It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Suggestion for the bitcoin Core GUI: QR-code for easy connection to trusted node Development & Technical Discussion
The probleme here is, that for this functionality, you need to have a listening…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 17, 2017, 09:53:43 PM | ||
Why Bitcoin Core Developers won't compromise Bitcoin Discussion
AgentofCoin, Thanks. I agree with basically every point made in your last two po…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 17, 2017, 08:36:14 PM | ||
Why Bitcoin Core Developers won't compromise Bitcoin Discussion
In this thread: people whining that they're unable to force third parties to com…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 14, 2017, 04:28:14 PM | ||
Major crash no. 5 for BU nodes. Bitcoin Discussion
I count about 11.Honestly though, I don't care either way. I just want to stir t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 09, 2017, 04:24:25 PM | ||
No inbound connections after pruning Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks a lot achow101 well, this is very bad. DNS seeders should not behave like…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 07, 2017, 09:34:05 PM | ||
small blocks actually making it harder to run a node? Development & Technical Discussion
Smaller mempool just means that unconfirmed transactions need to be dropped from…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 05, 2017, 01:35:32 PM | ||
small blocks actually making it harder to run a node? Development & Technical Discussion
seems the constraint for cheap nodes now shifting to memory:https://www.reddit.c…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 05, 2017, 12:40:50 PM | ||
The case for moving from a 160 bit to a 256 bit Bitcoin address Development & Technical Discussion
Also, It looks like the new 256 bit hash format is part of the current segwit pr…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 03, 2017, 07:02:38 AM | ||
Alleged Bitcoin Founder Satoshi Nakamoto creating Bitcoin Core Competitor Bitcoin Discussion
Why do you write "alleged creator" instead of "established fraudster"?Wright has…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 03, 2017, 05:03:14 AM | ||
Is diversity in bitcoin client implementations a good or a bad thing? Bitcoin Discussion
If one implementation goes down or has a bug, then only the users of that implem…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 03, 2017, 04:34:43 AM | ||
The case for moving from a 160 bit to a 256 bit Bitcoin address Development & Technical Discussion
My intuition is that on average it requires twice as many P2SH addresses to be g…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 03, 2017, 04:24:34 AM | ||
The case for moving from a 160 bit to a 256 bit Bitcoin address Development & Technical Discussion
The "birthday problem" calculates the odds of ANY TWO addresses in a set matchin…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 02, 2017, 08:40:04 PM | ||
The case for moving from a 160 bit to a 256 bit Bitcoin address Development & Technical Discussion
how long would it take to burn through 255 addresses at only 3 TPS,I think you h…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | May 01, 2017, 07:45:37 PM | ||
"Bitcoin" Unlimited Officially #REKT Bitcoin Discussion
his is down to G Max & Please show how I've "kept" anything at anything, or retr…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 25, 2017, 08:36:30 PM | ||
"Bitcoin" Unlimited Officially #REKT Bitcoin Discussion
um you forget the core 2013 DB eventYou mean the _day one_ bug in the software S…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 25, 2017, 08:07:44 PM | ||
Segregated Witness vs Bitcoin Unlimited vs Do Nothing Bitcoin Discussion
It started with Core...No it didn't.I guess this means you know who was behind d…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 25, 2017, 06:12:51 PM | ||
Segregated Witness vs Bitcoin Unlimited vs Do Nothing Bitcoin Discussion
It started with Core...No it didn't.
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 25, 2017, 03:22:35 PM | ||
How to use properly secp256k1 library Development & Technical Discussion
G***it. For Bitcoin talk moderators there is an edit button on every post right…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 24, 2017, 08:00:09 PM | ||
ViaBTC finally read all the BIPs about Segwit Bitcoin Discussion
Personally I liked that they were bragging that they weren't being paid, just a…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 24, 2017, 07:08:40 PM | ||
How to use properly secp256k1 library Development & Technical Discussion
We are living in XXI century. Machine-generated and machine-verifiable codes are…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 23, 2017, 11:40:35 PM | ||
Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell Bitcoin Discussion
when the blockchain is lagging as hell because we cannot even get confirmations…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 23, 2017, 02:02:31 PM | ||
Shocking: Small amount of chinese miners block 88% of segwit support by services Bitcoin Discussion
34% of miners support SegwitThat is 34% of hashpower, it may well be 99% of mine…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 23, 2017, 01:59:11 PM | ||
How to use properly secp256k1 library Development & Technical Discussion
I would have never thought consistency might have been a problem with integer va…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 23, 2017, 06:24:09 AM | ||
How to use properly secp256k1 library Development & Technical Discussion
You've missed part of my post:" just not gratuitously slower. It is also optimiz…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 22, 2017, 11:50:09 PM | ||
Banks have bought the Core Team Bitcoin Discussion
only one single "reference implementation", by a single team. That is total cen…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 22, 2017, 12:35:30 AM | ||
how long bitcoin core stores different branches for the case of reorg Development & Technical Discussion
Pruning removes them when it removes other blocks of the same age, otherwise fo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 20, 2017, 06:47:13 PM | ||
How to use properly secp256k1 library Development & Technical Discussion
libsecp256k1 is a crypto library-- not a bignum library.Its primitive operations…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 19, 2017, 01:20:37 AM | ||
Roger Ver has been compromised Bitcoin Discussion
segwit dos not solve quadratics.. it makes it 4x worse:0.12 4k maxtxsigops (~10s…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 18, 2017, 05:05:21 PM | ||
[bitcoin-dev] I do not support the BIP 148 UASF Development & Technical Discussion
As soon as a transaction is sent from an address with an insufficient balance,…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 18, 2017, 03:41:57 AM | ||
Interesting... Development & Technical Discussion
https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2017/04/17/new-quadratic-delays-in-bitcoin-scripts…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 17, 2017, 03:18:00 PM | ||
Did Craig Wright turn out to be Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin Discussion
his special skills? His special skills are that he once wrote a visual basic reg…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 15, 2017, 07:00:50 PM | ||
just out of curiousity, why would segwit impact asicboost Development & Technical Discussion
Because Segwit effs up the block architecture at such a low level... The incompa…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 13, 2017, 05:32:10 PM | ||
Why would make the extra merkle commitment asicboost uneconomical? Development & Technical Discussion
Because it's a 12x-ish additional work factor, thats all. Is 12x a killer? Depe…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 12, 2017, 02:35:57 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
This is semantics.It isn't-- because the speedups you conjecture creating alread…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 12, 2017, 02:18:19 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
I don't understand the specifics of the code, so can you enlighten me? What you'…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 12, 2017, 05:56:58 AM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
I think what tomtomtom7 is trying to say is that the common approach (used not o…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 11, 2017, 06:49:54 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
This in contrast to Core's model which needs sequential reads and writes to the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 11, 2017, 12:28:52 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
This in contrast to Core's model which needs sequential reads and writes to the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 11, 2017, 04:29:57 AM | ||
Blockchain optimisation BIP Development & Technical Discussion
Add spent transaction hashes and spent block numbers in mined block.spent transa…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 09, 2017, 02:34:44 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
I see the UTXO approach actually as a left over from the architecture before Com…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 08, 2017, 10:40:26 PM | ||
just out of curiousity, why would segwit impact asicboost Development & Technical Discussion
it's because a miner can choose to only include non-segwit txs inside the block,…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 08, 2017, 06:15:14 AM | ||
Asicboost: several questions. Development & Technical Discussion
The number of empty blocks by Personally, I didn't expect empty blocks to be inv…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | April 08, 2017, 06:06:35 AM | ||
Article 2,Section 1, Articles of Federation of BU + Closed Source Patch!? Bitcoin Discussion
You mean Qt? Isn't that mostly LGPL 3.0? In what way is the license violated?You…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 31, 2017, 09:52:40 PM | ||
Is the feature "reclaiming disk space" really implemented in Bitcoin Core? Development & Technical Discussion
That being said, while Satoshi's idea with reclaiming disk space is not implemen…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 25, 2017, 05:40:44 PM | ||
Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell Bitcoin Discussion
Would you please stop obsessing over me? It's creepy.I am not your mommy.You do…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 25, 2017, 05:37:23 PM | ||
Article 2,Section 1, Articles of Federation of BU + Closed Source Patch!? Bitcoin Discussion
Of which specific libraries was this a license violation?QT.
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 22, 2017, 09:37:41 PM | ||
Article 2,Section 1, Articles of Federation of BU + Closed Source Patch!? Bitcoin Discussion
it seemed to be predicated on the fact that immediate release would reveal the p…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 22, 2017, 07:37:46 PM | ||
Segregated Witlessness Bitcoin Discussion
you do know even when activated core wont have a walet enabled release for peopl…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 18, 2017, 03:08:55 PM | ||
Why can't the NITWITS understand that SEGWIT IS DEADWIT Bitcoin Discussion
The things you are calling out explicitly there, the taking coins and creating c…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 16, 2017, 03:24:24 AM | ||
Bitcoin Core 14 mod Bitcoin Discussion
Download a third party pre-compiled binary at your own risk.Validation.hstatic c…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 16, 2017, 03:14:55 AM | ||
Typo in key.h Development & Technical Discussion
In the bitcoin core file key.h there is a typo://! Check whether the 32-byte arr…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 16, 2017, 02:52:57 AM | ||
Malleated Transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Using a tagged format for a transaction is a one-time hard fork to upgrade the p…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 15, 2017, 03:47:44 PM | ||
[2017-03-15]Bitcoin Core Developers Attack Bitcoin Unlimited Press
This post is a dirty fucking lie.Every Bitcoin user should be outraged at this l…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 14, 2017, 11:18:05 PM | ||
Malleated Transactions Development & Technical Discussion
It does this by subtly changing the meaning of the fields so that older clients…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 13, 2017, 11:17:49 PM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
BIP16 had a full support from the miners. No it didn't it had support from maybe…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 13, 2017, 11:09:59 PM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think that list of moderators has changed.Rusty is not a moderator. I do…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 13, 2017, 01:03:43 PM | ||
Segwit IS the compromise: everybody is equally unhappy with it, including me Bitcoin Discussion
Segwit doesn't give any spammers more power than they have had before, in fact i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 12, 2017, 04:30:48 PM | ||
Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 Released Bitcoin Discussion
for the next release, please ... introduce the scheduled saving of mempool (like…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2017, 03:44:30 AM | ||
BU's "honest miner" security model Development & Technical Discussion
In BU, nodes can validate blocksjust as they can in Bitcoin, and simply ignore b…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 01, 2017, 01:41:56 PM | ||
BU's "honest miner" security model Development & Technical Discussion
There is no maximum blocksize in the whitepaper and We BU proponents do not beli…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 28, 2017, 07:42:56 PM | ||
Johnny (of Blockstream) vs Roger Ver - Bitcoin Scaling Debate Bitcoin Discussion
i hate this because gmaxwell loves his monero I don't do anything with monero.Qu…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 28, 2017, 01:22:13 PM | ||
BU's "honest miner" security model Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIf the attacker is overpowering the network, as noted, they can produce any…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 28, 2017, 04:07:41 AM | ||
BU's "honest miner" security model Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteAs such, the verification is reliable as long as honest nodes control the n…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 28, 2017, 01:56:44 AM | ||
BU's "honest miner" security model Development & Technical Discussion
BU model is the Bitcoin model, no changes on its root.Repeating a lie won't make…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2017, 10:53:09 PM | ||
Post your SegWit questions here - open discussion - big week for Bitcoin! Development & Technical Discussion
Then why don't you post it directly on the blog? What a better place to show to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2017, 10:07:51 PM | ||
Post your SegWit questions here - open discussion - big week for Bitcoin! Development & Technical Discussion
SegWit and technologies built on it are grossly oversoldhttp://www.deadalnix.me/…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2017, 09:32:16 PM | ||
nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story? Bitcoin Discussion
No intent to (unfairly/unduly ) smear you, but I haven't seen definitive proof…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2017, 06:52:26 PM | ||
nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story? Bitcoin Discussion
Inquiring minds want to know.I've talked to the admin that performed the block a…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2017, 11:16:35 PM | ||
nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story? Bitcoin Discussion
GMAX was already on double-secret probation, having been suspended for doxing/ha…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2017, 02:57:36 AM | ||
nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story? Bitcoin Discussion
And now our friendly (ex)rbtc mod account that I was accused of 'doxing' has arg…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2017, 07:47:53 PM | ||
nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story? Bitcoin Discussion
Also, a couple months ago he offered-- unsolicited-- to sell me his moderation a…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2017, 03:01:24 PM | ||
nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story? Off-topic
but remains a 'contractor' of blockstream under the title advisor and his "empl…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2017, 02:47:22 AM | ||
Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 release candidate 1 available Development & Technical Discussion
Does this affect the waiting time to get low-fee but above minrelaytxfee transac…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2017, 02:58:08 AM | ||
Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 release candidate 1 available Development & Technical Discussion
The release notes are still a bit in flux.There are some really nice performance…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 19, 2017, 09:44:04 AM | ||
Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 release candidate 1 available Development & Technical Discussion
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-core-dev/2017-February/00003…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 19, 2017, 09:42:38 AM | ||
FeeFilter message (minmempoolfee) and privacy Development & Technical Discussion
It's not clear to me if you understand the purpose of fee filter.The purpose of…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 17, 2017, 08:27:45 PM | ||
Post your SegWit questions here - open discussion - big week for Bitcoin! Development & Technical Discussion
The network must consent, but it has been done successfully in the past, in one…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 15, 2017, 02:18:21 PM | ||
Is my method a secure way to gather entropy? Development & Technical Discussion
-snip-That is my thought process.You somehow assume asking a search engine will…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 15, 2017, 05:51:19 AM | ||
Block-size debate solution Development & Technical Discussion
I wouldn't believe Mike Hearn if he told me the sky was blue-- but regardless--…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 12, 2017, 11:06:39 PM | ||
Block-size debate solution Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the c…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 12, 2017, 07:12:09 PM | ||
So who the hell is still supporting BU? Bitcoin Discussion
wake up. read something. "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!"Please.Old nodes do n…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 11, 2017, 03:41:58 PM | ||
List of people who have had commit access to Bitcoin Core Development & Technical Discussion
Quotehaving been given the positionI think it would be more correct to say that…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 02, 2017, 02:21:08 AM | ||
As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi! Bitcoin Discussion
franky1 is now also an enemy of fungiblity and not just decentralization? color…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 27, 2017, 12:38:06 AM | ||
As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi! Bitcoin Discussion
In this thread, large block maniacs show that their judgement is equally poor in…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 26, 2017, 10:20:48 PM | ||
can anyone trace any relation between two Adress . Development & Technical Discussion
Lite wallets all transmit a list of their addresses (or some equivalent) to the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 26, 2017, 01:52:39 PM | ||
Post your SegWit questions here - open discussion - big week for Bitcoin! Development & Technical Discussion
Hmm well I've started reading the arguments of the Bitcoin Unlimited project, an…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 26, 2017, 06:01:12 AM | ||
SegWit yay or nay? come vote here. Bitcoin Discussion
I think that is overly exaggerated. If my node is currently connected to several…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 25, 2017, 07:15:19 AM | ||
Configure Core not to download blocks or relay tx automatically Development & Technical Discussion
https://github.com/laanwj/bitcoin-submittx
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 25, 2017, 02:33:41 AM | ||
Idea: XPIR for more private lightweight nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Percy++ can do single server... though it's much slower than the multi-server mo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 24, 2017, 05:56:33 AM | ||
Idea: XPIR for more private lightweight nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Search bitcoin-wizards logs for percy++ which is another PIR library; there hav…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 23, 2017, 08:50:01 PM | ||
SegWit yay or nay? come vote here. Bitcoin Discussion
OK, should I say then, they are "fuller"? According to this chart it was in Nove…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 23, 2017, 02:44:22 PM | ||
SegWit yay or nay? come vote here. Bitcoin Discussion
Since November, we've had multiple days with full blocks.Your comment seems stra…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 22, 2017, 08:08:23 PM | ||
SegWit yay or nay? come vote here. Bitcoin Discussion
For those who don't know it, Franky1 appears to have a full time job lying about…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 22, 2017, 03:07:34 AM | ||
Let's analyze fee rate vs confirmation time! (1.2m tx data inside) Bitcoin Discussion
While not terribly useful, this scatter plot of # of blocks to confirmI think th…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 22, 2017, 02:04:18 AM | ||
Will segwit be activated? Bitcoin Discussion
segwit nodes 1601 (28.64%)unlimited 398 (7.12%)Please don't defraud people here…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 20, 2017, 09:17:29 PM | ||
Post your SegWit questions here - open discussion - big week for Bitcoin! Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin hard forks happened on On August 15, 2010, That is totally untrue. W…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 17, 2017, 08:07:21 PM | ||
secp256k1 library and Intel cpu Development & Technical Discussion
Instead, when we meet at the next Bitcoin event we'll both be attending, I'll ap…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 16, 2017, 11:27:16 AM | ||
secp256k1 library and Intel cpu Development & Technical Discussion
"I started making keys, starting with ones with fewest cuts and systematically w…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 15, 2017, 02:05:56 PM | ||
secp256k1 library and Intel cpu Development & Technical Discussion
Ok. Hasn't explained why cmov implementation looks like it does, because right n…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 15, 2017, 12:20:21 PM | ||
secp256k1 library and Intel cpu Development & Technical Discussion
No - I came to you saying that I would like to work on improving the block downl…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 14, 2017, 02:59:07 PM |