Author

Topic: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC - page 114. (Read 217687 times)

legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

Ah this is new - good initiative to mine more DCRs.

Any link to find out who is top block finder currently?
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

How come in my unconfirmed list I still have some x11 stuff that has never been moved into balance? It appears to be stuck just sitting there and I haven't Mined x11 for a while, as in like a week.

http://zpool.ca/?address=1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv


Not really sure. Likely a bug that didn't clear it off when it got processed.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
@crackfoo do we really need to be mining Blood in Quark? It is paying such a little amount. Even when I am getting 15% share of the Quark pool it is paying such small amounts it almost seems like such a waste of hash to be hashing for Blood? Also haven't seen any Join mined for a while or QuarkCoin. Could there be an opportunity to concentrate hash into only Darknet, Shark, BitQuark, Amsterdam and MonetaryUnit to make money and drop the coins not producing results? And the coins like Blood producing results worth nothing?

http://zpool.ca/?address=1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv


I completely disagree.

It's ok to disagree, but might you at least like to provide an expanation of why?

Since you asked, it's because your reasoning is wrong.

Have you looked at the profitibility of the coins you want to drop? blood was paying over 2.0 when
I posted my reply.

Small coins only get a small amount of hash so they aren't stealing from the big coins like darknet
and you can get a higher return. What's wrong with that?

member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
All good now. Thanks for your help. Love your pool
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
all my stats are 57 minutes behind atm.


Try clearing your cache. You might be hitting the old server.

I stopped the web service on the old one now so, it'll be plainly obvious for everyone now if they are trying to hit the old one Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
all my stats are 57 minutes behind atm.


Try clearing your cache. You might be hitting the old server.
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
all my stats are 57 minutes behind atm.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
looks like some kind of reboot was made ;-)

kickup the new server. wallets just coming back online.

thanks. but x15 is missing. I loved it.

EDIT: nevermind, it's back
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
hmm my workers not showing. sight hasnt updated for me for awhile now. cleared cookies etc. No issues on other pools
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Hashrate on quark not showing atm. Normal after reboot?


showing 1gh right now....
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
Hashrate on quark not showing atm. Normal after reboot?
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
looks like some kind of reboot was made ;-)

kickup the new server. wallets just coming back online.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
looks like some kind of reboot was made ;-)
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
@crackfoo do we really need to be mining Blood in Quark? It is paying such a little amount. Even when I am getting 15% share of the Quark pool it is paying such small amounts it almost seems like such a waste of hash to be hashing for Blood? Also haven't seen any Join mined for a while or QuarkCoin. Could there be an opportunity to concentrate hash into only Darknet, Shark, BitQuark, Amsterdam and MonetaryUnit to make money and drop the coins not producing results? And the coins like Blood producing results worth nothing?

http://zpool.ca/?address=1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv


I completely disagree.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 501
Ok so I'm understanding that my miner will send hashes with leading 00000's that match either the stratum dificulty or the coin's dificulty, so how does it calculate my hashrate then? If it is number of shares submitted wouldn't a higher dificulty effect your hash rate? wouldn't you want lots of hases found at a lower difficulty to submit so your hashrate looks higher?

It makes no difference to the hash rate because 2 difficulty 1 shares submissions is the same as 1 difficulty 2 share submission. If the difficulty is too high then you will get a high variance on the reported 5 minute average. If the difficulty is too low you are just going to pummel zpool's database server. You will always get variance on a 5 min share submission calculated hash rate average.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
@crackfoo do we really need to be mining Blood in Quark? It is paying such a little amount. Even when I am getting 15% share of the Quark pool it is paying such small amounts it almost seems like such a waste of hash to be hashing for Blood? Also haven't seen any Join mined for a while or QuarkCoin. Could there be an opportunity to concentrate hash into only Darknet, Shark, BitQuark, Amsterdam and MonetaryUnit to make money and drop the coins not producing results? And the coins like Blood producing results worth nothing?

http://zpool.ca/?address=1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv


There is only a small fraction of miners hashrate going on blood.

~205.2 kh/s while the pool is ~350mh/s

There is already little support for blood on pools so it helps maintain their network.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
Is there any plans on adding Eth as a payout coin on Zpool?

It's not possible. It needs a completely different frame work and the project dev has other priorities ATM.

legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 501
Hi, Mining Quark on zpookl why does the hashrate fluctuate so much? One minute it will be 26 MH/s and next minute 10 MH/s why such drastic swings? Diff is constant at 0.12 it seems.

Because the reported hash rate is a 5 min average, which really will fluctuate based on actual submissions. Hour long averages tend to be more accurate and fluctuate less, but not really appropriate for an algo switching pool.

But if the hashrate is reasonably constant at my end, why would the shares I submit fluctuate? Shouldn't they be constant as well?

Your miner hashrate will generate hashes at a reasonably consistent rate. However, only hashes that are greater than your stratum difficulty will be submitted. This really is a luck based random process, you may submit several hashes in one second, then none for several seconds. The pool is calculating your hashrate based on the actual above difficulty hashes submitted to the pool.

ok I see, I was seeing similar with ETH at nano pool as well so yea that makes sense. Thanks. Would that mean it is more beneficial to set a lower difficulty to submit more shares and have a higher hashrate? Or is the a scaling multiplyer added to the shares so if I return 10 shares in 5 mins at diff = 0.5 and 5 shares in 5 mins at diff = 1 would the payput be the same?

It makes no difference. Your share contribution is based on the stratum difficulty, not the difficulty of the actual share submitted. In pooled mining, there are two difficulties, the pool stratum difficulty, and the coin difficulty. Most hashes will be below the pool stratum difficulty and so not submitted. Rarely, you get a hash which is above the coin difficulty - congratulations you have solved a block on behalf of the pool. Most of the submitted shares though will be below the coin difficulty. This does nothing towards solving a block, it just proves to the pool that your miner is doing work and so you are contributed a share towards the eventual reward at the stratum difficulty. Effectively each hash is a lottery ticket that may win the block reward. The higher the hash rate, the more lottery tickets you are getting.
It is worth setting the difficulty of the miner to do an average of 10 submits a second if you are multi algo mining and the initial stratum difficulty is not appropriate for your miner hash rate, as the stratum processes used are rather slow to change difficulty.
Jump to: