It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
I noticed it as I found my code was assuming only a single SIGHASH type per vin,…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 03, 2016, 02:08:41 AM | ||
Mempool is now up to 25.5 MB with 22,200 transactions waiting. Bitcoin Discussion
The mempool was nearly empty at around 1-1.5 two days ago.No it wasn't-- maybe o…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 01, 2016, 04:44:31 PM | ||
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
This was asked, and answered in another recent thread: https://bitcointalk.org/i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 01, 2016, 12:04:15 PM | ||
Signature aggregation for improved scalablity. Development & Technical Discussion
Therefore, the total best-case validation time would be the time to compute e(g,…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 29, 2016, 05:03:27 PM | ||
[neㄘcash, ᨇcash, net⚷eys, or viᖚes?] Name AnonyMint's vapor coin? Altcoin Discussion
Quite astonishing. Especially, that gmaxwell is a super intelligent individual.…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2016, 04:59:14 PM | ||
Study Suggests Bitcoin Needs Major Changes to Scale UP Development & Technical Discussion
It wasn't my assumption, it was something that appeared to have been calculated…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2016, 03:55:12 PM | ||
nSequence and opt-in ReplaceByFee: difference between maxint and maxint-1? Development & Technical Discussion
Please try to get that code corrected. Lots of people copy and paste, and the pa…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2016, 03:41:47 PM | ||
Economic Totalitarianism Economics
I am adding now the fact that I sent Gregory a private message about this yester…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2016, 02:07:40 AM | ||
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
Do you have example code for how the sudoku was verified in zero knowledge? If y…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2016, 07:50:16 PM | ||
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
I am happy to announce the first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment (Z…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2016, 05:40:35 PM | ||
Signature aggregation for improved scalablity. Development & Technical Discussion
Yea, I spoke to jl2012-- it's interesting how a bit of ignorance can be brillian…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2016, 02:19:19 PM | ||
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
The warnings are disabled for whitelisted peers if the whitelistrelay flag is se…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2016, 12:47:29 PM | ||
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
An improvement that I've been thinking about implementing (after Blocktorrent) i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2016, 12:39:52 AM | ||
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
[I split the thread, because we were getting away from talking about the compact…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2016, 12:09:46 AM | ||
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
We care a lot about performance in the adversarial setting. It is very cheap to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2016, 11:29:56 PM | ||
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
Would these IBLT tx relay techniques also help defeat traffic analysis? Seems to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2016, 11:14:37 PM | ||
Signature aggregation for improved scalablity. Development & Technical Discussion
An implementation idea would be to assume that SIGHASH_ALL is used for all these…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2016, 10:18:22 PM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
I'd classify other implementations like libbitcoin and bctd as complementary, no…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2016, 02:44:26 AM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
iCEBREAKER, surely there is better fodder for the classic r3kt party?When people…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 09:00:53 PM | ||
f2pool not supporting roundtable was Re: 「魚池」BTC:270 Phash/s - LTC:500 Ghash/s - New Server in U.S. stratum-us.f2pool.com Bitcoin Discussion
f2pool not supporting roundtable was Re: 「魚池」BTC:270 Phash/s - LTC:500 Ghash/s - New Server in U.S. stratum-us.f2pool.com by gmaxwell
Unprofessional how? I say this without malice. Greg, you're not much of an ambas…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 08:43:43 PM | ||
f2pool not supporting roundtable was Re: 「魚池」BTC:270 Phash/s - LTC:500 Ghash/s - New Server in U.S. stratum-us.f2pool.com Bitcoin Discussion
f2pool not supporting roundtable was Re: 「魚池」BTC:270 Phash/s - LTC:500 Ghash/s - New Server in U.S. stratum-us.f2pool.com by gmaxwell
I for one think the posts are an example unprofessional practices on the part of…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 06:03:17 PM | ||
So the bitcoin classic (2MB) coup was compromised? Bitcoin Discussion
perhaps we should return mining to individual wallets and eliminate chinese pool…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 05:58:26 PM | ||
sendrawtransaction wire protocol? Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, if node b rejects your message, it will respond to you with a 'reject'…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 12:12:57 PM | ||
How good is prune mode! Bitcoin Discussion
thats not what the original version of what prune mode was envisioned.the origin…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 11:11:03 AM | ||
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
Those pauses aren't pauses. You're going by log entries, which only note when ve…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2016, 08:38:30 AM | ||
Wallet.dat file not working on .12 version pune mode Bitcoin Technical Support
Pruning works fine with a wallet. But you cannot just switch in an old out of da…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2016, 09:48:01 PM | ||
Bitcoin Core version 0.12.0 released Bitcoin Discussion
They removed the --with-libressl build option.This option was removed because th…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2016, 05:03:17 PM | ||
Pasting untrusted blocks/ and chainstate/ to new pruned node safe? Development & Technical Discussion
srinikethan, I think your expectations are unrealistic.It takes a long time-- te…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2016, 05:16:56 PM | ||
RBF transactions to be enabled at the next core update Development & Technical Discussion
CSV doesnt exist yet, but isnt there a BIP for it that is pending with high like…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 19, 2016, 07:29:58 PM | ||
Consensus supported sequence numbers Development & Technical Discussion
The original proposal only affected memory pools, so it isn't secured by POW. I…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 19, 2016, 06:13:10 PM | ||
Pruning and automatic checkpointing Development & Technical Discussion
Reindexing exists exclusively because the local state may have become corrupted.…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 19, 2016, 05:53:34 PM | ||
RBF transactions to be enabled at the next core update Development & Technical Discussion
what about CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY? That appears to be broken by this as there is no…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 19, 2016, 05:45:42 PM | ||
RBF transactions to be enabled at the next core update Development & Technical Discussion
Sorry, I'd like to start kind of a different thread as I am actually interested…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 17, 2016, 08:36:40 PM | ||
Would a fork to SHA-3 be usefull because of the destroyed mining market? Development & Technical Discussion
I shake my head in sadness at how hard decentralized things are to reason about.…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 17, 2016, 06:21:00 PM | ||
Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Classic Bitcoin Discussion
The 1mb is not part of original design. Increasing the block-size is. If arbitra…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 15, 2016, 10:17:38 PM | ||
Pasting untrusted blocks/ and chainstate/ to new pruned node safe? Development & Technical Discussion
Beyond the issue of potential problems in the data itself-- there has been no au…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 15, 2016, 06:59:31 PM | ||
Bitcoin 0.12 release Development & Technical Discussion
This could be the greatest plus thing we need and then I would be more than happ…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 11, 2016, 04:13:59 PM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
It seems like even Garzik doesn't agree with the '28 days' nonsense. Quote28 day…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 10, 2016, 10:51:07 PM | ||
Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Classic Bitcoin Discussion
I just wonder why Gavin is so sure that "thousands of Classic nodes will appear"…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 09, 2016, 09:00:35 PM | ||
Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! Bitcoin Discussion
That's not how it works.Nodes relay information to other nodes but one node does…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 09, 2016, 07:08:34 PM | ||
Hard Fork = Bitcoins * 2 ? Bitcoin Discussion
How best to conduct a hard fork then to avoid coin doubling?Step 1. Don't conduc…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 09, 2016, 03:27:00 AM | ||
Matt Corallo proposes 1.5mb blocks after segwit Bitcoin Discussion
It's funny to me that 1.5MB is a slap in the face, yet 2MB (as long as Gavin pus…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 09, 2016, 03:15:47 AM | ||
Mining history... some odd avalon boards Hardware
At my local hardware surplus place a bunch of gen 1 Avalon boards showed up.Amon…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 09, 2016, 02:28:02 AM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
Of course nodes could ignore their blocks, and holders can dump their coins.Ther…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 08, 2016, 09:07:14 PM | ||
Will Bitcoin 'Hard Fork' in any useful features.. ? Bitcoin Discussion
but then when features like confidential transactions become a thing. the mainbl…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 08, 2016, 08:43:59 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
I count 8.89% of all nodes now... where are you getting your data?/r/btc Bitcoin…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 08, 2016, 08:33:53 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
This was already answered. Full nodes can veto the miners at any given moment. A…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 08, 2016, 05:46:19 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
Not a word in that link re. "ways in which non-mining full nodes "deeply constra…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 08, 2016, 05:07:26 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
...I think its safe to say non-mining nodes *never* had any power. In the white…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 08, 2016, 02:52:51 PM | ||
Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! Bitcoin Discussion
there is no HF without them at all regardless of how many people switch. Hardfor…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 07, 2016, 05:20:42 PM | ||
Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Classic Bitcoin Discussion
Wouldn't citing the results of votes from here require partial trust to the crea…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 07, 2016, 05:12:01 PM | ||
Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Classic Bitcoin Discussion
bitcoinocracy has been spammed between every blockstream fanboy and affiliate im…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 07, 2016, 03:29:53 PM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
Can anybody explain to me in small words how it's possible for Fidelity or whoev…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 06, 2016, 10:55:28 PM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
Presumably because "Bitcoin Classic" is probably the most offensively newspeak-i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 06, 2016, 09:59:25 PM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
Another concern for them is the "Fidelity Problem" where certain institutions an…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 06, 2016, 04:40:51 PM | ||
Rare address hall of fame Bitcoin Discussion
1KATWALSHTHECuz5DFHoNqJax6hnDbL6KN (I can sign with it if you want)Any vanity p…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 05, 2016, 08:04:37 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
is gmaxwel still trying to flog the dead horse of classic, as a dead horse. rath…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 05, 2016, 12:51:49 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
Your incessant use of this canard only weakens your arguments. bitcoinocracy is…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 05, 2016, 12:40:25 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
Jeff registered this very forum.Nah, the forum was kicked off Bitcoin.org in 201…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 05, 2016, 03:37:20 AM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
You could say it is implicit.Any other efforts you have to skew this are just sp…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 09:06:27 PM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
transaction fee's do not need to be a revenue stream for atleast 2 decadesOn one…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 03:47:29 PM | ||
Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! Bitcoin Discussion
It would be very impractical, expensive and inefficient to do that.Why do you as…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 03:40:21 PM | ||
Bitcoin-Core connections in, advice for n00bs like me :) Development & Technical Discussion
So if i've understood correctly there was no benefit for network at all from my…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 07:07:31 AM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
In one hand they are stopping block size increase citing lack of consensus, and…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 06:45:18 AM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
Everyone just has it out for Blockstream simply because they contribute to devel…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 06:19:27 AM | ||
Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company? Bitcoin Discussion
Only 1 out of the 7 people who have commit access work for blockstream. gmaxwell…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 04, 2016, 02:27:13 AM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
And who erects the fences? Who wears the crown?The same force that prevents you…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 01, 2016, 10:36:18 PM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
Sounds like you are simply describing a tragedy of the commons.Indeed, you can l…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 01, 2016, 02:13:07 PM | ||
Safest bitcoin (not cold) wallet Wallet software
even using blockchain you'll be safe if you can sure your pc didnt infected with…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 01, 2016, 07:21:03 AM | ||
COIN WARS: And the battle begins... Altcoin Discussion
2) Core/Blockstream supporters seem deadset on causing as much confusion and des…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 01, 2016, 06:56:55 AM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
I'm not suggesting that miners engage in a wild scheme that acts against their o…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 01, 2016, 12:42:41 AM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
In regards to your comment about using pre-consensus techniques to completely el…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 31, 2016, 10:58:39 PM | ||
Finally, Bitcoin Core = REKT Bitcoin Discussion
which got basicaly monopolized by BlockStream and BitcoinCan you explain this fo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 31, 2016, 06:28:48 AM | ||
What is a team and is what not a team. Bitcoin Discussion
None of us have to take funding from anywhere in particular. Do you have any ide…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 30, 2016, 01:16:41 AM | ||
I "Think" that I found Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin Discussion
paper submitted to International Association for Cryptography Research (IACR)Thi…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 30, 2016, 01:10:31 AM | ||
Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! Bitcoin Discussion
So many critics! Hey, Gavin's trying to help!So were the doctors who performed f…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 29, 2016, 08:23:47 PM | ||
Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) Bitcoin Discussion
The Toomininstas are confronting the same problem the Gavinistas did, which is t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 29, 2016, 05:59:29 AM | ||
Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! Bitcoin Discussion
Just some spit-balling here, I'm sure I have some ordering and details wrong.Mik…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 29, 2016, 01:37:49 AM | ||
Estranged Core Developer Gavin Andresen Finally Makes Sensible 2MB BIP Proposal! Bitcoin Discussion
not so against any kind of increase in the max block sizeThe Bitcoin Core capaci…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 08:55:18 PM | ||
Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? Development & Technical Discussion
Hi Eric,You might want to meditate some on this post: https://bitcointalk.org/de…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 04:09:48 AM | ||
Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? Development & Technical Discussion
That is why miners should be depending on full nodes for their relaying needs, s…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 06:38:45 AM | ||
Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? Development & Technical Discussion
that is equivalent to saying that the user community is just plain stupidI thin…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 05:29:21 AM | ||
Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? Development & Technical Discussion
there is a balance (or conflict) of powerYes, but it does not play out equally i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 06:21:47 AM | ||
Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? Development & Technical Discussion
In terms of revenue, you've mentioned private side chains, I assume either by su…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 05:53:34 AM | ||
Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? Development & Technical Discussion
How does Blockstream plan on ensuring an ROI for its investors? I understand the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 04:57:33 AM | ||
"Bitcoin classic", brought up by literal crooks Bitcoin Discussion
People who make bad judgements tend to make bad judgements in many areas. It doe…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 01:36:11 AM | ||
"Bitcoin classic", brought up by literal crooks Bitcoin Discussion
Classic has been losing reliability and credibility, as to my knowledge, the dev…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2016, 12:58:06 AM | ||
Why soft fork is a very bad idea and should be avoided at all costs Development & Technical Discussion
I'm sorry you disagree with the primary process by which the Bitcoin system evol…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 27, 2016, 08:09:26 PM | ||
Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) Bitcoin Discussion
You don't understand how Lightning works then; the transactions are on-chain, bu…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 27, 2016, 06:29:28 PM | ||
Part 3 – Much more on why clues suggest Peter Todd is probably Satoshi Bitcoin Discussion
Doubt it.His view on block size debate is pretty different thanyour own fevered…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 27, 2016, 07:24:26 AM | ||
Raspberry Pi 2 Node Bitcoin Technical Support
You would need a 128GB SD card now. The performance will be very poor, it's just…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 27, 2016, 05:55:10 AM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
them utilising the methods Greg describes for sending blocks.The greatest irony…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 25, 2016, 11:29:11 PM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
Isn't there a little bit of 'chicken-and-egg' here?Why would miners use these ne…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 25, 2016, 10:04:39 PM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
them utilising the methods Greg describes for sending blocks.The greatest irony…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 25, 2016, 09:35:58 PM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
See http://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/public/downloads/feemarket.pdfp.13, from 2n…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 25, 2016, 03:52:16 PM | ||
Why Peter Rs Fee Market Wont Work Bitcoin Discussion
To me, it seems anything but negligible, and seems like common sense. The bigge…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 24, 2016, 01:07:18 PM | ||
Who Is At The Core Of Bitcoin? Lines Coded Per Developers. Development & Technical Discussion
I see this will raise quite a bit of discussion... As said the results are not e…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 22, 2016, 03:08:20 PM | ||
ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT Bitcoin Discussion
QuoteSOME interactions between new and old clients POSSIBLEWhat are you saying i…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 22, 2016, 02:47:06 PM | ||
Who Is At The Core Of Bitcoin? Lines Coded Per Developers. Development & Technical Discussion
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/41ojr7/people_who_are_angry_at_the_cor…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 22, 2016, 02:03:12 PM | ||
Does replacement interact with quantum computers? Development & Technical Discussion
If the potential of your transaction being replaced would be disadvantageous to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 21, 2016, 03:55:40 PM |