Topic: ZeroCoin Whitepaper Discussion (is it the first truly innovative ALT coin????) (Read 3589 times)
August 17, 2016, 06:32:48 PM
any update?
May 21, 2013, 08:53:00 AM
May 21, 2013, 08:46:02 AM
Did someone really say that fiat has gold backup ?
which Nation Champ ?!
: D
oh ShA-256 ? ... why bother guys ? why don't you 14 guys just send each other Bitcoin?
: D
ASIC 8=========D Bitcoin.
which Nation Champ ?!
: D
oh ShA-256 ? ... why bother guys ? why don't you 14 guys just send each other Bitcoin?
: D
ASIC 8=========D Bitcoin.
May 21, 2013, 06:42:36 AM
Could we get back to discussing the actual article?
May 21, 2013, 12:10:12 AM
Yes but FIAT currency has gold as backup.
Bitcoin has FIAT currency as backup.
So the bitcoin idea is fundamentally flawed. Unless it can be taxed.
May 20, 2013, 03:47:08 AM
^^ LOL ^^
May 20, 2013, 03:39:40 AM
May 20, 2013, 02:44:23 AM
Yes but FIAT currency has gold as backup.
Bitcoin has FIAT currency as backup.
Something to report to.
Bitcoin would be worthless without the dollar.
So in order for an exchange to actually work, one would have to exchange these bitcoins into stuff that actually have value, like gold or fiat currency.
Either that, or simply just convert all currency to bitcoins, which would be impossible in the next 50-100 years.
In order for bitcoin to have value, people need to offer services and goods in exchange for bitcoins. Then they need to actually be able to do something with those bitcoins in order to get value out of them (i.e. exchange them for money so they can pay their bills/food/etc.).
Do you see my point?
You can have as many exchanges as you'd like. If it's illegal you won't be able to convert the bitcoins to currency. Which means they would be worthless, as FIAT is what gives everything value.
So the bitcoin idea is fundamentally flawed. Unless it can be taxed.
Bitcoin has FIAT currency as backup.
Something to report to.
Bitcoin would be worthless without the dollar.
So in order for an exchange to actually work, one would have to exchange these bitcoins into stuff that actually have value, like gold or fiat currency.
Either that, or simply just convert all currency to bitcoins, which would be impossible in the next 50-100 years.
In order for bitcoin to have value, people need to offer services and goods in exchange for bitcoins. Then they need to actually be able to do something with those bitcoins in order to get value out of them (i.e. exchange them for money so they can pay their bills/food/etc.).
Do you see my point?
You can have as many exchanges as you'd like. If it's illegal you won't be able to convert the bitcoins to currency. Which means they would be worthless, as FIAT is what gives everything value.
So the bitcoin idea is fundamentally flawed. Unless it can be taxed.
be quite the adults are talking
May 19, 2013, 11:12:47 PM
sounds interesting.
May 19, 2013, 10:32:42 PM
Bump- the ZeroCoin speech was IMO one of the most interesting speeches at the bitcoin conference. There was a large showing for this speech, hinting at there being a lot of support for it. Gavin, the main core dev for Bitcoin, even mentioned it during his state of the union speech. He expressed his support for the project.
Also, to those worrying about governments breaking down due to not being able to collect taxes, this is silly. All ZeroCoin does is make bitcoin transactions anonymous. The exit and entry points when converting to FIAT will be controlled and regulated just like Bitcoin.
This is going to be huge, the only problem is it will take a long time to implement it. ZeroCoin is heavily cryptographic, much more so than Bitcoin, so there is a lot of challenging programming to be done. Also, the core Bitcoin code must be altered as well.
Also, to those worrying about governments breaking down due to not being able to collect taxes, this is silly. All ZeroCoin does is make bitcoin transactions anonymous. The exit and entry points when converting to FIAT will be controlled and regulated just like Bitcoin.
This is going to be huge, the only problem is it will take a long time to implement it. ZeroCoin is heavily cryptographic, much more so than Bitcoin, so there is a lot of challenging programming to be done. Also, the core Bitcoin code must be altered as well.
May 13, 2013, 03:50:49 PM
Pay for the services you want?
I can see it now
911: 911 What is your emergency?
Caller: My house is on fire.
911: Our database shows you have not paid for fire services.
Caller: I didn't think I would need them.
911: We will immediately dispatch fire trucks for your neighbors to protect their homes from your flaming structure. We also suggest you get a lawyer for the law suits the neighbors will file against you for negligence and property damage.
I can see it now
911: 911 What is your emergency?
Caller: My house is on fire.
911: Our database shows you have not paid for fire services.
Caller: I didn't think I would need them.
911: We will immediately dispatch fire trucks for your neighbors to protect their homes from your flaming structure. We also suggest you get a lawyer for the law suits the neighbors will file against you for negligence and property damage.
that basically a core service, council tax should cover this along with police, trash removal etc.
May 13, 2013, 03:48:00 PM
Pay for the services you want?
I can see it now
911: 911 What is your emergency?
Caller: My house is on fire.
911: Our database shows you have not paid for fire services.
Caller: I didn't think I would need them.
911: We will immediately dispatch fire trucks for your neighbors to protect their homes from your flaming structure. We also suggest you get a lawyer for the law suits the neighbors will file against you for negligence and property damage.
I can see it now
911: 911 What is your emergency?
Caller: My house is on fire.
911: Our database shows you have not paid for fire services.
Caller: I didn't think I would need them.
911: We will immediately dispatch fire trucks for your neighbors to protect their homes from your flaming structure. We also suggest you get a lawyer for the law suits the neighbors will file against you for negligence and property damage.
May 13, 2013, 03:35:13 PM
Yeah I understand. But how would the state function then?
Schools, hospitals, police, emergency units, parks, roads EVERYTHING is paid for with tax money.
How would this work if bitcoin is not to be regulated?
Schools, hospitals, police, emergency units, parks, roads EVERYTHING is paid for with tax money.
How would this work if bitcoin is not to be regulated?
The goverment will still take in more than enough from it's other million stealth taxes, i'm sure it could do away with income tax altogether already, shove another 10% on vat, and fuel tax, council tax etc etc. They don't really need to worry to much about income tax. People who earn millions/squillions through bitcoins or anything else tend to lead a more expensive life style or whats the the point of having all that cash so pump most of it back into the economy and tax is extracted. Most self employed people hardly pay any taxes anyway by the time all of their 'costs' are put through by their accountant. They don't really care as long as you keep spending. If you make bank with bitcoin and go out blowing your wad they are still getting more than their fair share.
Pay as you need - except core services (which mostly come out of council tax here anyway) is the way to go. Most of the tax is burned up in this country by bailing out banks, wars and paying the bloated government wages.
Bitcoin could allow you to escape some tax but when they want their taxes they will take them in ways bitcoin can't save you from. If you own a house, car, or want to purchase any mass produced physical product you will be paying tax in one way or another..
May 13, 2013, 03:30:11 PM
But I am not suggesting for it to be exchanged for money, but rather just pairing it with another blinded coin made from thin air, comitted by the receiver of the transaction, together with the proof. So we will not have any addresses ever, just pairing of committed secret serial numbers with the proofs in between. Let's say we have miner generated coins Mc1-Mc3 in the first 3 blocks. Then miner 3 wants to transact his coin over to user 1 (non miner). User 1 makes a coin Uc1, just like the miners, and sends it to miner 3. Miner 3 then pairs this with his own proof Mp3 and publishes it to be taken from some random other (here miner 1). Then you have the following after block 4 (who is registering the transaction):
Mc1-(Mp3-Uc1)
Mc2
Mc3
Mc4
Miner 3 can´t re-use his proof, so he has not got his coin anymore. The other 3 miners have yet to publish their proofs, beside User 1. So still only 4 coins in circulation.
Mc1-(Mp3-Uc1)
Mc2
Mc3
Mc4
Miner 3 can´t re-use his proof, so he has not got his coin anymore. The other 3 miners have yet to publish their proofs, beside User 1. So still only 4 coins in circulation.
May 13, 2013, 03:00:11 PM
Only the person who blinds a coin knows its "secret serial number" which is needed to exchange it for the money that was put up by someone who blinded a previous amount.
May 13, 2013, 02:54:39 PM
If I understand it correctly only someone who has previously "blinded" the coin can later exchange it for someone else's cash, using the secret information he used to blind the original coin. If only the miner knows, only the miner can later redeem it, or he has to transfer it to someone else, in which case it is no longer untraceable.
Hmm, I can´t see how it can be relevant to anonymity if a miner commits something out of thin air (generates coins) rather than having it pegged to some backing coin coming from an address. Let's say the miner commits a coin he himself generates, in the example of the paper. Why should he not do it all himself rather than first generate it and then wait to blind it in a transaction for the next miner to include in her block?
May 13, 2013, 02:33:04 PM
If I understand it correctly only someone who has previously "blinded" the coin can later exchange it for someone else's cash, using the secret information he used to blind the original coin. If only the miner knows, only the miner can later redeem it, or he has to transfer it to someone else, in which case it is no longer untraceable.
May 13, 2013, 02:28:57 PM
Why does ZeroCoin need a backing currency? What is the obstacle for having this as a blockchain version of OT, where the miners is granted the right to commit a certain number of un-backed Zerocoins for each mined block as coin-generation (bitcoin style)?
May 12, 2013, 01:54:15 AM
And if everything accepted bitcoins and nobody paid taxes, how would you pay the state to provide services like: police, emergency services, infrastructure, public services, public buildings, etc?
And jails, to hold scum like limitless.
Everyone would have to pay for jails if they want to be protected from criminals, other wise they will be exiled to Criminal Island.
Just joking.. obviously there are social problems that this could possibly cause, but I believe there will always be some way to work these issues out other than the current tax system. Just because taxes have been done like they have been for years, it doesn't mean that it's not subject to change.
May 12, 2013, 12:56:24 AM
And if everything accepted bitcoins and nobody paid taxes, how would you pay the state to provide services like: police, emergency services, infrastructure, public services, public buildings, etc?
And jails, to hold scum like limitless.
Jump to: