He should do several things to make this campaign better but he doesn't and that's why there's issues with this campaign. I think it would be a good idea for all campaigns to only accept Full Members and above but if campaign managers checked a user's posts before they accepted them there wouldn't need to deny certain ranks but they don't. It's the lazyness of campaign managers trying to automate everything that causes problems.
Like i said having a low rank doesn't mean people will spam(not talking about spammers though)A member ranked "Full member" can be a spammer too...
As per automation..I like it..Talking about dashboards to check the stats and posts count but i agree with you somewhere that spammers are more attracted to this sig compaign and best way to avoid is to make payments manually upon request by checking the posts
The amount of new accounts that spam compared to full members is not close enough to make that point valid.
If the sig was cut off at full member and up,I think there would be less complaints from the forum as it takes investment to get to that point.
Anyone else find this ironic?
