the miner is good, been using it from the version 1,01
seems stable enough, very glad to read that it has a performance boost for gtx 1080tis.. cause almost all my rigs are using these cards and 10% boost means I have one gtx1080ti for free!! nice)
Topic: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner (ver2.6.2 - kawpow RavenCoin). - page 38. (Read 107046 times)
May 03, 2018, 07:42:53 AM
May 03, 2018, 07:20:23 AM
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence.
Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ.
Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting.
If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law.
Thanks
http://gpl-violations.org
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ.
Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting.
If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law.
Thanks
http://gpl-violations.org
Quote
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Where have you been for YEARS!?
Solve this one first... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ccminersp-mod-modded-nvidia-maxwell-pascal-kernels-826901
or be silent
There is not first or last to be warned or prosecuted, this is not a competition, law is the same for everything and everyone.
Thanks for the url, it is done too.
You can share other urls with people who don't respect the GPL licence too.
May 03, 2018, 07:15:02 AM
plz make x17 available in future update. thanks
+1 for this suggestion. this is one of most required algo now. May 03, 2018, 07:14:24 AM
Can you tell me ports for dev mining fee.
All my rigs always hang at the string.
I think the problem it cant switch to your pool.
[INFO ] 18/05/03 12:44:41 Shares: 584 (A:98.29%, R:1.71%), Diff:0.871, 87.18MH/s - OK
[NOTICE ] 18/05/03 12:44:45 Block 195298, difficulty 16511.423
[X16 ] 18/05/03 12:44:45 Hashorder: EchGroWrlCubSmdFugBmwGroFugSmdJh5ShaBlkJh5ShbWrl
[X16 ] 18/05/03 12:44:45 Raw: A2E79C12C93F03DE
[INFO ] 18/05/03 12:45:08 Shares: 585 (A:98.29%, R:1.71%), Diff:0.548, 87.11MH/s - OK
[NOTICE ] 18/05/03 12:45:15 Mining some dev fee.
All my rigs always hang at the string.
I think the problem it cant switch to your pool.
[INFO ] 18/05/03 12:44:41 Shares: 584 (A:98.29%, R:1.71%), Diff:0.871, 87.18MH/s - OK
[NOTICE ] 18/05/03 12:44:45 Block 195298, difficulty 16511.423
[X16 ] 18/05/03 12:44:45 Hashorder: EchGroWrlCubSmdFugBmwGroFugSmdJh5ShaBlkJh5ShbWrl
[X16 ] 18/05/03 12:44:45 Raw: A2E79C12C93F03DE
[INFO ] 18/05/03 12:45:08 Shares: 585 (A:98.29%, R:1.71%), Diff:0.548, 87.11MH/s - OK
[NOTICE ] 18/05/03 12:45:15 Mining some dev fee.
May 03, 2018, 06:47:38 AM
I see there is a z-enemy 1.09 out.... any links plz? 
Yes 1.09 ready, soon ill add links and we start tests in our test discord... But 1.09 not for public, only after we finish all tests.
May 03, 2018, 05:21:49 AM
I see there is a z-enemy 1.09 out.... any links plz?
May 03, 2018, 05:19:55 AM
Also some times got this.
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:56:45 Stratum connection interrupted |
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:57:06 Stratum connection interrupted |
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:57:27 Stratum connection interrupted |
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:57:48 Stratum connection interrupted
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:56:45 Stratum connection interrupted |
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:57:06 Stratum connection interrupted |
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:57:27 Stratum connection interrupted |
[WARNING] 18/05/03 11:57:48 Stratum connection interrupted
May 03, 2018, 12:14:22 AM
How config miner restart when tool can't connect pool
May 02, 2018, 10:49:50 PM
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence.
Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ.
Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting.
If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law.
Thanks
http://gpl-violations.org
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ.
Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting.
If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law.
Thanks
http://gpl-violations.org
Quote
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Where have you been for YEARS!?
Solve this one first... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ccminersp-mod-modded-nvidia-maxwell-pascal-kernels-826901
or be silent
May 02, 2018, 10:08:50 PM
I periodically get a "Stratum connection interrupted" message when mining Ravencoin with enemy 1.08 at Suprnova.cc. Once it happens the miner stops, and I keep infoabout what block is being mined "Stratum conection interrupted" error messages.
Once I restart the miner it works fine. This has happened before with other ccminer based miners, but never happened with Suprminer 1.6
So I'm stuck between using Suprminer, at a 5-10% loss of efficiency, or enemy miner and keeping a constant watch on my rigperformance.
Does anyone have a fix for this? Can the next version simply restart itself when a "stratum connection interrupted" error arisesin x16r?
Once I restart the miner it works fine. This has happened before with other ccminer based miners, but never happened with Suprminer 1.6
So I'm stuck between using Suprminer, at a 5-10% loss of efficiency, or enemy miner and keeping a constant watch on my rigperformance.
Does anyone have a fix for this? Can the next version simply restart itself when a "stratum connection interrupted" error arisesin x16r?
May 02, 2018, 09:54:46 PM
I'm using this miner on one rig that has 2 1070 and 1 1060 with no problems.
Tried loading it to my other rig with 4 1070 2 1060 and I keep getting error code.
Both have the same drivers. I've tried updating to newer drivers. Deleting and reinstalling driver. Reinstalling the miner.
Any idea of whats causing this code on 1 of my 2 almost identical miners except for number of gpu's?
2:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
Tried loading it to my other rig with 4 1070 2 1060 and I keep getting error code.
Both have the same drivers. I've tried updating to newer drivers. Deleting and reinstalling driver. Reinstalling the miner.
Any idea of whats causing this code on 1 of my 2 almost identical miners except for number of gpu's?
2:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 NVIDIA CUDA 9.1
[ERROR ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
[INFO ] 18/05/02 22:51:51 zealot/enemy-1.08 miner
May 02, 2018, 09:20:54 PM
Hi, apparently, theses releases don't respect the GPL licence, your software is based on ccminer code, open source and free software under GPL v3 Licence.
Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ.
Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting.
If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law.
Thanks
http://gpl-violations.org
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Your have to release the licence source code of your releases, without that, your releases are not legit/legal, it's WAREZ.
Actually your asking fee, but you theft the code for your own profit and keep what you have added for your own profit too, this is bad, and selfish, if your don't release the source code, including your own added code. Please respect the work of original dev's, comply with the law, free software has licenses like any proprietary software, acting in a manner contrary to these licenses equates your actions to piracy, counterfeiting.
If your don't, GPL violation will then have to react to enforce the law.
Thanks
http://gpl-violations.org
Quote
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents. States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could make it effectively proprietary. To prevent this, the GPL assures that patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
May 02, 2018, 11:09:00 AM
I got this on all 10 rigs on SMOS
All rigs always hangs on last string.
What can it be?
[X16 ] 18/05/02 14:33:40 Raw: 865C33A7A841D8D5 |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:13 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 13.08MH/s |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:13 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 0.079MH/W, 0.0067MH/Mhz |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:13 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 59C(F:40%) 1961/4303MHz(165|
W) |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:14 Shares: 510 (A:99.80%, R:0.20%), Diff:0.399, 57.35MH|
/s - OK |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 GPU#4: GeForce GTX 1070, 13.00MH/s |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 GPU#4: GeForce GTX 1070, 0.074MH/W, 0.0066MH/Mhz |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 GPU#4: GeForce GTX 1070, 66C(F:45%) 1961/4303MHz(176|
W) |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 Shares: 511 (A:99.80%, R:0.20%), Diff:0.471, 57.46MH|
/s - OK |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 GPU#0: GeForce GTX 1070, 13.06MH/s |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 GPU#0: GeForce GTX 1070, 0.077MH/W, 0.0066MH/Mhz |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 GPU#0: GeForce GTX 1070, 64C(F:49%) 1974/4303MHz(169|
W) |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 Shares: 512 (A:99.80%, R:0.20%), Diff:1.113, 57.24MH|
/s - OK |
[NOTICE ] 18/05/02 14:34:58 Block 193743, difficulty 16511.423 |
[NOTICE ] 18/05/02 14:34:58 Mining some dev fee. |
What port are used for dev fee minig. Maybe the problem is that dev uses closed ports in my loca lnetwork.
All rigs always hangs on last string.
What can it be?
[X16 ] 18/05/02 14:33:40 Raw: 865C33A7A841D8D5 |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:13 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 13.08MH/s |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:13 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 0.079MH/W, 0.0067MH/Mhz |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:13 GPU#2: GeForce GTX 1070, 59C(F:40%) 1961/4303MHz(165|
W) |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:14 Shares: 510 (A:99.80%, R:0.20%), Diff:0.399, 57.35MH|
/s - OK |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 GPU#4: GeForce GTX 1070, 13.00MH/s |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 GPU#4: GeForce GTX 1070, 0.074MH/W, 0.0066MH/Mhz |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 GPU#4: GeForce GTX 1070, 66C(F:45%) 1961/4303MHz(176|
W) |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:27 Shares: 511 (A:99.80%, R:0.20%), Diff:0.471, 57.46MH|
/s - OK |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 GPU#0: GeForce GTX 1070, 13.06MH/s |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 GPU#0: GeForce GTX 1070, 0.077MH/W, 0.0066MH/Mhz |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 GPU#0: GeForce GTX 1070, 64C(F:49%) 1974/4303MHz(169|
W) |
[INFO ] 18/05/02 14:34:51 Shares: 512 (A:99.80%, R:0.20%), Diff:1.113, 57.24MH|
/s - OK |
[NOTICE ] 18/05/02 14:34:58 Block 193743, difficulty 16511.423 |
[NOTICE ] 18/05/02 14:34:58 Mining some dev fee. |
What port are used for dev fee minig. Maybe the problem is that dev uses closed ports in my loca lnetwork.
May 02, 2018, 11:04:44 AM
Firstly, I love the software and I want to keep using it.
I was getting PGN at BlockCruncher and had been on for about 8 or 9 hours. I was not near the rig and it suddenly dropped.
I have an m.2 storage, only 2 GPU (a 1070 Ti and a 960), the PSU is 1200 Platinum, 16 GB of RAM, I am using the AORUS software for the clocking and is on one of their preset clocks.
When I got home, computer was still working fine, GPUs were idle. I tried to restart enemy 1.08 but got nothing. I tried to start any other miner (ccminer) also got nothing. But they flashed away too quickly to see the error output.
I restarted the computer, now everything works fine. Any suggestions?
I notice on your front page RVN is "erratic". What does that mean exactly? What can I do so this does not happen again? I particularly enjoy mining PGN and would like to continue. Plus, obviously supporting your software too.
I was getting PGN at BlockCruncher and had been on for about 8 or 9 hours. I was not near the rig and it suddenly dropped.
I have an m.2 storage, only 2 GPU (a 1070 Ti and a 960), the PSU is 1200 Platinum, 16 GB of RAM, I am using the AORUS software for the clocking and is on one of their preset clocks.
When I got home, computer was still working fine, GPUs were idle. I tried to restart enemy 1.08 but got nothing. I tried to start any other miner (ccminer) also got nothing. But they flashed away too quickly to see the error output.
I restarted the computer, now everything works fine. Any suggestions?
I notice on your front page RVN is "erratic". What does that mean exactly? What can I do so this does not happen again? I particularly enjoy mining PGN and would like to continue. Plus, obviously supporting your software too.
May 02, 2018, 07:31:05 AM
Hi
I got a problem with SMOS with miner z- Emmy-v.1.08, miner often hangs during mining RVN when it switches to dev fee mining.
Miner is woknig but nothing happens in it after string "Mining some dev fee"
I got a problem with SMOS with miner z- Emmy-v.1.08, miner often hangs during mining RVN when it switches to dev fee mining.
Miner is woknig but nothing happens in it after string "Mining some dev fee"
I'm running z- Emmy-v.1.08 for a week or two in smos without any issues.
Fantastic mining software.
May 01, 2018, 04:04:31 AM
Hi
I got a problem with SMOS with miner z- Emmy-v.1.08, miner often hangs during mining RVN when it switches to dev fee mining.
Miner is woknig but nothing happens in it after string "Mining some dev fee"
I got a problem with SMOS with miner z- Emmy-v.1.08, miner often hangs during mining RVN when it switches to dev fee mining.
Miner is woknig but nothing happens in it after string "Mining some dev fee"
April 30, 2018, 11:36:30 PM
how much Mh gives it a miner for 1070ti x16r RVN?
I have about 11-11.5 Mh/sCore clock +150
Memory clock -502
Power limit 90
April 29, 2018, 07:26:16 AM
how much Mh gives it a miner for 1070ti x16r RVN?
April 27, 2018, 08:04:42 PM
been working great for my 1070 rig for about a week now
even though difficulty has gone down a lot , im really happy
with this one . thanks Enemy , been using you since I started
mining 16r.... kudos
even though difficulty has gone down a lot , im really happy
with this one . thanks Enemy , been using you since I started
mining 16r.... kudos
April 27, 2018, 06:11:17 AM
I have a Gigabyte Gaming 1070 Ti and a MSI 960. I am currently using the AORUS software to do the OC'ing with their preset "Overclock" function. I can and have used MSI Afterburner, but sadly I really don't know the first thing about what I should look for and how to establish stability with low risk.
I don't mind if the wattage goes up a little (electricity is pretty cheap), but I do want the hashrate to go up considerably. All I really want to know is what setting should I use that others may have had some success with.
The only other algo I really use is Neoscrypt (which is more memory intensive).
I don't mind if the wattage goes up a little (electricity is pretty cheap), but I do want the hashrate to go up considerably. All I really want to know is what setting should I use that others may have had some success with.
The only other algo I really use is Neoscrypt (which is more memory intensive).
That Overclock button is probably for gaming.
I would suggest getting something like the free Nvidia Inspector.
First, put the Power Target to 70-75%. This way it's less probable anything will crash.
There are two parameters you can tweak:
Base Offset (core clock) and Memory Offset.
You can leave Memory offset at 0, or even put it in negative as it doesn't affect this particular algo almost at all.
Increase the core clock slowly. You should reach a point where additional increasing doesn't increase the hashing power.
If you get to a point where the miner crashes, you obviously ran over all limits.
Jump to: