| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
"It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen."Use t…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:02:40 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
I've posted several threads about this. It looks as if the optimum would be a 3…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 10:59:14 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
This attack is known for years, just the first link from google: https://bitcoin…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 10:55:18 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think we ever have to go below 5 minutes. It's a great middle ground I f…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 07:13:24 AM |
|
|
|
Fee market or Fullblockapolypse Development & Technical Discussion
Just to get things back on track, I guess what I was wondering when I started th…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 07:11:48 AM |
|
|
|
Fee market or Fullblockapolypse Development & Technical Discussion
There's no fee market, no wallet is prepared for such a thing, nor are users.Plu…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 06:48:59 AM |
|
|
|
Fee market or Fullblockapolypse Development & Technical Discussion
There's no fee market, no wallet is prepared for such a thing, nor are users.Plu…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 06:27:41 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Imagine the difficulty of contacting enough such stakeholders. So with a very lo…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 06:00:02 AM |
|
|
|
Fee market or Fullblockapolypse Development & Technical Discussion
There's no fee market, no wallet is prepared for such a thing, nor are users.Plu…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 05:58:51 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
It has been discussed. There are threads here about it.Does not really help with…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 05:57:25 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Where can I buy these keys? I am interested to buy up any PoS using this method…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 05:41:52 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Where can I buy these keys? I am interested to buy up any PoS using this method…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 05:18:22 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
The coming halving of the blockward, also has absolutely no effect on making the…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 04:34:25 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
It has been discussed. There are threads here about it.Does not really help with…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 04:30:18 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think we ever have to go below 5 minutes. It's a great middle ground I f…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 04:15:48 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
I mean I know the disadvantages of bigger block sizes but I can't think of any d…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 03:51:48 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
I mean I know the disadvantages of bigger block sizes but I can't think of any d…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 03:48:30 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin's Weakest Link Development & Technical Discussion
P.S. For consistency, taking lower 160 bits of double sha256 would have removed…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 29, 2016, 01:55:07 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin's Weakest Link Development & Technical Discussion
So is it your opinion that Bitcoin with broken RIPEMD-160 is as robust as Bitcoi…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 29, 2016, 01:50:49 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin's Weakest Link Development & Technical Discussion
AFAIK, bitcoin protocol never uses RIPEMD-160 to hash data. Whenever the protoco…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 29, 2016, 01:30:47 PM |
|
|
|
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
solution to a 16x16 Sudoku puzzle for 0.10 BTC....good ideaHave to start with so…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 11:49:46 PM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
1) New great project without finished any other one 2) It is not independent bec…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 11:25:43 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
Some practical estimates:Most top 100 bitcoin compatible altcoins trade a total…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 10:52:32 PM |
|
|
|
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
How could an mp3 recording be verified to be what it is supposed to be? If you h…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 10:58:39 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
A defense against this would be to mark the multisigs that are being used as anc…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 10:33:14 PM |
|
|
|
Trouble preparing raw transactions Development & Technical Discussion
You might want to look at the bitcoin-tx utility (that was fairly recently added…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 03:13:40 AM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
The above just solves half the problem, the common externally verifiable time re…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 02:30:15 AM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
In order for independent chains to securely trade with each other, all chains mu…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 01:37:20 AM |
|
|
|
[ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs Announcements (Altcoins)
For those not following NXT, I have been divorced from NXT....A passport system…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 01:21:52 AM |
|
|
|
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
How can we use this? A trustless sudoku solutions market can now be created.For…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 12:08:19 AM |
|
|
|
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
In the context of your Sudoku puzzle, what is the proof and how does that proof…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 28, 2016, 12:02:11 AM |
|
|
|
--bench (?) Development & Technical Discussion
--bench (?) by jl777
Thanks. very useful info.If only I could try a similar bench with more bitcoin f…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 27, 2016, 06:41:11 PM |
|
|
|
Time Lock feature? Development & Technical Discussion
It does not prevent a double spend, has the problem of keeping a node with the t…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 27, 2016, 02:00:17 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
without the complete blockchain preceding it, you can be sure it is already spen…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 11:54:50 PM |
|
|
|
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
Im wondering though, does this mean a transaction can be proven to have been mad…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 11:52:00 PM |
|
|
|
--bench (?) Development & Technical Discussion
--bench (?) by jl777
I went to the https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/src/secp256k1direct…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 07:26:10 PM |
|
|
|
Study Suggests Bitcoin Needs Major Changes to Scale UP Development & Technical Discussion
So there was an article posted, maybe here or reddit, that was like an article o…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 07:19:14 PM |
|
|
|
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
since every peer has to receive every transactions eventually, it seems that Tra…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 07:17:33 PM |
|
|
|
The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment Development & Technical Discussion
I am happy to announce the first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment (Z…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 07:05:41 PM |
|
|
|
Attached Transactions - Alternative to Replace By Fee (RBF) - Anti Censorship Development & Technical Discussion
> What exactly does the 'word' being spread about censorship actually accomplis…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 03:47:43 AM |
|
|
|
Why LN when we have altcoins and exchanges? Development & Technical Discussion
There is no reason why an alt coin can't operate on a Bitcoin sidechain, and be…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 03:21:05 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
There is no way to prove that the consensus of the weaker block chain placed tho…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 01:57:25 AM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
A side note. By combining each readonly bundle with balances for all the address…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 01:32:17 AM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
Something we must fight against if we want Bitcoin to retain it's utility in the…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 26, 2016, 01:18:51 AM |
|
|
|
Signature aggregation for improved scalablity. Development & Technical Discussion
I am no cryptographer, just a C coder that calls the cool functions in creative…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 09:13:40 PM |
|
|
|
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
Random walks in random graphs tend to fill pretty efficiently, even with low fan…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 11:42:32 PM |
|
|
|
Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay Development & Technical Discussion
Blocksonly, very cool and practical.A way to reduce the size of the INV would be…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 11:17:04 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I assume you mean writing some meta-data into the stronger block chain, that the…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 11:03:37 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
An implementation idea would be to assume that SIGHASH_ALL is used for all these…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 10:50:34 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 09:46:38 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
while you can verify sigs a lot of times from the recent blocks, there are many…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 08:05:50 PM |
|
|
|
[ANN] SuperNET trades on Poloniex as UNITY, asset id 12071612744977229797 Announcements (Altcoins)
I am coding, but sometimes it requires to solve a way to decentralize asset owne…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 07:18:05 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
For me it was really fast compared to the older version, the verification I mean…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 07:05:41 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
Also, how can a PoS coin be attacked using this? Does this mean that PoS coins a…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 03:21:06 AM |
|
|
|
[ANN] SuperNET trades on Poloniex as UNITY, asset id 12071612744977229797 Announcements (Altcoins)
I am coding, but sometimes it requires to solve a way to decentralize asset owne…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 03:07:33 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I don't want to repeat myself. You will destroy the security of the coin by enab…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 03:00:15 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I don't want to repeat myself. You will destroy the security of the coin by enab…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 02:51:08 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 02:43:30 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
And so will everyone else get Bob's private key and a miner who wins the block c…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 01:57:28 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
This is a promise by Bob to release bob_priv_n within 2 days (or lose his deposi…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 01:49:22 AM |
|
|
|
Non-Compete Nodes Altcoin Discussion
In Bitcoin Core, how do I turn off the competition between the nodes? The idea h…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 01:06:23 AM |
|
|
|
i have a tx that is being rebroadcasted over and over and over.. Web Wallets
im stuck at importing the key.. :/blockchain is giving me a key that starts with…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 01:03:00 AM |
|
|
|
[ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs Announcements (Altcoins)
BTW, I forgot to thank James for finally getting back to BCT, I know where you h…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 12:24:54 AM |
|
|
|
i have a tx that is being rebroadcasted over and over and over.. Web Wallets
When and if you import the correct private key into electrum, I am thinking it m…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 25, 2016, 12:16:53 AM |
|
|
|
Any Javascript/JQuery/YUI/Dojo hackers in the house? Development & Technical Discussion
I'd love to see a pure-Javascript front-end GUI for bitcoind developed.I'm tempt…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 11:50:29 PM |
|
|
|
i have a tx that is being rebroadcasted over and over and over.. Web Wallets
When and if you import the correct private key into electrum, I am thinking it m…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 11:36:50 PM |
|
|
|
i have a tx that is being rebroadcasted over and over and over.. Web Wallets
some node is rebroadcasting it when it fails. the app just notifies me the coins…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 11:02:47 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
Some details have changed, but the original spec from the other thread were this…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 10:55:46 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I would be grateful if you or TierNolan could actually answer my question?Stated…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 10:36:35 PM |
|
|
|
i have a tx that is being rebroadcasted over and over and over.. Web Wallets
some node is rebroadcasting it when it fails. the app just notifies me the coins…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 10:17:44 PM |
|
|
|
i have a tx that is being rebroadcasted over and over and over.. Web Wallets
why not use coin control to spend the same inputs (use enough fee!)when that one…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 07:37:35 PM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
Could you please explain this in laymen tearms for asset holder of supernet, nxt…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 07:24:20 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I would be grateful if you or TierNolan could actually answer my question?Stated…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 07:21:08 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I would be grateful if you or TierNolan could actually answer my question?Stated…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 07:04:32 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
Thus the only way I can see that Bob can be required to issue that said transact…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 05:45:49 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
Also I think I only need to validate from the latest checkpoint, so that reduces…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 11:43:56 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
while you can verify sigs a lot of times from the recent blocks, there are many…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 11:29:00 AM |
|
|
|
--bench (?) Development & Technical Discussion
--bench (?) by jl777
Perhaps the benchmark methodology could be likea) online (measuring network tran…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 11:22:12 AM |
|
|
|
sendrawtransaction wire protocol? Development & Technical Discussion
The are two ways to send a transaction. The node can send an 'inv' message with…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 10:52:59 AM |
|
|
|
--bench (?) Development & Technical Discussion
--bench (?) by jl777
Perhaps the benchmark methodology could be likea) online (measuring network tran…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 10:47:11 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
Those pauses aren't pauses. You're going by log entries, which only note when ve…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 09:09:49 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
The first 200K blocks are mostly empty and represents about 10% of total size, m…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 08:52:54 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
Free bump from me, this topic sounds very important, i hope core devs see this a…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 08:32:46 AM |
|
|
|
How to do a clean hard fork leaving 2-chains Altcoin Discussion
The easiest way is to create an altcoin. Simply create a premine, giving free al…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 08:28:39 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
Did you do the same benchmark for 0.11.2? Wondering if some of the behaviors cou…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 08:24:08 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 0.12 full initial sync: results and analysis Development & Technical Discussion
The first 200K blocks are mostly empty and represents about 10% of total size, m…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 08:22:34 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteI do not trust anything which I can't verify and understand. But don't worr…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 08:11:55 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
I do not comprehend why you guys are unable to specify the protocol completely i…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 06:43:56 AM |
|
|
|
[ANN] SuperNET trades on Poloniex as UNITY, asset id 12071612744977229797 Announcements (Altcoins)
Please finish existing projects before starting a new one like https://bitcointa…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 04:47:51 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
The following is the current FSM. I wish there was a way to generate graphics fo…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 04:43:44 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
This protocol changes the deposit script so that Bob can reclaim the deposit at…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 04:38:34 AM |
|
|
|
sendrawtransaction wire protocol? Development & Technical Discussion
The bitcoin rpc has sendrawtransaction, but at the wire protocol level, there is…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 24, 2016, 02:40:53 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
My point is that once Bob releases this private key, anyone can spend his UXTO…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 11:08:14 PM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 11:00:57 PM |
|
|
|
Benefit of a Fee Market? Development & Technical Discussion
Until the blockreward is much closer to the sum of txfees, it would take some ho…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 06:42:09 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Constitution - Looking for feedback Development & Technical Discussion
You speak of blasphemy.To contaminate the separation of mining and owning BTC is…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 06:40:50 AM |
|
|
|
Atomic swaps using cut and choose Development & Technical Discussion
debugging is progressing slower than normal. just takes too long per iteration,…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 05:07:03 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Constitution - Looking for feedback Development & Technical Discussion
I suggested that with the block generation time reduction,Also BIP0009 could red…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 04:32:33 AM |
|
|
|
Benefit of a Fee Market? Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think everybody pays the minimum if blocks are not full. It is purported…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 04:31:01 AM |
|
|
|
Benefit of a Fee Market? Development & Technical Discussion
I'm seeing discussions how we need to keep the blocksize limit what it is until…
|
n/a | jl777 | February 23, 2016, 03:19:48 AM |
Jump to: