█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC - page 33.

sidroast

full member

Activity: 125

Merit: 100

Quote from: crackfoo on August 10, 2016, 06:40:22 PM

Quote from: chicle on August 10, 2016, 05:50:22 PM

anyone having issues connecting to sha256 port ? keep getting a null error

I've noticed a drop in the # of miners but it doesn't appear to be a problem on the system. I'm not sure if it's provider related but I didn't get any alerts from them.

I'm got some patching to do on that server tonight so I'll let you know when it's restarted to see if there is any change...

FWIW my spondoolies are a-ok on your pool but my antminers are getting KILLED, like every 4-6 hours they just die and I have to reboot them.

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: chicle on August 10, 2016, 05:50:22 PM

anyone having issues connecting to sha256 port ? keep getting a null error

What address are you using for your stratum server?

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: crackfoo on August 09, 2016, 03:50:33 PM

Quote from: sidroast on August 09, 2016, 03:01:31 PM

Can you add Stratis to zpool please? It's on suprnova as of now apparently.

Thanks much!!

Is it on an exchange?

I see this was just added to bittrex. If there is PoW left I'll add it.

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: chicle on August 10, 2016, 05:50:22 PM

anyone having issues connecting to sha256 port ? keep getting a null error

I've noticed a drop in the # of miners but it doesn't appear to be a problem on the system. I'm not sure if it's provider related but I didn't get any alerts from them.

I'm got some patching to do on that server tonight so I'll let you know when it's restarted to see if there is any change...

chicle

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

anyone having issues connecting to sha256 port ? keep getting a null error

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: sidroast on August 09, 2016, 03:01:31 PM

Can you add Stratis to zpool please? It's on suprnova as of now apparently.

Thanks much!!

Is it on an exchange?

crackfoo

legendary

Activity: 3486

Merit: 1126

Quote from: rik8119 on August 09, 2016, 03:33:35 PM

Hi zpool team,

thanks for having us (#worldleadcurrency). Keep up the great work. If there is anything you need from me please send me a PM.

Rik

Thanks for dropping by. There is actually something I hope you can answer. After running the wallet for 8-10 hours it eventually gives the error createnewblock() : connectblock failed, until I restart the wallet...

Any idea why itd do that??

rik8119

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

CEO WINC e. V.

Hi zpool team,

thanks for having us (#worldleadcurrency). Keep up the great work. If there is anything you need from me please send me a PM.

Rik

sidroast

full member

Activity: 125

Merit: 100

Can you add Stratis to zpool please? It's on suprnova as of now apparently.

Thanks much!!

jkminkov

hero member

Activity: 698

Merit: 500

why there's hashate on richx(myr-gr) 4 RICHX 1.814 347 585 87 secs 17 Mh/s 0.000

Aerithos

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 09, 2016, 07:34:49 AM

Quote from: pallas on August 09, 2016, 02:41:46 AM

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 08, 2016, 11:57:57 PM

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

could you post the sib hashrate you get with 1.8 and 1.8 dev?

On 3x gtx 980 cards with 1.8 Release my hashrate on SIB is around 4.4Mhash to 4.8Mhash after a normalized 5 minutes. On the 1.8 Dev version I do 7.8Mhash to 8.05 Mhash. Both are run with no commandline arguements other than basic settings of algorithym. I thought improvements were supposed to be incorporated with every major release, not get worse from the dev to the official.

The 1.8 dev had a special lyra2v2 build that still does a better job with sib on my 980Ti than the official 1.8 release (but worse on lyra2v2 [-_-] ). I've still got three different ccminer builds I use for multi-algo mining depending on best hashrate: tpruvot 1.8, tpruvot-lyra2v2, sphash 1.5.80. So I guess just use whichever one is faster, even if it's older.

Spiffy_1

full member

Activity: 235

Merit: 100

Quote from: pallas on August 09, 2016, 02:41:46 AM

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 08, 2016, 11:57:57 PM

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

could you post the sib hashrate you get with 1.8 and 1.8 dev?

On 3x gtx 980 cards with 1.8 Release my hashrate on SIB is around 4.4Mhash to 4.8Mhash after a normalized 5 minutes. On the 1.8 Dev version I do 7.8Mhash to 8.05 Mhash. Both are run with no commandline arguements other than basic settings of algorithym. I thought improvements were supposed to be incorporated with every major release, not get worse from the dev to the official.

JaredKaragen

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1166

My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?

Quote from: jkminkov on August 09, 2016, 03:52:02 AM

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 08, 2016, 11:57:57 PM

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

750ti, some other results submitted to benchmark, look for Palit, some results are not listed, probably bugs.
1.8 rel is bad for all but:
myr-gr 15.35, previous 15,10; vanilla 1133, previous 1062; blake2s 408, previous 376; however not near those stated above by JaredKaragen, blakecoin 1020, worst results were skein and sib, about 20% less.

if people link me directly to built downloads for win7/8/10 x64, ill include them in my batch and update things; but this is what I saw firsthand from current off-the-shelf options. be sure to specify what algos are optimized per-link.

there will ALWAYS be improvements for one algo or another.

Just look up the cryptominingblog gtx 980 hashrate charts. Totally not what they put out.

Grain of salt guys.

jkminkov

hero member

Activity: 698

Merit: 500

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 08, 2016, 11:57:57 PM

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

750ti, some other results submitted to benchmark, look for Palit, some results are not listed, probably bugs.
1.8 rel is bad for all but:
myr-gr 15.35, previous 15,10; vanilla 1133, previous 1062; blake2s 408, previous 376; however not near those stated above by JaredKaragen, blakecoin 1020, worst results were skein and sib, about 20% less.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 08, 2016, 11:57:57 PM

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

could you post the sib hashrate you get with 1.8 and 1.8 dev?

Spiffy_1

full member

Activity: 235

Merit: 100

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

ComputerGenie

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 552