from the campaign and just double what you are paying to Hero and Legendary members, I definitely bet you that the overall post quality will improve. Having a Hero or Legendary accounts is not easy. Especially if you weren't one before the merit system.

Your idea of paying a person who has 8000 posts might be viable, however, the posts would most likely be outdated, in random threads, on page 295 of Services or any other reason. YoBit also needs "activity" there are hundreds of threads being started every single day, which is basically the dream for shitposters.

I think according to the latest thread of suchmoon is that there are now more than 510 members in the campaign. But how many are actually "worth it"? I know that long posts aren't really the key and one short answer to a good question might be worth 3 long posts, but there are a lot of people who aren't even "posting" or "replying" to me, some posts are no different than "thank you, you're the best" which adds no constructive criticism, thought, idea. Nothing, nada.

YoBit has revived the signature campaign and posting on Bitcointalk, but I am not sure if it's in a good way, or bad way. They can always fix it though. All they have to do is read suggestions and listen to Yahoo.

I'd like to play a devil's advocate if I am going to hire an excellent poster with 200 posts and a member rank and a legendary average poster with 8000 posts, who do I hire? I'll go for a legendary average poster with 8000 posts,
This is 8000 posts showing visibility of my ads, people are not only looking for relevant topics but people are also looking for an answer to their queries whether it is a 5-year-old post.

Yobit people want advertising I don't think they will settle for 50 excellent posters they want 300 or more average posters, they want visibility.

I also agree with the above. Even 1 dollar per post or 1.5 depending on the price of Bitcoin is huge money if you're paying for shitposts like some of the members of this campaign have produced. Even if a spammer gets kicked he's still paid by Yobit for what he got before he got caught. This is an enormous waste of money if we count in people who were copying old posts, bumping threads as old as 10 years, and spamming games and rounds with one liners and making more than $20 a day doing so.

A quality post that gets merited and quoted by others is worth more than 20 spam posts and Yobit could easily get a quality post per every dollar spent.

Honestly I agree with you. Right now if you see a CryptoTalk signature you just sigh and assume the person posting is going to have nothing of value to say. It's not a good look for their forum as it implies that there will be nothing of value over there either. Meanwhile if you see a ChipMixer signature you immediately know that the person knows what they're talking about, is relatively trusted, etc.

Realistically improving the quality of their posters will do a lot from them. High-quality, engaged posters will generate the most revenue and organic activity for them, and they will never go over to CryptoTalk with how the signature campaign makes it look currently.

I've popped a PM over to yobit myself rather than expecting yahoo to as I'm sure he regularly communicates his concerns to them, and see what they respond.

This is what even I am fighting for - bring down the number of participants but I already said that they are trying to create an army of shitposters, 'not everyone is considered a shitposter but many are in this campaign' to just fill the forum with garbage and earn a buck while Yobit gets the advertisement they want for cheap. They want fast advertisement instead of effective marketing and whoever is behind the campaign spending these big amounts, need to look for a better consultant in order to make the campaign spender understand that this is not how it will work. Even if not 60, 50 participants are enough with higher ranks and around 0.0005 BTC per post payment to each with Max 30-40 paid posts weekly is what I consider to be an effective way of marketing here. If 0.0005 BTC * 40 paid posts are there = 0.02 BTC per participant per week which means 0.08 BTC per month for that participant. Now, 0.08 BTC * 50 participants = 4 BTC. See how much BTC saved? And even if they go for double, meaning 100 participants, then max would be 8 BTC. And considering they hire Yahoo or Darkstar to manage this campaign as you proposed, I do not think there will be any shit quality posters allowed in this campaign and the exposure Cryptotalk will get through those 100 participants will be much more effective against the defamation that they are representing in front of us by doing what they are doing.

Like as you said, this does seem to be a very bad way of marketing a product. They could handover the complete control of this campaign to yahoo or DarkStar and have a similar payrate like what Chipmixer does. Chipmixer pays 0.00075/post and there are around 60 posters being hired by the campaign. The budget allocated by Chipmixer is around 2.25BTC per week which totals up-to a sum of 9BTC per month if all the 60 of them post 50 posts per week which might never happen. By this way, I am sure this campaign can create another Chipmixer kinda participation from each and every one of the posters who are being hired by the campaign.

I am very much sure these 60 posters who would be hired to promote cryptotalk would be no way lesser to Chipmixer posters in terms of quality as every other low level shitposters would never be accepted in the campaign. This will certainly help the cryptotalk forum have a better reach rather than paying for every other spam post. Even if some of the old Chipmixer participants have average level of posting quality, some or the other read those posts. But sadly, majority of the forum is simply preventing the cryptotalk posters due to the level of spam being generated by these low life posters.

If Yahoo were to talk with Yobit and implement the merit criteria, we could be pretty much sure around 100-150 of the these low-level spammers would be kicked from the campaign for posting absolute nonsense. They should never be paid in bitcoin for posting such nonsensical and trivial posts and they are meant to stay in Altcoin Bounties forever.

If I recall correctly, the campaign participant was more than 300 earlier which is now above 500. And for your info, a lot of people trying to get the maximum which is 0.0024 per day minimum.

I do wonder what the budget is now that they've refilled the wallet. Now that the BTC price has rallied to $8500 (temporarily at least), they're definitely bleeding money super quick...they're absolutely draining their coffers by thousands of dollars a day at a minimum. Very brave strategy, let's see if it pays off for em I suppose.
[/quote]

I think it's the same. They alloted funds in BTC and they pay in BTC per post so, in my opinion, they don't about the value of BTC for the campaign just like there previous campaigns.
And also the funds depleted easily because yahoo is not the manager when this campaign begins that's why many spammers/multiple account users abused the campaign. I still saw many
spammers that still in the campaign which I believe new participants. Yobit must close the registration or add merit requirements so that they will limit participants' quantity the same as the total post
that they made daily.

Should have probably given a source, thanks for reminding me - far too many people on this forum never give sources for anything they say nowadays


I do wonder what the budget is now that they've refilled the wallet. Now that the BTC price has rallied to $8500 (temporarily at least), they're definitely bleeding money super quick...they're absolutely draining their coffers by thousands of dollars a day at a minimum. Very brave strategy, let's see if it pays off for em I suppose.

^^^^^^

Yobit has been around longer than most people here, so there is plenty enough in their reserve to keep it running for a long period of time.

They made a killing listing altcoins for 0.10BTC, have their own tokens listed and sold to their traders, have fee income, probably also operate trading bots, etc.

Still, having enough money doesn't mean it's smart to splash it all over this forum that aggressively. That same money can last you 6 months easily if you only work with 50 or so posters.

Posts in signature campaign threads indeed aren't eligible for payment, posts in non signature campaign threads in the services section are as long as they are constructive/helpful/informative.

If they really have this budget, I wonder how long will they be running the campaign (a month or two I assume) because with 0.2% trading fees, I doubt Yobit is making that kind of money (10 BTC/month for a campaign, then they must be making at least 5x of that through trading fees)
Doing some quick maths, assuming 80 members with an average of 0.00015BTC/post and on average 7 posts per day, 7*7*4*80*0.00015 = about 2.5 BTC/ month

Thus, 10 BTC/month might be the budget but they surely won't have to spend that much. 10 BTC should last for about 3-4 months if the campaign runs smoothly with the present terms, which is decent taking in consideration that Yobit must be making at least 5 folds that money

What's the link?

Is that JUST for www.bitcointalk.org and www.cryptotalk.org only?

Holy Frack! Then again looking at Yobit's fees for moving coin about, maybe 10 BTC is peanuts and on the cheap for them? Just re-read above 10 BTC a frigging month?

Anyway, would love a link. Indeed you could probably make a thread of just following their money each month as their advertising progresses along...

later

Brad

Yeah, withdrawals are working now. I assume they refilled the wallet.

I was fairly shocked to read what yahoo wrote about their budget - 10 whole BTC for the first month? I knew they were putting a lot of money into this but $75-80k a month is an insane budget, not to mention the fact that they've overrun that...I wonder where they're pulling these funds from because I didn't think Yobit was making that kind of money.

My button works now. It is not that the button works but man ...I can't get over the fact that Yobit is putting out all this BTC for this campaign..

(I assume it is yobit backing cryptotalk campaign?)

Anyway, from what I understand it must be working to get members here over to the Cryptotalk group also,  as far as advertising is concerned it must be working well...in that, they are

putting out a lot of BTC on here even at 10 posts a day. On the other hand, yobit.io may be just 'rich as f*ck' and what I consider a lot for the campaign is peanuts to them. Probably the

latter. Anyway, impressed so far it is not just a flash in the pan campaign!

So i'm encouraged!

Anyway, onward and upward

later

Brad

First off, I'm not getting paid to make this post, since posts in the Services section aren't paid by my campaign.  I just wanted to add my two cents about the button not working.

I was in the first Yobit campaign from 2015 to '16 (I think; I can't remember).  This happened constantly.  Like at least once a week if I remember correctly--but Yobit always topped off their campaign funds, even if it took a while.  So I think they're good for it this time.  Like their awful customer service, they fall behind on little 'ol things like their signature campaign funds but they have had a history of making things right again.  

Give Yahoo62278 a break on this, because there's really nothing he can do--don't post in this thread if it's just to complain about the withdrawal button not working.  He's aware of it.  

I think Yobit must have something like three employees total, because they don't ever seem to be minding the till.  

So there is no difference between you and the above 15 posters who posted about this Yobit button. The good thing about them is that they did not posts after manager told them and you have posted the same thing even when the manager told NOT TO POST.


You already know that this post will be counted.   and you might have already got the amount for it too in your balance.
You should have not posted this ,if you do not want it to be counted.  

That's how every user here is, IMPATIENT.
I had been facing the same issue since 8 hours already but didn't complain because we know that sometimes the pot becomes empty so we need to get it filled to drink the water again but these people were not patient enough that they showed their eagerness and some even had the intentions to start blaming Yobit again that they ran away without paying their participants again. I didn't visit the forum but after coming and seeing these 15 replies, it clearly defines how users of this campaign leave no chance behind to disgracefully insult Yobit and even expect payments for the same. /s

P.S.: Yahoo, please ask the Yobit Management to give you the authority at least to choose the boards and threads where posts will not be counted even if we post there, so we may continue to post there in our sole interest without getting worried about how it'd affect the campaign and funds as those will not be counted. And if possible, please don't count this post of mine to be paid as I've posted in a signature campaign thread.